Skip to main content
Log in

Do low-carbon rewards incentivize people to ridesplitting? Evidence from structural analysis

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ridesplitting is a pooled version of a ridesourcing service that can reduce emissions per trip compared with exclusive ridehailing. However, it only takes a small share of the ridesourcing market currently. Fiscal and social incentives are potential leverage tools to attract passengers from solo hailed rides. This study aims to quantitatively identify the effects of carbon credits (CC) and monetary rewards (MR) on people's willingness to adopt ridesplitting. The theory of planned behavior realized by structural equation modeling decomposes the factors which affect passengers' intention and actual action on choosing ridesplitting. Confirmatory factor analysis suggests that pro-environmental attitudes do not directly force people to ridesplitting. Path effect analysis shows that subjective norms and perceived behavioral control significantly affect ridesplitting intentions. Immediate effect regression reveals that CC has greater direct effects on ridesplitting intention than MR (4.5 times more effective). Moderating effect analysis shows the MR effect reduces while the CC effect enhances when increasing the incentive value. The results encourage policymakers and operation designers to consider better marketing schemes combining monetary and social incentives to promote ridesplitting and to gain better fiscal and environmental benefits from ridesourcing systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abkarian, H., Chen, Y., Mahmassani, H.S.: Understanding ridesplitting behavior with interpretable machine learning models using chicago transportation network company data. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2676(2), 83–99 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211036363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50(2), 179–211 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Akbari, M., Amiri, N.S., Zúñiga, M.Á., Padash, H., Shakiba, H.: Evidence for acceptance of ride-hailing services in Iran. Transp. Res. Rec: J. Transp. Res. Board 2674(11), 289–303 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso-Mora, J., Samaranayake, S., Wallar, A., Frazzoli, E., Rus, D.: On-demand high-capacity ride-sharing via dynamic trip-vehicle assignment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114(3), 462–467 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Asgari, H., Jin, X.: Propensity toward ride-sourcing: Desired savings in travel time and mobility cost to switch from private mobility. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 121, 102883 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basili, M., Rossi, M.A.: Platform-mediated reputation systems in the sharing economy and incentives to provide service quality: the case of ridesharing services. Electron. Commer Res. Appl. 39, 100835 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benita, F.: Carpool to work: determinants at the county-level in the United States. J. Transp. Geogr. 87, 102791 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellanos, S., Grant-Muller, S., Wright, K.: Technology, transport, and the sharing economy: towards a working taxonomy for shared mobility. Transp. Rev. 42(3), 318–336 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.1968976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., Zahiri, M., Zhang, S.: Understanding ridesplitting behavior of on-demand ride services: an ensemble learning approach. Transp. Res. Part c: Emerg. Technol. 76, 51–70 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, C.-M., Wang, E.T.G.: Understanding web-based learning continuance intention: the role of subjective task value. Inf. Manag. 45(3), 194–201 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner, M., Armitage, C.J.: Extending the theory of planned behavior: a review and avenues for further research. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 28(15), 1429–1464 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui, Y., Makhija, R.S.M.S., Chen, R.B., He, Q., Khani, A.: Understanding and modeling the social preferences for riders in rideshare matching. Transportation 48(4), 1809–1835 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigon, S., Murphy, C., TCRP Report 188: Shared mobility and the transformation of public transit, TCRP Report. Transportation research board, Washington DC. (2016)

  • Feng, Z.-H., Zou, L.-L., Wei, Y.-M.: Carbon price volatility: evidence from EU ETS. Appl. Energy 88(3), 590–598 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. (JMR) 18(1), 39–50 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehrke, S.R., Huff, M.P., Reardon, T.G.: Social and trip-level predictors of pooled ride-hailing service adoption in the Greater Boston region. Case Stud. Transp. Policy 9(3), 1026–1034 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou, Y., Garikapati, V., Weigl, D., Henao, A., Moniot, M., Sperling, J.: Factors Influencing willingness to pool in ride-hailing trips. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 2674(5), 419–429 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, R.H.: Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Sage Publications Inc, California (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, G., Qiao, S., Yeh, A.G.-O.: Spatiotemporally heterogeneous willingness to ridesplitting and its relationship with the built environment: a case study in Chengdu, China. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 133, 103425 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  • ITF: ITF (International Transport Forum) Transport Outlook 2021. OECD Publishing, Paris (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji, C.-J., Hu, Y.-J., Tang, B.-J.: Research on carbon market price mechanism and influencing factors: a literature review. Nat. Hazards 92(2), 761–782 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, X., Ding, Z., Liu, R.: Can Chinese residential low-carbon consumption behavior intention be better explained? The role of cultural values. Nat. Hazards 95(1–2), 155–171 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • La Barbera, F., Ajzen, I.: Moderating role of perceived behavioral control in the theory of planned behavior: a preregistered study. J.theor. Soc. Psychol. 5(1), 35–45 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, W.F., Wiedmann, T., Pongratz, J., Andrew, R., Crippa, M., Olivier, J.G.J., Wiedenhofer, D., Mattioli, G., Khourdajie, A.A., House, J., Pachauri, S., Figueroa, M., Saheb, Y., Slade, R., Hubacek, K., Sun, L., Ribeiro, S.K., Khennas, S., de la Rue du Can, S., Chapungu, L., Davis, S.J., Bashmakov, I., Dai, H., Dhakal, S., Tan, X., Geng, Y., Gu, B., Minx, J.: A review of trends and drivers of greenhouse gas emissions by sector from 1990 to 2018. Environ. Res. Lett. 16(7), 073005 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abee4e

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, J.R., Caicedo, J.D., Bayen, A.M., Shaheen, S.A.: To pool or not to pool? Understanding opportunities, challenges, and equity considerations to expanding the market for pooling. Transp. Res. Part a: Policy Pract. 148, 199–222 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., Lee, W.J., Yoo, K.-H.: Millennial ride-share passengers’ pro-sustainable behaviors: norm activation perspective. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 25(1), 15–26 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, W., Pu, Z., Li, Y., Ban, X.: Characterization of ridesplitting based on observed data: a case study of Chengdu, China. Transp. Res. Part c: Emerg. Technol. 100, 330–353 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, W., Pu, Z., Li, Y., Tu, M.: How does ridesplitting reduce emissions from ridesourcing? A spatiotemporal analysis in Chengdu, China. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 95, 102885 (2021a). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., Feng, F., Wang, W., Cheng, C., Wang, T., Tang, P., Miwa, T.: Structure analysis of factors influencing the preference of ridesplitting. J. Adv. Transp. 2021, 1–8 (2021b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Li, W., Li, Y., Fan, J., Shen, Z.: Quantifying environmental benefits of ridesplitting based on observed data from ridesourcing services. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 2675(8), 355–368 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Yan, X., Liu, F., Wang, R., Leng, Y.: A trip-specific model for fuel saving estimation and subsidy policy making of carpooling based on empirical data. Appl. Energy 240, 295–311 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Loa, P., Mashrur, S.M., Nurul Habib, K.: What influences the substitution of ride-sourcing for public transit and taxi services in Toronto? An exploratory structural equation model-based study. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2021.1978018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malik, J., Alemi, F., Circella, G.: Exploring the factors that affect the frequency of use of ridehailing and the adoption of shared ridehailing in California. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 2675(5), 120–135 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattia, G., Guglielmetti Mugion, R., Principato, L.: Shared mobility as a driver for sustainable consumptions: the intention to re-use free-floating car sharing. J. Clean. Prod. 237, 117404 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitropoulos, L., Kortsari, A., Ayfantopoulou, G.: Factors affecting drivers to participate in a carpooling to public transport service. Sustainability 13(16), 9129 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molina, J.A., Giménez-Nadal, J.I., Velilla, J.: Sustainable commuting: results from a social approach and international evidence on carpooling. Sustainability 12(22), 9587 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, B., Monzon, A., López, E.: Transition to a cyclable city: latent variables affecting bicycle commuting. Transp. Res. Part a: Policy Pract. 84, 4–17 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B.: A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika 49(1), 115–132 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, L.E., Maier, R., Friman, M.: Why do they ride with others? Meta-analysis of factors influencing travelers to carpool. Sustainability 11(8), 2414 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwieterman, J., Smith, C.S.: Sharing the ride: a paired-trip analysis of UberPool and Chicago transit authority services in Chicago, Illinois. Res. Transp. Econ. 71, 9–16 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaheen, S., Chan, N., Bansal, A., Cohen, A.: Shared mobility: a sustainability & technologies workshop: definitions, industry developments, and early understanding. University of California, Berkeley, Transportation Sustainability Research Center, California Department of Transportation, Berkeley (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaheen, S., Cohen, A.: Shared ride services in North America: definitions, impacts, and the future of pooling. Transp. Rev. 39(4), 427–442 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiraki, H., Matsumoto, K.I., Shigetomi, Y., Ehara, T., Ochi, Y., Ogawa, Y.: Factors affecting CO2 emissions from private automobiles in Japan: The impact of vehicle occupancy. Appl. Energy 259, 114196 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soria, J., Stathopoulos, A.: Investigating socio-spatial differences between solo ridehailing and pooled rides in diverse communities. J. Transp. Geogr. 95, 103148 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storch, D.M., Timme, M., Schroder, M.: Incentive-driven transition to high ride-sharing adoption. Nat Commun 12(1), 3003 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, L., Wang, S., Liu, S., Yao, L., Luo, W., Shukla, A.: A completive research on the feasibility and adaptation of shared transportation in mega-cities – A case study in Beijing. Appl. Energy 230, 1014–1033 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirachini, A.: Ride-hailing, travel behaviour and sustainable mobility: an international review. Transportation 47(4), 2011–2047 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirachini, A., Chaniotakis, E., Abouelela, M., Antoniou, C.: The sustainability of shared mobility: Can a platform for shared rides reduce motorized traffic in cities? Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 117, 102707 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu, M., Li, W., Orfila, O., Li, Y., Gruyer, D.: Exploring nonlinear effects of the built environment on ridesplitting: evidence from Chengdu. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 93, 102776 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu, W., Santi, P., Zhao, T., He, X., Li, Q., Dong, L., Wallington, T.J., Ratti, C.: Acceptability, energy consumption, and costs of electric vehicle for ride-hailing drivers in Beijing. Appl. Energy 250, 147–160 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadud, Z., Mattioli, G.: Fully automated vehicles: a cost-based analysis of the share of ownership and mobility services, and its socio-economic determinants. Transp. Res. Part a: Policy Pract. 151, 228–244 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., Yang, H.: Ridesourcing systems: a framework and review. Transp. Res. Part b: Methodol. 129, 122–155 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Jin, Y., Wang, L., Ma, W., Li, T.: Incentive-based approach to control demands for operation of one-way carsharing system. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 2673(4), 427–438 (2019a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Ma, W., Wang, M., Qu, X.: Demand control model with combinatorial incentives and surcharges for one-way carsharing operation. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 125, 102999 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.102999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., Chen, X., Chen, X.: Ridesplitting is shaping young people’s travel behavior: Evidence from comparative survey via ride-sourcing platform. Transp. Res. Part d: Transp. Environ. 75, 57–71 (2019b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Y., Yan, X., Liu, X., Zhao, X.: Identifying key factors associated with ridesplitting adoption rate and modeling their nonlinear relationships. Transp. Res. Part a: Policy Pract. 144, 170–188 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, L., Luo, X., Zhu, R., Santi, P., Wang, H., Wang, D., Zhang, S., Ratti, C.: Quantifying and analyzing traffic emission reductions from ridesharing: a case study of Shanghai. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 89, 102629 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi, W., Yan, J.: Energy consumption and emission influences from shared mobility in China: a national level annual data analysis. Appl. Energy 277, 115549 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M., Farber, S., Palm, M.: The true cost of sharing: a detour penalty analysis between UberPool and UberX trips in Toronto. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 87, 102540 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuriev, A., Dahmen, M., Paillé, P., Boiral, O., Guillaumie, L.: Pro-environmental behaviors through the lens of the theory of planned behavior: a scoping review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 155, 104660 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104660

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H., Chen, J., Li, W., Song, X., Shibasaki, R.: Mobile phone GPS data in urban ride-sharing: An assessment method for emission reduction potential. Appl. Energy 269, 115038 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115038

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, K., Guo, H., Yao, G., Li, C., Zhang, Y., Wang, W.: Modeling acceptance of electric vehicle sharing based on theory of planned behavior. Sustainability 10(12), 4686 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Z., Qin, X., Ke, J., Zheng, Z., Yang, H.: Analysis of multi-modal commute behavior with feeding and competing ridesplitting services. Transp. Res. Part a: Policy Pract. 132, 713–727 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to extend their thanks to the supports provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52002280, 52002244).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LW: Software, Data Curation, Formal analysis, Writing—Original Draft. WL: Conceptualization, Writing—Review & Editing. JW: Investigation, Supervision, Data Curation. DZ: Methodology. WM: Project administration, Resources.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenxiang Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

This study adopted the online questionnaire approach to collect data from respondents. The data outline can be found in Tables 17 and 18.

Table 17 Demographic profile of the respondents (n = 330)
Table 18 response distribution

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, L., Li, W., Weng, J. et al. Do low-carbon rewards incentivize people to ridesplitting? Evidence from structural analysis. Transportation 50, 2077–2109 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-022-10302-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-022-10302-y

Keywords

Navigation