Skip to main content
Log in

Local autonomy, tax morale, and the shadow economy

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Policymakers often propose strict enforcement strategies to fight the shadow economy and to increase tax morale. However, there is an alternative bottom-up approach that decentralises political power to those who are close to the problems. This paper analyses the relationship with local autonomy. We use data on tax morale at the individual level and macro data on the size of the shadow economy to analyse the relevance of local autonomy and compliance in Switzerland. The findings suggest that there is a positive (negative) relationship between local autonomy and tax morale (size of the shadow economy).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allingham, M. G., & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion: a theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1, 323–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alm, J. (1999). Tax compliance and administration. In W. B. Hildreth & J. A. Richardson (Eds.), Handbook on taxation (pp. 741–768). New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alm, J., & Torgler, B. (2006). Culture differences and tax morale in the United States and Europe. Journal of Economic Psychology, 27, 224–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alm, J., Jackson, B. R., & McKee, M. (1993). Fiscal exchange, collective decision institutions, and tax compliance. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 22, 285–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alm, J., Martinez-Vazquez, J., & Schneider, F. (2004). ‘Sizing’ the problem of the hard-to-tax. Paper presented at the “Hard to tax: an international perspective”. In J. Alm, J. Martinez-Vazquez, & S. Wallace (Eds.), Taxing the hard-to-tax. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alm, J., McClelland, G. H., & Schulze, W. D. (1992). Why do people pay taxes? Journal of Public Economics, 48, 21–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alm, J., McClelland, G. H., & Schulze, W. D. (1999). Changing the social norm of tax compliance by voting. KYKLOS, 48, 141–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, J., Erard, B., & Feinstein, J. (1998). Tax compliance. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 818–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahl, R. W. (1971). A regression approach to tax effort and tax ratio analysis. International Monetary Fund Staff Paper, 18, 570–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahl, R. (1999). Implementation rules for fiscal decentralization. Working paper, international studies program, school of policy studies. Atlanta: Georgia State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T., & Case, A. (1995). Incumbent behavior: vote-seeking, tax-setting, and yardstick competition. American Economic Review, 85, 25–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blankart, C. B. (2002). Steuern als Preise. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik, 138, 19–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chelliah, R. J. (1971). Trends in taxation in developing countries. International Monetary Fund Staff Papers, 18, 254–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, S. E., & Nourzad, F. (1992). Analyzing income tax evasion using amnesty data with self-selection correction: the case of the Michigan tax amnesty program. In J. Slemrod (Ed.), Why people pay taxes. Tax compliance and enforcement (pp. 167–189). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, R. G., Martinez-Vazquez, J., McKee, M., & Torgler, B. (2009, forthcoming). Tax morale affects tax compliance: evidence from surveys and an artefactual field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization.

  • Dreher, A., & Schneider, F. (2006). Corruption and the shadow economy: an empirical analysis. CREMA Working Paper 2006-01. Basel: Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elffers, H., Weigel, R. H., & Hessing, D. (1987). The consequences of different strategies for measuring tax evasion behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 8, 311–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erard, B., & Feinstein, J. S. (1994). The role of moral sentiments and audit perceptions in tax compliance. Public Finance, 49, 70–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinstein, J. (1991). An econometric analysis of income tax evasion and its detection. RAND Journal of Economics, 22, 15–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feld, L. P., & Frey, B. S. (2002a). Trust breeds trust: how taxpayers are treated. Economics of Governance, 3, 87–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feld, L. P., & Frey, B. S. (2002b). The tax authority and the taxpayer. An exploratory analysis. Paper presented the 2002 Annual Meeting of the European Public Choice Society Belgirate.

  • Feld, L. P., & Kirchgässner, G. (2001). The political economy of direct legislation: direct democracy and local decision-making. Economic Policy, 16, 331–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feld, L. P., & Schnellenbach, J. (2004). Begünstigt fiskalischer Wettbewerb die Politikinnovation und diffusion? Theoretische Anmerkungen und erste Befunde aus Fallstudien. In C. A. Schaltegger & S. Schaltegger (Eds.), Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik. Festschrift für René L. Frey. Zürich: vdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, L. P., & Tyran, J.-R. (2002). Tax evasion and voting: an experimental analysis. KYKLOS, 55, 197–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S. (1997). Not just for the money. An economic theory of personal motivation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S. (1999). Economics as a science of human behaviour. Boston: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S. (2001). Inspiring economics. Human motivation in political economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., & Eichenberger, R. (1999). The new democratic federalism for Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., & Feld, L. P. (2002). Deterrence and morale in taxation: an empirical analysis. CESifo Working Paper No. 760, August 2002.

  • Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy and institutions. Economic Journal, 110, 918–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). Happiness and economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, E., Johnson, S., Kaufmann, D., & Zoido-Lobaton, P. (2000). Dodging the grabbing hand: the determinants of unofficial activities in 69 countries. Journal of Public Economics, 76, 459–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graetz, M. J., & Wilde, L. L. (1985). The economics of tax compliance: facts and fantasy. National Tax Journal, 38, 355–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grasmick, H. G., Bursik, R. J., & Cochran, J. K. (1991). Render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s: religiosity and taxpayers’ inclinations to cheat. Sociological Quarterly, 32, 251–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISSP (1998). Codebook, religion II, ZA study 3190. Köln: Zentralarchiv für Empirische Sozialforschung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladner, A. (1994). Finanzkompetenzen der Gemeinden—ein Überblick über die Praxis. In F. Eng, A. Glatthard, & B. H. Koenig (Eds.), Finanzföderalismus (pp. 64–85). Bern: Emissionszentrale der Schweizer Gemeinden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, A. (1982). The psychology of taxation. Oxford: Martin Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lokwwod, B. (2006). The political economy of fiscal federalism. In A. Thtisham & G. Brosio (Eds.), Handbook of fiscal federalism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, S., & Swingen, J. (1991). The conduct of tax-evasion experiments: validation, analytical methods, and experimental realism. In P. Webley, H. Robben, H. Elffers, & D. Hessing (Eds.), Tax evasion: an experimental approach (pp. 128–138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulton, B. R. (1990). An illustration of a pitfall in estimating the effects of aggregated variables on micro units. Review of Economics and Statistics, 72, 334–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oates, W. E. (1999). An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37, 1120–1149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oates, W. E. (2008). On the evolution of fiscal federalism: theory and institutions. National Tax Journal, 61, 313–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pommerehne, W. W., & Weck-Hannemann, H. (1996). Tax rates, tax administration and income tax evasion in Switzerland. Public Choice, 88, 161–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pommerehne, W. W., Hart, A., & Frey, B. S. (1994). Tax morale, tax evasion and the choice of policy instruments in different political systems. Public Finance, 49(Suppl.), 52–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman, S. (1980). Risk taking and reelection: does federalism promote innovation? Journal of Legal Studies, 9, 593–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, J. A., Scholz, J. T., & Witte, A. D. (1989). Taxpayer compliance, Vols. 1 and 2. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, C. A., & Frey, R. L. (2003). Finanzausgleich und Föderalismus: Zur Neugestaltung der föderalen Finanzbeziehungen am Beispiel der Schweiz. Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, 4, 239–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmölders, G. (1951/1952). Finanzpsychologie. FinanzArchiv, 13, 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmölders, G. (1960). Das Irrationale in der öffentlichen Finanzwissenschaft. Hamburg: Rowolt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmölders, G. (1962). Volkswirtschaftslehre und Psychologie. Berlin: Reinbek.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmölders, G. (1970). Survey research in public finance: a behavioral approach to fiscal theory. Public Finance, 25, 300–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F. (2005a). Shadow economies around the world: what do we really know? European Journal of Political Economy, 21, 598–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F. (2005b). Shadow economies of 145 countries all over the world: what do we really know? CREMA Working Paper 2006-01. Basel: Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F., & Enste, D. (2000). Shadow economies: size, causes, and consequences. Journal of Economic Literature, 38, 77–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F., & Enste, D. H. (2002). The shadow economy. An international survey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F., Torgler, B., & Schaltegger, Ch. (2008). Schattenwirtschaft und Steuermoral, Kompaktwissen. Zurich: Ruegger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, R., & Orleans, S. (1967). On legal sanctions. University of Chicago Law Review, 34, 282–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. W. (1992). Reciprocity and fairness: positive incentives for tax compliance. In J. Slemrod (Ed.), Why people pay taxes. Tax compliance and enforcement (pp. 223–258). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. W., & Stalans, L. J. (1991). Encouraging tax compliance with positive incentives: a conceptual framework and research directions. Law and Society Review, 13, 35–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stutzer, A. (1999). Demokratieindizes für die Kantone der Schweiz. Working Paper No. 23. Zurich: University of Zurich, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tittle, C. (1980). Sanctions and social deviance: the question of deterrence. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgler, B. (2001). What do we know about tax morale and tax compliance? International Review of Economics and Business (RISEC), 48, 395–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgler, B. (2002). Speaking to theorists and searching for facts: tax morale and tax compliance in experiments. Journal of Economic Surveys, 16, 657–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torgler, B. (2005). Tax morale and direct democracy. European Journal of Political Economy, 21, 525–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torgler, B. (2006). The importance of faith: tax morale and religiosity. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 61, 81–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torgler, B. (2007). Tax compliance and tax morale: a theoretical and empirical analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torgler, B., & Schaltegger, C. A. (2005). Tax amnesties and political participation. Public Finance Review, 33, 403–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torgler, B., & Schneider, F. (2007a). What shapes attitudes toward paying taxes? Evidence from multicultural European countries. Social Science Quarterly, 88, 443–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torgler, B., & Schneider, F. (2007b). Shadow economy, tax morale, governance and institutional quality: a panel analysis. IZA Discussion Papers 2563, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).

  • Torgler, B., Schaltegger, C. A., & Schaffner, M. (2003). Is forgiveness divine? A cross-culture comparison of tax amnesties. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 139, 375–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (1990a). Justice, self-interest, and the legitimacy of legal and political authority. In J. J. Mansbridge (Ed.), Beyond self-interest (pp. 171–179). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (1990b). Why people obey the law. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (1997). Procedural fairness and compliance with the law. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 133, 219–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., Casper, J. D., & Fisher, B. (1989). Maintaining allegiance toward political authorities: the role of prior attitudes and the use of fair procedures. American Journal of Political Science, 33, 629–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M., Reksulak, M., & Shughart, W. F. (2001). The political economy of the IRS. Economics and Politics, 13, 201–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Friedrich Schneider.

Additional information

All are research fellows of CREMA—Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts, Switzerland. Torgler and Schneider are also associated with CESifo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Torgler, B., Schneider, F. & Schaltegger, C.A. Local autonomy, tax morale, and the shadow economy. Public Choice 144, 293–321 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9520-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9520-1

JEL Classification

Navigation