Abstract
A field study was conducted in 2006 in a dryland cotton field in Texas, USA, to explore the spatial variation of cotton fiber quality and the loan rate associated with it. A total of 66 cotton samples were hand-harvested, and the fiber quality properties investigated included the High Volume Instrument measurements of micronaire, length, uniformity, strength, elongation, reflectance (Rd) and yellowness (+b). Conventional statistics showed a generally low level of variation in fiber quality with coefficients of variation <10%. Variogram analysis showed that all fiber quality properties were spatially correlated. Contour maps of individual fiber quality properties were produced from block kriged estimates. Fiber length, uniformity, strength and Rd were positively correlated, and all of these were negatively correlated with +b. The spatial distribution of most fiber quality properties was similar to that of soil apparent electrical conductivity, suggesting that water holding capacity could be a limiting factor for cotton fiber quality. Maps of individual fiber quality properties were combined with the United State Department of Agriculture—Commodity Credit Corporation Loan Schedule for Upland Cotton to create a loan rate map that is associated with fiber quality. A loan rate difference of 20 cents kg–1 was observed within the field. This level of difference indicated that fiber quality at the field level can have a large impact on producers’ revenue. A site-specific management system encompassing both lint yields and fiber quality is strongly recommended for cotton production.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bradow, J. M., Wartelle, L. H., Bauer, P. J., & Sassenrath-Cole, G. F. (1997). Small-sample cotton fiber quality quantitation. Journal of Cotton Science, 1, 48–60.
Elms, M. K., Green, C. J., & Johnson, P. N. (2001). Variability of cotton yield and quality. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 32, 351–368.
Fridgen, J. J., White, S., Roberts, B., & Sheely, T. (2004). Site-specific application of cotton harvest aids using remotely sensed imagery. In D. A. Richter (Ed.), Proceedings of the beltwide cotton conference (pp. 820–837). Memphis, Tennessee, USA: National Cotton Council.
Ge, Y., Thomasson, J. A., Morgan, C. L., & Searcy, S. W. (2007). VNIR diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for agricultural soil property determination based on regression-kriging. Transactions of the ASABE, 50, 1081–1092.
Isaaks, E. H., & Srivastava, R. M. (1989). An introduction to applied geostatistics. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
Johnson, R. M., Downer, R. G., Bradow, J. M., Bauer, P. J., & Sadler, E. J. (2002). Variability in cotton fiber yield, fiber quality, and soil properties in a southeastern coastal plain. Agronomy Journal, 94, 1305–1316.
Journel, A. G., & Huijbregts, C. H. (1978). Mining geostatistics. New York, USA: Academic Press.
Kerry, R., & Oliver, M. A. (2007). Comparing sampling needs for variograms of soil properties computed by the methods of moments and residual maximum likelihood. Geoderma, 140, 383–396.
Lark, R. M. (2000). Estimating variograms of soil properties by the method-of-moments and maximum likelihood. European Journal of Soil Science, 51, 717–728.
Matheron, G. (1965). Les variables régionalisées et leur estimation: une application de la théorie de fonctions aléatoires aux sciences de la nature. Paris: Masson et Cie.
McKinion, J. M., Jenkins, J. N., Akins, D., Turner, S. B., Willers, J. L., Jallas, E., & Whisler, F. D. (2001). Analysis of a precision agriculture approach to cotton production. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 32, 213–228.
Patterson, H. D., & Thompson, R. (1971). Recovery of interblock information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika, 58, 545–554.
Perry, C., Pocknee, S., Kvien, C. & Vellidis, G. (2004). Optimizing irrigation water applications. In D. A. Richter (Ed.), Proceedings of the beltwide cotton conference (p. 316). Memphis, Tennessee, USA: National Cotton Council.
Ping, J. L., Green, C. J., Bronson, K. F., Zartman, R. E., & Doberman, A. D. (2004). Identification of relationships between cotton yield, quality, and soil properties. Agronomy Journal, 96, 1588–1597.
Plant, R. E., Munk, D. S., Roberts, B. R., Vargas, R. L., Rains, D. W., Travis, R. L., & Hutmacher, R. B. (2000). Relationships between remotely sensed reflectance data and cotton growth and yield. Transactions of the ASAE, 43, 535–546.
Sassenrath, G. F., Adams, E. R., & Williford, J. R. (2005). Rapid sampling system for determination of cotton fiber quality spatial variability. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 21, 9–14.
Searcy, S. W. & Beck, A. D. (2000). Real time assessment of cotton plant height. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on precision agriculture (CD), July 16–19, 2000. Bloomington, Minnesota, USA.
Solie, J. B., Raun, W. R., & Stone, M. L. (1999). Submeter spatial variability of selected soil and bermudagrass production variables. Soil Science Society American Journal, 63, 1724–1733.
Sui, R., & Thomasson, J. A. (2006). Ground-based sensing system for cotton nitrogen status determination. Transactions of the ASABE, 49, 1983–1991.
Thomasson, J. A., & Sui, R. (2003). Mississippi cotton yield monitor: Three years of field-test results. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 19, 631–636.
USDA. Agricultural Marketing Service. (2001). Agricultural handbook 566: The classification of cotton. Washington, DC, USA: USDA.
USDA. Farm Service Agency. (2007). 2006 CCC loan schedule of premiums and discounts for upland and ELS cotton. Available at http://www.fsa.usda.gov/FSA/webapp?area=home&subject=prsu&topic=lor. Accessed 07 July 2007.
Vellidis, G., Perry, C. D., Rains, G. C., Thomas, D. L., Wells, N., & Kvien, C. K. (2003). Simultaneous assessment of cotton yield monitors. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 19, 259–272.
Wang, R. (2004). Site-specific prediction and measurement of cotton fiber quality. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Mississippi State, Mississippi: Mississippi State University, Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering.
Webster, R., & Oliver, M. A. (1992). Sample adequately to estimate variograms of soil properties. Journal of Soil Science, 48, 177–192.
Wilkerson, J. B., Moody, F. H., Hart, W. E., & Funk, P. A. (2001). Design and evaluation of a cotton flow rate sensor. Transactions of the ASAE, 44, 1415–1420.
Yang, C., Fernandez, C. J., & Everitt, J. H. (2005). Mapping phymatotrichum root rot of cotton using airborne three band digital imagery. Transactions of the ASAE, 48, 1619–1626.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the Cotton Foundation and the Food and Fibers Research Grant Program at the Texas Department of Agriculture, Texas, USA for funding this project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ge, Y., Thomasson, J.A., Sui, R. et al. Spatial variation of fiber quality and associated loan rate in a dryland cotton field. Precision Agric 9, 181–194 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-008-9064-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-008-9064-2