Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Politics of Environmental Law: Political Ideology, Elitism or Urban-Rural Interests?

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines a number of demographic aspects in congressional districts and states that played important roles in a series of Congressional votes on environmental issues in 2000. These characteristics include urbanization or population density, education, income, race, and employment. Our findings are mixed. While we find some evidence (at least in Senate votes) that population density is a positive predictor of “pro-environment” votes, we also find that things commensurate with the Environmental Kuznets Curve such as income, education, and lifestyle also play an important role in environmental voting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman, B. A., & Hassler, W. T. (1981). Clean Coal/Dirty air, New Haven: Connecticut: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J., & Oates, W. E. (1979). Economics, environmental policy, and the quality of life, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J., & Oates, W. E. (1988). The theory of environmental policy, New York: Cambridge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1983). A theory of competition among pressure groups for political influence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, No. 3, August, 371–399.

  • Laband, D. N. (2001). Regulating biodiversity: Tragedy in the political commons. The Freeman: Ideas on Liberty, September. Taken from the Internet: http://www.fee.org/vnews.php?nid=376

  • Mayle, P. (1991). A year in provence, New York: Vintage Books USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McChesney, F. S. (1987). Rent extraction and rent creation in the economic theory of regulation. The Journal of Legal Studies, 16, 101–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • McChesney, F. S. (1998). High plains drifters: Politicians' lucrative protection racket. The Freeman: Ideas on Liberty, 4–9.

  • Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1992). Economics, organization and management, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pashigan, B. P. (1984). The effects of environmental regulation on optimal plant size and factor shares. Journal of Law and Economics, 27, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pashigan, B. P. (1985). Environmental regulation: Whose interests are being protected?. Economic Inquiry, 23, 551–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S. (1976). Toward a more general theory of regulation. Journal of Law and Economics, 19, 211–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, J. (2005). Death of a sawmill. Opinion Journal: From the Editorial Page of the Wall Street Journal, December 29, 2005, http://www.opinionjournal.com/cc/?id=110007741.

  • Posner, R. A. (1974). Theories of economic regulation. Bell Journal, 5, 335–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisner, M. (1989). The next water war: Cities versus agriculture. Issues in Science and Technology, 98–102.

  • Sowell, T. (1981). A guilt-edged society. from Pink and Brown People and Other Controversial Essays, Palo Alto, California: Hoover Press, 65–66.

  • Sowell, T. (1981). Environmentalists and ego trips. from Pink and Brown People and Other Controversial Essays, Palo Alto, California: Hoover Press, 100–101.

  • Sowell, T. (1981). Those phony environmentalists. from Pink and Brown People and Other Controversial Essays, Palo Alto, California: Hoover Press, 101–105.

  • Stigler, G. J. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. Bell Journal, 3–21.

  • Tucker, W. (1977). Environmentalism and the Leisure Class. Harper's, 49–80.

  • Sowell, T. (1982). Progress and Privilege: America in the age of environmentalism, New York: Anchor Press/Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2001). Statistical Abstracts of the United States.

  • Yandle, B. (1989). The political limits of environmental regulation: Tracking the Unicorn, Westport, Connecticut: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William L. Anderson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderson, W.L., Mizak, D.A. Politics of Environmental Law: Political Ideology, Elitism or Urban-Rural Interests?. Public Choice 129, 131–157 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-9018-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-9018-z

Keywords

Navigation