Abstract
The current adult and child forensic psychiatrist is well trained, familiar, and comfortable with the use of the semi-structured Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition, APA 2013 (DSM-5) [In APA, 2003] interview style. The author’s assertion is not that this method is invalid or unreliable; rather, that it can be complemented by integrating elements of the defendant’s four pillar assessment. Assessing the four pillars expands on the information provided by a semi-structured DSM-5-style interview in psychiatry. The four pillars are the foundation of a person’s personality; temperament, cognition (learning abilities or weaknesses), cognitive flexibility (theory of mind) and internal working models of attachment, within the backdrop of the family and of the social and cultural environment in which they have lived. The importance of the study of four pillars is based on the understanding that human behavior and psychopathology as a complex and multifaceted process that includes the level of social-emotional maturity and cognitive abilities (In Delgado et al. Contemporary Psychodynamic Psychotherapy for Children and Adolescents: Integrating Intersubjectivity and Neuroscience. Springer, Berlin, 2015). The four pillars are not new concepts, rather they had been studied by separate non-clinical disciplines, and had not been integrated to the clinical practice. As far as we know, it wasn’t until Delgado et al. (Contemporary Psychodynamic Psychotherapy for Children and Adolescents: Integrating Intersubjectivity and Neuroscience. Springer, Berlin, 2015) incorporated the four pillars in a user-friendly manner to clinical practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Psychiatric Association: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th Edition DSM-5. American Psychiatric Association Washington, 2013
Delgado SV, Strawn JR, Pedapati EV: Contemporary Psychodynamic Psychotherapy for Children and Adolescents: Integrating Intersubjectivity and Neuroscience. Springer, Berlin, 2015
Mossman D, Noffsinger SG, Ash P, et. al.: AAPL practice guideline for the forensic psychiatric evaluation of competence to stand trial. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online 35:4, 2007
Borum R, Grisso T: Establishing standards for criminal forensic reports: An empirical analysis. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online 24:297–317, 1996
Grisso T: Evaluating Juveniles’ Adjudicative Competence: A Guide for Clinical Practice. Professional Resource Press, Sarasota, 2005
Pinals DA, Tillbrook CE, Mumley DL: Practical application of the MacArthur competence assessment tool-criminal adjudication (MacCAT-CA) in a public sector forensic setting. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online 34:179–88, 2006
Delgado SV, Strawn JR: Difficult Psychiatric Consultations: An Integrated Approach. Springer, Berlin, 2014
Drukteinis AM: Forensic historiography: Narratives and science. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online 42(4)427–436, 2014
Thomas A, Chess S: Goodness of Fit: Clinical Applications from Infancy Through Adult Life. Routledge, New York, 1999
Emde RN, Hewitt JK: Infancy to Early Childhood: Genetic and Environmental Influences on Developmental Change. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001
Bronson M: Self-regulation in Early Childhood: Nature and Nurture. Guilford Press, New York, 2000
McLaughlin KA, Kubzansky LD, Dunn EC, et al: Childhood social environment, emotional reactivity to stress, and mood and anxiety disorders across the life course. Depression and Anxiety 27(12):1087–1094, 2010
Bornstein MH, Cote LR: Child temperament in three US cultural groups. Infant Mental Health Journal 30(5):433–451, 2009
Paulussen-Hoogeboom MC, Stams GJ, Hermanns JM et al: Child negative emotionality and parenting from infancy to preschool: A meta-analytic review. Developmental Psychology 43(2):438–453, 2007
Roffman JL, Gerber AJ: Neural Models of Psychodynamic Concepts and Treatments: Implications for Psychodynamic Psychotherapy. In Levy RA, Ablon JS, Kachele H (Eds) Psychodynamic Psychotherapy Research: Evidence-Based Practice and Practice-Based Research. Springer, Berlin, pp. 305–338, 2012
Altarac M, Saroha E: Lifetime prevalence of learning disability among US children. Pediatrics 119:S77–S83, 2007
Cooper S, Smiley E, Morrison J et al.: Mental ill-health in adults with intellectual disabilities: Prevalence and associated factors. The British Journal of Psychiatry 190:27–35, 2007
Riffin T: Competence to stand trial evaluations with juveniles. Offer of proof. The New England Journal on Criminal and Civil Confinement 32(1)15–28, 2006
Foangy P, Target M: The place of psychodynamic theory in developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology 12:407–425,2000
Johnson DR: Emotional attention set-shifting and its relationship to anxiety and emotion regulation. Emotion 9(5):681–690, 2009
Schmeichel BJ, Volokhov RN, Demaree HA: Working memory capacity and the self-regulation of emotional expression and experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 95(6)1526–1540, 2008
Bowlby J: Attachment, 2nd edn., Vol. 1, Attachment and Loss. Basic Books, New York, 1999
Hunter JJ, Maunder RG, Gupta M: Teaching consultation-liaison psychotherapy: Assessment of adaptation to medical and surgical illness. Academic Psychiatry 31:367–374, 2007
Bretherton I, Munholland KA: Internal Working Models in Attachment Relationships: A Construct Revisited. In: Cassidy J, Shaver PR (Eds) Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications. Guilford Press, New York, 1999
Wechsler D: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Third edition: Administration and scoring manual. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation, 1997
Wilkinson GS, Robertson GJ: Wide Range Achievement Test–Fourth Edition. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources, 2006
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Sergio V Delgado MD, has received royalties from Springer for 2 books, and the manuscript refers to concepts highlighted in his last book published. Drew Barzman MD, declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
Animals were not involved. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Delgado, S.V., Barzman, D.H. Beyond DSM-5 and IQ Scores: Integrating the Four Pillars to Forensic Evaluations. Psychiatr Q 88, 199–211 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-016-9443-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-016-9443-1