1 Erratum to: Positivity DOI 10.1007/s11117-015-0354-4
We acknowledge that some results of our original article have been proved earlier in [1, 2] by Elbour et al.
The first one is Theorem 2.8 of the original paper, which is exactly [1, Theorem 2.11]. But we provide a different way to prove “(iib) \(\Rightarrow \) (i)” of Theorem 2.8 of the original paper. The next one is Theorem 3.3 of the original paper, a few lines can prove it is exactly [1, Theorem 2.7]. Also, we introduce the theorem in a different way. At last, Theorem 2.1 and part of Theorem 2.6 of the original paper are contained in [2, Theorem 2.7] and [2, Corollary 2.11], respectively. We feel sorry about that we ignored [1, 2].
References
Elbour, A., Machrafi, N., Moussa, M.: On the class of weak almost limited operators (2014) (preprint). arXiv:1403.0136
Machrafi, N., Elbour, A., Fahri, E., Bouras, K.: On the positive weak almost limited operators. Arab J. Math. Sci. 21(2), 136–143 (2015). ISSN 1319-5166
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1007/s11117-015-0354-4.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Deng, Y., Chen, Z. & Gao, N. Erratum to: On positive almost weak* Dunford–Pettis operators. Positivity 20, 755 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11117-015-0376-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11117-015-0376-y