Abstract
Latin American teachers’ unions have stepped into the policymaking sphere and shaped education policies unrelated to regular workplace priorities like salaries and class sizes at notable moments. The literature on teachers’ unions in Latin America has not addressed this, tending to focus instead on those unions’ history and role in social movements, or their struggles against controversial education reform. This article links existing literatures in an effort to explain why teachers’ unions sometimes break from their normal workplace demands to take an active role in education policymaking. Drawing on case studies of Brazil, Bolivia, Chile, Venezuela, and Guatemala, it argues that teachers’ unions break out of this usual role and promulgate system-enhancing education policy in the context of societywide social movements, such as those that lead to democratization or indigenous rights. However, only where these policies meet a receptive government are they translated from proposal to practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Gindin and Melo (2011) give a brief review of this literature.
References
Anderson, M. E. (2001). Guatemala: The education sector. Technical paper. Guatemala Poverty Assessment (GUAPA) Program. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/10/6830603/guatemala-education-sector
Anzia, S. F. (2011). Election timing and the electoral influence of interest groups. The Journal of Politics, 73(2), 412–427.
Aragón, M. J. (2014). Beyond cultural recognition: Training teachers for intercultural bilingual education in Guatemala. In R. Cortina (Ed.), The education of indigenous citizens in Latin America (pp. 148–168). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Ballou, D. (2001). Pay for performance in public and private schools. Economics of Education Review, 20(1), 51–61.
Bonifaz, R. (2011). Origen de la Evaluación Docente y su conexión con las políticas públicas en educación [The origin of teacher evaluation and its connection with public policies in education]. In J. Manzi, R. González, & Y. Sun (Eds.), La Evaluación Docente en Chile. Santiago: Centro Medición de la Pontifica Universidad Católica de Chile, MIDE UC.
Bruns, B., Evans, D., & Luque, J. (2012). Achieving world-class education in Brazil: The next agenda. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/2383/656590REPLACEM0hieving0World0Class0.pdf?sequence=1
Bruns, B., Filmer, D., & Patrinos, H. A. (2011). Making schools work: Evidence on accountability reforms. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EDUCATION/Resources/278200-1298568319076/makingschoolswork.pdf
Choque, C. (2005). La EIB entre los quechuas: Testimonio de parte (1990–1994) [The EIB among the Quechua: Self-testimony (1990–1994)]. La Paz: Plural, PINSEIB, PROEIB Andes.
Collier, R., & Mahoney, J. (1997). Adding collective actors to collective outcomes: Labour and recent democratization in South America and southern Europe. Comparative Politics, 29(3), 285–303.
Cook, M. L. (1996). Organizing dissent: Unions, the state and the democratic teachers’ movement in Mexico. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Contreras, M. (1998). Formulación, implementación y avance de la reforma educativa en Bolivia. Revista Ciencia y Cultura, 3, 55–76. http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?pid=S2077-33231998000100009&script=sci_arttext
Corrales, J. (1999). The politics of education reform: Bolstering the supply and demand; overcoming institutional blocks. The Education Reform and Management Series, 2(1). http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/1999/01/1561394/politics-education-reform-bolstering-supply-demand-overcoming-institutional-blocks
Cortina, R. (2014). Introduction. In R. Cortina (Ed.), The education of indigenous citizens in Latin America. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Crouch, L. (2005). Political economy, incentives, and teachers’ unions: Case studies in Chile and Peru. In E. Vegas (Ed.), Incentives to improve teaching: Lessons from Latin America. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2005/01/6259386/incentives-improve-teaching-lessons-latin-america
de Oliveira, D. A. (2007). Participación de la sociedad brasilera en la gestión democrática de la educación: El rol de los consejos [Brazilian society’s participation in the democratic management of education: The role of the councils]. In F. Stubrin, D. A. de Oliveria, M. Da G. Bollman, & R. Ferreira (Eds.), Participación e incidencia de la sociedad civil en las políticas educativas: El caso brasileño. Buenos Aires: Fundación Laboratorio de Políticas Públicas.
ECLAC [Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean] (2012). Statistical yearbook for Latin America and the Caribbean. Santiago: ECLAC. http://www.cepal.org/publicaciones/xml/4/48864/AnuarioEstadistico2012_ing.pdf
Education International (2004). Teachers and education unions: Ending child labour. Brussels: Education International/ ILO-IPEC. http://download.ei-ie.org/SiteDirectory/ChildLabourEditorialGroup/Doc/Teachers%20and%20Education%20Unions%20Ending%20Child%20Labour_Resource%20Manual_e.pdf
Fernández, M. (2012). From the streets to the classrooms: The politics of education spending in Mexico. Doctoral dissertation in political science, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Gajardo, M., & Gómez, F. (2005). Social dialogue in education in Latin America: A regional survey. Working paper. Geneva: International Labour Organization. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—ed_dialogue/—sector/documents/publication/wcms_160804.pdf
Gindin, J. (2009). Sur, neoliberalismo . . . ¿y despues? Los sindicatos docentes en Venezuela, Argentina, Bolivia, Brasil, Uruguay y Ecuador [The South, neoliberalism . . . And after? Teachers’ unions in Venezuela, Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Uruguay and Ecuador]. Paper presented at the conference Evaluación de los sistemas educativos en el marco de la nueva realidad político-social latinoamericana y caribeña, Confederación de Educadores Americanos y STEI-Intersindical, 27–28 July, 2009, Montevideo.
Gindin, J. (2011). Por nós mesmos: As práticas sindicais dos professores públicos na Argentina, no Brasil e no México [For ourselves: The practices of public school teachers in Argentina, Brazil and México]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Rio de Janeiro: Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro.
Gindin, J., & Melo, S. D. G. (2011). A internacionalização do debate sobre o sindicalismo dos trabalhadores em educação na América Latina [The internationalization of the debate on teachers’ unions in Latin America]. In S. dal Rosso (Ed.), Associativismo e sindicalismo docente em educação. Organização e lutas. Brasília: Paralelo 15.
Gohn, M. D. G. (1992). Movimentos sociais e educação [Social movements and education]. São Paulo: Cortez.
Gordon, N., & Vegas, E. (2005). Educational finance equalization, spending, teacher quality, and student outcomes: The case of Brazil’s FUNDEF. In E. Vegas (Ed.), Incentives to improve teaching: Lessons from Latin America. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2005/01/6259386/incentives-improve-teaching-lessons-latin-america
Grindle, M. (2004). Despite the odds: The contentious politics of education reform. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Hartney, M., & Flavin, P. (2009). From the schoolhouse to the statehouse: Teacher union political activism and state education reform policy. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 11(3), 251–268.
Hecock, R. D. (2014). Democratization, education reform, and the Mexican Teachers Union. Latin American Research Review, 49(1), 62–82.
Lopes Cardozo, M. T. A. (2011). Future teachers and social change in Bolivia: Between decolonisation and demonstration. Delft, Netherlands: Eburon. http://educationanddevelopment.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/lopes-cardozo-future-teachers-and-social-change-2011.pdf
López, L. E. (2005). De resquicios a boquerones: La Educación intercultural bilingüe en Bolivia [Intercultural bilingual education in Bolivia]. La Paz: PROEIB Andes.
López, L. E., & Murillo, L. (2006). La reforma educativa boliviana: lecciones aprendidas y sostenibilidad de las transformaciones [The Bolivian education reform: Lessons learned and the sustainability of the transformation]. Cochabamba, Bolivia: Convenio Corporación Andina de Fomento/Organización de Estados Iberoamericanos para la Educación, la Ciencia y la Cultura. http://oeiperu.org/documentos/CAF_Informe_Bolivia.pdf
Mizala, A., & Romaguera, P. (2005). Teachers’ salary structure and incentives in Chile. In E. Vegas (Ed.), Incentives to improve teaching: Lessons from Latin America (pp. 103–150). Washington, DC: World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2005/01/6259386/incentives-improve-teaching-lessons-latin-america
Mizala, A., & Schneider, B. R. (2014). Negotiating education reform: Teacher evaluations and incentives in Chile (1990–2010). Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 27(1), 87–109.
Moe, T. (2003). The politics of the status quo. In P. E. Peterson (Ed.), Our schools and our future: Are we still at risk? (pp. 177–219). Stanford, CA: Hoover Press.
Moe, T. (2005). Political control and the power of the agent. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 22(1), 1–29.
Moe, T. (2011). Special interest: Teachers unions and America’s public schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Muñoz, A. (2005). El sindicalismo mexicano frente a la reforma del Estado: El impacto de la descentralización educativa y el cambio político en el Sindicato Nacional de Trabajadores de la Educación 1992–1998 [Mexican unionism against reform: The impact of education decentralization and political change on the National Union of Education Workers 1992–1998]. Mexico City: Universidad Iberoamericana.
Murillo, M. V. (1999). Recovering political dynamics: Teachers unions and the decentralization of education in Argentina and Mexico. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 41(1), 31–57.
Núñez, I. (1986). Gremios del magisterio: Setentaaños de historia (1900–1970) [Teachers’ unions: Seventy years of history (1900–1970)]. Santiago: Programa Interdisciplinario de Investigaciones en Educación.
PREAL [Programa de Promocion de la Reforma Educativa en America Latina y el Caribe] (2001). Quedándonos atrás: Un informe del progreso educativo en América Latina [Lagging behind: A report on education progress in Latin America]. Technical report. Washington, DC, and Santiago: PREAL. http://www.oei.es/quipu/Informe_preal2001.pdf
PREAL (2006). Quantity without quality: A report card on education in Latin America. Technical report. Washington, DC, and Santiago: PREAL. http://www.thedialogue.org/page.cfm?pageID=32&pubID=397
Regalsky, P., & Laurie, N. (2007). “The school, whose place is this?” The deep structures of the hidden curriculum in indigenous education in Bolivia. Comparative Education, 43(2), 231–251.
Rocha, C. V. (2003). Anatomia da uma reforma: Descentralização da educação pública de Minas Gerais e mudança institucional [Anatomy of a reform: The decentralization of public education in Minas Gerais and institutional change]. Revista de Ciências Sociais, 46(3), 557–592.
Saviani, D. (1997). A nova lei da educação: trajetória, limites e perspectivas [The new education law: trajectory, limits and perspectives]. Campinas, São Paulo: Autores Associados.
Stubrin, F. (2007). Reforma del estado y políticas educativas: Las repuestas de la sociedad civil organizada [State reform and education policy: Organized civil society’s response]. In F. Stubrin, D. A. de Oliveria, M. Da G. Bollman, & R. Ferreira (Eds.), Participación e incidencia de la sociedad civil en las políticas educativas: El caso brasileño (pp. 41–45). Buenos Aires: Fundación Laboratorio de Políticas Públicas.
Tarrow, S. (1998). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, S. G. (2004). Intercultural and bilingual education in Bolivia: The challenge of ethnic diversity and national identity. Working paper. La Paz: Instituto de Investigaciones Socio-Económicas, Universidad Católica Boliviana. http://www.iisec.ucb.edu.bo/papers/2001-2005/iisec-dt-2004-01.htm
UNESCO (2009). Decisions adopted by the executive board at its 181st session. Paris, 14–30 April 2009. Paris: UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001826/182664e.pdf
UNESCO (2013). Background and criteria for teacher-policy development in Latin America and the Caribbean. Santiago: OREALC/UNESCO. http://www.orealc.cl/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files_mf/politicasdocentesingles27082013.pdf
Vaillant, D. (2005). Education reforms and teachers unions: Avenues for action. Paris: UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001410/141028e.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Finger, L., Gindin, J. From proposal to policy: Social movements and teachers’ unions in Latin America. Prospects 45, 365–378 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-015-9355-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-015-9355-0