Skip to main content
Log in

Interaction between federal taxation and horizontal tax competition: theory and evidence from Canada

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to determine to what extent and how federal taxes affect local tax decisions. Testing the impact of an increase in the federal tax on horizontal tax competition with Canada-US data for 1984–1994, it finds evidence that an increase in federal tax makes horizontal tax reactions weaker. This is because an increase in federal tax raises the cost, in terms of utility of income, of a unit increase in the province’s tax rate. On the methodological side, it is possible to estimate the impact of the federal tax on the fiscal policy of the province without neglecting control for year effects, which cannot be used in the empirical literature because they are perfectly collinear with the federal tax.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asplud, M., Friberg, R., & Wilander, F. (2007). Demand and distance: evidence on cross-border shopping. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 141–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T., & Rosen, H. S. (1998). Vertical externalities in tax setting: evidence from gasoline and cigarettes. Journal of Public Economics, 70, 383–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1983). A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98, 371–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blankart, C. B. (2002). A public choice view of tax competition. Public Finance Review, 30, 366–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boadway, R., & Keen, M. (1996). Efficiency and optimal direction of federal-state transfers. International Tax and Public Finance, 3, 137–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodenstein, M., & Ursprung, H. W. (2005). Political yardstick competition, economic integration, and constitutional choice in a federation: a numerical analysis of a contest success function model. Public Choice, 124, 329–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bork, R. (2003). Tax competition and the choice of tax structure in a majority voting model. Journal of Urban Economics, 54, 173–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, G., & Buchanan, J. (1980). The power to tax: analytical foundations of a fiscal constitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brueckner, J. K. (2003). Strategic interaction among governments: an overview of empirical studies. International Regional Science Review, 26, 175–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brueckner, J. K., & Saavedra, L. A. (2001). Do local governments engage in strategic property-tax competition? National Tax Journal, 54, 203–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devereux, M. P., Lockwood, B., & Redoano, M. (2007). Horizontal and vertical indirect tax competition: theory and some evidence from the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 451–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, D. (1977). A theory of the size and shape of nations. Journal of Political Economy, 85, 59–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuest, C., & Huber, B. (2001). Tax competition and tax coordination in a median voter model. Public Choice, 107, 97–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, W. H. (2008). Econometric analysis, 6/E. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanbur, R., & Keen, M. (1993). Jeux sans frontiers: tax competition and tax coordination when provinces differ in size. American Economic Review, 83, 887–892.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kau, J. B., & Rabin, P. H. (1981). The size of government. Public Choice, 37, 261–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kau, J. B., & Rabin, P. H. (2002). The growth of governments: sources and limits. Public Choice, 113, 389–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keen, M. (1995). Vertical tax externality in the theory of fiscal federalism. IMF Staff Papers, 45, 454–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, M., & Kotsogiannis, C. (2002). Does federalism lead to excessively high taxes? American Economic Review, 92, 363–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meltzer, A. H., & Richard, S. F. (1981). A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of Political Economy, 89, 914–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peitz, M. (1995). Utility maximization in models of discrete choice. Economic Letters, 49, 91–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzo, L. (2008). Local government responsiveness to federal transfers: theory and evidence. International Tax and Public Finance, 15, 316–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shughart II, W. F., & Tollison, R. D. (1991). Fiscal federalism and the Laffer curve. Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice, 9, 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedder, R. (1997). Bordering on chaos, fiscal federalism and excise taxes. In W. F. Shughart II (Ed.), Taxing choice: the predatory politics of fiscal discrimination. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittman, D. (1989). Why democracies produce efficient results. The Journal of Political Economy, 97, 1395–1424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrede, M. (1999). Tragedy of the fiscal common? Fiscal stock Externalities in a leviathan model of fiscal federalism. Public Choice, 101, 177–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zodrow, G. R., & Mieszkowsky, P. (1986). Pigou, Tiebout, property taxation, and the underprovision of local public goods. Journal of Urban Ecnonomics, 19, 356–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonzio Rizzo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rizzo, L. Interaction between federal taxation and horizontal tax competition: theory and evidence from Canada. Public Choice 144, 369–387 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9524-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9524-x

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation