Abstract
This paper measures and compares the World Bank regions’ opportunity sets to promote ease of doing business for the years 2010 and 2019, as well as the time period 2010–2019. We combine the theoretical framework of Verbunt et al. (2020) and the non-parametric frontier estimation approach as proposed by Van Puyenbroeck and Rogge (2020) to construct and assess (changes in) the regions’ opportunity sets and best practice frontiers. The results reveal considerable differences across World Bank regions in ease of doing business, which decrease over the period of study. By 2019, the regions have grouped into two clusters: the leading high income OECD, Europe and Central Asia, and East Asia and Pacific, and the lagging Middle East and North Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean, South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. The results prove to be consistent with the concept of development clustering.
Highlights
-
Estimating regions’ opportunity sets and best practice to promote ease of doing business
-
Measuring differences in regions’ opportunity sets to promote ease of doing business.
-
Advocating a non-parametric frontier approach for constructing opportunity sets.
-
Measuring changes in opportunity sets and best practice for period 2010–2019.
-
Identify considerable differences in EDB best practice frontiers across regions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Data for the Ease of Doing Business Index are retrieved from https://www.doingbusiness.org/en/data.
The parameter m was set equal to 5 for all seven World Bank regions to address the potential issue of group-size bias, with regions including different number of countries (e.g. the region Sub-Saharan Africa counts 45 countries, Europe and Central Asia includes 22 countries, Middle East and North Africa 18 countries and South Asia 8 countries) (for more on the potential issue of group-size bias in DEA-based estimations, see e.g., Staat, 2001, 2002).
References
Acemoglu D, Collier P, Johnson S, Klein M, & Wheeler G (2013) A Review of Doing Business (Open letter by leading researchers in support of Doing Business).
Alesina A, Ardagna S, Nicoletti G, Schiantarelli F (2005) Regulation and investment. J Eur Econ Association 3(4):791–825
Asmild M, Tam F (2007) Estimating global frontier shifts and global Malmquist indices. J Prod Anal 27(2):137–48
Blanchard O, Giavazzi F (2003) Macroeconomic effects of regulation and deregulation in goods and labor markets. Quarterly J Econ 118:879–908
Berg J, Cazes S (2007) The doing business indicators: Measurement issues and political implications (Economic and Labour Market Paper No. 2007/6).
Berg J, Cazes S (2008) Policymaking gone away: The labor market regulations of the doing business indicators. Comparative Labor Law Policy J 29(4):8–23
Bertrand M, Kramarz F (2002) Does entry regulation hinder job creation? Evidence from the French retail industry. Quarterly J Econ 117(4):1369–1413
Besley T, Persson T (2011) Pillars of Prosperity: The Political Economics of Development Clusters. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Besley T (2015) Law, regulation, and the business climate: The nature and influence of the World Bank Doing Business project. J Econ Perspect 29(3):99–120
Boedo HJ, Mukoyama T (2012) Evaluating the effects of entry regulations and firing costs on international income differences. J Econ Growth 17(2):143–170
Borchert I, Gootiiz B, Mattoo A (2012) Policy barriers to international trade in services: Evidence from a new database. World Bank Econ Rev 28(1):162–188
Brunetti A, Kisunko G, Weder B (1998) Credibility of rules and economic growth: Evidence from a worldwide survey of the private sector. World Bank Econ Rev 12(3):353–384
Cazals C, Florens J-P, Simar L (2002) Nonparametric frontier estimation: A robust approach. J Econ 106(1):1–25
Chari AV (2011) Identifying the aggregate productivity effects of entry and size restrictions: An empirical analysis of license reform in India. American Econ J: Econ Policy 3:66–96
Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Operational Res 2(6):429–444
Chemin M (2009) The impact of the judiciary on entrepreneurship: Evaluation of Pakistan’s “Access to Justice Programme”. J Pub Econ 93(1):114–125
Cherchye L, Moesen W, Rogge N, Van Puyenbroeck T (2007) An introduction to ‘benefit of the doubt’ composite indicators. Soc Indicators Res 82(1):111–145
Corcoran A, Gillanders R (2015) Foreign direct investment and the ease of doing business. Rev World Econ 151(1):103–126
Crafts N (2006) Regulation and productivity performance. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 22(2):186–202
Daraio C, Simar L (2007) Advanced Robust and Nonparametric Methods in Efficiency Analysis: Methodology and Applications (Vol. 4). Springer, New York, NY
Davis KE, Kruse MB (2008) Taking the measure of law: The case of the doing business project. Law Soc Inq 32(4):1095–1119
Dawson JW, Seater JJ (2013) Federal regulation and aggregate economic growth. J Econ Growth 18(2):137–177
De Andrade GH, Bruhn M, Mckenzie D (2013) A helping hand or the long arm of the law? Experimental evidence on what governments can do to formalize firms. World Bank Econ Rev 30(1):24–54
Debreu G (1951) The coefficient of resource utilization. Econometrica: J Econometric Soc 19(3):273–292
Djankov S (2016) The Doing Business project: How it started. J Econ Perspect 30(1):247–248
Doing Business (2019) Doing Business 2019: Training for Reform. The World Bank, Washington DC
Doshi R, Kelley JG, Simmons BA (2019) The power of ranking: the Ease of Doing Business indicator and global regulatory behavior. Int Org 73(3):611–643
Estevão J, Lopes JD, Penela D, Soares JM (2019) The Doing Business ranking and the GDP. A qualitative study. Journal of Business Research. Forthcoming.
Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J Royal Statistical Soc: Series A (General) 120(3):253–281
Freund C, Rocha N (2011) What constrains Africa’s exports? World Bank Econ Rev 25(3):361–386
Gielnik MM, Uy MA, Funken R, Bischoff KM (2017) Boosting and sustaining passion: A long-term perspective on the effects of entrepreneurship training. J Business Venturing 32(3):334–353
Herrendorf B, Teixeira A (2011) Barriers to entry and development. Int Econ Rev 52(2):573–602
Ho YP, Wong PK (2007) Financing, regulatory costs, and entrepreneurial propensity. Small Business Econ 28(2–3):187–204
Horta IM, Camanho AS (2015) A nonparametric methodology for evaluating convergence in a multi-input multi-output setting. Eur J Operational Res 246:554–561
Irwin D (2014) Doing business: Using ratings to drive reform. J Int Develop 26(5):658–667
Jovanovic B, Jovanovic B (2018) Ease of doing business and FDI in the ex-socialist countries. Int Econ Econ Policy 15(3):587–627
Karagiannis G (2017) On aggregate composite indicators. J Operational Res Soc 68(7):741–746
Karagiannis G (2021) DEA Models Without Inputs or Outputs: A Tour de Force. In: Parmeter CF, Sickles RC (Eds.) Advances in Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Springer, Cham (Switzerland), p 211–232
Karagiannis R, Karagiannis G (2018) Intra-and inter-group composite indicators using the BoD model. Socio-Economic Planning. Sciences 61:44–51
Klapper L, Love I (2016) The impact of business environment reforms on new registrations of limited liability companies. World Bank Econ Rev 30(2):332–353
Koopmans TC (1951) An Analysis of Production as an Efficient Combination of Activities. In: Koopmans TC (Ed.) Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, Cowles Commission for Research in Economics, Monograph No. 13. Wiley, New York, NY
Koopmans TC (1957) Three Essays on the State of Economic Science. McGraw Hill, New York, NY
Lawless M (2013) Do complicated tax systems prevent foreign direct investment? Economica 80(317):1–22
Lee S-H, Yamakawa Y, Peng MW, Barney JB (2011) How do bankruptcy laws affect entrepreneurship development around the world? J Business Venturing 26(5):505–520
Maričić M, Bulajić M, Radojičić Z, Jeremić V (2019) Shedding light on the Doing Business Index: A machine learning approach. Business Sys Res 10(2):73–84
McCormack G (2018) Why ‘Doing Business’ with the World Bank may be bad for you. Eur Business Org Law Rev 19:649–676
Nicoletti G, Scarpetta S (2003) Regulation, productivity and growth: OECD evidence. Econ Policy 18(36):9–72
Poschke M (2010) The regulation of entry and aggregate productivity. Econ J 120(549):1175–1200
Quintin E (2008) Limited enforcement and the organization of production. J Macroecon 30(3):1222–1245
Rogge N (2018) On aggregating benefit of the doubt composite indicators. Eur J Operational Res 264(1):364–369
Rogge N, Archer G (2021) Measuring and analyzing country change in establishing ease of doing business using a revised version of World Bank’s ease of doing business index. Eur J Operational Res 290(1):373–385
Ruiz F, Cabello JM, Perez-Gladish B (2018) Building Ease-of-Doing-Business synthetic indicators using a double reference point approach. Technol Forecasting Soc Change 131:130–140
Shane S (1992) Why do some societies invent more than others? J Business Venturing 7(1):29–46
Shephard RW (1970) Theory of cost and production functions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Staat M (2001) The effect of sample size on the mean efficiency in DEA: Comment. J Prod Anal 15(2):129–137
Staat M (2002) Bootstrapped efficiency estimates for a model for groups and hierarchies in DEA. Eur J Operational Res 138(1):1–8
Van Puyenbroeck T (2018) On the output orientation of the benefit-of-the-doubt-model. Soc Indicators Res 139(2):415–431
Van Puyenbroeck T, Rogge N (2020) Comparing regional human development using global frontier difference indices. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 70:100663
Verbunt P, Rogge N, Van Puyenbroeck T (2022) Non-parametric estimation and evaluation of capability sets. Oxford Economic Papers 74(1):265–296
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1: Country EBD composite scores (year 2010)
Country | Region | \(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{EAP}\) | \(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{ECA}\) | \(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{LAC}\) | \(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{MENA}\) | \(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{OECD}\) | \(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{SA}\) | \(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{SSA}\) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brunei Darussalam | East Asia and Pacific | 90.91% | 104.52% | 102.45% | 97.19% | 84.30% | 117.16% | 122.02% |
Cambodia | East Asia and Pacific | 81.97% | 90.50% | 91.71% | 94.11% | 75.54% | 103.88% | 107.46% |
China | East Asia and Pacific | 86.46% | 92.83% | 96.59% | 95.81% | 77.04% | 110.31% | 111.50% |
Fiji | East Asia and Pacific | 103.27% | 112.45% | 113.97% | 117.94% | 91.35% | 132.64% | 139.18% |
Hong Kong SAR, China | East Asia and Pacific | 129.42% | 143.20% | 145.88% | 155.81% | 117.93% | 169.62% | 177.73% |
Indonesia | East Asia and Pacific | 86.83% | 95.73% | 96.93% | 102.39% | 79.94% | 114.03% | 121.19% |
Kiribati | East Asia and Pacific | 94.76% | 109.04% | 107.52% | 106.51% | 88.03% | 122.43% | 124.41% |
Lao PDR | East Asia and Pacific | 72.89% | 79.36% | 80.04% | 80.15% | 66.27% | 89.59% | 92.06% |
Malaysia | East Asia and Pacific | 115.95% | 125.60% | 130.76% | 141.58% | 106.91% | 151.89% | 161.35% |
Marshall Islands | East Asia and Pacific | 85.97% | 94.40% | 93.92% | 90.41% | 78.06% | 107.01% | 110.44% |
Micronesia, Fed Sts | East Asia and Pacific | 81.43% | 91.48% | 89.00% | 86.67% | 73.97% | 101.81% | 105.65% |
Mongolia | East Asia and Pacific | 90.81% | 97.48% | 102.07% | 102.33% | 82.09% | 116.95% | 118.31% |
Palau | East Asia and Pacific | 63.27% | 66.60% | 69.84% | 73.04% | 56.25% | 82.11% | 85.62% |
Papua New Guinea | East Asia and Pacific | 87.71% | 98.31% | 96.82% | 96.93% | 80.79% | 110.43% | 114.29% |
Philippines | East Asia and Pacific | 87.82% | 101.32% | 96.39% | 94.94% | 81.81% | 114.06% | 116.27% |
Samoa | East Asia and Pacific | 100.73% | 114.77% | 110.04% | 113.15% | 92.99% | 126.95% | 133.79% |
Singapore | East Asia and Pacific | 125.68% | 144.35% | 146.91% | 153.95% | 120.55% | 168.92% | 175.20% |
Solomon Islands | East Asia and Pacific | 84.60% | 94.38% | 93.26% | 91.63% | 75.96% | 105.55% | 109.07% |
Taiwan, China | East Asia and Pacific | 105.37% | 119.57% | 117.47% | 117.10% | 96.62% | 137.07% | 144.59% |
Thailand | East Asia and Pacific | 112.33% | 123.90% | 124.70% | 127.37% | 102.44% | 143.29% | 149.71% |
Timor-Leste | East Asia and Pacific | 32.87% | 35.14% | 38.54% | 38.71% | 30.01% | 41.08% | 40.46% |
Tonga | East Asia and Pacific | 99.42% | 113.69% | 111.38% | 108.83% | 91.16% | 126.18% | 130.09% |
Vanuatu | East Asia and Pacific | 95.05% | 108.74% | 105.99% | 105.32% | 87.31% | 118.27% | 124.59% |
Vietnam | East Asia and Pacific | 90.15% | 100.45% | 102.21% | 104.39% | 81.47% | 117.89% | 123.24% |
Albania | Europe and Central Asia | 98.30% | 102.77% | 107.67% | 116.81% | 87.97% | 126.02% | 131.98% |
Armenia | Europe and Central Asia | 97.13% | 102.10% | 107.48% | 105.93% | 87.42% | 120.80% | 128.67% |
Azerbaijan | Europe and Central Asia | 97.60% | 101.81% | 108.43% | 107.75% | 88.25% | 121.27% | 126.38% |
Belarus | Europe and Central Asia | 78.89% | 85.45% | 89.18% | 84.39% | 70.91% | 96.65% | 96.14% |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | Europe and Central Asia | 79.99% | 84.52% | 89.26% | 92.93% | 71.03% | 105.33% | 108.47% |
Bulgaria | Europe and Central Asia | 110.65% | 116.44% | 121.19% | 131.20% | 97.58% | 142.59% | 148.05% |
Croatia | Europe and Central Asia | 91.36% | 101.71% | 101.97% | 104.89% | 82.49% | 117.96% | 124.41% |
Cyprus | Europe and Central Asia | 94.54% | 105.60% | 105.61% | 107.65% | 87.08% | 125.62% | 129.90% |
Georgia | Europe and Central Asia | 117.29% | 126.35% | 129.18% | 130.00% | 103.70% | 148.99% | 158.66% |
Kazakhstan | Europe and Central Asia | 59.54% | 65.16% | 65.57% | 63.73% | 53.84% | 78.47% | 77.64% |
Kosovo | Europe and Central Asia | 86.42% | 93.93% | 96.42% | 102.17% | 76.95% | 111.59% | 113.59% |
Kyrgyz Republic | Europe and Central Asia | 81.09% | 88.10% | 89.30% | 92.39% | 72.83% | 106.20% | 111.26% |
Macedonia, FYR | Europe and Central Asia | 98.13% | 108.39% | 108.51% | 111.60% | 89.88% | 125.81% | 131.24% |
Moldova | Europe and Central Asia | 94.44% | 98.84% | 106.52% | 104.88% | 84.46% | 117.06% | 118.88% |
Montenegro | Europe and Central Asia | 93.15% | 99.07% | 103.51% | 111.61% | 83.75% | 121.13% | 129.18% |
Romania | Europe and Central Asia | 101.60% | 107.17% | 112.34% | 120.27% | 89.66% | 132.97% | 136.99% |
Russian Federation | Europe and Central Asia | 76.65% | 85.00% | 85.86% | 85.71% | 69.82% | 96.29% | 99.45% |
Serbia | Europe and Central Asia | 87.01% | 93.33% | 95.79% | 100.72% | 77.50% | 111.41% | 118.06% |
Tajikistan | Europe and Central Asia | 34.69% | 38.37% | 38.44% | 37.91% | 32.11% | 46.43% | 45.03% |
Turkey | Europe and Central Asia | 101.26% | 110.72% | 113.40% | 115.37% | 90.99% | 130.51% | 136.27% |
Ukraine | Europe and Central Asia | 42.51% | 49.26% | 47.53% | 46.78% | 39.58% | 50.70% | 53.40% |
Uzbekistan | Europe and Central Asia | 34.25% | 37.62% | 38.00% | 37.86% | 31.59% | 45.49% | 45.54% |
Antigua and Barbuda | Latin America and Caribbean | 97.51% | 112.22% | 105.86% | 109.31% | 91.01% | 124.63% | 130.28% |
Argentina | Latin America and Caribbean | 87.11% | 96.22% | 99.46% | 102.52% | 79.10% | 114.72% | 117.50% |
Bahamas, The | Latin America and Caribbean | 92.48% | 106.10% | 103.89% | 102.90% | 85.80% | 122.05% | 127.77% |
Belize | Latin America and Caribbean | 90.35% | 103.27% | 98.22% | 96.47% | 81.70% | 114.98% | 119.95% |
Bolivia | Latin America and Caribbean | 69.94% | 78.90% | 78.65% | 76.14% | 63.57% | 89.60% | 89.64% |
Brazil | Latin America and Caribbean | 86.56% | 98.78% | 94.10% | 95.03% | 81.66% | 110.21% | 115.33% |
Colombia | Latin America and Caribbean | 100.41% | 111.26% | 110.08% | 115.28% | 91.63% | 127.90% | 130.82% |
Costa Rica | Latin America and Caribbean | 88.15% | 98.27% | 97.75% | 94.80% | 80.16% | 113.52% | 118.99% |
Dominica | Latin America and Caribbean | 98.84% | 110.66% | 105.89% | 111.25% | 89.67% | 123.31% | 132.59% |
Dominican Republic | Latin America and Caribbean | 98.97% | 110.18% | 110.07% | 111.56% | 88.77% | 131.04% | 132.98% |
Ecuador | Latin America and Caribbean | 92.01% | 101.63% | 101.71% | 100.18% | 82.89% | 116.86% | 122.32% |
El Salvador | Latin America and Caribbean | 93.88% | 97.62% | 102.82% | 106.67% | 81.82% | 120.05% | 126.53% |
Grenada | Latin America and Caribbean | 95.25% | 108.41% | 102.34% | 107.17% | 88.23% | 120.29% | 125.73% |
Guatemala | Latin America and Caribbean | 98.94% | 106.38% | 106.57% | 116.59% | 87.86% | 124.72% | 132.02% |
Guyana | Latin America and Caribbean | 87.81% | 94.68% | 98.68% | 100.41% | 79.49% | 115.61% | 114.93% |
Haiti | Latin America and Caribbean | 68.68% | 77.00% | 76.59% | 77.45% | 62.34% | 86.78% | 88.14% |
Honduras | Latin America and Caribbean | 92.64% | 102.35% | 102.22% | 109.88% | 82.56% | 119.40% | 124.90% |
Jamaica | Latin America and Caribbean | 89.64% | 98.94% | 97.47% | 99.85% | 82.61% | 111.36% | 118.50% |
Mexico | Latin America and Caribbean | 93.35% | 101.72% | 103.77% | 109.32% | 84.36% | 123.18% | 131.17% |
Nicaragua | Latin America and Caribbean | 81.09% | 91.83% | 93.08% | 94.44% | 73.85% | 107.66% | 111.38% |
Panama | Latin America and Caribbean | 99.88% | 113.50% | 110.07% | 114.00% | 91.14% | 129.60% | 138.04% |
Paraguay | Latin America and Caribbean | 94.62% | 106.04% | 104.84% | 106.65% | 86.82% | 118.58% | 124.29% |
Peru | Latin America and Caribbean | 108.65% | 115.61% | 118.40% | 126.66% | 95.02% | 138.56% | 145.76% |
Puerto Rico US | Latin America and Caribbean | 104.54% | 113.18% | 115.85% | 126.40% | 94.76% | 135.74% | 142.62% |
St Kitts and Nevis | Latin America and Caribbean | 99.37% | 113.43% | 105.80% | 108.80% | 91.47% | 124.87% | 130.80% |
St Lucia | Latin America and Caribbean | 97.14% | 111.74% | 105.58% | 109.27% | 90.02% | 121.47% | 127.96% |
St Vincent & the Grenadines | Latin America and Caribbean | 102.15% | 118.43% | 110.35% | 112.92% | 94.37% | 129.59% | 134.57% |
Suriname | Latin America and Caribbean | 67.10% | 76.90% | 75.94% | 72.11% | 61.94% | 86.48% | 88.89% |
Trinidad and Tobago | Latin America and Caribbean | 97.19% | 106.74% | 106.34% | 115.35% | 88.68% | 125.01% | 130.31% |
Uruguay | Latin America and Caribbean | 90.95% | 101.52% | 97.60% | 102.10% | 82.45% | 114.56% | 123.38% |
Venezuela, RB | Latin America and Caribbean | 53.01% | 57.44% | 60.07% | 59.86% | 47.75% | 68.49% | 67.87% |
Algeria | Middle East and North Africa | 71.12% | 78.52% | 78.64% | 79.20% | 63.83% | 92.98% | 93.39% |
Bahrain | Middle East and North Africa | 103.02% | 113.94% | 115.08% | 105.49% | 92.27% | 131.70% | 130.24% |
Djibouti | Middle East and North Africa | 52.76% | 57.25% | 58.66% | 61.34% | 47.63% | 70.83% | 71.82% |
Egypt, Arab Rep | Middle East and North Africa | 89.45% | 98.73% | 97.74% | 98.93% | 81.48% | 112.06% | 118.58% |
Iran, Islamic Rep | Middle East and North Africa | 88.16% | 96.74% | 97.78% | 99.26% | 79.63% | 112.15% | 116.03% |
Iraq | Middle East and North Africa | 68.55% | 77.05% | 76.68% | 73.53% | 62.78% | 88.51% | 89.60% |
Jordan | Middle East and North Africa | 77.13% | 83.54% | 85.05% | 85.00% | 69.21% | 100.20% | 101.78% |
Kuwait | Middle East and North Africa | 95.89% | 108.18% | 108.72% | 102.06% | 88.69% | 122.29% | 124.00% |
Lebanon | Middle East and North Africa | 92.43% | 105.57% | 105.30% | 103.34% | 86.08% | 119.87% | 126.79% |
Morocco | Middle East and North Africa | 89.61% | 100.20% | 98.00% | 99.06% | 82.16% | 115.82% | 120.76% |
Oman | Middle East and North Africa | 102.13% | 113.22% | 114.78% | 104.46% | 92.10% | 131.06% | 130.07% |
Qatar | Middle East and North Africa | 95.20% | 104.79% | 106.71% | 99.15% | 85.66% | 121.98% | 123.79% |
Saudi Arabia | Middle East and North Africa | 110.70% | 123.31% | 123.17% | 119.87% | 100.49% | 141.09% | 143.22% |
Syrian Arab Republic | Middle East and North Africa | 70.51% | 77.73% | 77.63% | 78.39% | 63.88% | 91.65% | 93.16% |
Tunisia | Middle East and North Africa | 98.04% | 107.86% | 108.13% | 106.77% | 88.76% | 127.34% | 129.42% |
United Arab Emirates | Middle East and North Africa | 109.99% | 121.91% | 122.78% | 114.21% | 98.89% | 143.43% | 144.65% |
West Bank and Gaza | Middle East and North Africa | 80.78% | 87.90% | 90.82% | 88.87% | 73.73% | 103.23% | 104.27% |
Yemen, Rep | Middle East and North Africa | 79.19% | 85.43% | 87.63% | 89.67% | 70.30% | 101.33% | 103.22% |
Australia | OECD high income | 117.73% | 128.56% | 132.38% | 139.33% | 103.27% | 154.38% | 161.14% |
Austria | OECD high income | 111.62% | 121.93% | 126.50% | 129.83% | 99.77% | 147.24% | 152.68% |
Belgium | OECD high income | 103.75% | 114.44% | 118.27% | 119.53% | 95.56% | 136.23% | 137.25% |
Canada | OECD high income | 114.49% | 126.42% | 128.65% | 136.18% | 104.70% | 148.36% | 155.98% |
Chile | OECD high income | 105.63% | 116.81% | 116.93% | 117.23% | 94.35% | 137.02% | 137.64% |
Czech Republic | OECD high income | 98.92% | 107.07% | 110.39% | 114.58% | 87.13% | 129.99% | 136.85% |
Denmark | OECD high income | 120.42% | 136.18% | 133.88% | 138.97% | 106.65% | 156.47% | 166.59% |
Estonia | OECD high income | 117.19% | 128.68% | 128.54% | 128.60% | 102.96% | 152.95% | 157.93% |
Finland | OECD high income | 114.59% | 126.62% | 128.29% | 131.65% | 101.69% | 151.03% | 158.97% |
France | OECD high income | 103.12% | 116.99% | 118.07% | 119.15% | 94.45% | 137.30% | 142.62% |
Germany | OECD high income | 114.01% | 130.36% | 128.07% | 134.55% | 103.18% | 149.54% | 155.96% |
Greece | OECD high income | 92.45% | 105.20% | 102.07% | 101.50% | 83.90% | 119.89% | 124.73% |
Hungary | OECD high income | 100.22% | 108.84% | 112.48% | 117.47% | 89.53% | 132.02% | 135.51% |
Iceland | OECD high income | 115.12% | 128.94% | 132.28% | 135.25% | 104.22% | 151.72% | 159.01% |
Ireland | OECD high income | 119.44% | 133.13% | 134.40% | 143.44% | 109.18% | 156.83% | 165.20% |
Israel | OECD high income | 107.45% | 117.52% | 120.39% | 131.15% | 98.85% | 140.70% | 148.04% |
Italy | OECD high income | 96.79% | 106.69% | 106.44% | 107.32% | 87.85% | 125.79% | 128.54% |
Japan | OECD high income | 110.26% | 122.83% | 123.42% | 129.78% | 100.65% | 145.09% | 153.41% |
Korea, Rep | OECD high income | 117.88% | 133.45% | 130.68% | 134.70% | 105.54% | 152.82% | 162.06% |
Latvia | OECD high income | 117.38% | 124.30% | 130.90% | 138.74% | 102.00% | 153.06% | 156.55% |
Lithuania | OECD high income | 112.68% | 120.04% | 124.53% | 125.25% | 98.71% | 144.68% | 149.94% |
Luxembourg | OECD high income | 95.11% | 107.00% | 111.89% | 114.09% | 87.43% | 127.54% | 126.77% |
Netherlands | OECD high income | 105.58% | 117.79% | 120.41% | 122.74% | 95.27% | 140.84% | 145.60% |
New Zealand | OECD high income | 134.63% | 146.03% | 149.80% | 157.99% | 120.29% | 171.07% | 180.83% |
Norway | OECD high income | 118.60% | 130.64% | 131.94% | 132.31% | 105.44% | 153.16% | 154.28% |
Poland | OECD high income | 102.44% | 107.32% | 111.95% | 123.01% | 90.35% | 132.53% | 139.06% |
Portugal | OECD high income | 100.84% | 110.84% | 113.18% | 115.22% | 91.36% | 134.49% | 135.19% |
Slovak Republic | OECD high income | 107.23% | 112.45% | 117.55% | 120.18% | 94.60% | 135.84% | 143.70% |
Slovenia | OECD high income | 91.70% | 100.49% | 98.80% | 104.78% | 84.45% | 115.65% | 120.26% |
Spain | OECD high income | 99.62% | 108.73% | 110.57% | 114.61% | 88.95% | 130.88% | 136.04% |
Sweden | OECD high income | 117.87% | 133.05% | 130.92% | 133.05% | 105.52% | 153.50% | 162.63% |
Switzerland | OECD high income | 112.30% | 123.63% | 123.80% | 128.46% | 99.97% | 144.04% | 150.81% |
United Kingdom | OECD high income | 123.39% | 135.49% | 137.55% | 150.29% | 109.93% | 161.64% | 172.12% |
United States | OECD high income | 127.29% | 136.55% | 141.56% | 151.52% | 113.52% | 165.49% | 176.01% |
Afghanistan | South Asia | 54.93% | 61.54% | 61.49% | 62.60% | 51.67% | 69.21% | 69.51% |
Bangladesh | South Asia | 68.34% | 76.39% | 77.13% | 78.71% | 63.91% | 88.67% | 89.13% |
Bhutan | South Asia | 91.02% | 103.12% | 104.27% | 104.30% | 83.40% | 111.01% | 116.51% |
India | South Asia | 75.30% | 81.63% | 82.82% | 87.35% | 66.88% | 95.84% | 97.92% |
Maldives | South Asia | 86.92% | 97.17% | 98.16% | 92.13% | 79.38% | 105.78% | 111.52% |
Nepal | South Asia | 92.29% | 101.37% | 102.01% | 98.80% | 82.82% | 109.15% | 117.90% |
Pakistan | South Asia | 81.10% | 89.23% | 87.66% | 92.68% | 74.41% | 101.12% | 105.73% |
Sri Lanka | South Asia | 86.17% | 96.21% | 93.14% | 97.10% | 77.17% | 107.16% | 117.29% |
Angola | Sub-Saharan Africa | 63.25% | 68.66% | 68.74% | 69.97% | 57.27% | 77.12% | 79.80% |
Benin | Sub-Saharan Africa | 60.85% | 67.14% | 65.97% | 65.02% | 55.05% | 76.80% | 78.37% |
Botswana | Sub-Saharan Africa | 97.50% | 104.82% | 108.18% | 109.44% | 86.87% | 121.84% | 126.78% |
Burkina Faso | Sub-Saharan Africa | 61.35% | 69.18% | 68.95% | 67.12% | 54.94% | 76.73% | 77.70% |
Burundi | Sub-Saharan Africa | 56.10% | 58.83% | 61.58% | 60.10% | 50.54% | 69.55% | 69.27% |
Cabo Verde | Sub-Saharan Africa | 84.26% | 94.94% | 96.58% | 98.22% | 76.85% | 111.94% | 110.75% |
Cameroon | Sub-Saharan Africa | 68.55% | 78.28% | 73.87% | 74.20% | 63.77% | 86.28% | 87.76% |
Central African Republic | Sub-Saharan Africa | 37.31% | 42.85% | 41.09% | 40.50% | 34.96% | 47.86% | 48.56% |
Chad | Sub-Saharan Africa | 46.52% | 52.38% | 51.85% | 50.40% | 42.82% | 58.32% | 58.73% |
Comoros | Sub-Saharan Africa | 74.75% | 83.51% | 81.31% | 80.94% | 67.75% | 91.28% | 94.00% |
Congo, Dem Rep | Sub-Saharan Africa | 54.33% | 60.93% | 59.13% | 58.58% | 49.95% | 66.06% | 67.51% |
Congo, Rep | Sub-Saharan Africa | 58.48% | 65.20% | 64.98% | 62.00% | 53.18% | 72.22% | 73.07% |
Côte d’Ivoire | Sub-Saharan Africa | 62.31% | 67.47% | 71.35% | 72.76% | 56.41% | 79.79% | 78.74% |
Equatorial Guinea | Sub-Saharan Africa | 74.00% | 81.99% | 81.98% | 83.51% | 66.23% | 93.05% | 92.66% |
Eritrea | Sub-Saharan Africa | 37.58% | 42.01% | 41.79% | 41.55% | 34.50% | 45.17% | 46.27% |
Ethiopia | Sub-Saharan Africa | 63.35% | 71.30% | 72.27% | 73.13% | 58.62% | 81.16% | 82.20% |
Gabon | Sub-Saharan Africa | 71.77% | 79.68% | 79.23% | 78.19% | 64.30% | 93.43% | 93.63% |
Gambia, The | Sub-Saharan Africa | 74.55% | 82.97% | 83.26% | 82.85% | 67.25% | 96.78% | 95.94% |
Ghana | Sub-Saharan Africa | 97.58% | 103.58% | 108.11% | 108.55% | 87.54% | 122.60% | 124.63% |
Guinea | Sub-Saharan Africa | 56.92% | 63.61% | 64.77% | 64.90% | 51.57% | 74.83% | 74.35% |
Guinea-Bissau | Sub-Saharan Africa | 39.01% | 41.23% | 41.91% | 42.66% | 35.63% | 47.65% | 49.11% |
Kenya | Sub-Saharan Africa | 91.89% | 101.33% | 99.55% | 102.25% | 82.79% | 112.74% | 119.48% |
Lesotho | Sub-Saharan Africa | 77.48% | 88.36% | 88.44% | 85.46% | 72.13% | 96.67% | 98.88% |
Liberia | Sub-Saharan Africa | 66.70% | 73.76% | 74.43% | 73.64% | 61.89% | 83.18% | 85.85% |
Madagascar | Sub-Saharan Africa | 64.98% | 72.86% | 73.09% | 75.76% | 60.06% | 85.54% | 86.11% |
Malawi | Sub-Saharan Africa | 72.28% | 84.27% | 81.12% | 78.26% | 67.12% | 90.36% | 93.65% |
Mali | Sub-Saharan Africa | 65.82% | 73.89% | 74.19% | 75.09% | 60.01% | 84.19% | 86.36% |
Mauritania | Sub-Saharan Africa | 64.53% | 69.85% | 72.72% | 69.87% | 57.62% | 80.30% | 81.07% |
Mauritius | Sub-Saharan Africa | 106.92% | 122.78% | 121.37% | 124.18% | 101.44% | 140.69% | 141.29% |
Mozambique | Sub-Saharan Africa | 77.36% | 85.76% | 84.93% | 87.47% | 69.77% | 98.25% | 100.73% |
Namibia | Sub-Saharan Africa | 99.51% | 109.84% | 109.39% | 112.83% | 88.42% | 126.52% | 131.28% |
Niger | Sub-Saharan Africa | 58.72% | 63.48% | 65.57% | 64.00% | 52.36% | 73.01% | 73.25% |
Nigeria | Sub-Saharan Africa | 67.19% | 70.80% | 73.32% | 76.83% | 61.53% | 82.46% | 88.03% |
Rwanda | Sub-Saharan Africa | 93.34% | 101.05% | 104.48% | 104.30% | 84.55% | 116.99% | 118.45% |
São Tomé and Príncipe | Sub-Saharan Africa | 64.82% | 73.17% | 70.55% | 71.44% | 59.40% | 85.00% | 86.09% |
Senegal | Sub-Saharan Africa | 62.95% | 70.11% | 69.46% | 68.55% | 57.78% | 83.05% | 84.21% |
Seychelles | Sub-Saharan Africa | 90.78% | 101.12% | 101.75% | 101.51% | 81.97% | 119.68% | 118.54% |
Sierra Leone | Sub-Saharan Africa | 65.17% | 73.21% | 71.48% | 72.90% | 60.61% | 81.57% | 83.70% |
South Africa | Sub-Saharan Africa | 106.89% | 118.09% | 119.42% | 127.35% | 97.16% | 136.06% | 142.10% |
Sudan | Sub-Saharan Africa | 74.78% | 80.51% | 83.64% | 78.84% | 67.66% | 91.44% | 93.07% |
Tanzania | Sub-Saharan Africa | 83.09% | 90.82% | 94.78% | 96.33% | 75.75% | 106.75% | 106.65% |
Togo | Sub-Saharan Africa | 56.91% | 62.45% | 63.80% | 63.41% | 52.52% | 74.89% | 75.08% |
Uganda | Sub-Saharan Africa | 73.65% | 83.09% | 84.10% | 83.02% | 68.29% | 93.39% | 96.05% |
Zambia | Sub-Saharan Africa | 83.02% | 93.28% | 93.35% | 95.13% | 76.32% | 106.73% | 109.09% |
Zimbabwe | Sub-Saharan Africa | 66.30% | 71.33% | 74.75% | 76.58% | 59.63% | 87.32% | 88.80% |
Appendix 2: Country EBD composite scores (year 2019)
Country | Region | \(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{EAP}\) | \(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{ECA}\) | \(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{LAC}\) | \(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{MENA}\) | \(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{OECD}\) | \(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{SA}\) | \(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{SSA}\) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brunei Darussalam | East Asia and Pacific | 108.67% | 104.20% | 121.06% | 126.96% | 102.46% | 129.49% | 131.55% |
Cambodia | East Asia and Pacific | 83.41% | 79.39% | 92.42% | 96.97% | 78.36% | 98.66% | 101.44% |
China | East Asia and Pacific | 104.15% | 102.53% | 124.06% | 116.22% | 98.41% | 127.05% | 130.76% |
Fiji | East Asia and Pacific | 84.74% | 81.47% | 98.09% | 94.93% | 78.10% | 101.32% | 104.52% |
Hong Kong SAR, China | East Asia and Pacific | 117.98% | 115.25% | 140.95% | 134.56% | 110.22% | 140.59% | 147.37% |
Indonesia | East Asia and Pacific | 93.40% | 93.06% | 110.76% | 108.96% | 90.24% | 113.51% | 120.42% |
Kiribati | East Asia and Pacific | 73.03% | 71.28% | 84.67% | 80.20% | 68.56% | 86.96% | 88.10% |
Lao PDR | East Asia and Pacific | 80.85% | 77.67% | 93.06% | 92.01% | 75.06% | 95.25% | 100.39% |
Malaysia | East Asia and Pacific | 112.26% | 111.25% | 134.64% | 130.83% | 108.05% | 138.12% | 143.40% |
Marshall Islands | East Asia and Pacific | 79.61% | 77.09% | 93.33% | 87.25% | 74.95% | 93.27% | 98.21% |
Micronesia, Fed Sts | East Asia and Pacific | 74.53% | 71.15% | 86.34% | 82.10% | 68.26% | 82.83% | 91.28% |
Mongolia | East Asia and Pacific | 100.25% | 96.39% | 118.15% | 117.74% | 95.43% | 123.88% | 125.81% |
Palau | East Asia and Pacific | 82.31% | 79.31% | 97.36% | 89.58% | 77.00% | 97.54% | 101.22% |
Papua New Guinea | East Asia and Pacific | 88.21% | 84.74% | 101.61% | 102.64% | 83.66% | 104.50% | 109.78% |
Philippines | East Asia and Pacific | 54.76% | 54.31% | 59.44% | 64.33% | 52.87% | 65.96% | 67.00% |
Samoa | East Asia and Pacific | 92.33% | 89.46% | 107.61% | 99.75% | 87.21% | 109.94% | 114.07% |
Singapore | East Asia and Pacific | 117.03% | 114.84% | 141.66% | 135.27% | 111.56% | 146.22% | 148.91% |
Solomon Islands | East Asia and Pacific | 87.65% | 85.77% | 103.53% | 93.74% | 82.03% | 101.85% | 106.77% |
Taiwan, China | East Asia and Pacific | 109.47% | 108.48% | 130.64% | 120.95% | 103.76% | 135.05% | 138.04% |
Thailand | East Asia and Pacific | 107.65% | 107.83% | 128.42% | 122.34% | 102.70% | 130.34% | 136.14% |
Timor-Leste | East Asia and Pacific | 53.75% | 51.48% | 61.59% | 58.66% | 50.55% | 62.57% | 64.77% |
Tonga | East Asia and Pacific | 92.76% | 90.82% | 107.35% | 106.24% | 88.33% | 109.67% | 114.13% |
Vanuatu | East Asia and Pacific | 92.43% | 87.08% | 106.61% | 107.26% | 86.80% | 111.35% | 115.13% |
Vietnam | East Asia and Pacific | 98.71% | 97.77% | 115.07% | 116.94% | 94.92% | 119.29% | 126.76% |
Albania | Europe and Central Asia | 100.09% | 95.66% | 116.54% | 114.24% | 93.62% | 116.10% | 124.91% |
Armenia | Europe and Central Asia | 108.90% | 103.66% | 127.02% | 121.87% | 100.72% | 131.13% | 138.45% |
Azerbaijan | Europe and Central Asia | 111.90% | 105.78% | 133.80% | 129.37% | 106.06% | 136.90% | 139.85% |
Belarus | Europe and Central Asia | 110.81% | 103.98% | 127.74% | 119.69% | 100.36% | 130.24% | 135.03% |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | Europe and Central Asia | 92.93% | 88.28% | 106.89% | 105.48% | 85.41% | 107.14% | 113.33% |
Bulgaria | Europe and Central Asia | 102.98% | 98.57% | 119.84% | 116.09% | 95.09% | 120.64% | 126.57% |
Croatia | Europe and Central Asia | 104.15% | 99.09% | 119.98% | 115.11% | 95.35% | 121.98% | 127.46% |
Cyprus | Europe and Central Asia | 98.33% | 95.08% | 117.01% | 113.20% | 91.63% | 116.25% | 122.31% |
Georgia | Europe and Central Asia | 119.27% | 112.35% | 142.18% | 137.90% | 112.14% | 145.97% | 151.13% |
Kazakhstan | Europe and Central Asia | 111.24% | 105.80% | 133.00% | 122.99% | 106.31% | 137.75% | 140.09% |
Kosovo | Europe and Central Asia | 106.35% | 100.04% | 122.63% | 123.04% | 100.11% | 129.53% | 130.75% |
Kyrgyz Republic | Europe and Central Asia | 99.69% | 94.84% | 116.80% | 112.80% | 92.79% | 121.31% | 125.61% |
Macedonia, FYR | Europe and Central Asia | 113.83% | 108.80% | 135.07% | 134.75% | 108.41% | 137.78% | 143.11% |
Moldova | Europe and Central Asia | 104.64% | 99.90% | 124.18% | 119.52% | 97.45% | 126.58% | 130.54% |
Montenegro | Europe and Central Asia | 105.12% | 98.51% | 120.09% | 122.40% | 98.43% | 127.38% | 131.61% |
Romania | Europe and Central Asia | 104.09% | 99.76% | 121.68% | 121.94% | 97.73% | 124.98% | 129.75% |
Russian Federation | Europe and Central Asia | 110.40% | 105.27% | 129.27% | 126.48% | 104.03% | 133.38% | 139.28% |
Serbia | Europe and Central Asia | 104.90% | 100.82% | 120.56% | 119.02% | 96.92% | 121.16% | 130.11% |
Tajikistan | Europe and Central Asia | 83.69% | 82.06% | 98.59% | 91.64% | 80.14% | 101.80% | 101.71% |
Turkey | Europe and Central Asia | 106.67% | 102.34% | 127.77% | 124.52% | 101.20% | 130.85% | 136.06% |
Ukraine | Europe and Central Asia | 99.56% | 95.91% | 116.27% | 116.34% | 93.58% | 120.21% | 123.33% |
Uzbekistan | Europe and Central Asia | 97.15% | 93.99% | 113.25% | 108.87% | 91.22% | 115.39% | 120.81% |
Antigua and Barbuda | Latin America and Caribbean | 83.62% | 82.36% | 97.75% | 94.31% | 79.48% | 101.46% | 103.37% |
Argentina | Latin America and Caribbean | 84.19% | 81.73% | 99.78% | 95.13% | 80.02% | 102.17% | 104.19% |
Bahamas, The | Latin America and Caribbean | 81.93% | 80.50% | 96.15% | 88.23% | 77.30% | 96.66% | 100.95% |
Belize | Latin America and Caribbean | 79.33% | 76.74% | 90.88% | 84.73% | 73.68% | 90.44% | 96.27% |
Bolivia | Latin America and Caribbean | 69.98% | 67.99% | 81.45% | 76.85% | 64.94% | 81.96% | 86.05% |
Brazil | Latin America and Caribbean | 85.20% | 84.31% | 101.39% | 93.12% | 80.94% | 105.05% | 105.58% |
Colombia | Latin America and Caribbean | 103.15% | 97.20% | 114.33% | 119.54% | 95.99% | 121.94% | 123.44% |
Costa Rica | Latin America and Caribbean | 103.56% | 97.92% | 115.75% | 119.46% | 97.52% | 124.59% | 129.52% |
Dominica | Latin America and Caribbean | 86.69% | 85.01% | 99.83% | 93.88% | 81.79% | 102.91% | 108.48% |
Dominican Republic | Latin America and Caribbean | 89.52% | 85.65% | 102.13% | 97.63% | 82.51% | 103.69% | 108.57% |
Ecuador | Latin America and Caribbean | 83.93% | 82.17% | 98.73% | 93.29% | 78.66% | 101.53% | 106.04% |
El Salvador | Latin America and Caribbean | 97.13% | 91.27% | 109.70% | 111.21% | 90.75% | 114.08% | 121.36% |
Grenada | Latin America and Caribbean | 80.68% | 78.34% | 92.31% | 87.89% | 76.99% | 96.22% | 97.38% |
Guatemala | Latin America and Caribbean | 91.95% | 88.01% | 103.28% | 106.56% | 87.10% | 109.08% | 113.70% |
Guyana | Latin America and Caribbean | 82.53% | 80.08% | 96.50% | 93.53% | 78.87% | 99.35% | 99.85% |
Haiti | Latin America and Caribbean | 56.75% | 54.01% | 62.81% | 63.41% | 52.46% | 64.60% | 68.24% |
Honduras | Latin America and Caribbean | 90.68% | 86.82% | 99.02% | 105.92% | 85.70% | 108.86% | 110.53% |
Jamaica | Latin America and Caribbean | 97.42% | 93.04% | 107.90% | 114.35% | 92.68% | 115.15% | 118.97% |
Mexico | Latin America and Caribbean | 105.39% | 99.16% | 117.43% | 122.70% | 98.28% | 126.74% | 130.09% |
Nicaragua | Latin America and Caribbean | 79.92% | 77.19% | 93.68% | 89.75% | 75.06% | 94.04% | 100.78% |
Panama | Latin America and Caribbean | 98.02% | 93.63% | 109.56% | 113.10% | 91.94% | 115.58% | 121.63% |
Paraguay | Latin America and Caribbean | 83.36% | 82.53% | 97.76% | 91.04% | 79.03% | 101.17% | 103.09% |
Peru | Latin America and Caribbean | 99.35% | 94.33% | 115.27% | 116.40% | 93.41% | 120.64% | 124.07% |
Puerto Rico US | Latin America and Caribbean | 100.72% | 95.96% | 110.51% | 117.30% | 94.68% | 121.71% | 121.28% |
St Kitts and Nevis | Latin America and Caribbean | 80.92% | 78.43% | 93.05% | 89.71% | 75.46% | 97.20% | 99.55% |
St Lucia | Latin America and Caribbean | 87.36% | 86.36% | 100.20% | 95.87% | 82.87% | 102.97% | 107.71% |
St Vincent & the Grenadines | Latin America and Caribbean | 83.31% | 81.62% | 96.01% | 93.62% | 78.99% | 100.71% | 102.42% |
Suriname | Latin America and Caribbean | 61.32% | 59.89% | 69.79% | 70.02% | 57.43% | 71.92% | 76.31% |
Trinidad and Tobago | Latin America and Caribbean | 86.54% | 85.44% | 100.99% | 98.87% | 82.72% | 101.91% | 107.82% |
Uruguay | Latin America and Caribbean | 88.93% | 86.92% | 102.30% | 99.48% | 84.42% | 104.37% | 111.79% |
Venezuela, RB | Latin America and Caribbean | 40.72% | 40.01% | 47.29% | 43.78% | 37.98% | 46.77% | 49.98% |
Algeria | Middle East and North Africa | 61.62% | 59.79% | 69.30% | 69.35% | 58.00% | 73.00% | 74.50% |
Bahrain | Middle East and North Africa | 101.69% | 98.59% | 120.26% | 107.94% | 94.32% | 121.88% | 122.27% |
Djibouti | Middle East and North Africa | 87.87% | 85.44% | 104.07% | 97.14% | 85.20% | 102.74% | 106.99% |
Egypt, Arab Rep | Middle East and North Africa | 84.59% | 82.26% | 98.43% | 96.76% | 79.78% | 99.38% | 105.02% |
Iran, Islamic Rep | Middle East and North Africa | 81.88% | 80.11% | 96.20% | 90.33% | 76.56% | 98.65% | 102.38% |
Iraq | Middle East and North Africa | 49.88% | 48.13% | 54.31% | 57.10% | 46.89% | 59.10% | 59.40% |
Jordan | Middle East and North Africa | 87.75% | 85.56% | 100.91% | 95.35% | 81.86% | 102.90% | 109.31% |
Kuwait | Middle East and North Africa | 92.72% | 90.60% | 107.99% | 96.41% | 86.68% | 108.30% | 110.58% |
Lebanon | Middle East and North Africa | 78.06% | 75.38% | 91.59% | 84.66% | 73.84% | 92.01% | 96.18% |
Morocco | Middle East and North Africa | 99.29% | 97.31% | 116.56% | 107.45% | 92.76% | 117.68% | 121.22% |
Oman | Middle East and North Africa | 95.78% | 93.16% | 111.70% | 101.98% | 89.39% | 112.34% | 117.00% |
Qatar | Middle East and North Africa | 96.21% | 93.18% | 112.46% | 97.54% | 89.82% | 111.06% | 116.50% |
Saudi Arabia | Middle East and North Africa | 99.07% | 95.12% | 118.10% | 107.31% | 94.96% | 120.84% | 122.28% |
Syrian Arab Republic | Middle East and North Africa | 63.82% | 61.70% | 73.90% | 69.64% | 59.76% | 74.10% | 75.91% |
Tunisia | Middle East and North Africa | 92.61% | 90.62% | 107.31% | 100.35% | 87.92% | 110.52% | 113.87% |
United Arab Emirates | Middle East and North Africa | 117.54% | 113.96% | 139.89% | 127.08% | 108.83% | 141.50% | 146.20% |
West Bank and Gaza | Middle East and North Africa | 94.03% | 88.88% | 106.42% | 108.49% | 89.37% | 112.51% | 117.69% |
Yemen, Rep | Middle East and North Africa | 30.39% | 28.69% | 33.09% | 33.33% | 27.74% | 33.36% | 36.27% |
Australia | OECD high income | 113.82% | 107.24% | 131.78% | 131.82% | 106.20% | 137.71% | 139.89% |
Austria | OECD high income | 109.42% | 104.87% | 128.21% | 121.70% | 100.58% | 130.89% | 137.17% |
Belgium | OECD high income | 104.33% | 98.65% | 119.37% | 116.94% | 95.24% | 120.09% | 127.14% |
Canada | OECD high income | 110.21% | 104.09% | 130.41% | 129.37% | 104.68% | 133.84% | 137.11% |
Chile | OECD high income | 99.33% | 97.66% | 116.50% | 110.75% | 92.37% | 119.90% | 122.89% |
Czech Republic | OECD high income | 107.25% | 103.46% | 123.02% | 120.57% | 98.79% | 123.75% | 135.03% |
Denmark | OECD high income | 116.21% | 112.29% | 136.44% | 131.52% | 106.39% | 138.23% | 146.47% |
Estonia | OECD high income | 115.20% | 109.40% | 134.42% | 128.32% | 104.15% | 135.68% | 142.91% |
Finland | OECD high income | 108.76% | 105.54% | 127.76% | 122.03% | 99.77% | 128.01% | 136.36% |
France | OECD high income | 107.03% | 104.06% | 125.22% | 119.77% | 99.00% | 127.57% | 133.99% |
Germany | OECD high income | 105.53% | 106.57% | 125.61% | 123.74% | 101.17% | 125.79% | 134.00% |
Greece | OECD high income | 97.68% | 93.31% | 112.67% | 108.13% | 89.78% | 109.90% | 119.92% |
Hungary | OECD high income | 105.67% | 99.96% | 122.03% | 121.60% | 97.48% | 124.53% | 131.29% |
Iceland | OECD high income | 107.32% | 105.51% | 128.15% | 120.68% | 100.85% | 131.31% | 136.77% |
Ireland | OECD high income | 108.91% | 105.60% | 130.80% | 123.75% | 101.56% | 129.59% | 134.46% |
Israel | OECD high income | 99.85% | 97.43% | 119.42% | 116.70% | 95.69% | 120.36% | 124.66% |
Italy | OECD high income | 101.87% | 97.72% | 117.32% | 112.18% | 93.73% | 118.82% | 125.83% |
Japan | OECD high income | 100.57% | 99.70% | 118.29% | 113.37% | 94.16% | 120.56% | 127.12% |
Korea, Rep | OECD high income | 116.51% | 112.74% | 135.78% | 130.52% | 107.71% | 141.85% | 144.51% |
Latvia | OECD high income | 114.77% | 107.17% | 132.60% | 132.76% | 105.94% | 137.72% | 140.39% |
Lithuania | OECD high income | 117.03% | 110.81% | 138.07% | 130.28% | 106.62% | 138.63% | 145.84% |
Luxembourg | OECD high income | 88.92% | 85.87% | 101.68% | 101.47% | 82.33% | 104.44% | 109.33% |
Netherlands | OECD high income | 104.71% | 100.51% | 121.12% | 115.11% | 96.05% | 121.18% | 129.67% |
New Zealand | OECD high income | 125.37% | 118.08% | 145.78% | 147.18% | 117.06% | 151.79% | 156.92% |
Norway | OECD high income | 113.36% | 109.30% | 134.23% | 127.46% | 105.73% | 140.06% | 140.49% |
Poland | OECD high income | 108.16% | 103.66% | 125.68% | 125.97% | 100.26% | 126.88% | 134.97% |
Portugal | OECD high income | 106.05% | 101.51% | 122.36% | 116.15% | 97.02% | 123.01% | 131.07% |
Slovak Republic | OECD high income | 108.08% | 103.05% | 125.37% | 121.24% | 98.66% | 126.81% | 135.54% |
Slovenia | OECD high income | 105.33% | 100.33% | 121.23% | 115.45% | 96.64% | 120.86% | 129.74% |
Spain | OECD high income | 108.88% | 103.58% | 126.33% | 121.48% | 99.76% | 127.36% | 134.65% |
Sweden | OECD high income | 111.69% | 108.97% | 131.32% | 124.08% | 103.49% | 134.51% | 140.33% |
Switzerland | OECD high income | 107.07% | 103.71% | 124.24% | 117.73% | 98.90% | 126.88% | 133.01% |
United Kingdom | OECD high income | 111.49% | 111.01% | 133.46% | 131.49% | 106.06% | 136.09% | 144.82% |
United States | OECD high income | 116.65% | 109.65% | 131.99% | 136.08% | 109.23% | 142.58% | 144.79% |
Afghanistan | South Asia | 70.30% | 68.83% | 83.81% | 77.00% | 67.15% | 82.32% | 85.37% |
Bangladesh | South Asia | 61.68% | 60.19% | 70.91% | 67.26% | 58.95% | 71.73% | 75.02% |
Bhutan | South Asia | 101.91% | 98.81% | 119.45% | 112.82% | 93.77% | 114.96% | 126.08% |
India | South Asia | 98.83% | 96.38% | 117.30% | 114.79% | 95.26% | 113.28% | 123.60% |
Maldives | South Asia | 80.46% | 78.88% | 91.91% | 86.28% | 76.58% | 93.41% | 96.29% |
Nepal | South Asia | 85.00% | 82.01% | 99.65% | 95.32% | 80.36% | 99.84% | 105.03% |
Pakistan | South Asia | 80.83% | 78.05% | 96.83% | 88.74% | 78.00% | 92.94% | 98.71% |
Sri Lanka | South Asia | 87.83% | 85.35% | 101.23% | 95.48% | 82.73% | 100.80% | 108.41% |
Angola | Sub-Saharan Africa | 49.61% | 47.71% | 54.23% | 57.06% | 46.84% | 58.77% | 60.16% |
Benin | Sub-Saharan Africa | 75.09% | 73.93% | 85.14% | 80.37% | 71.90% | 85.85% | 90.20% |
Botswana | Sub-Saharan Africa | 94.18% | 91.27% | 110.49% | 105.90% | 86.75% | 110.12% | 115.42% |
Burkina Faso | Sub-Saharan Africa | 74.54% | 73.51% | 84.56% | 79.69% | 71.00% | 85.06% | 88.52% |
Burundi | Sub-Saharan Africa | 62.81% | 61.10% | 68.75% | 69.49% | 59.83% | 72.65% | 73.73% |
Cabo Verde | Sub-Saharan Africa | 85.24% | 83.38% | 100.46% | 93.21% | 80.16% | 102.25% | 103.47% |
Cameroon | Sub-Saharan Africa | 67.04% | 64.86% | 75.21% | 76.00% | 63.24% | 76.44% | 80.28% |
Central African Republic | Sub-Saharan Africa | 52.63% | 51.48% | 61.31% | 57.11% | 50.14% | 61.60% | 64.21% |
Chad | Sub-Saharan Africa | 56.35% | 56.67% | 66.74% | 60.33% | 53.70% | 68.30% | 69.49% |
Comoros | Sub-Saharan Africa | 75.52% | 74.72% | 87.07% | 82.11% | 71.52% | 88.73% | 91.89% |
Congo, Dem Rep | Sub-Saharan Africa | 39.05% | 36.82% | 42.55% | 41.80% | 35.66% | 41.54% | 45.51% |
Congo, Rep | Sub-Saharan Africa | 57.40% | 57.70% | 66.76% | 61.55% | 54.91% | 67.24% | 69.54% |
Côte d’Ivoire | Sub-Saharan Africa | 85.90% | 82.78% | 97.36% | 98.74% | 81.57% | 101.19% | 103.19% |
Equatorial Guinea | Sub-Saharan Africa | 67.99% | 65.09% | 78.35% | 73.65% | 62.42% | 80.40% | 82.08% |
Eritrea | Sub-Saharan Africa | 28.25% | 26.86% | 31.17% | 31.86% | 26.14% | 31.51% | 33.92% |
Ethiopia | Sub-Saharan Africa | 68.02% | 65.67% | 78.73% | 75.54% | 63.93% | 81.11% | 82.38% |
Gabon | Sub-Saharan Africa | 68.66% | 67.24% | 77.93% | 73.50% | 65.89% | 77.90% | 81.37% |
Gambia, The | Sub-Saharan Africa | 75.26% | 73.24% | 86.70% | 82.31% | 69.99% | 88.29% | 91.58% |
Ghana | Sub-Saharan Africa | 86.48% | 84.20% | 100.43% | 98.79% | 81.99% | 103.40% | 108.13% |
Guinea | Sub-Saharan Africa | 75.42% | 74.94% | 86.75% | 80.34% | 72.03% | 88.83% | 90.59% |
Guinea-Bissau | Sub-Saharan Africa | 67.02% | 64.94% | 76.15% | 71.61% | 63.52% | 78.18% | 80.95% |
Kenya | Sub-Saharan Africa | 105.45% | 99.79% | 121.16% | 123.02% | 100.12% | 124.05% | 128.48% |
Lesotho | Sub-Saharan Africa | 90.36% | 86.90% | 104.26% | 101.84% | 83.81% | 102.49% | 110.79% |
Liberia | Sub-Saharan Africa | 64.47% | 63.11% | 75.52% | 69.22% | 61.43% | 73.92% | 78.65% |
Madagascar | Sub-Saharan Africa | 70.92% | 70.13% | 80.87% | 77.01% | 68.33% | 81.66% | 85.04% |
Malawi | Sub-Saharan Africa | 93.69% | 89.61% | 103.45% | 108.80% | 88.65% | 112.84% | 113.69% |
Mali | Sub-Saharan Africa | 77.11% | 75.14% | 87.34% | 83.09% | 73.21% | 87.25% | 92.79% |
Mauritania | Sub-Saharan Africa | 81.31% | 78.96% | 92.82% | 87.78% | 77.79% | 95.65% | 95.91% |
Mauritius | Sub-Saharan Africa | 109.72% | 107.51% | 132.36% | 122.90% | 103.51% | 134.31% | 134.17% |
Mozambique | Sub-Saharan Africa | 77.88% | 76.90% | 88.82% | 85.23% | 73.58% | 89.74% | 96.03% |
Namibia | Sub-Saharan Africa | 88.00% | 85.24% | 103.75% | 98.36% | 81.85% | 106.37% | 108.53% |
Niger | Sub-Saharan Africa | 79.69% | 77.94% | 89.97% | 85.12% | 76.62% | 92.41% | 93.95% |
Nigeria | Sub-Saharan Africa | 79.68% | 75.33% | 90.77% | 92.31% | 74.21% | 93.27% | 96.16% |
Rwanda | Sub-Saharan Africa | 115.95% | 109.18% | 134.30% | 133.69% | 107.94% | 141.97% | 142.61% |
São Tomé and Príncipe | Sub-Saharan Africa | 67.51% | 66.25% | 77.33% | 73.24% | 63.94% | 77.33% | 81.77% |
Senegal | Sub-Saharan Africa | 79.03% | 76.93% | 88.92% | 84.12% | 75.42% | 91.28% | 93.60% |
Seychelles | Sub-Saharan Africa | 89.43% | 86.67% | 105.20% | 93.95% | 83.46% | 104.58% | 106.66% |
Sierra Leone | Sub-Saharan Africa | 73.19% | 71.48% | 83.62% | 79.48% | 69.74% | 86.37% | 87.12% |
South Africa | Sub-Saharan Africa | 95.11% | 90.87% | 114.80% | 106.11% | 90.06% | 113.07% | 116.14% |
Sudan | Sub-Saharan Africa | 66.67% | 65.27% | 76.43% | 71.77% | 62.70% | 78.46% | 81.41% |
Tanzania | Sub-Saharan Africa | 76.05% | 72.86% | 87.54% | 87.00% | 70.66% | 90.99% | 93.66% |
Togo | Sub-Saharan Africa | 79.19% | 77.01% | 89.08% | 84.49% | 75.50% | 91.72% | 93.45% |
Uganda | Sub-Saharan Africa | 81.49% | 78.62% | 97.03% | 93.43% | 76.37% | 97.58% | 102.65% |
Zambia | Sub-Saharan Africa | 100.30% | 95.89% | 113.87% | 116.32% | 94.82% | 117.30% | 120.33% |
Zimbabwe | Sub-Saharan Africa | 74.35% | 69.94% | 88.72% | 86.22% | 70.06% | 91.16% | 92.22% |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rogge, N., Kolyaseva, A. Measuring and comparing World Bank regions’ ‘ease of doing business’ opportunity sets. J Prod Anal 57, 131–155 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-021-00624-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-021-00624-x