In the following, we present the MD characterization of the structural ensemble of LH2purp and compare it to the more commonly studied LH2acid. Next, we analyze the exciton Hamiltonians of LH2purp, and trace the difference between LH2purp and LH2acid back to the structural parameters. Finally, we assess the quality of our calculated Hamiltonians by comparing the simulated room temperature optical spectra with experiments.
Dynamical ensemble of LH2
In order to determine the room temperature structural ensemble representing LH2purp, three independent replicas were performed of the complex in a model membrane. We seek to understand to what extent this structural ensemble is different from the Cryo-EM structure (Gardiner et al. 2021). RMSD plots (Fig. S1) show a significant deviation of the protein backbone from the Cryo-EM structure in all replicas. The largest RMSD values are found for the C-terminal part of the apoprotein chains, and partially for the N-terminal parts, in agreement with the Cryo-EM B-factors (Gardiner et al. 2021). On the contrary, the helices show rather low and stable RMSD values. The B850 ring of pigments shows comparatively low RMSD values, whereas the B800 ring presents higher displacements. This result is in line with the simulations on LH2acid (Cardoso Ramos et al. 2019).
We assessed the equilibration of our simulations with two-dimensional RMSD plots (Fig. S2). These plots compare all pairs of structures along the MDs, and reveal conformational changes occurring mainly in the first 300 ns, both in the helices and in the BChl rings. However, the RMSD within the last 100–200 ns is generally lower than the RMSD from the inifial frames, suggesting that a more equilibrated structure is reached in this time frame.
The RMSD plots suggest that some reorganization of the pigments occurs when the complex is relaxed at room temperature. Figure 2 shows the distribution of center-center distances and mutual orientations in the closest BChl dimers, compared with the Cryo-EM structure. The pair of BChl molecules within the same \(\alpha /\beta\) dimer subunit (Intra-dimer) explores a range of geometries close to the Cryo-EM. A different situation is found for the closest BChl pair in different subunits (Inter-dimer), which during the MD are found at a larger distance, and with a different mutual orientation. The dipolar orientation factor \(\kappa\) is significantly smaller in the MD compared to the Cryo-EM, and smaller than the orientation factor of the Intra-dimer BChl pair, which suggests a lowering of the excitonic coupling for the Inter-dimer pair.
In LH2acid, the Inter-dimer pair is found at a slightly shorter distance than the Intra-dimer pair (Papiz et al. 2003). This finding is also replicated during MD simulations (Cardoso Ramos et al. 2019). Gardiner and co-workers have shown that in LH2purp the Inter-dimer pair is more separated (Gardiner et al. 2021). Our MD simulations show that this separation is even larger at room temperature, and also the orientation changes significantly. Thus, although the differences between LH2acid and LH2purp are noticeable already at the level of Cryo-EM/X-ray structures, only considering thermal fluctuations is it possible to correctly describe the relative arrangements of BChls in the \(\alpha \beta\) ring.
Hydrogen bonding plays a primary role in tuning the spectral properties of LH2 complexes. In LH2acid, both \(\alpha\)- and \(\beta\)-BChls in the B850 ring have their C3\(^{1}\) acetyl group H-bonded to protein residues, respectively, Trp45 and Tyr44. Conversely, in LH2purp, only the \(\beta\)-BChl features a H-bond between its C3\(^{1}\) acetyl group and the \(\beta\)-Trp47 in the same polypeptide chain. This hydrogen bond remained stable throughout the three MD replicas. The distribution of H-bond distances (Fig. 3a) is analogous to the \(\alpha\)-Bchl\(\cdots\)Trp45 distance in LH2acid (Cardoso Ramos et al. 2019), and features longer distances than the \(\beta\)-BChl\(\cdots\)Tyr44 counterpart. This finding suggests that the nature of the H-bonding amino acid residue determines the H-bond distance, irrespective of the BChl binding pocket. Interestingly, Jang et al. (2015) analyzed hypothetical LH2 complexes with different symmetry numbers (5–12), and found a similar H-bond between \(\beta\)-BChl and a Trp in the \(\beta\) chain. However, such a hydrogen bond was predicted only for complexes with symmetry number \(\ge 8\), and not for a 7-meric complex, for which H-bond to Tyr was predicted. Notably, Trp47 is conserved among LH2 antennas of several species. However, the position of Trp47 is close to the \(\alpha \beta\) ring only for LH2purp. We conclude that the substitutions in the primary sequence of the \(\beta\) polypeptide can affect also the positions of conserved residues and their interaction with the BChls.
In the Cryo-EM structure of LH2purp, the B800-BChl interacts with a histidine (His92) of the \(\alpha\) chain in the next subunit, through the C3\(^{1}\) acetyl oxygen. We investigate the stability of this H-bond in Fig. 3b. Clearly, the C=O\(\cdots\)His distance reveals two different populations, where the H-bond can be formed or broken. When the H-bond is broken, the C=O\(\cdots\)His distance can span values ranging from 4 to 8 Å. During our MD simulation, a new hydrogen bond is formed between Trp23 of the \(\alpha\) chain and the C13\(^1\) carbonyl of B800-BChl. Indeed, Trp23 is mostly found at H-bonding distance with the C13\(^1\) carbonyl (red line in Fig. 3b), whereas the conformation found in the Cryo-EM structure has a smaller population. This analysis suggests that the B800-BChl environment is heterogeneous and dynamic. We anticipate that this heterogeneity will impact the energetic disorder of the B800 ring.
Exciton structure
The exciton structure and optical spectra of the LH2purp system are determined by the site energies of the BChls and the couplings among them. It was shown that both factors concur in determining spectral shift between different forms of LH2 (Nottoli et al. 2018). In this Section, we analyze the average site energies and couplings obtained from the MD replicas presented above. We then analyze the exciton states obtained with this average Hamiltonian. In order to uncover the factors underlying the 850 nm to 830 nm shift of the lowest absorption band, we compare the present results with the same values obtained for LH2acid (Cardoso Ramos et al. 2019).
The average site energies computed on the MD trajectories of LH2purp and LH2acid are compared in Table 1. One can immediately note the \(\sim\)200 \(\hbox {cm}^{-1}\) blue shift of \(\alpha\)-BChl passing from LH2acid to LH2purp, which is consistent with the loss of one H-bond. Previous calculations (Cardoso Ramos et al. 2019) estimated that a H-bond to the acetyl red shifts the \(\hbox {Q}_{{y}}\) excitation by about 140–200 \(\hbox {cm}^{-1}\). Therefore, the loss of one H-bond results in a blue shift of the same amount. Interestingly, also the \(\beta\)-BChl is blue shifted in LH2purp, by \(\sim\)80 \(\hbox {cm}^{-1}\), although the \(\beta\)-BChl features a hydrogen in LH2purp as well, which remains stable in our MD simulation (see above). However, the H-bond to Trp found in LH2purp is less tight than the H-bond to Tyr found in LH2acid. Therefore, the red-shifting effect of a Trp H-bond should be smaller.
Table 1 Average site energies of the three distinct BChls along the three MD replicas of LH2purp, compared to the ones of LH2acid obtained from Cardoso Ramos et al. (2019) Our calculations also reveal that B800-BChl is significantly red-shifted from the value calculated on LH2acid. It is difficult to pinpoint the structural changes that cause this shift. In fact, the B800-BChl in LH2purp has an opposite orientation with respect to LH2acid, in addition to different binding residues. We note anyways that the C13\(^1\) carbonyl is surrounded by a nonpolar environment in LH2acid, whereas it features a hydrogen bond in LH2purp, at least according to our MD simulations (see above).
The exciton couplings contribute substantially to the band splitting in LH2. Here we calculated couplings along the three MD replicas of LH2purp using the multiscale QM/MMPol method, and compared the results with LH2acid. The average couplings are compared in Fig. 4. LH2purp features generally smaller couplings than LH2acid. We observe that the nearest-neighbor couplings reflect the change in mutual orientation and relative distance highlighted in Fig. 2. In fact, the Inter-dimer coupling between close \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) BChls belonging to different subunits is the largest coupling in LH2acid (298 \(\hbox {cm}^{-1}\)), but it is almost halved in LH2purp (166 \(\hbox {cm}^{-1}\)). The large difference between the two couplings can be traced back to the increased center-center distance and the smaller orientation factor in this pair (Fig. 2).
In addition to the nearest-neighbor \(\alpha \beta\) couplings, also the other couplings show significant deviations from LH2acid. Figure 2 reveals that the couplings between \(\beta\)-Bchls of two consecutive subunits is strongly reduced in LH2purp, and also the coupling between \(\alpha\)-Bchls is slightly smaller. Importantly, we observe that the intra-B800 coupling is reduced by one third passing from LH2acid to LH2purp. The 10 \(\hbox {cm}^{-1}\) coupling obtained on LH2purp suggests excitons of the B800 ring will be essentially localized. In addition, we note that inter-ring couplings are still strong, and larger than B800-B800 couplings. Therefore, inter-ring interactions may be important for tuning the optical properties of LH2purp.
We are now in a position to analyze the \({Q}_{{y}}\) excitons of LH2purp and how they differ from LH2acid. To simplify the analysis, we describe the “homogeneous” exciton states obtained from diagonalization of the average exciton Hamiltonian. The spectra calculations in the next Section will instead account for the presence of static disorder in the Hamiltonian parameters. Analyzing the homogeneous exciton states is anyway very useful to understand how site energies and exciton couplings contribute to the exciton energies.
Figure 5 shows the exciton states of LH2purp and LH2acid and their connection to the \({Q}_{{y}}\) site energies of the BChls. We first focus on the much less coupled B800 ring, which gives rise to a small splitting of the exciton states. This splitting is almost negligible in LH2purp, while it is still noticeable in LH2acid. Disorder effects are expected to strongly reduce delocalization when exciton couplings are small, although the exciton couplings in the B800 ring of LH2acid (\(\sim\)30 \(\hbox {cm}^{-1}\)) are probably strong enough to support some delocalization (Novoderezhkin and van Grondelle 2013).
The B850 excitons are split by the strong nearest-neighbor couplings in both LH2 systems. In a homogeneous ring, these states are maximally delocalized and can be assigned on the basis of their symmetry. In the B850 ring, the dipole strength of the \(\hbox {Q}_{{y}}\) transitions is almost completely concentrated in the \(k = \pm 1\) exciton state, which is the only bright state of this ring. This state is substantially lower in energy in LH2acid, even though the site energies are not lowered by the same amount. The exciton band width is also much larger in LH2acid, due to the stronger exciton couplings. In addition, the B850 ring of LH2acid contains more BChls, which allows more delocalization of the exciton. We expect that this may give rise to a larger band width, and therefore contribute to the lowering of the \(k = \pm 1\) state. The exciton band width of LH2 complexes can be experimentally measured by fluorescence anisotropy spectrocopy (Pajusalu et al. 2011). To the best of our knowledge, no such measurements have been attempted for LH2purp: these experiments could offer a way to independently validate the exciton couplings calculated here.
The difference between LH2acid and LH2purp in the energy of the bright \(k = \pm 1\) state arises from a combination of several factors: the site energies are lower in LH2acid, the couplings are stronger in LH2acid, and finally LH2acid features 18 BChls in the B850 ring, compared with the 14 BChls of LH2purp. In order to compare these factors, we analyzed some “mixed models”, which we construct by substituting the LH2purp excitonic parameters with those of LH2acid. The resulting shift of the \(k = \pm 1\) bright state is shown in Fig. 6. Moving the \(\alpha\)-BChl and \(\beta\)-BChl site energies to the values of LH2acid results in a red shift of \(\sim\)130 \(\hbox {cm}^{-1}\). A similar red shift is obtained by substituting all the couplings shown in Fig. 4 with those of LH2acid.
If we substitute both site energies and couplings of LH2purp with the LH2acid counterpart, we obtain a red shift of \(\sim\)260 \(\hbox {cm}^{-1}\). This shows that site energies and couplings have similar and additive effects on the energy of the bright exciton. The obtained red shift is slightly smaller than the difference between LH2acid and LH2purp, which is \(\sim\)310 \(\hbox {cm}^{-1}\) (grey bar in Fig. 6). This remaining red shift can be imputed to the greater number of pigments in LH2acid, which allow more delocalization. Although these results are obtained in the absence of disorder, the trends of Fig. 6 can be expected to qualitatively hold also when static disorder is considered.
Our model predicts a shift of about 310 \(\hbox {cm}^{-1}\) between the bright B850 states of LH2acid and LH2purp. The B850 band of LH2acid peaks at 859 nm (Macpherson et al. 2001), whereas LH2purp has a maximum at 828 nm (Gardiner et al. 2021). This gives us an estimate of around 440 \(\hbox {cm}^{-1}\) for the difference between the bright exciton energies. Our calculations seem to slightly underestimate this difference, as already observed for the high-light and low-light forms of LH2 in Rbl. acidophilus (Cardoso Ramos et al. 2019). It is difficult to pinpoint exactly the origin of this discrepancy. One source of error is related to the force field used in MD simulations, which does not describe well the rotation of the C3\(^{1}\) acetyl group (Cardoso Ramos et al. 2019).
We note that we have not included the effects of charge transfer states in the previous analysis. Although CT states have an influence on the energy of the LH2 excitons (Nottoli et al. 2018), this influence is strongly modulated by inhomogeneous disorder (Cupellini et al. 2018). For this reason, we will assess the influence of CT states on the spectra in the following section. For the moment, let us briefly analyze the CT energies and couplings, which are reported in Table S1. LH2purp features strongly reduced \({Q}_{{y}}\)-CT couplings for the Inter-dimer \(\alpha \beta\) pair. The Intra-dimer couplings are instead enhanced in LH2purp, but this enhancement is smaller in magnitude than the reduction of Inter-dimer couplings. This effect can be again traced back to the arrangement of \(\alpha\)- and \(\beta\)- BChls in different subunits of LH2purp (see Fig. 2).
Optical spectra
We assessed the quality of our exciton parameters by simulating the optical spectra for LH2purp and LH2acid. For each Hamiltonian extracted from the MD simulation, we computed the homogeneous lineshape of the complex (See the “Methods” section). The ensemble lineshape is then obtained by averaging the spectrum over all MD frames. In order to improve the treatment of exciton-vibrational coupling, the lineshape was computed using the full cumulant expansion (FCE) theory (Ma and Cao 2015; Cupellini et al. 2020b). As noted in our previous work, CT states contribute to the broadening of the B850 band. However, it was not possible to match the experimental broadening (Cupellini et al. 2018). Here we used a more practical approach, where we included additional disorder in the exciton Hamiltonian to match the lineshape broadening (The disorder parameters are reported in Table S4), while also including CT states in the exciton Hamiltonian.
The simulated absorption spectra are shown in Fig. 7a (solid lines), along with the experimental counterparts (Cogdell et al. 1990; Cupellini et al. 2016). The calculations reproduce almost quantitatively the blue shift of the B850 band passing from LH2acid to LH2purp. In addition, the shape of the LH2purp absorption well matches the experiment, with a main peak arising from the B850 BChls and a shoulder that can be attributed to B800 BChls. Despite the very good agreement for LH2purp, the energy of the B850 band is slightly underestimated by our model, whereas the position of the B800 band is better described. This discrepancy can be traced back, as explained in the previous section, to the incorrect force field description of the C3\(^1\) acetyl torsion in the MD simulations. Nonetheless, the error in the peak position is only \(\sim\)90 \(\hbox {cm}^{-1}\), which confirms the good overall accuracy of our calculations.
We can assess the impact of CT states on the LH2 spectra by comparing our results with the calculations that exclude CT states (dashed color lines in Fig. 7a). Clearly, CT states contribute substantially to the B850 band shift in LH2acid, and the gap between B850 and B800 bands is only reproduced by the calculations that include CT states. Conversely, the effect on LH2purp is less pronounced. As explained above, the inter-dimer \({Q}_{{y}}\)-CT couplings are strongly reduced in LH2purp, although the intra-dimer ones are enhanced. On average, the reduction of inter-dimer couplings is more substantial, and dampens the effect of CT states in LH2purp. We note that the shift between the B850 bands of LH2acid and LH2purp is reduced when CT states are not included in the calculation. As such, CT states have an impact on the difference between LH2acid and LH2purp, as previously suggested for the high-light form of Rbl. acidophilus LH2 (Nottoli et al. 2018).
Let us now analyze the energetic disorder and band broadening in both LH2 systems. It was necessary to include additional diagonal disorder (See Sect. S1 in the Supplementary Information) to reproduce the width of the B850 band, which means that the B850 energetic disorder is underestimated by MD-based simulations. Without this additional disorder, the B850 band of both complexes is too narrow, and lacks the low-energy tail (See Fig. S4). It has been shown that including CT states is needed to obtain broadened lineshapes, but it is not sufficient (Cupellini et al. 2018). Here, the standard deviation of the environmental disorder for the \(\alpha\)- and \(\beta\)- BChls of both complexes (Table S5) is smaller compared to the additional disorder introduced in the simulations, suggesting that other significant sources of disorder must be present in the two complexes. We can put forward several hypotheses in this respect. As suggested in Cupellini et al. (2018), the structural fluctuations experienced by LH2 complexes might occur on much longer timescales than those accessible by MD simulations. Here we used much longer simulations (0.5 μs per replica) than in Cupellini et al. (2018); however LH complexes showed fluctuations in the order of milliseconds, to which our MD is completely blind. Another source of error might be lying in the MM force field description of BChl. As mentioned above, the force field does not describe well the acetyl torsion of BChl (Cardoso Ramos et al. 2019), which might lead to underestimating the structural fluctuation of the BChls and therefore also the site energy disorder. As shown in Fig. S5, the acetyl group is more planar in the MD structure of \(\beta\)-BChl than in the Cryo-EM structure.
The B800 band of LH2acid shows an opposite problem to the B850 band, i.e. it is too broad in our simulation. Apparently, the B800 disorder is exaggerated in our MD simulation, contrary to the B850 one. Indeed, the environmental disorder of B800-BChls obtained from the MD is much larger than the B850 one (Table S5). This can be rationalized by the fact that the B800 BChls have a completely different environment, much more polar than the B850 BChls, and more disordered. The B800 BChls are also in contact with water, as they are outside of the transmembrane region of the protein. The disorder arising from the polar environment seems to be overestimated by our MD simulation. This may be due to deficiencies in the force field description of intermolecular BChl-protein and BChl-water interactions.
It is worth assessing the importance of a MD-based description for LH2purp. To this end, we compare the MD-calculated spectra with a static description based on the Cryo-EM structure where the BChls were optimized in a QM/MM scheme (See Sect. S2 in the Supplementary Information for details). The spectrum calculated directly on the Cryo-EM structure is compared with the MD one in Fig. S6. Contrarily to the MD-based spectrum, the Cryo-EM one features only a single band, and does not present the B800 shoulder. The absolute position of the band is slightly different owing to the different internal structure of the BChls, therefore we focus on the relative position of the two bands. This relative position is incorrectly predicted in the Cryo-EM calculation, where B800 and B850 absorption bands essentially overlap. This feature arises from the relative site energies of B800 and B850 BChls: In fact, while in the MD simulation the B800-BChl has a similar site energy to the \(\alpha\)- and \(\beta\)- BChls, in the Cryo-EM calculation the B800-BChl has a much lower site energy than the others. Indeed, it seems that the relative site energies of BChl pigments cannot be reliably predicted from the calculations based on the Cryo-EM structure. This result is not unexpected, as static structures (Cryo-EM and X-ray) often present site energy shifts that are not representative of the thermal ensembles (Cignoni et al. 2022).
To gain a deeper insight into the exciton structure of the LH2 complexes, we finally simulated their CD spectra. CD spectra are much more sensitive to variations in the orientations of transition dipoles and in excitonic couplings. At variance with most LH2 complexes, LH2purp shows a peculiar CD spectrum with only one intense negative band (Georgakopoulou et al. 2002; Cogdell et al. 1990). Our simulated CD spectrum (Fig. 7b, top) closely reproduces this feature, presenting an almost perfect agreement with the experiment. The peculiar CD shape of LH2purp can be traced back to the stronger inter-ring couplings and weaker intra-B800 couplings discussed in the previous section. Without this interaction, the simulations predict a much narrower CD couplet centered around 12 000 \(\hbox {cm}^{-1}\), i.e. in the middle of the B850 band (See Fig. S3 in the Supplementary Information). We further note that the positive band is weaker in the experiment than in our simulation. Indeed, the experimental CD of LH2purp is nonconservative, probably as a consequence of the mixing with higher excited states of the BChls or with the bright states of the carotenoids. As in this work we have not considered such states, we can only reproduce the conservative part of the CD shape.
The shape of the LH2acid CD spectrum, with its characteristic couplets, is also reproduced by our simulation (Fig. 7b, bottom). However, the CD intensities of LH2acid are not perfectly reproduced. This problem was also observed previously (Cupellini et al. 2016), and attributed to the extreme sensitivity of the CD couplets to small changes in the transition dipole angles. In our simulations, the CD spectra are averaged on the ensemble of dipole orientations, site energies, and exciton couplings obtained from molecular dynamics. Therefore, small errors in the structural disorder might be amplified CD spectra. Nonetheless, we stress that the sign and positions of the CD band are correctly reproduced by our simulations, without requiring any empirical parameter specifically tuned for reproducing CD spectra (Georgakopoulou et al. 2002).