Abstract
Changes in land use in riverside ecosystems added to the flood and ebb regimes of rivers modify the spatial variability of the physical–mechanical attributes of soil, making it more susceptible to degradation processes, especially during the rainy season. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the use of a Eutric Cambisol, which was cultivated with banana trees, on the pattern of spatial variability of physical–mechanical attributes of the soil under two states of consistency in riparian zones of the Ribeira de Iguape River, São Paulo, Brazil. After the flood period, soil samples were collected from 0.0 to 0.2 m soil depth up to 200 m perpendicular from the river. The study of the spatial variability of soil attributes is considered to be one of the principles of precision agriculture enabling site-specific management. Such data can be used for interpolation, the use of inverse weighted distance (IDW) was chosen, a widely used deterministic method for multivariate interpolation. The following soil attributes were measured: particle-size distribution (clay, silt and sand), water content, bulk density (initial and preconsolidation pressure), cone index, compression index and preconsolidation pressure. The effects of flood and ebb periods on the resilience of these attributes in the Ribeira de Iguape River were evaluated by subjecting the soil to solid and plastic states of soil consistency. The pattern of spatial variation of the physical–mechanical attributes of the Eutric Cambisol was modified: spatial continuity in the soil attributes was greater under smaller water contents (ebb) and less, i.e. greater spatial variation, under flood conditions. The physical and mechanical qualities of the Eutric Cambisol were more affected in the soil closer to the water body. Extreme changes in the load-bearing capacity of the soil with high solid states and weak plastic states consistencies show its susceptibility to structural degradation, mainly under the river flood regimes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aguiar Junior, T. R., Rasera, K., Parron, L. M., Brito, A. G., & Ferreira, M. T. (2015). Nutrient removal effectiveness by riparian buffer zones in rural temperate watersheds: The impact of no-till crops practices. Agriculture Water Management, 149, 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2014.10.031
Al-Shayea, N. A. (2001). The combined effect of clay and moisture content on the behavior of remolded unsaturated soils. Engineering Geology., 62(4), 319–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(01)00032-1
Alvares, C. A., Stape, J. L., Sentelhas, P. C., Gonçalves, J. L. M., & Sparovek, G. (2013). Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 22(6), 711–728. https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0507
Araújo, R., Goedert, W. J., & Lacerda, M. P. C. (2007). Qualidade de um solo sob diferentes usos e sob cerrado nativo (Soil quality under different uses and native Cerrado). Revista Brasileira De Ciência Do Solo., 31(5), 1099–1108.
Babak, O., & Deutsch, C. V. (2009). Statistical approach to inverse distance interpolation. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 23(5), 543–553.
Babak, O. (2014). Inverse distance interpolation for facies modeling. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 28(6), 1373–1382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-013-0833-8
Bond, N. R., Burrows, R. M., Kennard, M. J., & Bunn, S. E. (2019). Water scarcity as a driver of multiple stressor effects. In: S. Sabater, A. Elosegi, R. Ludwig (Eds.), Multiple stressors in river ecosystems (pp. 111–129). Cambridge, MA, USA: Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811713-2.00006-6.
Botero-Acosta, A., Chu, M. L., Guzman, J. A., Starks, P. J., & Moriasi, D. N. (2017). Riparian erosion vulnerability model based on environmental features. Journal of Environment Management, 203(1), 592–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.02.045
Brasil, 2012. Lei No. 12.651, de 25 de maio de 2012. Dispõe sobre a proteção da vegetação nativa e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da República Federativa do Brasil, Poder Executivo, Brasília, DF, 28 maio 2012 (Law No. 12.651 of May 25, 2012. Provides for the protection of native vegetation and other measures. Official Gazette of the Federative Republic of Brazil, Executive Branch, Brasília, DF, 28 May 2012). Retrieved November, 2021, from www.planalto.gov.br
Brouder, S. M., Hofmann, B. S., & Morris, D. K. (2005). Mapping soil pH: Accuracy of common soil sampling strategies and estimation techniques. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 69(2), 427–442. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0427
Burrough, P. A. (1986). Principles of geographical information systems for land resources assessment. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Celentano, D., Rousseau, G. X., Engel, V. L., Zelarayán, M., Oliveira, E. C., Araujo, et al. (2016). Degradation of riparian forest affects soil properties and ecosystem services provision in eastern Amazon of Brazil. Land Degradation and Development. 28(2), 482–493. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2547.
CBH-RB - Comitê da Bacia Hidrográfica do Ribeira de Iguape e Litoral Sul. 2019. Relatório de Situação dos Recursos Hídricos da UGRHI 11 – 2018 – Ano-Base 2017 (Committee for the Ribeira de Iguape and Litoral Sul River Basin. 2019. UGRHI Water Resources Situation Report 11 – 2018 – Base Year 2017). Retrieved November, 2021, from https://www.sigrh.sp.gov.br/public/uploads/documents//CBH-RB/17551/relatorio-de-situacao-2019-versao-final-27-09-19.pdf
Conde, R. P., & Yamamoto, J. K. (1996). Avaliação de reservas por métodos computacionais: Um estudo de caso na mina de canoas 2 (PR) (Ore reserve estimation by computational methods: A case study in Canoas 2 mine PR). Revista Brasileira De Geociências, 26(1), 35–42.
Cortez, L. A., Marques Júnior, J., Peluco, R. G., Siqueira, D. S., Siansi, F. L., Barbosa, R. S., et al. (2020). Subsoiling of an oxisol at fixed and varying depth in areas under sugarcane. Precision Agriculture, 21, 1351–1365.
Daniels, R. B., & Nelson, L. A. (1978). Soil variability and productivity: Future developments. In L. L. Boersma Chair (Ed.), Future developments in soil science research (pp. 279–291). Madison, WI, USA: Soil Science Society of America Journal.
Dec, D., Dörner, J., & Balocchi, O. (2011). Temporal and spatial variability of structure dependent properties of a volcanic ash soil under pasture in southern Chile. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research., 71(2), 293–303. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392011000200015
Deng, L., Wang, K. B., Zhu, G. Y., Liu, Y. L., Chen, L., & Shangguan, Z. P. (2018). Changes of soil carbon in five land use stages following 10years of vegetation succession on the Loess Plateau, China. Catena, 171, 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.07.014
Dias Junior, M. S., & Pierce, F. J. (1995). A simple procedure for estimating preconsolidation pressure from soil compression curve. Soil Technology., 8(2), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/0933-3630(95)00015-8
Diodato, N., & Ceccarelli, M. (2005). Interpolation processes using multivariate geostatistics for mappin of climatological precipitation mean in the Sannio Mountains (southern Italy). Earth Surface Process and Landforms., 30(3), 259–268.
Dominati, E., Patterson, M., & Mackay, A. (2010). A framework for classifying and quantifying the natural capital and ecosystem services of soils. Ecological Economics, 69(9), 1858–1868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.05.002
Esteban, D. A., Souza, Z. M., Tormena, C. A., Lovera, L. H., Lima, E. S., Oliveira, I. N., et al. (2019). Soil compaction, root system and productivity of sugarcane under different row spacing and controlled traffic at harvest. Soil and Tillage Research, 187, 60–71.
Hamza, M. A., & Anderson, W. K. (2005). Soil compaction in cropping systems: A review of the nature, causes and possible solutions. Soil and Tillage Research, 82(2), 121–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2004.08.009
Hough, B. (1969). Basic soil engineering. New York, USA: Ronald Press Company.
Iori, P., Silva, R. B., Dias Junior, M. S., & Lima, J. M. (2012). Pressão de preconsolidação como ferramenta de análise da sustentabilidade estrutural de classes de solos com diferentes usos (Preconsolidation pressure as a tool for sustainability analysis of soil structure of soil classes under different uses). Revista Brasileira De Ciência Do Solo., 36(5), 1448–1456. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832012000500008
Iori, P., Silva, R. B., Dias Junior, M. S., Nakamura, R., & Almeida, L. C. F. (2019). Soil quality analysis in riparian areas for soil and water resource management. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science., 66(5), 572–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2019.1630822
Isaaks, E. H., & Srivastava, R. M. (1989). An introduction to applied geostatistics (p. 560). New York, USA: Oxford University.
IUSS Working Group WRB. (2015). World reference base for soil resources 2014, update 2015. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil Resources Reports No. 106. Rome, Italy: FAO.
Keesstra, S. D., Kondrlova, E., Czajka, A., Seeger, M., & Maroulis, J. (2012). Assessing riparian zone impacts on water and sediment movement: A new approach. Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, 91(1–2), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016774600001633
Kitamura, A. E., Carvalho, M. P., & Lima, C. F. R. (2007). Relação entre a variabilidade das frações granulométricas e a produtividade de feijoeiro sob plantio direto (Relationship between the spatial variability of particle-size fractions of soil and common bean yield under no-tillage). Revista Brasileira De Ciência Do Solo., 31, 361–369. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832007000200018
Kravchenko, A., & Bullock, D. G. (1999). A comparative study of interpolation methods for mapping soil properties. Agronomy Journal., 91(3), 393–400. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1999.00021962009100030007x
Lambe, T. W., & Whitman, R. V. (1969). Soil mechanics. New York, USA: Wiley.
Legates, D. R., & McCabe, G. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of “goodness-of-fit” measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resources Research., 35(1), 233–241.
Mills, C. F., & Bathurst, J. C. (2015). Spatial variability of suspended sediment yield in a gravel-bed river across four orders of magnitude of catchment area. CATENA, 133, 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2015.04.008
Naiman, R. J., Décamps, H., Mcclain, M. E., & Likens, G. E. (2005). Disturbance and agents of change. In R. J. Naiman, H. Décamps, & M. E. Mcclain (Eds.), Riparia: Ecology, conservation, and management of streamside communities (pp. 19–48). Cambridge, MA, USA: Elsevier Academic Press.
Neves, H. H., Mata, M. G. F., Guerra, J. G. M., Carvalho, D. F., Wendroth, O. T., & Ceddia, M. B. (2017). Spatial and temporal patterns of soil water content in an agroecological production system. Scientia Agricola, 74(4), 83–392. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-992x-2016-0213
O’Sullivan, D., & Unwin, D. (2003). Geographic information analysis. New York, USA: Wiley.
Ortigara, C., Koppe, E., Luz, F. B., Bertollo, A. M., Kaiser, D. R., & Silva, V. R. (2014). Uso do solo e propriedades físico-mecânicas de Latossolo Vermelho (Soil use and physical-mechanical properties of a Red Oxisol). Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, 38(2), 619–626. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832014000200026
Özvan, A., Özvan, E. E., Akkaya, İ, Akin, M., & Akin, M. K. (2019). A study of the relationship between the pressuremeter modulus and the preconsolidation pressure around a thrust fault. Environmental Earth Sciences, 78, 596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8597-1
Pereira, A. H. F., Vitorino, A. C. T., Prado, E. A. F., Bergamin, A. C., Mauad, M., & Arantes, H. P. (2015). Least limiting water range and load bearing capacity of soil under types of tractor-trailers for mechanical harvesting of green sugarcane. Revista Brasileira De Ciência Do Solo., 39(6), 1603–1610. https://doi.org/10.1590/01000683rbcs20140561
Reynolds, W. D., Drury, C. F., Yang, X. M., Fox, C. A., Tann, C. S., & Zhang, T. Q. (2007). Land management effects on the near-surface physical quality of a clay loam soil. Soil and Tillage Research, 96(1–2), 316–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2007.07.003
Robinson, T. P., & Metternicht, G. (2003). A comparison of inverse distance weighting and ordinary kriging for characterizing within-paddock spatial variability of soil properties in Western Australia. Cartography., 32(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00690805.2003.9714231
Sajid, A. H., Rudra, R. P., & Parkin, G. (2013). Systematic evaluation of Kriging and inverse distance weighting methods for spatial analysis of soil bulk density. Canadian Biosystem Engineering, 55(1), 1–13.
Santoso, P. B., Yanto, A., & Suryani, R. (2018). Inverse distance weighting interpolated soil properties and their related landslide occurrences. MATEC Web of Conferences., 195(2018), 03013. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201819503013
Silva, R. B., Lanças, K. P., & Masquetto, B. J. (2015). Desenvolvimento, automação e desempenho de um consolidômetro com interface homem-máquina (Development, automation and performance of a consolidometer with human-machine interface). Revista Brasileira De Ciência Do Solo., 39(2), 416–472. https://doi.org/10.1590/01000683rbcs20140435
Souza, A. L. T., Fonseca, D. G., Libório, R. A., & Tanaka, M. O. (2013). Influence of riparian vegetation and forest structure on the water quality of rural loworder streams in SE Brazil. Forest Ecology and Management, 298, 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.02.022
Teixeira, P. C., Donagemma, G. K., Fontana, A., Teixeira & W. G. (2017). Manual de Métodos de Análise de Solos (Soil Science Analysis Methods). 3ª ed. Brasília, GO, Brazil: Embrapa.
Vos, B. D., Meirvenne, M. V., Quataert, P., Deckers, J., & Muys, B. (2005). Predictive quality of pedotransfer functions for estimating bulk density of forest soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal., 69(2), 500–510. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0500
Watson, D. F. (1992). Contouring: A guide to the analysis and display of spatial data. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
Weber, D. D., & Englund, E. J. (1992). Evaluation and comparison of spatial interpolators. Mathematical Geology., 24, 381–391.
Weber, D. D., & Englund, E. J. (1994). Evaluation and comparison of spatial interpolators II. Mathematical Geology, 26, 589–603.
Webster, R., & Oliver, M. A. (1992). Sample adequately to estimate variograms of soil properties. Journal of Soil Science., 43, 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1992.tb00128
Webster, R., & Oliver, M. A. (2007). Geostatistics for environmental scientists. Chichester, UK: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470517277
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the landholder, Roberto Rosette, who kindly provided access to his property, which was the subject of this research, as well as the research office at the State University of Campinas (UNICAMP) for providing language help.
Funding
We would like to thank the State Water Resources Fund (FEHIDRO) for financial support (Grant Number 263/2013).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
da Silva, R.B., Iori, P., Tavares, R.L.M. et al. Do water dynamics and land use in riparian areas change the spatial pattern of physical–mechanical properties of a Cambisol?. Precision Agric 23, 984–1007 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-021-09871-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-021-09871-2