Advertisement

Public Choice

, Volume 156, Issue 3–4, pp 517–536 | Cite as

Time to vote?

  • John Gibson
  • Bonggeun Kim
  • Steven Stillman
  • Geua Boe-Gibson
Article

Abstract

Despite the centrality of voting costs to the paradox of voting, little effort has been made to measure these costs accurately, outside of a few spatially limited case studies. In this paper, we apply Geographic Information Systems (GIS) tools to validated national election survey data from New Zealand. We calculate distance and travel time by road from the place of residence to the nearest polling place and combine our time estimate with imputed wages for all sample members. Using this new measure of the opportunity cost of voting to predict turnout at the individual level, we find that small increases in the opportunity costs of time can have large effects in reducing voter turnout.

Keywords

Opportunity cost Paradox of voting Travel time 

JEL Classification

D7 R4 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful for the financial support from Marsden Fund grant 07-MEP-003 and to comments from two anonymous referees and the associate editor. All remaining errors in this paper are those of the authors.

References

  1. Aldrich, J. (1993). Rational choice and turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 246–278. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brady, H., & McNulty, J. (2011). Turning out to vote: the costs of finding and getting to the polling place. American Political Science Review, 105, 115–134. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cebula, R., & Toma, M. (2006). Determinants of geographical differentials in the voter participation rate. Atlantic Economic Journal, 34, 33–40. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dyck, J., & Gimpel, J. (2005). Distance, turnout, and the convenience of voting. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 531–548. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Feddersen, T. (2004). Rational choice theory and the paradox of not voting. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18, 99–112. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Frey, B. (1971). Why do high income people participate more in politics. Public Choice, 11, 101–105. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gimpel, J., Dyck, J., & Shaw, D. (2006). Location, knowledge and time pressures in the spatial structure of convenience voting. Electoral Studies 25, 35–58. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gimpel, J., & Schuknecht, J. (2003). Political participation and the accessibility of the ballot box. Political Geography, 22, 471–488. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Haspel, M., & Knotts, H. (2005). Location, location, location: precinct placement and the costs of voting. The Journal of Politics, 67, 560–573. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hausman, J., Abrevaya, J., & Scott-Morton, F. (1998). Misclassification of the dependent variable in a discrete response setting. Journal of Econometrics, 87, 239–269. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. International Monetary Fund (2008). Climate change and the global economy. In World economic outlook: housing and the business cycle (Chapter 4). Washington: IMF. Google Scholar
  12. Karp, J., & Brockington, D. (2005). Social desirability and response validity: a comparative analysis of over-reporting voter turnout in five countries. The Journal of Politics, 67, 825–840. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Larson, D. (1993). Separability and the shadow value of leisure time. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75, 572–577. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee, K., & Kim, I.-M. (2005). Estimating the value of leisure time in Korea. Applied Economics Letters, 12, 639–641. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Matsusaka, J., & Palda, F. (1999). Voter turnout: how much can we explain? Public Choice, 98, 431–446. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McNulty, J., Dowling, C., & Ariotti, M. (2009). Driving saints to sin: how increasing the difficulty of voting dissuades even the most motivated voters. Political Analysis, 17, 435–455. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Niemi, R. (1976). Costs of voting and nonvoting. Public Choice, 27, 115–119. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ozimek, A., & Miles, D. (2011). Stata utilities for geocoding and generating travel time and travel distance information. The Stata Journal, 11, 106–119. Google Scholar
  19. Pearce, J., Witten, K., & Bartie, P. (2006). Neighborhoods and health: a GIS approach to measuring community resource accessibility. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60, 389–395. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pesaran, M. (1974). On the general problem of model selection. Review of Economic Studies, 41, 153–171. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pesaran, M. (1982). Comparison of the local power of alternative tests of non-nested regression models. Econometrica, 50, 1287–1305. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Riker, W., & Ordeshook, P. (1968). A theory of the calculus of voting. American Political Science Review, 62, 25–42. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Silver, B., Anderson, B., & Abramson, P. (1986). Who over-reports voting? American Political Science Review, 80, 613–624. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Skinner, J. (1987). A superior measure of consumption from the panel study of income dynamics. Economics Letters, 23, 213–216. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Statistics New Zealand (2007). Non-profit institutions satellite account: 2004. Wellington: Statistics New Zealand. Google Scholar
  26. Tollison, R., & Willett, T. (1973). Some simple economics of voting and not voting. Public Choice, 16, 59–71. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vowles, J. (2010). Electoral system change, generations, competitiveness and turnout in New Zealand, 1963–2005. British Journal of Political Science, 40, 875–895. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Gibson
    • 1
  • Bonggeun Kim
    • 2
  • Steven Stillman
    • 3
  • Geua Boe-Gibson
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of WaikatoHamiltonNew Zealand
  2. 2.Seoul National UniversitySeoulKorea
  3. 3.University of Otago, Motu and IZADunedinNew Zealand
  4. 4.University of WaikatoHamiltonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations