Skip to main content
Log in

On aggregation of technical and revenue efficiency measures

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We discuss and propose new results regarding combined production efficiencies of an aggregate group, such as industry or region. Based on the production economic notion of aggregate technology, we present an algebraic representation of the aggregation output set, and use this to derive a new decomposition of the aggregation unit’s technical efficiency, e.g. a group’s technical efficiency. Our novel decomposition can identify more clearly the inefficiency due to the underlying units and the inefficiency due to the aggregation. For the special single output case, the proposed aggregation measure is consistent with the extant literature, and identical to Farrell’s measure of structural efficiency of a group. However, for the general multiple outputs case we show that there is a gap between the proposed measure and the extant literature. We illustrate the formal results with a numerical example based on a dataset from literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Extensions on weighting schemes for consistent aggregation include Färe and Karagiannis (2014, 2017, 2020).

  2. \({{\mathbb{R}}}^{d}\) denotes the d-dimensional Euclidean space, and \({{\mathbb{R}}}_{+}^{d}\) its nonnegative orthant. Sets are denoted by uppercase calligraphic letters and vectors by lowercase boldface letters. An exception is the price-vector denoted by uppercase boldface P. All vectors are implicitly column vectors. For vectors \({{{\bf{a}}}},{{{\bf{b}}}}\in {{\mathbb{R}}}^{d}\), the inequality ab (a > b) means that aibi (ai > bi), for all i = 1, …, d.

  3. The notation with sub-script FZ indicates the respective measures are as defined by Färe and Zelenyuk (2003).

References

  • Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manag Sci 30:1078–1092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby C, Russell RR (1999) Aggregation of efficiency indices. J Prod Anal 12:5–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK (1983) The structure of technical efficiency. Scandinavian J Econ 85:181–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK (1994) Production frontiers. Cambridge University Press

  • Färe R, Karagiannis G (2014) A postscript on aggregate Farrell efficiencies. Eur J Oper Res 233:784–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Karagiannis G (2017) The denominator rule for share-weighting aggregation. Eur J Oper Res 260:1175–1180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Karagiannis G (2020) On the denominator rule and a theorem by Janos Aczél. Eur J Oper Res 282:398–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Lovell CAK (1978) Measuring the technical efficiency of production. J Econ Theory 19:150–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Primont D. (1994) Multi-output production and duality: theory and applications. Springer Science & Business Media.

  • Färe R, Zelenyuk V (2003) On aggregate Farrell efficiencies. Eur J Oper Res 146:615–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Zelenyuk V (2007) Extending Färe and Zelenyuk (2003). Eur J Oper Res 179:594–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Zelenyuk V (2021) On aggregation of multi-factor productivity indexes. J Prod Anal 55:107–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell M (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc Ser A: Gen 120:253–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Førsund F, Hjalmarsson L (1979) Generalised Farrell measures of efficiency: An application to milk processing in Swedish dairy plants. Econ J 89:294–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haas DA, Murphy FH (2003) Compensating for non-homogeneity in decision-making units in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 144:530–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li S-k, Cheng Y-s (2007) Solving the puzzles of structural efficiency. Eur J Oper Res 180:713–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li S-K, Ng YC (1995) Measuring the productive efficiency of a group of firms. Int Adv Econ Res 1:377–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer A, Zelenyuk V (2014) Aggregation of malmquist productivity indexes allowing for reallocation of resources. Eur J Oper Res 238:774–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer A, Zelenyuk V (2019) Aggregation of individual efficiency measures and productivity indices. Springer International Publishing, p 527–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23727-1_14.

  • Nesterenko V, Zelenyuk V (2007) Measuring potential gains from reallocation of resources. J Prod Anal 28:107–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pham M, Simar L, Zelenyuk V (2023) Statistical inference for aggregation of malmquist productivity indices. Oper Res https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2022.2424

  • Shephard R (1970) Theory of Cost and Production Functions (Princeton studies in mathematical economics). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Simar L, Zelenyuk V (2007) Statistical inference for aggregates of farrell-type efficiencies. J Appl Econ 22:1367–1394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarrin M, Schoenfelder J, Brunner JO (2022) Homogeneity and best practice analyses in hospital performance management: An analytical framework. Health Care Manag Sci 25:406–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelenyuk V (2020) Aggregation of efficiency and productivity: from firm to sector and higher levels. In Handbook of production economics. Springer, pp 1–40.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fredrik Ødegaard.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Begen, M.A., Ødegaard, F. & Sadeghi, J. On aggregation of technical and revenue efficiency measures. J Prod Anal (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-023-00710-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-023-00710-2

Keywords

Navigation