Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Measuring and comparing World Bank regions’ ‘ease of doing business’ opportunity sets

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper measures and compares the World Bank regions’ opportunity sets to promote ease of doing business for the years 2010 and 2019, as well as the time period 2010–2019. We combine the theoretical framework of Verbunt et al. (2020) and the non-parametric frontier estimation approach as proposed by Van Puyenbroeck and Rogge (2020) to construct and assess (changes in) the regions’ opportunity sets and best practice frontiers. The results reveal considerable differences across World Bank regions in ease of doing business, which decrease over the period of study. By 2019, the regions have grouped into two clusters: the leading high income OECD, Europe and Central Asia, and East Asia and Pacific, and the lagging Middle East and North Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean, South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. The results prove to be consistent with the concept of development clustering.

Highlights

  • Estimating regions’ opportunity sets and best practice to promote ease of doing business

  • Measuring differences in regions’ opportunity sets to promote ease of doing business.

  • Advocating a non-parametric frontier approach for constructing opportunity sets.

  • Measuring changes in opportunity sets and best practice for period 2010–2019.

  • Identify considerable differences in EDB best practice frontiers across regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Data for the Ease of Doing Business Index are retrieved from https://www.doingbusiness.org/en/data.

  2. The parameter m was set equal to 5 for all seven World Bank regions to address the potential issue of group-size bias, with regions including different number of countries (e.g. the region Sub-Saharan Africa counts 45 countries, Europe and Central Asia includes 22 countries, Middle East and North Africa 18 countries and South Asia 8 countries) (for more on the potential issue of group-size bias in DEA-based estimations, see e.g., Staat, 2001, 2002).

References

  • Acemoglu D, Collier P, Johnson S, Klein M, & Wheeler G (2013) A Review of Doing Business (Open letter by leading researchers in support of Doing Business).

  • Alesina A, Ardagna S, Nicoletti G, Schiantarelli F (2005) Regulation and investment. J Eur Econ Association 3(4):791–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asmild M, Tam F (2007) Estimating global frontier shifts and global Malmquist indices. J Prod Anal 27(2):137–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard O, Giavazzi F (2003) Macroeconomic effects of regulation and deregulation in goods and labor markets. Quarterly J Econ 118:879–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg J, Cazes S (2007) The doing business indicators: Measurement issues and political implications (Economic and Labour Market Paper No. 2007/6).

  • Berg J, Cazes S (2008) Policymaking gone away: The labor market regulations of the doing business indicators. Comparative Labor Law Policy J 29(4):8–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand M, Kramarz F (2002) Does entry regulation hinder job creation? Evidence from the French retail industry. Quarterly J Econ 117(4):1369–1413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besley T, Persson T (2011) Pillars of Prosperity: The Political Economics of Development Clusters. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Besley T (2015) Law, regulation, and the business climate: The nature and influence of the World Bank Doing Business project. J Econ Perspect 29(3):99–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boedo HJ, Mukoyama T (2012) Evaluating the effects of entry regulations and firing costs on international income differences. J Econ Growth 17(2):143–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borchert I, Gootiiz B, Mattoo A (2012) Policy barriers to international trade in services: Evidence from a new database. World Bank Econ Rev 28(1):162–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunetti A, Kisunko G, Weder B (1998) Credibility of rules and economic growth: Evidence from a worldwide survey of the private sector. World Bank Econ Rev 12(3):353–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cazals C, Florens J-P, Simar L (2002) Nonparametric frontier estimation: A robust approach. J Econ 106(1):1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chari AV (2011) Identifying the aggregate productivity effects of entry and size restrictions: An empirical analysis of license reform in India. American Econ J: Econ Policy 3:66–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Operational Res 2(6):429–444

  • Chemin M (2009) The impact of the judiciary on entrepreneurship: Evaluation of Pakistan’s “Access to Justice Programme”. J Pub Econ 93(1):114–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherchye L, Moesen W, Rogge N, Van Puyenbroeck T (2007) An introduction to ‘benefit of the doubt’ composite indicators. Soc Indicators Res 82(1):111–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran A, Gillanders R (2015) Foreign direct investment and the ease of doing business. Rev World Econ 151(1):103–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crafts N (2006) Regulation and productivity performance. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 22(2):186–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daraio C, Simar L (2007) Advanced Robust and Nonparametric Methods in Efficiency Analysis: Methodology and Applications (Vol. 4). Springer, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis KE, Kruse MB (2008) Taking the measure of law: The case of the doing business project. Law Soc Inq 32(4):1095–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson JW, Seater JJ (2013) Federal regulation and aggregate economic growth. J Econ Growth 18(2):137–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Andrade GH, Bruhn M, Mckenzie D (2013) A helping hand or the long arm of the law? Experimental evidence on what governments can do to formalize firms. World Bank Econ Rev 30(1):24–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu G (1951) The coefficient of resource utilization. Econometrica: J Econometric Soc 19(3):273–292

  • Djankov S (2016) The Doing Business project: How it started. J Econ Perspect 30(1):247–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doing Business (2019) Doing Business 2019: Training for Reform. The World Bank, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Doshi R, Kelley JG, Simmons BA (2019) The power of ranking: the Ease of Doing Business indicator and global regulatory behavior. Int Org 73(3):611–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estevão J, Lopes JD, Penela D, Soares JM (2019) The Doing Business ranking and the GDP. A qualitative study. Journal of Business Research. Forthcoming.

  • Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J Royal Statistical Soc: Series A (General) 120(3):253–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freund C, Rocha N (2011) What constrains Africa’s exports? World Bank Econ Rev 25(3):361–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gielnik MM, Uy MA, Funken R, Bischoff KM (2017) Boosting and sustaining passion: A long-term perspective on the effects of entrepreneurship training. J Business Venturing 32(3):334–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrendorf B, Teixeira A (2011) Barriers to entry and development. Int Econ Rev 52(2):573–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho YP, Wong PK (2007) Financing, regulatory costs, and entrepreneurial propensity. Small Business Econ 28(2–3):187–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horta IM, Camanho AS (2015) A nonparametric methodology for evaluating convergence in a multi-input multi-output setting. Eur J Operational Res 246:554–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin D (2014) Doing business: Using ratings to drive reform. J Int Develop 26(5):658–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic B, Jovanovic B (2018) Ease of doing business and FDI in the ex-socialist countries. Int Econ Econ Policy 15(3):587–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karagiannis G (2017) On aggregate composite indicators. J Operational Res Soc 68(7):741–746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karagiannis G (2021) DEA Models Without Inputs or Outputs: A Tour de Force. In: Parmeter CF, Sickles RC (Eds.) Advances in Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Springer, Cham (Switzerland), p 211–232

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Karagiannis R, Karagiannis G (2018) Intra-and inter-group composite indicators using the BoD model. Socio-Economic Planning. Sciences 61:44–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Klapper L, Love I (2016) The impact of business environment reforms on new registrations of limited liability companies. World Bank Econ Rev 30(2):332–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans TC (1951) An Analysis of Production as an Efficient Combination of Activities. In: Koopmans TC (Ed.) Activity Analysis of Production and Allocation, Cowles Commission for Research in Economics, Monograph No. 13. Wiley, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans TC (1957) Three Essays on the State of Economic Science. McGraw Hill, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawless M (2013) Do complicated tax systems prevent foreign direct investment? Economica 80(317):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S-H, Yamakawa Y, Peng MW, Barney JB (2011) How do bankruptcy laws affect entrepreneurship development around the world? J Business Venturing 26(5):505–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maričić M, Bulajić M, Radojičić Z, Jeremić V (2019) Shedding light on the Doing Business Index: A machine learning approach. Business Sys Res 10(2):73–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormack G (2018) Why ‘Doing Business’ with the World Bank may be bad for you. Eur Business Org Law Rev 19:649–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicoletti G, Scarpetta S (2003) Regulation, productivity and growth: OECD evidence. Econ Policy 18(36):9–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poschke M (2010) The regulation of entry and aggregate productivity. Econ J 120(549):1175–1200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quintin E (2008) Limited enforcement and the organization of production. J Macroecon 30(3):1222–1245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogge N (2018) On aggregating benefit of the doubt composite indicators. Eur J Operational Res 264(1):364–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogge N, Archer G (2021) Measuring and analyzing country change in establishing ease of doing business using a revised version of World Bank’s ease of doing business index. Eur J Operational Res 290(1):373–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz F, Cabello JM, Perez-Gladish B (2018) Building Ease-of-Doing-Business synthetic indicators using a double reference point approach. Technol Forecasting Soc Change 131:130–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane S (1992) Why do some societies invent more than others? J Business Venturing 7(1):29–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shephard RW (1970) Theory of cost and production functions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Staat M (2001) The effect of sample size on the mean efficiency in DEA: Comment. J Prod Anal 15(2):129–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staat M (2002) Bootstrapped efficiency estimates for a model for groups and hierarchies in DEA. Eur J Operational Res 138(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Puyenbroeck T (2018) On the output orientation of the benefit-of-the-doubt-model. Soc Indicators Res 139(2):415–431

  • Van Puyenbroeck T, Rogge N (2020) Comparing regional human development using global frontier difference indices. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 70:100663

  • Verbunt P, Rogge N, Van Puyenbroeck T (2022) Non-parametric estimation and evaluation of capability sets. Oxford Economic Papers 74(1):265–296

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicky Rogge.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Country EBD composite scores (year 2010)

Country

Region

\(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{EAP}\)

\(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{ECA}\)

\(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{LAC}\)

\(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{MENA}\)

\(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{OECD}\)

\(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{SA}\)

\(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{SSA}\)

Brunei Darussalam

East Asia and Pacific

90.91%

104.52%

102.45%

97.19%

84.30%

117.16%

122.02%

Cambodia

East Asia and Pacific

81.97%

90.50%

91.71%

94.11%

75.54%

103.88%

107.46%

China

East Asia and Pacific

86.46%

92.83%

96.59%

95.81%

77.04%

110.31%

111.50%

Fiji

East Asia and Pacific

103.27%

112.45%

113.97%

117.94%

91.35%

132.64%

139.18%

Hong Kong SAR, China

East Asia and Pacific

129.42%

143.20%

145.88%

155.81%

117.93%

169.62%

177.73%

Indonesia

East Asia and Pacific

86.83%

95.73%

96.93%

102.39%

79.94%

114.03%

121.19%

Kiribati

East Asia and Pacific

94.76%

109.04%

107.52%

106.51%

88.03%

122.43%

124.41%

Lao PDR

East Asia and Pacific

72.89%

79.36%

80.04%

80.15%

66.27%

89.59%

92.06%

Malaysia

East Asia and Pacific

115.95%

125.60%

130.76%

141.58%

106.91%

151.89%

161.35%

Marshall Islands

East Asia and Pacific

85.97%

94.40%

93.92%

90.41%

78.06%

107.01%

110.44%

Micronesia, Fed Sts

East Asia and Pacific

81.43%

91.48%

89.00%

86.67%

73.97%

101.81%

105.65%

Mongolia

East Asia and Pacific

90.81%

97.48%

102.07%

102.33%

82.09%

116.95%

118.31%

Palau

East Asia and Pacific

63.27%

66.60%

69.84%

73.04%

56.25%

82.11%

85.62%

Papua New Guinea

East Asia and Pacific

87.71%

98.31%

96.82%

96.93%

80.79%

110.43%

114.29%

Philippines

East Asia and Pacific

87.82%

101.32%

96.39%

94.94%

81.81%

114.06%

116.27%

Samoa

East Asia and Pacific

100.73%

114.77%

110.04%

113.15%

92.99%

126.95%

133.79%

Singapore

East Asia and Pacific

125.68%

144.35%

146.91%

153.95%

120.55%

168.92%

175.20%

Solomon Islands

East Asia and Pacific

84.60%

94.38%

93.26%

91.63%

75.96%

105.55%

109.07%

Taiwan, China

East Asia and Pacific

105.37%

119.57%

117.47%

117.10%

96.62%

137.07%

144.59%

Thailand

East Asia and Pacific

112.33%

123.90%

124.70%

127.37%

102.44%

143.29%

149.71%

Timor-Leste

East Asia and Pacific

32.87%

35.14%

38.54%

38.71%

30.01%

41.08%

40.46%

Tonga

East Asia and Pacific

99.42%

113.69%

111.38%

108.83%

91.16%

126.18%

130.09%

Vanuatu

East Asia and Pacific

95.05%

108.74%

105.99%

105.32%

87.31%

118.27%

124.59%

Vietnam

East Asia and Pacific

90.15%

100.45%

102.21%

104.39%

81.47%

117.89%

123.24%

Albania

Europe and Central Asia

98.30%

102.77%

107.67%

116.81%

87.97%

126.02%

131.98%

Armenia

Europe and Central Asia

97.13%

102.10%

107.48%

105.93%

87.42%

120.80%

128.67%

Azerbaijan

Europe and Central Asia

97.60%

101.81%

108.43%

107.75%

88.25%

121.27%

126.38%

Belarus

Europe and Central Asia

78.89%

85.45%

89.18%

84.39%

70.91%

96.65%

96.14%

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Europe and Central Asia

79.99%

84.52%

89.26%

92.93%

71.03%

105.33%

108.47%

Bulgaria

Europe and Central Asia

110.65%

116.44%

121.19%

131.20%

97.58%

142.59%

148.05%

Croatia

Europe and Central Asia

91.36%

101.71%

101.97%

104.89%

82.49%

117.96%

124.41%

Cyprus

Europe and Central Asia

94.54%

105.60%

105.61%

107.65%

87.08%

125.62%

129.90%

Georgia

Europe and Central Asia

117.29%

126.35%

129.18%

130.00%

103.70%

148.99%

158.66%

Kazakhstan

Europe and Central Asia

59.54%

65.16%

65.57%

63.73%

53.84%

78.47%

77.64%

Kosovo

Europe and Central Asia

86.42%

93.93%

96.42%

102.17%

76.95%

111.59%

113.59%

Kyrgyz Republic

Europe and Central Asia

81.09%

88.10%

89.30%

92.39%

72.83%

106.20%

111.26%

Macedonia, FYR

Europe and Central Asia

98.13%

108.39%

108.51%

111.60%

89.88%

125.81%

131.24%

Moldova

Europe and Central Asia

94.44%

98.84%

106.52%

104.88%

84.46%

117.06%

118.88%

Montenegro

Europe and Central Asia

93.15%

99.07%

103.51%

111.61%

83.75%

121.13%

129.18%

Romania

Europe and Central Asia

101.60%

107.17%

112.34%

120.27%

89.66%

132.97%

136.99%

Russian Federation

Europe and Central Asia

76.65%

85.00%

85.86%

85.71%

69.82%

96.29%

99.45%

Serbia

Europe and Central Asia

87.01%

93.33%

95.79%

100.72%

77.50%

111.41%

118.06%

Tajikistan

Europe and Central Asia

34.69%

38.37%

38.44%

37.91%

32.11%

46.43%

45.03%

Turkey

Europe and Central Asia

101.26%

110.72%

113.40%

115.37%

90.99%

130.51%

136.27%

Ukraine

Europe and Central Asia

42.51%

49.26%

47.53%

46.78%

39.58%

50.70%

53.40%

Uzbekistan

Europe and Central Asia

34.25%

37.62%

38.00%

37.86%

31.59%

45.49%

45.54%

Antigua and Barbuda

Latin America and Caribbean

97.51%

112.22%

105.86%

109.31%

91.01%

124.63%

130.28%

Argentina

Latin America and Caribbean

87.11%

96.22%

99.46%

102.52%

79.10%

114.72%

117.50%

Bahamas, The

Latin America and Caribbean

92.48%

106.10%

103.89%

102.90%

85.80%

122.05%

127.77%

Belize

Latin America and Caribbean

90.35%

103.27%

98.22%

96.47%

81.70%

114.98%

119.95%

Bolivia

Latin America and Caribbean

69.94%

78.90%

78.65%

76.14%

63.57%

89.60%

89.64%

Brazil

Latin America and Caribbean

86.56%

98.78%

94.10%

95.03%

81.66%

110.21%

115.33%

Colombia

Latin America and Caribbean

100.41%

111.26%

110.08%

115.28%

91.63%

127.90%

130.82%

Costa Rica

Latin America and Caribbean

88.15%

98.27%

97.75%

94.80%

80.16%

113.52%

118.99%

Dominica

Latin America and Caribbean

98.84%

110.66%

105.89%

111.25%

89.67%

123.31%

132.59%

Dominican Republic

Latin America and Caribbean

98.97%

110.18%

110.07%

111.56%

88.77%

131.04%

132.98%

Ecuador

Latin America and Caribbean

92.01%

101.63%

101.71%

100.18%

82.89%

116.86%

122.32%

El Salvador

Latin America and Caribbean

93.88%

97.62%

102.82%

106.67%

81.82%

120.05%

126.53%

Grenada

Latin America and Caribbean

95.25%

108.41%

102.34%

107.17%

88.23%

120.29%

125.73%

Guatemala

Latin America and Caribbean

98.94%

106.38%

106.57%

116.59%

87.86%

124.72%

132.02%

Guyana

Latin America and Caribbean

87.81%

94.68%

98.68%

100.41%

79.49%

115.61%

114.93%

Haiti

Latin America and Caribbean

68.68%

77.00%

76.59%

77.45%

62.34%

86.78%

88.14%

Honduras

Latin America and Caribbean

92.64%

102.35%

102.22%

109.88%

82.56%

119.40%

124.90%

Jamaica

Latin America and Caribbean

89.64%

98.94%

97.47%

99.85%

82.61%

111.36%

118.50%

Mexico

Latin America and Caribbean

93.35%

101.72%

103.77%

109.32%

84.36%

123.18%

131.17%

Nicaragua

Latin America and Caribbean

81.09%

91.83%

93.08%

94.44%

73.85%

107.66%

111.38%

Panama

Latin America and Caribbean

99.88%

113.50%

110.07%

114.00%

91.14%

129.60%

138.04%

Paraguay

Latin America and Caribbean

94.62%

106.04%

104.84%

106.65%

86.82%

118.58%

124.29%

Peru

Latin America and Caribbean

108.65%

115.61%

118.40%

126.66%

95.02%

138.56%

145.76%

Puerto Rico US

Latin America and Caribbean

104.54%

113.18%

115.85%

126.40%

94.76%

135.74%

142.62%

St Kitts and Nevis

Latin America and Caribbean

99.37%

113.43%

105.80%

108.80%

91.47%

124.87%

130.80%

St Lucia

Latin America and Caribbean

97.14%

111.74%

105.58%

109.27%

90.02%

121.47%

127.96%

St Vincent & the Grenadines

Latin America and Caribbean

102.15%

118.43%

110.35%

112.92%

94.37%

129.59%

134.57%

Suriname

Latin America and Caribbean

67.10%

76.90%

75.94%

72.11%

61.94%

86.48%

88.89%

Trinidad and Tobago

Latin America and Caribbean

97.19%

106.74%

106.34%

115.35%

88.68%

125.01%

130.31%

Uruguay

Latin America and Caribbean

90.95%

101.52%

97.60%

102.10%

82.45%

114.56%

123.38%

Venezuela, RB

Latin America and Caribbean

53.01%

57.44%

60.07%

59.86%

47.75%

68.49%

67.87%

Algeria

Middle East and North Africa

71.12%

78.52%

78.64%

79.20%

63.83%

92.98%

93.39%

Bahrain

Middle East and North Africa

103.02%

113.94%

115.08%

105.49%

92.27%

131.70%

130.24%

Djibouti

Middle East and North Africa

52.76%

57.25%

58.66%

61.34%

47.63%

70.83%

71.82%

Egypt, Arab Rep

Middle East and North Africa

89.45%

98.73%

97.74%

98.93%

81.48%

112.06%

118.58%

Iran, Islamic Rep

Middle East and North Africa

88.16%

96.74%

97.78%

99.26%

79.63%

112.15%

116.03%

Iraq

Middle East and North Africa

68.55%

77.05%

76.68%

73.53%

62.78%

88.51%

89.60%

Jordan

Middle East and North Africa

77.13%

83.54%

85.05%

85.00%

69.21%

100.20%

101.78%

Kuwait

Middle East and North Africa

95.89%

108.18%

108.72%

102.06%

88.69%

122.29%

124.00%

Lebanon

Middle East and North Africa

92.43%

105.57%

105.30%

103.34%

86.08%

119.87%

126.79%

Morocco

Middle East and North Africa

89.61%

100.20%

98.00%

99.06%

82.16%

115.82%

120.76%

Oman

Middle East and North Africa

102.13%

113.22%

114.78%

104.46%

92.10%

131.06%

130.07%

Qatar

Middle East and North Africa

95.20%

104.79%

106.71%

99.15%

85.66%

121.98%

123.79%

Saudi Arabia

Middle East and North Africa

110.70%

123.31%

123.17%

119.87%

100.49%

141.09%

143.22%

Syrian Arab Republic

Middle East and North Africa

70.51%

77.73%

77.63%

78.39%

63.88%

91.65%

93.16%

Tunisia

Middle East and North Africa

98.04%

107.86%

108.13%

106.77%

88.76%

127.34%

129.42%

United Arab Emirates

Middle East and North Africa

109.99%

121.91%

122.78%

114.21%

98.89%

143.43%

144.65%

West Bank and Gaza

Middle East and North Africa

80.78%

87.90%

90.82%

88.87%

73.73%

103.23%

104.27%

Yemen, Rep

Middle East and North Africa

79.19%

85.43%

87.63%

89.67%

70.30%

101.33%

103.22%

Australia

OECD high income

117.73%

128.56%

132.38%

139.33%

103.27%

154.38%

161.14%

Austria

OECD high income

111.62%

121.93%

126.50%

129.83%

99.77%

147.24%

152.68%

Belgium

OECD high income

103.75%

114.44%

118.27%

119.53%

95.56%

136.23%

137.25%

Canada

OECD high income

114.49%

126.42%

128.65%

136.18%

104.70%

148.36%

155.98%

Chile

OECD high income

105.63%

116.81%

116.93%

117.23%

94.35%

137.02%

137.64%

Czech Republic

OECD high income

98.92%

107.07%

110.39%

114.58%

87.13%

129.99%

136.85%

Denmark

OECD high income

120.42%

136.18%

133.88%

138.97%

106.65%

156.47%

166.59%

Estonia

OECD high income

117.19%

128.68%

128.54%

128.60%

102.96%

152.95%

157.93%

Finland

OECD high income

114.59%

126.62%

128.29%

131.65%

101.69%

151.03%

158.97%

France

OECD high income

103.12%

116.99%

118.07%

119.15%

94.45%

137.30%

142.62%

Germany

OECD high income

114.01%

130.36%

128.07%

134.55%

103.18%

149.54%

155.96%

Greece

OECD high income

92.45%

105.20%

102.07%

101.50%

83.90%

119.89%

124.73%

Hungary

OECD high income

100.22%

108.84%

112.48%

117.47%

89.53%

132.02%

135.51%

Iceland

OECD high income

115.12%

128.94%

132.28%

135.25%

104.22%

151.72%

159.01%

Ireland

OECD high income

119.44%

133.13%

134.40%

143.44%

109.18%

156.83%

165.20%

Israel

OECD high income

107.45%

117.52%

120.39%

131.15%

98.85%

140.70%

148.04%

Italy

OECD high income

96.79%

106.69%

106.44%

107.32%

87.85%

125.79%

128.54%

Japan

OECD high income

110.26%

122.83%

123.42%

129.78%

100.65%

145.09%

153.41%

Korea, Rep

OECD high income

117.88%

133.45%

130.68%

134.70%

105.54%

152.82%

162.06%

Latvia

OECD high income

117.38%

124.30%

130.90%

138.74%

102.00%

153.06%

156.55%

Lithuania

OECD high income

112.68%

120.04%

124.53%

125.25%

98.71%

144.68%

149.94%

Luxembourg

OECD high income

95.11%

107.00%

111.89%

114.09%

87.43%

127.54%

126.77%

Netherlands

OECD high income

105.58%

117.79%

120.41%

122.74%

95.27%

140.84%

145.60%

New Zealand

OECD high income

134.63%

146.03%

149.80%

157.99%

120.29%

171.07%

180.83%

Norway

OECD high income

118.60%

130.64%

131.94%

132.31%

105.44%

153.16%

154.28%

Poland

OECD high income

102.44%

107.32%

111.95%

123.01%

90.35%

132.53%

139.06%

Portugal

OECD high income

100.84%

110.84%

113.18%

115.22%

91.36%

134.49%

135.19%

Slovak Republic

OECD high income

107.23%

112.45%

117.55%

120.18%

94.60%

135.84%

143.70%

Slovenia

OECD high income

91.70%

100.49%

98.80%

104.78%

84.45%

115.65%

120.26%

Spain

OECD high income

99.62%

108.73%

110.57%

114.61%

88.95%

130.88%

136.04%

Sweden

OECD high income

117.87%

133.05%

130.92%

133.05%

105.52%

153.50%

162.63%

Switzerland

OECD high income

112.30%

123.63%

123.80%

128.46%

99.97%

144.04%

150.81%

United Kingdom

OECD high income

123.39%

135.49%

137.55%

150.29%

109.93%

161.64%

172.12%

United States

OECD high income

127.29%

136.55%

141.56%

151.52%

113.52%

165.49%

176.01%

Afghanistan

South Asia

54.93%

61.54%

61.49%

62.60%

51.67%

69.21%

69.51%

Bangladesh

South Asia

68.34%

76.39%

77.13%

78.71%

63.91%

88.67%

89.13%

Bhutan

South Asia

91.02%

103.12%

104.27%

104.30%

83.40%

111.01%

116.51%

India

South Asia

75.30%

81.63%

82.82%

87.35%

66.88%

95.84%

97.92%

Maldives

South Asia

86.92%

97.17%

98.16%

92.13%

79.38%

105.78%

111.52%

Nepal

South Asia

92.29%

101.37%

102.01%

98.80%

82.82%

109.15%

117.90%

Pakistan

South Asia

81.10%

89.23%

87.66%

92.68%

74.41%

101.12%

105.73%

Sri Lanka

South Asia

86.17%

96.21%

93.14%

97.10%

77.17%

107.16%

117.29%

Angola

Sub-Saharan Africa

63.25%

68.66%

68.74%

69.97%

57.27%

77.12%

79.80%

Benin

Sub-Saharan Africa

60.85%

67.14%

65.97%

65.02%

55.05%

76.80%

78.37%

Botswana

Sub-Saharan Africa

97.50%

104.82%

108.18%

109.44%

86.87%

121.84%

126.78%

Burkina Faso

Sub-Saharan Africa

61.35%

69.18%

68.95%

67.12%

54.94%

76.73%

77.70%

Burundi

Sub-Saharan Africa

56.10%

58.83%

61.58%

60.10%

50.54%

69.55%

69.27%

Cabo Verde

Sub-Saharan Africa

84.26%

94.94%

96.58%

98.22%

76.85%

111.94%

110.75%

Cameroon

Sub-Saharan Africa

68.55%

78.28%

73.87%

74.20%

63.77%

86.28%

87.76%

Central African Republic

Sub-Saharan Africa

37.31%

42.85%

41.09%

40.50%

34.96%

47.86%

48.56%

Chad

Sub-Saharan Africa

46.52%

52.38%

51.85%

50.40%

42.82%

58.32%

58.73%

Comoros

Sub-Saharan Africa

74.75%

83.51%

81.31%

80.94%

67.75%

91.28%

94.00%

Congo, Dem Rep

Sub-Saharan Africa

54.33%

60.93%

59.13%

58.58%

49.95%

66.06%

67.51%

Congo, Rep

Sub-Saharan Africa

58.48%

65.20%

64.98%

62.00%

53.18%

72.22%

73.07%

Côte d’Ivoire

Sub-Saharan Africa

62.31%

67.47%

71.35%

72.76%

56.41%

79.79%

78.74%

Equatorial Guinea

Sub-Saharan Africa

74.00%

81.99%

81.98%

83.51%

66.23%

93.05%

92.66%

Eritrea

Sub-Saharan Africa

37.58%

42.01%

41.79%

41.55%

34.50%

45.17%

46.27%

Ethiopia

Sub-Saharan Africa

63.35%

71.30%

72.27%

73.13%

58.62%

81.16%

82.20%

Gabon

Sub-Saharan Africa

71.77%

79.68%

79.23%

78.19%

64.30%

93.43%

93.63%

Gambia, The

Sub-Saharan Africa

74.55%

82.97%

83.26%

82.85%

67.25%

96.78%

95.94%

Ghana

Sub-Saharan Africa

97.58%

103.58%

108.11%

108.55%

87.54%

122.60%

124.63%

Guinea

Sub-Saharan Africa

56.92%

63.61%

64.77%

64.90%

51.57%

74.83%

74.35%

Guinea-Bissau

Sub-Saharan Africa

39.01%

41.23%

41.91%

42.66%

35.63%

47.65%

49.11%

Kenya

Sub-Saharan Africa

91.89%

101.33%

99.55%

102.25%

82.79%

112.74%

119.48%

Lesotho

Sub-Saharan Africa

77.48%

88.36%

88.44%

85.46%

72.13%

96.67%

98.88%

Liberia

Sub-Saharan Africa

66.70%

73.76%

74.43%

73.64%

61.89%

83.18%

85.85%

Madagascar

Sub-Saharan Africa

64.98%

72.86%

73.09%

75.76%

60.06%

85.54%

86.11%

Malawi

Sub-Saharan Africa

72.28%

84.27%

81.12%

78.26%

67.12%

90.36%

93.65%

Mali

Sub-Saharan Africa

65.82%

73.89%

74.19%

75.09%

60.01%

84.19%

86.36%

Mauritania

Sub-Saharan Africa

64.53%

69.85%

72.72%

69.87%

57.62%

80.30%

81.07%

Mauritius

Sub-Saharan Africa

106.92%

122.78%

121.37%

124.18%

101.44%

140.69%

141.29%

Mozambique

Sub-Saharan Africa

77.36%

85.76%

84.93%

87.47%

69.77%

98.25%

100.73%

Namibia

Sub-Saharan Africa

99.51%

109.84%

109.39%

112.83%

88.42%

126.52%

131.28%

Niger

Sub-Saharan Africa

58.72%

63.48%

65.57%

64.00%

52.36%

73.01%

73.25%

Nigeria

Sub-Saharan Africa

67.19%

70.80%

73.32%

76.83%

61.53%

82.46%

88.03%

Rwanda

Sub-Saharan Africa

93.34%

101.05%

104.48%

104.30%

84.55%

116.99%

118.45%

São Tomé and Príncipe

Sub-Saharan Africa

64.82%

73.17%

70.55%

71.44%

59.40%

85.00%

86.09%

Senegal

Sub-Saharan Africa

62.95%

70.11%

69.46%

68.55%

57.78%

83.05%

84.21%

Seychelles

Sub-Saharan Africa

90.78%

101.12%

101.75%

101.51%

81.97%

119.68%

118.54%

Sierra Leone

Sub-Saharan Africa

65.17%

73.21%

71.48%

72.90%

60.61%

81.57%

83.70%

South Africa

Sub-Saharan Africa

106.89%

118.09%

119.42%

127.35%

97.16%

136.06%

142.10%

Sudan

Sub-Saharan Africa

74.78%

80.51%

83.64%

78.84%

67.66%

91.44%

93.07%

Tanzania

Sub-Saharan Africa

83.09%

90.82%

94.78%

96.33%

75.75%

106.75%

106.65%

Togo

Sub-Saharan Africa

56.91%

62.45%

63.80%

63.41%

52.52%

74.89%

75.08%

Uganda

Sub-Saharan Africa

73.65%

83.09%

84.10%

83.02%

68.29%

93.39%

96.05%

Zambia

Sub-Saharan Africa

83.02%

93.28%

93.35%

95.13%

76.32%

106.73%

109.09%

Zimbabwe

Sub-Saharan Africa

66.30%

71.33%

74.75%

76.58%

59.63%

87.32%

88.80%

  1. Note: \(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{EAP}\): robust country EDB composite indicator score relative to the best practice frontier of East Asia and Pacific region; \(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{ECA}\): robust country EDB composite indicator score relative to the best practice frontier of Europe and Central Asia region; \(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{LAC}\): robust country EDB composite indicator score relative to the best practice frontier of Latin America and Caribbean region; \(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{MENA}\): robust country EDB composite indicator score relative to the best practice frontier of Middle East and North Africa region; \(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{OECD}\): robust country EDB composite indicator score relative to the best practice frontier of High Income OECD region; \(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{SA}\): robust country EDB composite indicator score relative to the best practice frontier of South Asia region; \(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{SSA}\): robust country EDB composite indicator score relative to the best practice frontier of Sub-Saharan Africa region.

Appendix 2: Country EBD composite scores (year 2019)

Country

Region

\(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{EAP}\)

\(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{ECA}\)

\(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{LAC}\)

\(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{MENA}\)

\(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{OECD}\)

\(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{SA}\)

\(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{SSA}\)

Brunei Darussalam

East Asia and Pacific

108.67%

104.20%

121.06%

126.96%

102.46%

129.49%

131.55%

Cambodia

East Asia and Pacific

83.41%

79.39%

92.42%

96.97%

78.36%

98.66%

101.44%

China

East Asia and Pacific

104.15%

102.53%

124.06%

116.22%

98.41%

127.05%

130.76%

Fiji

East Asia and Pacific

84.74%

81.47%

98.09%

94.93%

78.10%

101.32%

104.52%

Hong Kong SAR, China

East Asia and Pacific

117.98%

115.25%

140.95%

134.56%

110.22%

140.59%

147.37%

Indonesia

East Asia and Pacific

93.40%

93.06%

110.76%

108.96%

90.24%

113.51%

120.42%

Kiribati

East Asia and Pacific

73.03%

71.28%

84.67%

80.20%

68.56%

86.96%

88.10%

Lao PDR

East Asia and Pacific

80.85%

77.67%

93.06%

92.01%

75.06%

95.25%

100.39%

Malaysia

East Asia and Pacific

112.26%

111.25%

134.64%

130.83%

108.05%

138.12%

143.40%

Marshall Islands

East Asia and Pacific

79.61%

77.09%

93.33%

87.25%

74.95%

93.27%

98.21%

Micronesia, Fed Sts

East Asia and Pacific

74.53%

71.15%

86.34%

82.10%

68.26%

82.83%

91.28%

Mongolia

East Asia and Pacific

100.25%

96.39%

118.15%

117.74%

95.43%

123.88%

125.81%

Palau

East Asia and Pacific

82.31%

79.31%

97.36%

89.58%

77.00%

97.54%

101.22%

Papua New Guinea

East Asia and Pacific

88.21%

84.74%

101.61%

102.64%

83.66%

104.50%

109.78%

Philippines

East Asia and Pacific

54.76%

54.31%

59.44%

64.33%

52.87%

65.96%

67.00%

Samoa

East Asia and Pacific

92.33%

89.46%

107.61%

99.75%

87.21%

109.94%

114.07%

Singapore

East Asia and Pacific

117.03%

114.84%

141.66%

135.27%

111.56%

146.22%

148.91%

Solomon Islands

East Asia and Pacific

87.65%

85.77%

103.53%

93.74%

82.03%

101.85%

106.77%

Taiwan, China

East Asia and Pacific

109.47%

108.48%

130.64%

120.95%

103.76%

135.05%

138.04%

Thailand

East Asia and Pacific

107.65%

107.83%

128.42%

122.34%

102.70%

130.34%

136.14%

Timor-Leste

East Asia and Pacific

53.75%

51.48%

61.59%

58.66%

50.55%

62.57%

64.77%

Tonga

East Asia and Pacific

92.76%

90.82%

107.35%

106.24%

88.33%

109.67%

114.13%

Vanuatu

East Asia and Pacific

92.43%

87.08%

106.61%

107.26%

86.80%

111.35%

115.13%

Vietnam

East Asia and Pacific

98.71%

97.77%

115.07%

116.94%

94.92%

119.29%

126.76%

Albania

Europe and Central Asia

100.09%

95.66%

116.54%

114.24%

93.62%

116.10%

124.91%

Armenia

Europe and Central Asia

108.90%

103.66%

127.02%

121.87%

100.72%

131.13%

138.45%

Azerbaijan

Europe and Central Asia

111.90%

105.78%

133.80%

129.37%

106.06%

136.90%

139.85%

Belarus

Europe and Central Asia

110.81%

103.98%

127.74%

119.69%

100.36%

130.24%

135.03%

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Europe and Central Asia

92.93%

88.28%

106.89%

105.48%

85.41%

107.14%

113.33%

Bulgaria

Europe and Central Asia

102.98%

98.57%

119.84%

116.09%

95.09%

120.64%

126.57%

Croatia

Europe and Central Asia

104.15%

99.09%

119.98%

115.11%

95.35%

121.98%

127.46%

Cyprus

Europe and Central Asia

98.33%

95.08%

117.01%

113.20%

91.63%

116.25%

122.31%

Georgia

Europe and Central Asia

119.27%

112.35%

142.18%

137.90%

112.14%

145.97%

151.13%

Kazakhstan

Europe and Central Asia

111.24%

105.80%

133.00%

122.99%

106.31%

137.75%

140.09%

Kosovo

Europe and Central Asia

106.35%

100.04%

122.63%

123.04%

100.11%

129.53%

130.75%

Kyrgyz Republic

Europe and Central Asia

99.69%

94.84%

116.80%

112.80%

92.79%

121.31%

125.61%

Macedonia, FYR

Europe and Central Asia

113.83%

108.80%

135.07%

134.75%

108.41%

137.78%

143.11%

Moldova

Europe and Central Asia

104.64%

99.90%

124.18%

119.52%

97.45%

126.58%

130.54%

Montenegro

Europe and Central Asia

105.12%

98.51%

120.09%

122.40%

98.43%

127.38%

131.61%

Romania

Europe and Central Asia

104.09%

99.76%

121.68%

121.94%

97.73%

124.98%

129.75%

Russian Federation

Europe and Central Asia

110.40%

105.27%

129.27%

126.48%

104.03%

133.38%

139.28%

Serbia

Europe and Central Asia

104.90%

100.82%

120.56%

119.02%

96.92%

121.16%

130.11%

Tajikistan

Europe and Central Asia

83.69%

82.06%

98.59%

91.64%

80.14%

101.80%

101.71%

Turkey

Europe and Central Asia

106.67%

102.34%

127.77%

124.52%

101.20%

130.85%

136.06%

Ukraine

Europe and Central Asia

99.56%

95.91%

116.27%

116.34%

93.58%

120.21%

123.33%

Uzbekistan

Europe and Central Asia

97.15%

93.99%

113.25%

108.87%

91.22%

115.39%

120.81%

Antigua and Barbuda

Latin America and Caribbean

83.62%

82.36%

97.75%

94.31%

79.48%

101.46%

103.37%

Argentina

Latin America and Caribbean

84.19%

81.73%

99.78%

95.13%

80.02%

102.17%

104.19%

Bahamas, The

Latin America and Caribbean

81.93%

80.50%

96.15%

88.23%

77.30%

96.66%

100.95%

Belize

Latin America and Caribbean

79.33%

76.74%

90.88%

84.73%

73.68%

90.44%

96.27%

Bolivia

Latin America and Caribbean

69.98%

67.99%

81.45%

76.85%

64.94%

81.96%

86.05%

Brazil

Latin America and Caribbean

85.20%

84.31%

101.39%

93.12%

80.94%

105.05%

105.58%

Colombia

Latin America and Caribbean

103.15%

97.20%

114.33%

119.54%

95.99%

121.94%

123.44%

Costa Rica

Latin America and Caribbean

103.56%

97.92%

115.75%

119.46%

97.52%

124.59%

129.52%

Dominica

Latin America and Caribbean

86.69%

85.01%

99.83%

93.88%

81.79%

102.91%

108.48%

Dominican Republic

Latin America and Caribbean

89.52%

85.65%

102.13%

97.63%

82.51%

103.69%

108.57%

Ecuador

Latin America and Caribbean

83.93%

82.17%

98.73%

93.29%

78.66%

101.53%

106.04%

El Salvador

Latin America and Caribbean

97.13%

91.27%

109.70%

111.21%

90.75%

114.08%

121.36%

Grenada

Latin America and Caribbean

80.68%

78.34%

92.31%

87.89%

76.99%

96.22%

97.38%

Guatemala

Latin America and Caribbean

91.95%

88.01%

103.28%

106.56%

87.10%

109.08%

113.70%

Guyana

Latin America and Caribbean

82.53%

80.08%

96.50%

93.53%

78.87%

99.35%

99.85%

Haiti

Latin America and Caribbean

56.75%

54.01%

62.81%

63.41%

52.46%

64.60%

68.24%

Honduras

Latin America and Caribbean

90.68%

86.82%

99.02%

105.92%

85.70%

108.86%

110.53%

Jamaica

Latin America and Caribbean

97.42%

93.04%

107.90%

114.35%

92.68%

115.15%

118.97%

Mexico

Latin America and Caribbean

105.39%

99.16%

117.43%

122.70%

98.28%

126.74%

130.09%

Nicaragua

Latin America and Caribbean

79.92%

77.19%

93.68%

89.75%

75.06%

94.04%

100.78%

Panama

Latin America and Caribbean

98.02%

93.63%

109.56%

113.10%

91.94%

115.58%

121.63%

Paraguay

Latin America and Caribbean

83.36%

82.53%

97.76%

91.04%

79.03%

101.17%

103.09%

Peru

Latin America and Caribbean

99.35%

94.33%

115.27%

116.40%

93.41%

120.64%

124.07%

Puerto Rico US

Latin America and Caribbean

100.72%

95.96%

110.51%

117.30%

94.68%

121.71%

121.28%

St Kitts and Nevis

Latin America and Caribbean

80.92%

78.43%

93.05%

89.71%

75.46%

97.20%

99.55%

St Lucia

Latin America and Caribbean

87.36%

86.36%

100.20%

95.87%

82.87%

102.97%

107.71%

St Vincent & the Grenadines

Latin America and Caribbean

83.31%

81.62%

96.01%

93.62%

78.99%

100.71%

102.42%

Suriname

Latin America and Caribbean

61.32%

59.89%

69.79%

70.02%

57.43%

71.92%

76.31%

Trinidad and Tobago

Latin America and Caribbean

86.54%

85.44%

100.99%

98.87%

82.72%

101.91%

107.82%

Uruguay

Latin America and Caribbean

88.93%

86.92%

102.30%

99.48%

84.42%

104.37%

111.79%

Venezuela, RB

Latin America and Caribbean

40.72%

40.01%

47.29%

43.78%

37.98%

46.77%

49.98%

Algeria

Middle East and North Africa

61.62%

59.79%

69.30%

69.35%

58.00%

73.00%

74.50%

Bahrain

Middle East and North Africa

101.69%

98.59%

120.26%

107.94%

94.32%

121.88%

122.27%

Djibouti

Middle East and North Africa

87.87%

85.44%

104.07%

97.14%

85.20%

102.74%

106.99%

Egypt, Arab Rep

Middle East and North Africa

84.59%

82.26%

98.43%

96.76%

79.78%

99.38%

105.02%

Iran, Islamic Rep

Middle East and North Africa

81.88%

80.11%

96.20%

90.33%

76.56%

98.65%

102.38%

Iraq

Middle East and North Africa

49.88%

48.13%

54.31%

57.10%

46.89%

59.10%

59.40%

Jordan

Middle East and North Africa

87.75%

85.56%

100.91%

95.35%

81.86%

102.90%

109.31%

Kuwait

Middle East and North Africa

92.72%

90.60%

107.99%

96.41%

86.68%

108.30%

110.58%

Lebanon

Middle East and North Africa

78.06%

75.38%

91.59%

84.66%

73.84%

92.01%

96.18%

Morocco

Middle East and North Africa

99.29%

97.31%

116.56%

107.45%

92.76%

117.68%

121.22%

Oman

Middle East and North Africa

95.78%

93.16%

111.70%

101.98%

89.39%

112.34%

117.00%

Qatar

Middle East and North Africa

96.21%

93.18%

112.46%

97.54%

89.82%

111.06%

116.50%

Saudi Arabia

Middle East and North Africa

99.07%

95.12%

118.10%

107.31%

94.96%

120.84%

122.28%

Syrian Arab Republic

Middle East and North Africa

63.82%

61.70%

73.90%

69.64%

59.76%

74.10%

75.91%

Tunisia

Middle East and North Africa

92.61%

90.62%

107.31%

100.35%

87.92%

110.52%

113.87%

United Arab Emirates

Middle East and North Africa

117.54%

113.96%

139.89%

127.08%

108.83%

141.50%

146.20%

West Bank and Gaza

Middle East and North Africa

94.03%

88.88%

106.42%

108.49%

89.37%

112.51%

117.69%

Yemen, Rep

Middle East and North Africa

30.39%

28.69%

33.09%

33.33%

27.74%

33.36%

36.27%

Australia

OECD high income

113.82%

107.24%

131.78%

131.82%

106.20%

137.71%

139.89%

Austria

OECD high income

109.42%

104.87%

128.21%

121.70%

100.58%

130.89%

137.17%

Belgium

OECD high income

104.33%

98.65%

119.37%

116.94%

95.24%

120.09%

127.14%

Canada

OECD high income

110.21%

104.09%

130.41%

129.37%

104.68%

133.84%

137.11%

Chile

OECD high income

99.33%

97.66%

116.50%

110.75%

92.37%

119.90%

122.89%

Czech Republic

OECD high income

107.25%

103.46%

123.02%

120.57%

98.79%

123.75%

135.03%

Denmark

OECD high income

116.21%

112.29%

136.44%

131.52%

106.39%

138.23%

146.47%

Estonia

OECD high income

115.20%

109.40%

134.42%

128.32%

104.15%

135.68%

142.91%

Finland

OECD high income

108.76%

105.54%

127.76%

122.03%

99.77%

128.01%

136.36%

France

OECD high income

107.03%

104.06%

125.22%

119.77%

99.00%

127.57%

133.99%

Germany

OECD high income

105.53%

106.57%

125.61%

123.74%

101.17%

125.79%

134.00%

Greece

OECD high income

97.68%

93.31%

112.67%

108.13%

89.78%

109.90%

119.92%

Hungary

OECD high income

105.67%

99.96%

122.03%

121.60%

97.48%

124.53%

131.29%

Iceland

OECD high income

107.32%

105.51%

128.15%

120.68%

100.85%

131.31%

136.77%

Ireland

OECD high income

108.91%

105.60%

130.80%

123.75%

101.56%

129.59%

134.46%

Israel

OECD high income

99.85%

97.43%

119.42%

116.70%

95.69%

120.36%

124.66%

Italy

OECD high income

101.87%

97.72%

117.32%

112.18%

93.73%

118.82%

125.83%

Japan

OECD high income

100.57%

99.70%

118.29%

113.37%

94.16%

120.56%

127.12%

Korea, Rep

OECD high income

116.51%

112.74%

135.78%

130.52%

107.71%

141.85%

144.51%

Latvia

OECD high income

114.77%

107.17%

132.60%

132.76%

105.94%

137.72%

140.39%

Lithuania

OECD high income

117.03%

110.81%

138.07%

130.28%

106.62%

138.63%

145.84%

Luxembourg

OECD high income

88.92%

85.87%

101.68%

101.47%

82.33%

104.44%

109.33%

Netherlands

OECD high income

104.71%

100.51%

121.12%

115.11%

96.05%

121.18%

129.67%

New Zealand

OECD high income

125.37%

118.08%

145.78%

147.18%

117.06%

151.79%

156.92%

Norway

OECD high income

113.36%

109.30%

134.23%

127.46%

105.73%

140.06%

140.49%

Poland

OECD high income

108.16%

103.66%

125.68%

125.97%

100.26%

126.88%

134.97%

Portugal

OECD high income

106.05%

101.51%

122.36%

116.15%

97.02%

123.01%

131.07%

Slovak Republic

OECD high income

108.08%

103.05%

125.37%

121.24%

98.66%

126.81%

135.54%

Slovenia

OECD high income

105.33%

100.33%

121.23%

115.45%

96.64%

120.86%

129.74%

Spain

OECD high income

108.88%

103.58%

126.33%

121.48%

99.76%

127.36%

134.65%

Sweden

OECD high income

111.69%

108.97%

131.32%

124.08%

103.49%

134.51%

140.33%

Switzerland

OECD high income

107.07%

103.71%

124.24%

117.73%

98.90%

126.88%

133.01%

United Kingdom

OECD high income

111.49%

111.01%

133.46%

131.49%

106.06%

136.09%

144.82%

United States

OECD high income

116.65%

109.65%

131.99%

136.08%

109.23%

142.58%

144.79%

Afghanistan

South Asia

70.30%

68.83%

83.81%

77.00%

67.15%

82.32%

85.37%

Bangladesh

South Asia

61.68%

60.19%

70.91%

67.26%

58.95%

71.73%

75.02%

Bhutan

South Asia

101.91%

98.81%

119.45%

112.82%

93.77%

114.96%

126.08%

India

South Asia

98.83%

96.38%

117.30%

114.79%

95.26%

113.28%

123.60%

Maldives

South Asia

80.46%

78.88%

91.91%

86.28%

76.58%

93.41%

96.29%

Nepal

South Asia

85.00%

82.01%

99.65%

95.32%

80.36%

99.84%

105.03%

Pakistan

South Asia

80.83%

78.05%

96.83%

88.74%

78.00%

92.94%

98.71%

Sri Lanka

South Asia

87.83%

85.35%

101.23%

95.48%

82.73%

100.80%

108.41%

Angola

Sub-Saharan Africa

49.61%

47.71%

54.23%

57.06%

46.84%

58.77%

60.16%

Benin

Sub-Saharan Africa

75.09%

73.93%

85.14%

80.37%

71.90%

85.85%

90.20%

Botswana

Sub-Saharan Africa

94.18%

91.27%

110.49%

105.90%

86.75%

110.12%

115.42%

Burkina Faso

Sub-Saharan Africa

74.54%

73.51%

84.56%

79.69%

71.00%

85.06%

88.52%

Burundi

Sub-Saharan Africa

62.81%

61.10%

68.75%

69.49%

59.83%

72.65%

73.73%

Cabo Verde

Sub-Saharan Africa

85.24%

83.38%

100.46%

93.21%

80.16%

102.25%

103.47%

Cameroon

Sub-Saharan Africa

67.04%

64.86%

75.21%

76.00%

63.24%

76.44%

80.28%

Central African Republic

Sub-Saharan Africa

52.63%

51.48%

61.31%

57.11%

50.14%

61.60%

64.21%

Chad

Sub-Saharan Africa

56.35%

56.67%

66.74%

60.33%

53.70%

68.30%

69.49%

Comoros

Sub-Saharan Africa

75.52%

74.72%

87.07%

82.11%

71.52%

88.73%

91.89%

Congo, Dem Rep

Sub-Saharan Africa

39.05%

36.82%

42.55%

41.80%

35.66%

41.54%

45.51%

Congo, Rep

Sub-Saharan Africa

57.40%

57.70%

66.76%

61.55%

54.91%

67.24%

69.54%

Côte d’Ivoire

Sub-Saharan Africa

85.90%

82.78%

97.36%

98.74%

81.57%

101.19%

103.19%

Equatorial Guinea

Sub-Saharan Africa

67.99%

65.09%

78.35%

73.65%

62.42%

80.40%

82.08%

Eritrea

Sub-Saharan Africa

28.25%

26.86%

31.17%

31.86%

26.14%

31.51%

33.92%

Ethiopia

Sub-Saharan Africa

68.02%

65.67%

78.73%

75.54%

63.93%

81.11%

82.38%

Gabon

Sub-Saharan Africa

68.66%

67.24%

77.93%

73.50%

65.89%

77.90%

81.37%

Gambia, The

Sub-Saharan Africa

75.26%

73.24%

86.70%

82.31%

69.99%

88.29%

91.58%

Ghana

Sub-Saharan Africa

86.48%

84.20%

100.43%

98.79%

81.99%

103.40%

108.13%

Guinea

Sub-Saharan Africa

75.42%

74.94%

86.75%

80.34%

72.03%

88.83%

90.59%

Guinea-Bissau

Sub-Saharan Africa

67.02%

64.94%

76.15%

71.61%

63.52%

78.18%

80.95%

Kenya

Sub-Saharan Africa

105.45%

99.79%

121.16%

123.02%

100.12%

124.05%

128.48%

Lesotho

Sub-Saharan Africa

90.36%

86.90%

104.26%

101.84%

83.81%

102.49%

110.79%

Liberia

Sub-Saharan Africa

64.47%

63.11%

75.52%

69.22%

61.43%

73.92%

78.65%

Madagascar

Sub-Saharan Africa

70.92%

70.13%

80.87%

77.01%

68.33%

81.66%

85.04%

Malawi

Sub-Saharan Africa

93.69%

89.61%

103.45%

108.80%

88.65%

112.84%

113.69%

Mali

Sub-Saharan Africa

77.11%

75.14%

87.34%

83.09%

73.21%

87.25%

92.79%

Mauritania

Sub-Saharan Africa

81.31%

78.96%

92.82%

87.78%

77.79%

95.65%

95.91%

Mauritius

Sub-Saharan Africa

109.72%

107.51%

132.36%

122.90%

103.51%

134.31%

134.17%

Mozambique

Sub-Saharan Africa

77.88%

76.90%

88.82%

85.23%

73.58%

89.74%

96.03%

Namibia

Sub-Saharan Africa

88.00%

85.24%

103.75%

98.36%

81.85%

106.37%

108.53%

Niger

Sub-Saharan Africa

79.69%

77.94%

89.97%

85.12%

76.62%

92.41%

93.95%

Nigeria

Sub-Saharan Africa

79.68%

75.33%

90.77%

92.31%

74.21%

93.27%

96.16%

Rwanda

Sub-Saharan Africa

115.95%

109.18%

134.30%

133.69%

107.94%

141.97%

142.61%

São Tomé and Príncipe

Sub-Saharan Africa

67.51%

66.25%

77.33%

73.24%

63.94%

77.33%

81.77%

Senegal

Sub-Saharan Africa

79.03%

76.93%

88.92%

84.12%

75.42%

91.28%

93.60%

Seychelles

Sub-Saharan Africa

89.43%

86.67%

105.20%

93.95%

83.46%

104.58%

106.66%

Sierra Leone

Sub-Saharan Africa

73.19%

71.48%

83.62%

79.48%

69.74%

86.37%

87.12%

South Africa

Sub-Saharan Africa

95.11%

90.87%

114.80%

106.11%

90.06%

113.07%

116.14%

Sudan

Sub-Saharan Africa

66.67%

65.27%

76.43%

71.77%

62.70%

78.46%

81.41%

Tanzania

Sub-Saharan Africa

76.05%

72.86%

87.54%

87.00%

70.66%

90.99%

93.66%

Togo

Sub-Saharan Africa

79.19%

77.01%

89.08%

84.49%

75.50%

91.72%

93.45%

Uganda

Sub-Saharan Africa

81.49%

78.62%

97.03%

93.43%

76.37%

97.58%

102.65%

Zambia

Sub-Saharan Africa

100.30%

95.89%

113.87%

116.32%

94.82%

117.30%

120.33%

Zimbabwe

Sub-Saharan Africa

74.35%

69.94%

88.72%

86.22%

70.06%

91.16%

92.22%

  1. Note: \(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{EAP}\): robust country EDB composite indicator score relative to the best practice frontier of East Asia and Pacific region; \(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{ECA}\): robust country EDB composite indicator score relative to the best practice frontier of Europe and Central Asia region; \(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{LAC}\): robust country EDB composite indicator score relative to the best practice frontier of Latin America and Caribbean region; \(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{MENA}\): robust country EDB composite indicator score relative to the best practice frontier of Middle East and North Africa region; \(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{OECD}\): robust country EDB composite indicator score relative to the best practice frontier of High Income OECD region; \(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{SA}\): robust country EDB composite indicator score relative to the best practice frontier of South Asia region; \(\widehat \theta _{m,c}^{SSA}\): robust country EDB composite indicator score relative to the best practice frontier of Sub-Saharan Africa region.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rogge, N., Kolyaseva, A. Measuring and comparing World Bank regions’ ‘ease of doing business’ opportunity sets. J Prod Anal 57, 131–155 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-021-00624-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-021-00624-x

JEL

Keywords

Navigation