Abstract
Soils occupied by dryland pastures usually have low fertility but can exhibit a high spatial variability. Consequently, logical application of fertilisers should be based on an appropriate knowledge of spatial variability of the main soil properties that can affect pasture yield and quality. Delineation of zones with similar soil fertility is necessary to implement site-specific management, reinforcing the interest of methods to identify these homogeneous zones. Thus, the formulation of the objective Rasch model constitutes a new approach in pasture fields. A case study was performed in a pasture field located in a montado (agrosilvopastoral) ecosystem. Measurements of some soil properties (texture, organic matter, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, cation exchange capacity and soil apparent electrical conductivity) at 24 sampling locations were integrated in the Rasch model. A classification of all sampling locations according to pasture soil fertility was established. Moreover, the influence of each soil property on the soil fertility was highlighted, with the clay content the most influential property in this sandy soil. Then, a clustering process was undertaken to delimit the homogeneous zones, considering soil pasture fertility, elevation and slope as the input layers. Three zones were delineated and vegetation indices (normalized difference vegetation index, NDVI, and normalized difference water index, NDWI) and pasture yield data at sampling locations were employed to check their differences. Results showed that vegetation indices were not suitable to detect the spatial variability between zones. However, differences in pasture yield and quality were evident, besides some key soil properties, such as clay content and organic matter.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Álvarez, P. (2004). Transforming non categorical data for Rasch analysis. Rasch Measurement in health sciences. Maple Grove, Minnesota, USA: JAM Press.
Andrews, S. S., Karlen, D. L., & Cambardella, C. A. (2004). The soil management assessment framework: a quantitative soil quality evaluation method. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 68, 1945–1962.
AOAC. (2005). Official Method of Analysis of AOAC International (18th ed.). Arlington, AT, USA: AOAC International.
Arshad, M., Li, N., Zhao, D., Sefton, M., & Triantafilis, J. (2019). Comparing management zone maps to address infertility and sodicity in sugarcane fields. Soil and Tillage Research, 193, 122–132.
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Buhmann, M. D. (2003). Radial basis functions: theory and implementations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ceddia, M. B., Vieira, S. R., Villela, A. L. O., Mota, L. S., Anjos, L. H. C., & Carvalho, D. F. (2009). Topography and spatial variability of soil physical properties. Scientia Agricola, 66(3), 338–352.
Chen, Y., Yu, J., & Khan, S. (2013). The spatial framework for weight sensitivity analysis in AHP-based multi-criteria decision making. EnvironmentalModelling & Software, 48, 129–140.
Collins, C. D., & Foster, B. L. (2008). The role of topography and soil characteris-tics in the relationship between species richness and primary productivity in a Kansas grassland. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Sciences, 111, 105–117.
Edwards, A., & Alcock, L. (2010). Using Rasch analysis to identify uncharacteristic responses to undergraduate assessments. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications, 29, 165–175.
Egner, H., Riehm, H., & Domingo, W. R. (1960). “Utersuchungeniiber die chemische Bodenanalyse als Grudlagefiir die Beurteilung des Nahrstoff-zunstandes der Boden. II” (Studies on chemical soil analysis as a basis for assessing the nutrient status of the soil). K. Lantbrhogsk. Annlr, 20, 199–216. (in German).
FAO (2006). World reference base for soil resources. World Soil Resources Reports N. 103. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
Ferrari, P. A., & Salini, S. (2011). Complementary use of rasch models and nonlinear principal component analysis in the assessment of the opinion of european about utilities. Journal of Classification, 28, 53–69.
Fortes, R., Millán, S., Prieto, M. H., & Campillo, C. (2015). A methodology based on apparent electrical conductivity and guided soil samples to improve irrigation zoning. Precision Agriculture, 16, 441–454.
Godinho, S., Guiomar, N., Machado, R., Santos, P., Sá-Sousa, P., Fernandes, J. P., et al. (2016). Assessment of environment, land management, and spatial variables on recent changes in montado land cover in southern Portugal. Agroforestry Systems, 90, 177–192.
Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of Item Response Theory. Newbury Park, CA, USA: Sage Publishing.
Kindelan, M., Moscoso, M., & González-Rodríguez, P. (2016). Radial basis function interpolation in the limit of increasingly flat basis functions. Journal of Computational Physics, 307, 225–242.
Linacre, J. M. (2009). Winsteps (Computer program and manual). Chicago, USA: MESA Press.
Maestrini, B., & Basso, B. (2018). Predicting spatial patterns of within-field crop yield variability. Field Crops Research, 219, 106–112.
Miao, Y., Mulla, D. J., & Robert, P. C. (2018). An integrated approach to site-specific management zone delineation. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 5(4), 432–441.
Mokarram, M., & Hojati, M. (2017). Using ordered weight averaging (OWA) aggregation for multi-criteria soil fertility evaluation by GIS (case study: southeast Iran). Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 132, 1–13.
Moral, F. J., & Serrano, J. (2019). Using low-cost geophysical survey to map soil properties and delineate management zones on grazed permanent pastures. Precision Agriculture, 20, 1000–1014.
Moral, F. J., Rebollo, F. J., & Serrano, J. (2019). Estimating and mapping pasture soil fertility in a portuguese montado based on a objective model and geostatistical techniques. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 157, 500–508.
Moral, F. J., & Rebollo, F. J. (2017). Characterization of soil fertility using the Rasch model. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 17(2), 486–498.
Moral, F. J., Terrón, J. M., & Rebollo, F. J. (2011). Site-specific management zones based on the Rasch model and geostatistical techniques. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 75, 223–230.
Moral, F. J., Terrón, J. M., & Marques da Silva, J. R. (2010). Delineation of management zones using mobile measurements of soil apparent electrical conductivity and multivariate geostatistical techniques. Soil and Tillage Research, 106, 335–343.
Morari, F., Castrignanò, A., & Pagliarin, C. (2009). Application of multivariate geostatistics in delineating management zones within a gravelly vineyard using geo-electrical sensors. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 68, 97–107.
Ortega, R. A., & Santibáñez, O. A. (2007). Determination of management zones in corn (Zea mays L.) based on soil fertility. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 58, 49–59.
Peel, M. C., Finlayson, B. L., & McMahon, T. A. (2007). Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 11, 1633–1644.
Peralta, N. R., Cicore, P. L., Marino, M. A., Marques da Silva, J. R., & Costa, J. L. (2015). Use of geophysical survey as a predictor of the edaphic properties variability in soils used for livestock production. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research., 13(4), e1103.
Peralta, N. R., & Costa, J. L. (2013). Delineation of management zones with soil apparent electrical conductivity to improve nutrient management. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 99, 218–226.
Rasch, G. (1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Revised and expanded ed. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press., (1960, Danmarks Paedagogiske Institut)
Rebollo, F.J., Moral, F.J., Campillo, C., Marques da Silva, J.R., Serrano, J.M., & Pérez-Rodríguez, J.M., 2017. Delineation of management zones based on the Rasch model in an olive orchard. In J A Taylor, D Cammarano, A Prashar, A Hamilton (Eds.) Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Precision Agriculture. Advances in Animal Biosciences: 8 (2), 610–614.
Schellberg, J., Hill, M. J., Gerhards, R., Rothmund, M., & Braun, M. (2008). Precision agriculture on grassland: Applications, perspectives and constraints. European Journal of Agronomy, 29(2–3), 59–71.
Sekaran, U. (2000). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. New York, USA: Wiley, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Serrano, J., Shahidian, S., Marques da Silva, J., Paixao, L., Calado, J., & de Carvalho, M. (2019). Integration of soil electrical conductivity and indices obtained through satellite imagery for differential management of pasture fertilization. AgriEngineering, 1, 567–585.
Serrano, J., Shahidian, S., Marques da Silva, J., Sales-Baptista, E., Ferraz De Oliveira, I., Lopes De Castro, J., et al. (2017). Tree influence on soil and pasture: Contribution of proximal sensing to pasture productivity and quality estimation in montado ecosystems. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 14(6), 10024–10041.
Serrano, J., Peça, J., Marques da Silva, J., & Shahidian, S. (2010). Mapping soil and pasture variability with an electromagnetic induction sensor. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 73, 7–16.
Stefanski, A., & Simpson, R.J. (2010). Uneven nurient distributionin hillside paddocks indicate potential need for variable rate fertiliser application to pastures. In: Dove, H., Culvenor, R. (Eds.), Food security from sustainable agriculture. Proceedings 15th Australian agronomy conference. Australian Society of Agronomy/The Regional Institute Ltd.: Gosford, NSW.
Tristán, A. (2002). Análisis de Rasch para todos (Rasch analysis for everyone). Mexico city, Mexico: Ceneval. (in Spanish).
Trotter, M., Guppy, C., Haling, R., Trotter, T., Edwards, C., & Lamb, D. (2014). Spatial variability in pH and key soil nutrients: Is this an opportunity to increase fertiliser and lime-use efficiency in grazing systems? Crop and Pasture Science, 65, 817–827.
Xin-Zhong, W., Guo-Shun, L., Hong-Chao, H., Zhen-Hai, W., Qing-Hua, L., Xu-Feng, L., et al. (2009). Determination of management zones for a tobacco field based on soil fertility. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 65, 168–175.
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by the Junta de Extremadura and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through the Project GR18086 (Research Group TIC008). It was also funded by National Funds through FCT (Foundation for Science and Technology) under the Project UIDB/05183/2020, by the project INNOACE—Innovación abierta e inteligente en la EUROACE (Tarea 2.1.3) and by the projects PDR2020−101-030693 and PDR2020−101-031244 (“Programa 1.0.1-Grupos Operacionais”).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moral, F.J., Rebollo, F.J., Serrano, J.M. et al. Mapping management zones in a sandy pasture soil using an objective model and multivariate techniques. Precision Agric 22, 800–817 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-020-09756-w
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-020-09756-w