Skip to main content
Log in

Determining placement criteria of moisture sensors through temporal stability analysis of soil water contents for a variable rate irrigation system

  • Published:
Precision Agriculture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Developing placement criteria for soil moisture sensors is crucial in increasing the practical functionality of a variable rate irrigation (VRI) system. In this field study, the temporal stability pattern of soil water content was compared between VRI and uniform rate irrigation (URI) treatments during growing seasons of winter wheat and summer maize to determine the placement criteria of soil water sensors. The 1.64-ha experimental site located in a highly variable alluvial flood plain was divided into four management zones according to the available water holding capacity ranging from 152 to 205 mm within the 0.6 m soil profile. In each zone, two sub-zones were created to represent VRI and URI treatments. A temporal stability analysis of soil moisture was conducted by regularly measuring soil water contents at 62 locations in the field during the growing seasons. Results showed that the VRI management changed the overall similarity of soil moisture spatial patterns when crop water consumption was provided mainly by irrigation water rather than precipitation. In each management zone, every measuring position was a time-stable location with respect to the mean soil water content. Significant linear regressions were detected between the mean clay percentile in each management zone and the clay percentile representing the mean soil water content sites, and a nearly equivalent value of fitted equation coefficient was obtained for winter wheat (1.15) and summer maize (1.19). These results demonstrated that the temporal stability of soil water content spatial patterns still existed in each management zone with the VRI management, and the clay percentile supplied a priori identification for placement of soil moisture sensors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Raes, D., & Smith, M. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. In FAO irrigation and drainage paper No. 56. Rome, Italy: FAO.

  • Bannayan, M., & Hoogenboom, G. (2009). Using pattern recognition for estimating cultivar coefficients of a crop simulation model. Field Crops Research, 111, 290–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas, A., & Si, B. C. (2011). Scales and locations of time stability of soil water storage in a hummocky landscape. Journal of Hydrology, 408(1–2), 100–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. G., LaRue, J., Stone, K. C., & King, B. A. (2013). Adoption of site-specific variable rate sprinkler irrigation systems. Irrigation Science, 31, 871–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, G. L., & Liu, C. M. (1998). Analysis of root system growth in relation to soil water extraction pattern by winter wheat under water-limiting conditions. Journal of Natural Resources, 13(3), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grayson, R. B., & Western, A. W. (1998). Towards areal estimation of soil water content from point measurements: Time and space stability of mean response. Journal of Hydrology, 207(1–2), 68–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hedley, C. B., Bradbury, S., Ekanayake, J., Yule, I. J., & Carrick, S. (2010). Spatial irrigation scheduling for variable rate irrigation. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association, 72, 97–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedley, C. B., & Yule, I. J. (2009). A method for spatial prediction of daily soil water status for precise irrigation scheduling. Agricultural Water Management, 96(12), 1737–1745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, W., Tallon, L. K., & Si, B. C. (2012). Evaluation of time stability indices for soil water storage upscaling. Journal of Hydrology, 475, 229–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, P. D., Porter, J. R., & Wilson, D. R. (1991). A test of the computer simulation model ARC-WHEAT1 on wheat crops grown in New Zealand. Field Crops Research, 27, 337–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kachanoski, R. G., & De Jong, E. (1988). Scale dependence and the temporal persistence of spatial patterns of soil water storage. Water Resource Research., 24(1), 85–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaleita, A. L., Hirschi, M. C., & Tian, L. F. (2007). Field-scale surface soil moisture patterns and their relationship to topographic indices. Transactions of the ASABE, 50(2), 557–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamgar, A., Hopmans, J. W., Wallender, W. W., & Wendroth, O. (1993). Plotsize and sample number for neutron probe measurements in small field trials. Soil Science, 156(4), 213–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerry, R., & Oliver, M. A. (2008). Determining nugget: Sill ratios of standardized variograms from aerial photographs to krige sparse soil data. Precisison Agriculture, 9(1), 33–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, B. A., Stark, J. C., & Wall, R. W. (2006). Comparison of site-specific and conventional uniform irrigation management for potatoes. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 22(5), 677–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijbroke, R., Hoogenboom, G., & Jones, W. J. (2003). Optimizing irrigation management for a spatially variable soybean field. Agricultural Systems, 76(1), 359–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, J. T., & Amato, M. (1990). Field evaluation of plant extractable soil water for irrigation scheduling. Acta Horticulturae, 278, 595–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, E. J., Camp, C. R., Evans, D. E., & Millen, J. A. (2002). Spatial variation of corn response to irrigation. Transactions of the ASAE, 45(6), 1869–1881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaap, M. G., Leij, F. J., & Van Genuchten, M. T. (2001). Rosetta: A computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions. Journal of Hydrology, 251(3–4), 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, C. S., Nielsen, D. R., & Biggar, J. W. (1979). Scaling of field measured soil water properties. Hilgardia, 47, 77–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor, C. W., & Cochran, W. C. (1967). Statistical methods (3rd ed.). Ames, IA: Iowa State Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sui, R., & Baggard, J. (2015). Wireless sensor network for monitoring soil moisture and weather conditions. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 31(2), 193–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vachaud, G., Passerat De Silans, A., Balabanis, P., & Vauclin, M. (1985). Temporal stability of spatially measured soil water probability density function. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 49(4), 822–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Genuchten, M. T. (1980). A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 44(5), 892–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Pelt, R. S., & Wierenga, P. J. (2001). Temporal stability of spatially measured soil matric potential probability density function. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 65, 668–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vauclin, M., Viera, S. R., Vachaud, G., & Nielsen, D. R. (1983). The use of cokriging with limited field soil observations. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 47, 175–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Western, A. W., & Bloschl, G. (1999). On the spatial scaling of soil moisture. Journal of Hydrology, 217, 203–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, J. C. (1962). Rate of soil drainage following an irrigation III: A new concept of the upper limit of available moisture. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 42, 122–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, W. X., Li, J. S., LI, X. M., & Li, Y. F. (2016). Comparison of irrigation scheduling with water balance and sensor-based methods for a variable rate irrigation system of center pivot, paper No. 2461053. St Joseph, MI: ASABE.

  • Zhao, W. X., Li, J. S., Yang, R. M., & Li, Y. F. (2014). Field evaluation of water distribution characteristics of variable ratecenter pivot irrigation system. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 30(22), 53–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, S. L., Wu, Y. C., Wang, Z. M., Lu, L. Q., & Wang, R. Z. (2008). The nitrate leached below maize root zone is available for deep-rooted wheat in winter wheat-summer maize rotation in the North China Plain. Environmental Pollution, 152(3), 723–730.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFC0400104), the State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin (Grant No. 2016TS05), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51309251).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiusheng Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, W., Li, J., Yang, R. et al. Determining placement criteria of moisture sensors through temporal stability analysis of soil water contents for a variable rate irrigation system. Precision Agric 19, 648–665 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-017-9545-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-017-9545-2

Keywords

Navigation