Phenolic Acids and Flavonoids
Flavonoids and phenolic acids are phytochemicals widespread in brassica vegetables . Qualitative HPLC analysis of broccoli sprouts revealed chlorogenic, p-coumaric, ferulic, gentisic and sinapic acids, and also robinin, with traces of myricetin, luteolin, quercetin and apigenin. In broccoli florets only caffeic, isochlorogenic and sinapic acids and also traces of myricetin were detected. Although some peaks on HPLC chromatograms remained unidentified, we decided to determine and compare the content of the recognized polyphenols in both extracts by means of quantitative HPLC analysis. The results (Table 1) revealed vast differences in the amounts of the phenolic acids of the tested broccoli sprouts and florets extracts. Sinapic, gentisic, and ferulic acids predominated in broccoli sprouts, with chlorogenic and p-coumaric acids in smaller amounts. In contrast, isochlorogenic acid, not detected in sprouts, was present in the highest amount in broccoli florets, accompanied with sinapic and caffeic acids. A range of phenolic acids have been identified so far in broccoli sprouts including chlorogenic, gallic, sinapic, ferulic, benzoic, vanillic, protocatechuic or p-coumaric acid [20,21,22,23], while neochlorogenic and chlorogenic acids, together with sinapic and ferulic acids derivatives, were detected in the florets. The results of Pająk et al.  indicated similar qualitative phenolic acids profile, but with quantitative differences: ferulic (7.66 mg/100 g dw), p-coumaric (2.04 mg/100 g dw) and chlorogenic (11.49 mg/100 g dw) acids were in lower, while sinapic acid (548 mg/100 g dw) was in higher amounts, in comparison to our results. For broccoli florets, our results are similar to those by Fernández-León et al.  for sinapic acid in some Monaco cultivars. Our results indicated robinin, a kaempferol glucoside, to be the only flavonoid identified in broccoli sprouts. Similar results were reported by Pająk et al.  and Gawlik-Dziki et al. , indicating kaempferol as the major compound in broccoli sprouts after hydrolysis. Other authors identified also luteolin, apigenin, quercetin, and kaempferol, contributing altogether to 2.77–14.66 mg/100 g dw [20, 21].
The content of SF is given in Table 1. Broccoli sprouts were significantly richer in SF than the florets, and the results are consistent with Nakagawa et al. , who indicated 10 times higher amount of SF in the sprouts in comparison to mature plants. Our results are also similar to López-Cervantes et al. , while the results of Moon et al.  for 6 days sprouts (222.6 mg/kg fw) and Nakagawa et al.  for sprouts from the market (1153 mg/100 g dw) were higher than ours. Such differences may be due to the plant variety or growing and sprouting condition. Our results for SF content in broccoli florets comply with Nakagawa et al.  for broccoli from Japan (69.1–171.3 mg/100 g dw) and Campas-Baypoli et al. , for lyophilized florets from Mexico (31–45.4 mg/100 g dw). Many studies, including our results, proved that broccoli sprouts are better source of SF than the florets [23, 24], which implies their use as dietary prevention of different health problems.
Fatty Acid Profile
Fatty acid analysis was performed by means of gas chromatography. Preliminary qualitative GC analysis of broccoli sprouts extracts indicated the presence of caproic, myristic, palmitic, stearic, arachidic, lignoceric, palmitooleic, oleic, linoleic, α-linolenic, eicosenoic, erucic and docosadienoic acids, while in broccoli florets caproic, capric, palmitic, stearic, lignoceric, oleic, linoleic, eicosenoic and erucic acids were detected. For detailed comparison of the tested materials, the percentage of saturated (SFAs) and unsaturated (UFAs) fatty acids was further determined by GC. SFAs in broccoli sprouts and florets consisted 10.5 and 77% of total pool of fatty acids, respectively, with palmitic (5.7%) and stearic (2.8%) acids dominating in sprouts, and caproic (34.9%), stearic (15.9%) and palmitic (12%) acids in florets (Table 1). Qualitative fatty acids profile in both evaluated materials was similar to Ahmed et al.  for Brassica juncea and López-Cervantes et al.  for broccoli sprouts. We found the relative content of UFAs in the analyzed broccoli sprouts to be 88%, with the predominant oleic acid (45.5%) but linoleic (20.8%) and α-linolenic acids (17.0%) on similar level. In broccoli florets oleic acid was also the main UFA (12.4%), but in significantly lower amount in comparison to the sprouts. The results of López-Cervantes et al.  indicated linoleic (26.31–31.88%) and α-linolenic acids (21.34–28.69%), with lower amount of oleic acid (5.17–11.70%) in broccoli sprouts. What is particularly important, our results revealed significantly higher total UFAs content in the sprouts in comparison to the florets, with very low amounts of harmful erucic  acid in sprouts (0.5%) and florets (2%), in comparison to the broccoli seeds (38% - data not shown). Another study of three South Korea broccoli cultivars revealed much lower content of total SFAs, and higher amount of UFAs, with the predominance of palmitic and linolenic acids, in the florets, when compared to our results .
Cytotoxic impact of the tested broccoli products was performed by MTT assay against cancer HepG2 and SW480, but also normal BJ cells, to determine the potential selectivity. The tested samples varied in their influence on the examined cell lines, in dose dependent manner. Both broccoli sprouts and florets caused significant decrease in SW480 and HepG2 cancer cells viability (Fig. 1), with more profound effect for the former and less susceptibility of the latter. The cytotoxic effect of broccoli florets was stronger for both cancer cell lines in comparison to the sprouts. It is worth to note that the latter were also more selective against cancer cells, as opposed to the florets, affecting also normal fibroblasts. Such effects may result from the differences in phytochemical content of both products. Broccoli sprouts with the predominance of polyphenolics and SF, known from their antioxidant and protective effects [1, 3], actually did not affect normal fibroblasts, while the opposite results were observed for the florets, with lower content of the mentioned protective compounds. Stronger cytotoxic effect against cancer cells by broccoli florets, especially in higher concentration, may result from the presence of SFAs, and the effect was also observed by Lima et al. . Similar experiment on cytotoxic activity of broccolini (Brassica oleracea Italica x Alboglabra), a hybrid between broccoli and Gai Lan, on four human cancer cell lines (SW480, HepG2, Hela, and A549) was performed by Wang & Zhang  and the results showed a dose-dependent antiproliferative properties of broccolini leaves extract. Cytotoxic activity of broccoli sprouts was previously studied on human leukemic cell line (HL-60), with no significant effects on proliferation or viability  and on two murine prostate cancer cell lines, AT2 and Mat-Ly-Lu, with interesting effect, correlated with antioxidant activity . Broccoli florets extracts were tested on human ovary (OVCAR-5), breast (MCF-7), colon (Colo-205) and prostate (PC-3) cancer cells  and significant effect on human lung cancer cells A-549 was also described . All the results indicate that broccoli sprouts and florets may be considered as potent cancer chemopreventive agents.
Apoptosis and Necrosis
To further investigate the impact of the tested broccoli sprouts and florets on the cells, their proapoptotic potential was evaluated by means of flow cytometry (Fig. 1). Strong cytotoxic effect of broccoli florets on SW480 cells, described above, proved to be due to necrosis (46.6%) rather than apoptosis (32.7%), while the opposite effect was observed for HepG2 (20.9 and 51.9%, respectively) and for normal fibroblasts (2.1 and 51.9%, respectively). On the contrary, the tested broccoli sprouts, with minor cytotoxic effect, stimulated apoptosis in SW480 (77.4%) and necrosis (50%) in HepG2 cancer cells, and their slight impact on normal fibroblasts was due to proapoptotic effect (20.9%). Our findings for broccoli sprouts were also proved for SW480 cells by Wang & Zhang  and Hudson et al. , but also for human bladder carcinoma cells . Our study is probably the first to demonstrate significant differences between mechanism of cell death between dry broccoli sprouts and florets. Such strong effect of broccoli sprouts on SW480 cells in comparison to florets may expand dietetic recommendation for chemoprevention of colorectal cancer, though further in vitro and in vivo studies are needed. The statistically significant HPCA model of two significant components was derived. Table 1S shows the details of PCA models for blocks X1 and X2 as well as for overall HPCA model. Block X1 was described completely by only one principal component which accounts for 99.2% of the variation in this block. All variables in this block had similar absolute values of their loadings (around 0.35), but for C16:0, C18:0, C24:0, C20:1 and C22:1 with positive, while for C18:1 and C18:2 with negative signs, which therefore indicates inverse correlation between the last two and the rest of fatty acids as a whole group. Figure 1S shows HPCA final plot for the first two components. The first principal component in this model had positive loadings for APOPT-SW480, SF, sinapic acid, and first principal component from the block X2, which all were interrelated with correlation weighs of ca. 0.13–0.14, and simultaneously correlated negatively with APOPT-BJ, APOPT-HEPG2 and principal component from the block X1 (again with correlation weighs with absolute values in the same range as above). Being in one cluster of variables (APOPT-BJ, APOPT-HEPG2 and principal component from the block X1) means also that APOPT-BJ and APOPT-HEPG2 were positively interrelated with fatty acids C16:0, C18:0, C24:0, C20:1 and C22:1, and negatively with C18:1 and C18:2. Such relationships suggest that sinapic acid, SF and two fatty acids (C18:1 and C18:2) inhibit apoptosis of BJ and HepG2, while other fatty acids promote it. Second principal component in HPCA was solely loaded by second principal component from X2 block predominantly influenced by NECRO-BJ and NECRO-HEPG2. The separation between BS and BF samples in HPCA model was evident in direction determined only by the first principal component of HPCA model. Considering this result, BS samples were characterized by apparently higher values of sinapic acid, SF, C18:1, C18:2, MTT-BJ-2.5, and MTT-HEPG2–2.5, and lower values of APOPT-BJ, APOPT-HEPG2, C16:0, C18:0, C24:0, C20:1 and C22:1 as compared with BF samples. This is consistent with results delivered by t-test analysis.