Skip to main content
Log in

Estimating off-rate pesticide application errors resulting from agricultural sprayer turning movements

  • Published:
Precision Agriculture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pesticide application is an essential practice on many U.S. crop farms. Off-rate pesticide application errors may result from velocity differential across the spray boom while turning, pressure fluctuations across the spray boom, or changes in boom-to-canopy height due to undulating terrain. The sprayer path co-ordinates and the status (on or off) of each boom control section were recorded using the sprayer control console which provided map-based automatic boom section control. These data were collected for ten fields of varying shapes and sizes located in central Kentucky. In order to estimate potential errors resulting from sprayer turning movements, a method was developed to compare the differences in application areas between spray boom control sections. The area covered by the center boom control section was considered the “target rate area” and the difference in these areas and the areas covered by remaining control sections were compared to estimate application rate errors. The results of this analysis conducted with sprayer application files collected from ten fields, many containing impassable grassed waterways, indicated that a substantial portion of the fields (6.5–23.8%) could have received application in error by more than ±10% of the target rate. Off-rate application errors exceeding ±10% of the target rate for the study fields tended to increase as the average turning angles increased. The implication of this is that producers may be unintentionally applying at off-label rates in fields of varying shapes and sizes where turning movements are required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bode, L. E., & Butler, B. J. (1983). Spray characteristics of rotary atomizers. In K. G. Seymour (Ed.), Proceedings of the pesticide formulations and application systems second conference (pp. 89–104). ASTM TP 795. Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing Materials.

  • Bonny, S. (2008). Genetically modified glyphosate-tolerant soybean in the USA: Adoption factors, impacts and prospects. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 28, 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, W. J., Hahn, R. R., & Stachowski, P. J. (2006). Time of weed removal with glyphosate affects corn growth and yield components. Agronomy Journal, 98(2), 349–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faechner, T., Norrena, K., Thomas, A. G., & Deutsch, C. V. (2002). A risk-qualified approach to calculate locally varying herbicide application rates. Weed Research, 42(6), 476–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, J. P., Shearer, S. A., Stombaugh, T. S., Higgins, S. F., & Dillon, C. R. (2003). ‘As-applied’ model validation for variable-rate application of granular materials. In P. C. Rober, R. H. Rust, W. E. Larson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th international conference on precision agriculture and other precision resources management. Madison, WI, USA: ASA-CSSA-SSSA. CD-ROM.

  • Gibson, C. (2004). Full season soybean enterprise 1999–2003. University of Kentucky College of Agriculture. http://www.uky.edu/Ag/AgEcon/pubs/ext_other/kfbm_soybean99-03.pdf. Accessed 26 Jul 2010.

  • Giles, D. K., & Downey, D. (2003). Quality control verification and mapping for chemical application. Precision Agriculture, 4, 103–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, H. G., & Yule, I. J. (2007). Modeling of fertilizer distribution using measured machine parameters. Transactions of the ASABE, 50(4), 1141–1147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luck, J. D., Pitla, S. K., Shearer, S. A., Mueller, T. G., Dillon, C. R., Fulton, J. P., et al. (2010a). Potential for pesticide and nutrient savings via map-based automatic boom section control of spray nozzles. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 70(1), 19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luck, J. D., Zandonadi, R. S., Luck, B. D., & Shearer, S. A. (2010b). Reducing pesticide over-application with map-based automatic boom section control on agricultural sprayers. Transactions of the ASABE, 53(3), 685–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, K. N., & Zablotowicz, R. M. (2003). Glyphosate-resistant soybean response to various salts of glyphosate and glyphosate accumulation in soybean nodules. Weed Science, 51, 496–502.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, K. N., Hoagland, R. E., & Zablotowicz, R. M. (2000). Effect of glyphosate on growth, chlorophyll, and nodulation in glyphosate-resistant and susceptible soybean (Glycine max) varieties. Journal of New Seeds, 2, 37–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafagh-Kolvanagh, J., Zehtab-Salmasi, S., Javanshir, A., Moghaddam, M., & Nasab, A. D. M. (2008). Effects of nitrogen and duration of weed interference on grain yield and SPAD (chlorophyll) value of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merril.). Journal of Food Agriculture and the Environment, 6(3–4), 368–373.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkerson, G. G., Price, A. J., Bennett, A. C., Krueger, D. W., Roberson, G. T., & Robinson, B. L. (2004). Evaluating the potential for site-specific herbicide application in soybean. Weed Technology, 18(4), 1101–1110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their appreciation to Mike Ellis, Bob Ellis, Jim Ellis, and Matt McClure of Worth and Dee Ellis Farm for their cooperation on this research project. This material is based upon work supported by the Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under Agreement no. 2008-34628-19532. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The information reported in this paper (no. 10-05-045) is part of a project of the Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station and is published with the approval of the Director. Mention of trade names is for informational purposes only and does not necessarily imply endorsement by the Kentucky Agricultural Experiment Station.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joe D. Luck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Luck, J.D., Pitla, S.K., Zandonadi, R.S. et al. Estimating off-rate pesticide application errors resulting from agricultural sprayer turning movements. Precision Agric 12, 534–545 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-010-9199-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-010-9199-9

Keywords

Navigation