Abstract
According to the residential self-selection hypothesis in transportation planning, individual characteristics centering on sociodemographics and attitudes have been conceptualized as antecedent confounders in the built environment–travel behavior relationship (and subsequently, the built environment as a mediator). In medical science, socio-ecological models have been used to designate the individual characteristics and built environment to mutually function as moderators. However, whether individual characteristics (built environment) assume the role of the antecedent (mediator), moderator, or control, has received scant scholarly attention. Using a structural equation model based on the total travel time data of Seoul, this study finds that, by mode of travel, sociodemographics work as moderators for automobile travel and attitudes as antecedents for nonmotorized travel. The sociodemographics/attitudes and built environment are likely to be significant only if their counterpart is also significant. Demographically, the compact built environment tends to reduce automobile travel only for older residents and those who live in larger households. Moreover, travelers with positive attitudes toward daily facilities may self-select into compact neighborhoods and subsequently increase nonmotorized travel.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.
Code availability
Not applicable.
Notes
If the individual characteristics are moderators in the built environment–travel relationship (for example, a compact built environment may be effective in increasing active travel only for males), then, the built environment simultaneously works as a moderator in the individual characteristics–travel relationship (the gender difference on active travel is significant only in compact built environment settings).
According to the RSS hypothesis, partial mediation is usually specified and empirically supported, that is, not only their indirect effect through the built environment choice, but also the direct effect of the individual characteristics on travel behavior. For example, car lovers are inclined to move to suburban areas to meet their diving demands (indirect effect) but, no matter where they live, their automobile preference by itself is expected to increase automobile travel (direct effect).
Several studies (e.g., Bohte et al. 2009; Mokhtarian and Cao 2008) considered that, even from the RSS perspective, the built environment can influence attitudes (not only directly, but also indirectly through the built environment–travel behavior–attitudes path) in the long-term learning process or for the justification of residential choices (i.e., to reduce mismatches between travel attitudes and given travel options in the neighborhood), thereby suggesting a possible reciprocal causation (Gim 2016; Van Wee et al. 2019). In fact, the reciprocal causation potential has been empirically supported by natural experimental (e.g., De Vos et al. 2018; Lin et al. 2017) and longitudinal (e.g., Van de Coevering et al. 2018, 2021) studies. For example, through a natural experiment, Lin et al. (2017) identified this reciprocal causation for people with the possibility of residential self-selection and the one-way effect of the built environment on attitudes (i.e., reverse effect of residential self-selection) for those without this possibility. Likewise, De Vos et al. (2018) employed a cohort approach and found that attitudes as well as travel mode choices are adjusted by the new built environment after residential relocation. More recently, based on longitudinal SEM, Van de Coevering et al. (2021) confirmed both directions of the attitudes–built environment relationship. Also in theory, based on associations among the built environment, attitudes, and travel behavior, Cao et al. (2009) differently conceptualized the role of attitudes as (1) complete confounder (i.e., attitudes fully explain the observed built environment–travel relationship), (2) mediator of the relationship, (3) mediator of the reverse relationship, and (4) shared correlate with both. Extending these conceptual relationships, Heinen et al. (2018) further suspected attitudes as (5) predictor of travel behavior, (6) partial confounder (i.e., attitudes strengthens/weakens the observed built environment–travel relationship), and (7) antecedent of the relationship. According to Heinen et al. (2018), this study deals with the “classical example of residential self-selection” (p. 943), that is, (1) and (7) (full and partial mediation of the built environment).
Four core principles of socio-ecological models are as follows (Sallis et al. 2008). (1) Health behavior results from multiple levels of determinants. (2) The determinants interact across these levels. (3) Multi-level interventions are the most useful for behavioral changes. (4) The models are required to be customized to specific behavior according to which different determinants should be identified at each level.
The formative component is a component that is defined by indicators, while for the reflective component, an indicator is just one of numerous phenotypes of the latent variable. If two or more sociodemographic indicators have conceptual correlations (e.g., income and education), a representative one is selected for the formative component. Otherwise, the correlations lead to unstable coefficients and large standard errors.
Thus, the findings of this study do not apply to the underaged population in Seoul and those who are unregistered (e.g., short-staying inbound tourists and illegal immigrants).
Other survey items that were not used in this study include the perceived importance of the mechanical characteristics of different travel modes (e.g., convenience, comfort, safety, and privacy).
The automobile models used the data of automobile travelers as drivers of private vehicles, that is, automobile travelers as passengers and drivers of shared vehicles were not considered.
As a rule of thumb for the minimum sample size for PLS-SEM, Hair et al. (2011) suggested the larger of the following two: (1) 10 times the largest number of formative indicators for a component and (2) 10 times the largest number of structural paths to a component. As shown in Figs. 4, 5, 6 and 7, the largest numbers of formative indicators and structural paths in this study are 80 (= 8 sociodemographic indicators * 10) and 50 (= 5 paths to the travel behavior component in the moderation models * 10), respectively, and the sample size was required to be a minimum of 80. Meanwhile, regardless of such a rule of thumb, much smaller samples have often been used for PLS-SEM (see Aibinu and Al-Lawati 2010; Tenenhaus et al. 2005). In their simulation study on the sample size, Henseler et al. (2014) concluded that PLS-SEM functions well even in cases in which the numbers of indicators/components and paths exceed the sample size.
References
Aibinu, A.A., Al-Lawati, A.M.: Using PLS-SEM technique to model construction organizations’ willingness to participate in e-bidding. Autom. Constr. 19(6), 714–724 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2010.02.016
Ball, K., Timperio, A., Salmon, J., Giles-Corti, B., Roberts, R., Crawford, D.: Personal, social and environmental determinants of educational inequalities in walking: a multilevel study. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 61(2), 108–114 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2006.048520
Banister, D., Watson, S., Wood, C.: Sustainable cities: transport, energy, and urban form. Environ. Plan. B 24(1), 125–144 (1997)
Baron, R.M., Kenny, D.A.: The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51(6), 1173–1182 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Bauman, A.E., Sallis, J.F., Dzewaltowski, D.A., Owen, N.: Toward a better understanding of the influences on physical activity: the role of determinants, correlates, causal variables, mediators, moderators, and confounders. Am. J. Prev. Med. 23(2), 5–14 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00469-5
Beenackers, M.A., Kamphuis, C.B.M., Prins, R.G., Mackenbach, J.P., Burdorf, A., Van Lenthe, F.J.: Urban form and psychosocial factors: do they interact for leisure-time walking? Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 46(2), 293–301 (2014)
Bhat, C.R., Guo, J.Y.: A comprehensive analysis of built environment characteristics on household residential choice and auto ownership levels. Transp. Res. Part b Methodol. 41(5), 506–526 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2005.12.005
Boarnet, M., Crane, R.: The influence of land use on travel behavior: specification and estimation strategies. Transp. Res. A 35(9), 823–845 (2001)
Bohte, W., Maat, K., van Wee, B.: Measuring attitudes in research on residential self-selection and travel behaviour: a review of theories and empirical research. Transp. Rev. 29(3), 325–357 (2009)
Brown, B.B., Yamada, I., Smith, K.R., Zick, C.D., Kowaleski-Jones, L., Fan, J.X.: Mixed land use and walkability: variations in land use measures and relationships with BMI, overweight, and obesity. Health Place 15(4), 1130–1141 (2009)
Cao, X.: Exploring causal effects of neighborhood type on walking behavior using stratification on the propensity score. Environ. Plan A 42(2), 487–504 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1068/a4269
Cao, X., Handy, S.L., Mokhtarian, P.L.: The influences of the built environment and residential self-selection on pedestrian behavior: evidence from Austin. TX. Transp. 33(1), 1–20 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-005-7027-2
Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P.L., Handy, S.L.: Do changes in neighborhood characteristics lead to changes in travel behavior? A Struct. Equ. Model. Approach. Transp. 34(5), 535–556 (2007)
Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P.L., Handy, S.L.: Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behaviour: a focus on empirical findings. Transp. Rev. 29(3), 359–395 (2009)
Cao, X., Xu, Z., Fan, Y.: Exploring the connections among residential location, self-selection, and driving: propensity score matching with multiple treatments. Transp. Res. Part a Policy Pract. 44(10), 797–805 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2010.07.010
Cao, X.: Disentangling the influence of neighborhood type and self-selection on driving behavior: an application of sample selection model. Transportation 36(2), 207–222 (2009). http://link.springer.com/journal/volumesAndIssues/11116
Carlson, J.A., Sallis, J.F., Conway, T.L., Saelens, B.E., Frank, L.D., Kerr, J., Cain, K.L., King, A.C.: Interactions between psychosocial and built environment factors in explaining older adults’ physical activity. Prev. Med. 54(1), 68–73 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.10.004
Carlson, J.A., Bracy, N.L., Sallis, J.F., Millstein, R.A., Saelens, B.E., Kerr, J., Conway, T.L., Frank, L.D., Cain, K.L., King, A.C.: Sociodemographic moderators of relations of neighborhood safety to physical activity. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 46(8), 1554–1563 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1249/mss.0000000000000274
Carrión, G.C., Nitzl, C., Roldán, J.L.: Mediation analyses in partial least squares structural equation modeling: guidelines and empirical examples. In: Latan, H., Noonan, R. (eds.) Partial Least Squares Path Modeling. Springer, Cham, Switzerland (2017)
Chan, E.T.H.: The influence of the built environment on neighbourhood-level walking behaviour and experience: a case study of Shenzhen. University of Oxford (2020)
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., Aiken, L.S., West, S.H.: Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ (2003)
Colabianchi, N., Clennin, M.N., Dowda, M., McIver, K.L., Dishman, R.K., Porter, D.E., Pate, R.R.: Moderating effect of the neighbourhood physical activity environment on the relation between psychosocial factors and physical activity in children: a longitudinal study. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 73(7), 598–604 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2018-211456
Crane, R.: The influence of urban form on travel: an interpretive review. J. Plan. Lit. 15(1), 3–23 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1177/08854120022092890
D’Angelo, H., Fowler, S.L., Nebeling, L.C., Oh, A.Y.: Adolescent physical activity: moderation of individual factors by neighborhood environment. Am. J. Prev. Med. 52(6), 888–894 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.013
De Abreu e Silva, J., Golob, T.F., Goulias, K.G.: Effects of land use characteristics on residence and employment location and travel behavior of urban adult workers. Transp. Res. Record 17, 121–131 (2006)
De Meester, F., Van Dyck, D., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Deforche, B., Cardon, G.: Do psychosocial factors moderate the association between neighborhood walkability and adolescents’ physical activity? Soc. Sci. Med. 81, 1–9 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.01.013
De Vos, J., Derudder, B., Van Acker, V., Witlox, F.: Reducing car use: changing attitudes or relocating? the influence of residential dissonance on travel behavior. J. Transp. Geogr. 22, 1–9 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.11.005
De Vos, J., Ettema, D., Witlox, F.: Changing travel behaviour and attitudes following a residential relocation. J. Transp. Geogr. 73, 131–147 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.10.013
Ding, D., Gebel, K.: Built environment, physical activity, and obesity: what have we learned from reviewing the literature? Health Place 18(1), 100–105 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.08.021
Eisenberg, Y., Vanderbom, K.A., Vasudevan, V.: Does the built environment moderate the relationship between having a disability and lower levels of physical activity? Syst. Rev. Prev. Med. 95, S75–S84 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.07.019
Ewing, R., Cervero, R.: Travel and the built environment: a meta-analysis. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 76(3), 265–294 (2010)
Ewing, R., Bartholomew, K., Winkelman, S., Walters, J., Chen, D.: Growing cooler evidence on urban development and climate change. In. Urban Land Institute, Washington, D.C. (2008)
Fink, M., Harms, R., Kraus, S.: Cooperative internationalization of SMEs: self-commitment as a success factor for International Entrepreneurship. Eur. Manag. J. 26(6), 429–440 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2008.09.003
Forsyth, A., Michael Oakes, J., Lee, B., Schmitz, K.H.: The built environment, walking, and physical activity: Is the environment more important to some people than others? Transp. Res. Part d: Transp. Environ. 14(1), 42–49 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2008.10.003
Frank, L.D., Saelens, B.E., Powell, K.E., Chapman, J.E.: Stepping towards causation: do built environments or neighborhood and travel preferences explain physical activity, driving, and obesity? Soc. Sci. Med. 65(9), 1898–1914 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.05.053
Gao, J., Ettema, D., Helbich, M., Kamphuis, C.B.M.: Travel mode attitudes, urban context, and demographics: do they interact differently for bicycle commuting and cycling for other purposes? Transportation 46(6), 2441–2463 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-019-10005-x
Gim, T.-H.T.: Influences on trip frequency according to travel purposes: a structural equation modeling approach in Seoul, South Korea. Environ. Plann. b. Plann. Des. 38(3), 429–446 (2011)
Gim, T.-H.T.: A meta-analysis of the relationship between density and travel behavior. Transportation 39(3), 491–519 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-011-9373-6
Gim, T.-H.T.: The relationships between land use measures and travel behavior: a meta-analytic approach. Transp. Plan. Technol. 36(5), 413–434 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2013.818272
Gim, T.-H.T.: The relationship between land use and automobile travel utility: a multiple indicators multiple causes approach. Transp. Res. Part d Transp. Environ. 41, 188–204 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.10.004
Gim, T.-H.T.: Testing the reciprocal relationship between attitudes and land use in relation to trip frequencies: a nonrecursive model. Int. Reg. Sci. Rev. 39(2), 203–227 (2016)
Gim, T.-H.T.: Full random coefficients multilevel modeling of the relationship between land use and trip time on weekdays and weekends. Sustainability 9(10), 1824 (2017)
Gim, T.-H.T.: An analysis of the relationship between land use and weekend travel: focusing on the internal capture of trips. Sustainability 10(2), 425 (2018a)
Gim, T.-H.T.: Land use, travel utility, and travel behavior: an analysis from the perspective of the positive utility of travel. Pap. Reg. Sci. 97, S169–S193 (2018b)
Gim, T.-H.T.: Examining the effects of residential self-selection on internal and external validity: an interaction moderation analysis using structural equation modeling. Transp. Lett. 11(5), 275–286 (2019)
Goodman, A., Sahlqvist, S., Ogilvie, D.: Who uses new walking and cycling infrastructure and how? longitudinal results from the UK iConnect study. Prev. Med. 57(5), 518–524 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.07.007
Hägerstrand, T.: What about people in regional science? Pap. Reg. Sci. Assoc. 24(1), 6–21 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01936872
Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J. Market. Theory Pract. 19(2), 139–152 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Ringle, C.M., Sarstedt, M.: A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (2017)
Hair, J.F., Risher, J.J., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M.: When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur. Bus. Rev. 31(1), 2–24 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hall, P.: Sustainable cities or town cramming? planning for a sustainable future. Spon, London, UK (2001)
Handy, S., Mokhtarian, P.: Growing cooler: the evidence on urban development and climate change. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 75(1), 95–96 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360802540364
Handy, S.L., Boarnet, M.G., Ewing, R., Killingsworth, R.E.: How the built environment affects physical activity: views from urban planning. Am. J. Prev. Med. 23(2 Supplement 1), 64–73 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-3797(02)00475-0
Handy, S.L., Cao, X., Mokhtarian, P.L.: Correlation or causality between the built environment and travel behavior? evidence from Northern California. Transp. Res. D 10(6), 427–444 (2005)
Handy, S.L.: Does the built environment influence physical activity? Examining the evidence: critical assessment of the literature on the relationships among transportation, land use, and physical activity. In. TRB Special Report 282, (2005)
Haybatollahi, M., Czepkiewicz, M., Laatikainen, T., Kyttä, M.: Neighbourhood preferences, active travel behaviour, and built environment: an exploratory study. Transport. Res. f: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 29, 57–69 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2015.01.001
Hayes, A.F.: Beyond Baron and Kenny: statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Commun. Monogr. 76(4), 408–420 (2009)
Heinen, E., van Wee, B., Panter, J., Mackett, R., Ogilvie, D.: Residential self-selection in quasi-experimental and natural experimental studies: an extended conceptualization of the relationship between the built environment and travel behavior. J. Transp. Land Use 11(1), 939–959 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2018.1165
Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T.K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C.M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D.W., Ketchen, D.J., Hair, J.F., Hult, G.T.M., Calantone, R.J.: Common beliefs and reality about PLS: comments on Rönkkö and Evermann (2013). Organ. Res. Methods 17(2), 182–209 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114526928
Holden, E., Norland, I.T.: Three challenges for the compact city as a sustainable urban form: household consumption of energy and transport in eight residential areas in the Greater Oslo Region. Urban Stud. 42(12), 2145–2166 (2005)
Karazsia, B.T., Berlin, K.S.: Can a mediator moderate? considering the role of time and change in the mediator–moderator distinction. Behav. Ther. 49(1), 12–20 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2017.10.001
Kerr, J., Norman, G.J., Adams, M.A., Ryan, S., Frank, L., Sallis, J.F., Calfas, K.J., Patrick, K.: Do neighborhood environments moderate the effect of physical activity lifestyle interventions in adults? Health Place 16(5), 903–908 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.05.002
Khazzoom, D.J.: Economic implications for mandated efficiency in standards for household appliances. Energy J. 1(4), 21–40 (1980)
Kim, C., Kim, W.-Y., Park, J.: An analysis of habitual mode use in the years of rising oil prices. J. Adv. Transp. 2019, 9561403 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9561403
King, A.C., Toobert, D., Ahn, D., Resnicow, K., Coday, M., Riebe, D., Garber, C.E., Hurtz, S., Morton, J., Sallis, J.F.: Perceived environments as physical activity correlates and moderators of intervention in five studies. Am. J. Health Promot. 21(1), 24–35 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/089011710602100106
Kitamura, R., Mokhtarian, P.L., Laidet, L.: A micro-analysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation 24(2), 125–158 (1997)
Kock, N., Hadaya, P.: Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: the inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Inf. Syst. J. 28(1), 227–261 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12131
Krzywinski, M., Altman, N.: Power and sample size. Nat. Methods 10(12), 1139–1140 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2738
Landau, C., Bock, C.: Value creation through vertical intervention of corporate centres in single business units of unrelated diversified portfolios – the case of private equity firms. Long Range Plan. 46(1), 97–124 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.11.002
Levinson, D.M., Kumar, A.: Density and the journey to work. Growth Chang. 28(2), 147–172 (1997)
Lin, T., Wang, D., Guan, X.: The built environment, travel attitude, and travel behavior: residential self-selection or residential determination? J. Transp. Geogr. 65, 111–122 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.10.004
Manaugh, K., El-Geneidy, A.: Validating walkability indices: how do different households respond to the walkability of their neighborhood? Transp. Res. Part d Transp. Environ. 16(4), 309–315 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2011.01.009
McIntosh, C.N., Edwards, J.R., Antonakis, J.: Reflections on partial least squares path modeling. Organ. Res. Methods 17(2), 210–251 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114529165
Meurs, H., van Wee, B.: Land use and mobility: a synthesis of findings and policy implications. Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res. 3(2), 219–233 (2004)
Michael, Y.L., Carlson, N.E.: Analysis of individual social-ecological mediators and moderators and their ability to explain effect of a randomized neighborhood walking intervention. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 6, 49 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-6-49
Mokhtarian, P.L., Cao, X.: Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behavior: a focus on methodologies. Transp. Res. B 42(3), 204–228 (2008)
Mokhtarian, P.L., van Herick, D.: Quantifying residential self-selection effects: a review of methods and findings from applications of propensity score and sample selection approaches. J. Transp. Land Use 9(1), 7–26 (2016)
Moore, J.B., Beets, M.W., Kaczynski, A.T., Besenyi, G.M., Morris, S.F., Kolbe, M.B.: Sex moderates associations between perceptions of the physical and social environments and physical activity in youth. Am. J. Health Promot. 29(2), 132–135 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.121023-ARB-516
Næss, P.: Gender differences in the influences of urban structure on daily-life travel. In: Priya, T., Cresswell, T. (eds.) Gendered Mobilities, pp. 173–192. Ashgate, Aldershot, UK (2008)
Næss, P.: Response to Van Wee and Boarnet. J. Transp. Land Use 7(3), 87–92 (2014). https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.v7i3.724
Nitzl, C., Roldan Jose, L., Cepeda, G.: Mediation analysis in partial least squares path modeling: helping researchers discuss more sophisticated models. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 116(9), 1849–1864 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-07-2015-0302
Owen, N., Cerin, E., Leslie, E., duToit, L., Coffee, N., Frank, L.D., Bauman, A.E., Hugo, G., Saelens, B.E., Sallis, J.F.: Neighborhood walkability and the walking behavior of Australian adults. Am. J. Prev. Med. 33(5), 387–395 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.025
Panter, J.R., Jones, A.: Attitudes and the environment as determinants of active travel in adults: what do and don’t we know? J. Phys. Act. Health 7(4), 551–561 (2010)
Panter, J.R., Jones, A.P., van Sluijs, E.M.F., Griffin, S.J.: Attitudes, social support and environmental perceptions as predictors of active commuting behaviour in school children. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 64(1), 41–48 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2009.086918
Preacher, K.J., Hayes, A.F.: SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 36, 717–731 (2004)
Rajamani, J., Bhat, C.R., Handy, S.L., Knaap, G.-J., Song, Y.: Assessing impact of urban form measures on nonwork trip mode choice after controlling for demographic and level-of-service effects. Transp. Res. Rec. 1831, 158–165 (2003)
Richardson, A.S., Troxel, W.M., Ghosh-Dastidar, M.B., Beckman, R., Hunter, G.P., DeSantis, A.S., Colabianchi, N., Dubowitz, T.: One size doesn’t fit all: cross-sectional associations between neighborhood walkability, crime and physical activity depends on age and sex of residents. BMC Public Health 17(1), 97 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3959-z
Sallis, J.F., Owen, N.: Ecological models of health behavior. In: Glanz, K., Rimer, B.K., Viswanath, K. (eds.) Health Behavior: Theory, Research, and Practice, pp. 43–64. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA (2015)
Sallis, J.F., Owen, N., Fisher, E.B.: Ecological models of health behavior. In: Glanz, K., Rimer, B.K., Viswanath, K. (eds.) Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice, pp. 465–485. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA (2008)
Salmon, J., Hesketh, K.D., Arundell, L., Downing, K.L., Biddle, S.J.H.: Changing behavior using ecological models. In: Hagger, M.S., Cameron, L.D., Hamilton, K., Hankonen, N., Lintunen, T. (eds.) The Handbook of Behavior Change, pp. 237–250. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2020)
Saunders, H.: The Khazzoom-Brookes postulate and neoclassical growth. Energy J. 13(4), 131–148 (1992)
Schwanen, T., Mokhtarian, P.L.: What affects commute mode choice: neighborhood physical structure or preferences toward neighborhoods? J. Transp. Geogr. 13(1), 83–99 (2005a). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.11.001
Schwanen, T., Mokhtarian, P.L.: What if you live in the wrong neighborhood? the impact of residential neighborhood type dissonance on distance traveled. Transp. Res. Part d Transp. Environ. 10(2), 127–151 (2005b). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2004.11.002
Seoul Research Data Service: Transportation mode share. https://data.si.re.kr/data/%EC%84%9C%EC%9A%B8%EA%B3%BC-%EC%84%B8%EA%B3%84%EB%8C%80%EB%8F%84%EC%8B%9C/51#:~:text=%EA%B7%B8%EB%A6%AC%EA%B3%A0%20%EC%84%9C%EC%9A%B8%EC%9D%80%20%EB%8C%80%EC%A4%91%EA%B5%90%ED%86%B5,%EB%8F%84%EC%8B%9C%EC%9E%84%EC%9D%84%20%EC%95%8C%20%EC%88%98%20%EC%9E%88%EC%97%88%EB%8B%A4. (2021). Accessed December 24, 2021
Tenenhaus, M., Pagès, J., Ambroisine, L., Guinot, C.: PLS methodology to study relationships between hedonic judgements and product characteristics. Food Qual. Prefer. 16(4), 315–325 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2004.05.013
Titze, S., Stronegger, W.J., Janschitz, S., Oja, P.: Environmental, social, and personal correlates of cycling for transportation in a student population. J. Phys. Act. Health 4(1), 66–79 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.4.1.6610.1123/jpah.4.1.66
Van Acker, V., Witlox, F.: Car ownership as a mediating variable in car travel behaviour research using a structural equation modelling approach to identify its dual relationship. J. Transp. Geogr. 18(1), 65–74 (2010)
Van de Coevering, P., Maat, K., van Wee, B.: Residential self-selection, reverse causality and residential dissonance. A latent class transition model of interactions between the built environment, travel attitudes and travel behavior. Transport. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 118, 466–479 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.035
Van Dyck, D., Cerin, E., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Salvo, D., Christiansen, L.B., Macfarlane, D., Owen, N., Mitas, J., Troelsen, J., Aguinaga-Ontoso, I., Davey, R., Reis, R., Sarmiento, O.L., Schofield, G., Conway, T.L., Sallis, J.F.: Moderating effects of age, gender and education on the associations of perceived neighborhood environment attributes with accelerometer-based physical activity: the IPEN adult study. Health Place 36, 65–73 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2015.09.007
Van Wee, B., De Vos, J., Maat, K.: Impacts of the built environment and travel behaviour on attitudes: theories underpinning the reverse causality hypothesis. J. Transp. Geogr. 80, 102540 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102540
Van de Coevering, P., Maat, K., van Wee, B.: Causes and effects between attitudes, the built environment and car kilometres: a longitudinal analysis. J. Transp. Geogr. 91, 102982 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.102982
Wang, D., Lin, T.: Residential self-selection, built environment, and travel behavior in the Chinese context. J. Transport Land Use 7(3), 5–14 (2014)
Warner, R.M.: Applied Statistics: From Bivariate Through Multivariate Techniques. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (2013)
Zang, P., Lu, Y., Ma, J., Xie, B., Wang, R., Liu, Y.: Disentangling residential self-selection from impacts of built environment characteristics on travel behaviors for older adults. Soc. Sci. Med. 238, 112515 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112515
Zegras, P.C.: Influence of land use on travel behavior in Santiago, Chile. Transport. Res. Record 1898, 175–182 (2004)
Zhang, M.: The role of land use in travel mode choice: evidence from Boston and Hong Kong. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 70(3), 344–360 (2004)
Zhao, X., Lynch, J.G., Chen, Q.: Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: myths and truths about mediation analysis. J. Consumer Res. 37(2), 197–206 (2010)
Zhou, B., Kockelman, K.: Self-selection in home choice: Use of treatment effects in evaluating relationship between built environment and travel behavior. Transp. Res. Rec. 2077, 54–61 (2008)
Funding
This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2021S1A3A2A01087370).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
T.H.T.G. conceived the study, performed the analysis, and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix: Moderation models (extended version)
Appendix: Moderation models (extended version)
Automobile travel | Nonmotorized travel | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Standardized coef | S.D | t | Standardized coef | S.D | t | ||||
T_Nn ← TB | 1 | 1 | |||||||
Path coefficients | AT → TB | 0.382 | 0.399 | 0.959 | − 0.088 | 0.075 | 1.179 | ||
BE → TB | − 1.474 | 0.990 | 1.489 | − 0.005 | 0.140 | 0.034 | |||
BE*AT → TB | − 0.319 | 0.639 | 0.499 | − 0.266 | 0.286 | 0.930 | |||
BE*SD → TB | − 1.248 | * | 0.747 | 1.671 | 0.029 | 0.166 | 0.173 | ||
SD → TB | 0.159 | 0.181 | 0.877 | 0.082 | 0.118 | 0.694 | |||
Outer weights | H_Ad → SD | 0.479 | 0.457 | 1.050 | 0.146 | 0.211 | 0.691 | ||
H_Ch05 → SD | − 0.896 | 0.710 | 1.262 | 0.147 | 0.200 | 0.735 | |||
H_Ch19 → SD | 0.203 | 0.256 | 0.791 | 0.147 | 0.194 | 0.758 | |||
H_In → SD | 0.080 | 0.229 | 0.351 | 0.330 | 0.287 | 1.151 | |||
H_Sz → SD | 0.162 | 0.277 | 0.585 | − 0.464 | 0.428 | 1.085 | |||
I_Ag → SD | 0.373 | 0.332 | 1.126 | 0.352 | 0.320 | 1.101 | |||
I_Gn → SD | 0.035 | 0.255 | 0.136 | − 0.232 | 0.339 | 0.683 | |||
I_Mr → SD | − 0.300 | 0.313 | 0.958 | 0.341 | 0.310 | 1.100 | |||
Outer loadings | At_E_At ← AT | 0.364 | 0.347 | 1.049 | 0.154 | 0.125 | 1.231 | ||
At_E_Bk ← AT | 0.089 | 0.248 | 0.360 | 0.182 | 0.188 | 0.967 | |||
At_E_Bs ← AT | 0.176 | 0.254 | 0.692 | 0.557 | *** | 0.191 | 2.909 | ||
At_E_Cl ← AT | 0.241 | 0.286 | 0.843 | 0.532 | *** | 0.165 | 3.229 | ||
At_E_Jb ← AT | 0.256 | 0.341 | 0.751 | 0.594 | *** | 0.196 | 3.032 | ||
At_E_Mt ← AT | 0.299 | 0.343 | 0.872 | 0.544 | *** | 0.178 | 3.048 | ||
At_E_Rs ← AT | 0.434 | 0.364 | 1.191 | 0.799 | *** | 0.230 | 3.478 | ||
At_E_Sc ← AT | 0.489 | 0.431 | 1.136 | 0.399 | ** | 0.186 | 2.145 | ||
At_E_Sp ← AT | − 0.146 | 0.257 | 0.567 | − 0.121 | 0.142 | 0.853 | |||
At_E_St ← AT | 0.436 | 0.335 | 1.302 | 0.646 | *** | 0.222 | 2.912 | ||
At_E_Wl ← AT | 0.211 | 0.270 | 0.780 | 0.015 | 0.201 | 0.073 | |||
At_M_At ← AT | − 0.332 | 0.339 | 0.978 | 0.262 | 0.210 | 1.245 | |||
At_M_Bk ← AT | 0.454 | 0.374 | 1.214 | − 0.122 | 0.222 | 0.549 | |||
At_M_Bs ← AT | − 0.185 | 0.288 | 0.644 | 0.041 | 0.197 | 0.206 | |||
At_M_Mt ← AT | − 0.357 | 0.376 | 0.950 | 0.253 | 0.166 | 1.520 | |||
At_M_Wl ← AT | − 0.084 | 0.187 | 0.450 | − 0.070 | 0.184 | 0.382 | |||
D_Bsn ← BE† | 0.992 | *** | 0.054 | 18.431 | 0.686 | *** | 0.113 | 6.064 | |
D_Bus02 ← BE† | 0.993 | *** | 0.062 | 15.942 | 0.693 | *** | 0.191 | 3.623 | |
D_Bus05 ← BE† | 0.992 | *** | 0.059 | 16.702 | 0.714 | *** | 0.195 | 3.667 | |
D_Emp ← BE† | 0.993 | *** | 0.086 | 11.514 | 0.595 | *** | 0.138 | 4.319 | |
Ent ← BE | − 0.016 | 0.163 | 0.100 | − 0.156 | 0.177 | 0.885 | |||
D_Int02 ← BE† | 0.993 | *** | 0.046 | 21.755 | 0.841 | *** | 0.135 | 6.239 | |
D_Int05 ← BE† | 0.993 | *** | 0.060 | 16.657 | 0.836 | *** | 0.143 | 5.865 | |
D_Mtr02 ← BE† | 0.993 | *** | 0.057 | 17.404 | 0.780 | *** | 0.101 | 7.728 | |
D_Mtr05 ← BE† | 0.992 | *** | 0.046 | 21.790 | 0.809 | *** | 0.089 | 9.136 | |
D_Ppl ← BE† | 0.993 | *** | 0.034 | 29.173 | 0.546 | *** | 0.211 | 2.588 | |
D_Bsn*At_E_At ← BE*AT | 0.893 | *** | 0.188 | 4.759 | 0.038 | 0.167 | 0.224 | ||
D_Bsn*At_E_Bk ← BE*AT | 0.913 | *** | 0.189 | 4.823 | 0.037 | 0.275 | 0.136 | ||
D_Bsn*At_E_Bs ← BE*AT | 0.967 | *** | 0.193 | 5.014 | 0.275 | 0.268 | 1.026 | ||
D_Bsn*At_E_Cl ← BE*AT | 0.967 | *** | 0.205 | 4.724 | − 0.054 | 0.215 | 0.249 | ||
D_Bsn*At_E_Jb ← BE*AT | 0.963 | *** | 0.210 | 4.589 | 0.172 | 0.186 | 0.927 | ||
D_Bsn*At_E_Mt ← BE*AT | − 0.948 | *** | 0.222 | 4.266 | 0.191 | 0.258 | 0.743 | ||
D_Bsn*At_E_Rs ← BE*AT | 0.982 | *** | 0.196 | 4.999 | − 0.237 | 0.294 | 0.806 | ||
D_Bsn*At_E_Sc ← BE*AT | 0.939 | *** | 0.200 | 4.688 | 0.022 | 0.247 | 0.087 | ||
D_Bsn*At_E_Sp ← BE*AT | − 0.834 | *** | 0.232 | 3.603 | 0.319 | 0.311 | 1.026 | ||
D_Bsn*At_E_St ← BE*AT | 0.972 | *** | 0.192 | 5.053 | − 0.255 | 0.308 | 0.828 | ||
D_Bsn*At_E_Wl ← BE*AT | − 0.301 | ** | 0.139 | 2.169 | 0.079 | 0.262 | 0.303 | ||
D_Bsn*At_M_At ← BE*AT | 0.757 | *** | 0.173 | 4.383 | 0.288 | 0.285 | 1.009 | ||
D_Bsn*At_M_Bk ← BE*AT | 0.967 | *** | 0.203 | 4.771 | − 0.154 | 0.267 | 0.576 | ||
D_Bsn*At_M_Bs ← BE*AT | − 0.978 | *** | 0.207 | 4.735 | 0.170 | 0.238 | 0.717 | ||
D_Bsn*At_M_Mt ← BE*AT | − 0.974 | *** | 0.211 | 4.614 | 0.141 | 0.245 | 0.576 | ||
D_Bsn*At_M_Wl ← BE*AT | − 0.885 | *** | 0.211 | 4.193 | 0.052 | 0.242 | 0.213 | ||
D_Bsn*H_Ad ← BE*SD | − 0.957 | 0.666 | 1.437 | 0.341 | 0.420 | 0.813 | |||
D_Bsn*H_Ch05 ← BE*SD | 0.966 | 0.659 | 1.467 | 0.341 | 0.420 | 0.812 | |||
D_Bsn*H_Ch19 ← BE*SD | 0.951 | 0.615 | 1.547 | 0.342 | 0.420 | 0.812 | |||
D_Bsn*H_In ← BE*SD | − 0.777 | 0.552 | 1.409 | 0.096 | 0.184 | 0.519 | |||
D_Bsn*H_Sz ← BE*SD | 0.632 | * | 0.370 | 1.709 | 0.061 | 0.210 | 0.291 | ||
D_Bsn*I_Ag ← BE*SD | 0.784 | * | 0.474 | 1.655 | − 0.173 | 0.248 | 0.697 | ||
D_Bsn*I_Gn ← BE*SD | − 0.975 | 0.651 | 1.498 | − 0.018 | 0.209 | 0.084 | |||
D_Bsn*I_Mr ← BE*SD | 0.982 | 0.647 | 1.518 | − 0.003 | 0.215 | 0.014 | |||
D_Bus02*At_E_At ← BE*AT | 0.895 | *** | 0.189 | 4.741 | 0.073 | 0.159 | 0.460 | ||
D_Bus02*At_E_Bk ← BE*AT | 0.916 | *** | 0.190 | 4.827 | 0.505 | 0.334 | 1.515 | ||
D_Bus02*At_E_Bs ← BE*AT | 0.965 | *** | 0.193 | 5.009 | 0.117 | 0.150 | 0.782 | ||
D_Bus02*At_E_Cl ← BE*AT | 0.964 | *** | 0.205 | 4.708 | − 0.434 | 0.326 | 1.330 | ||
D_Bus02*At_E_Jb ← BE*AT | 0.963 | *** | 0.211 | 4.560 | − 0.008 | 0.184 | 0.041 | ||
D_Bus02*At_E_Mt ← BE*AT | − 0.948 | *** | 0.223 | 4.246 | 0.097 | 0.177 | 0.548 | ||
D_Bus02*At_E_Rs ← BE*AT | 0.981 | *** | 0.196 | 5.004 | − 0.435 | 0.364 | 1.195 | ||
D_Bus02*At_E_Sc ← BE*AT | 0.937 | *** | 0.201 | 4.661 | 0.198 | 0.193 | 1.025 | ||
D_Bus02*At_E_Sp ← BE*AT | − 0.832 | *** | 0.232 | 3.588 | − 0.186 | 0.197 | 0.940 | ||
D_Bus02*At_E_St ← BE*AT | 0.970 | *** | 0.192 | 5.045 | − 0.390 | 0.315 | 1.240 | ||
D_Bus02*At_E_Wl ← BE*AT | − 0.309 | ** | 0.142 | 2.170 | 0.352 | 0.247 | 1.423 | ||
D_Bus02*At_M_At ← BE*AT | 0.754 | *** | 0.174 | 4.336 | 0.252 | 0.246 | 1.026 | ||
D_Bus02*At_M_Bk ← BE*AT | 0.967 | *** | 0.202 | 4.779 | − 0.058 | 0.153 | 0.378 | ||
D_Bus02*At_M_Bs ← BE*AT | − 0.979 | *** | 0.206 | 4.748 | − 0.009 | 0.137 | 0.068 | ||
D_Bus02*At_M_Mt ← BE*AT | − 0.973 | *** | 0.211 | 4.618 | 0.003 | 0.147 | 0.017 | ||
D_Bus02*At_M_Wl ← BE*AT | − 0.882 | *** | 0.211 | 4.182 | − 0.094 | 0.168 | 0.557 | ||
D_Bus02*H_Ad ← BE*SD | − 0.961 | 0.667 | 1.441 | 0.619 | 0.473 | 1.307 | |||
D_Bus02*H_Ch05 ← BE*SD | 0.964 | 0.658 | 1.466 | 0.618 | 0.473 | 1.307 | |||
D_Bus02*H_Ch19 ← BE*SD | 0.945 | 0.609 | 1.553 | 0.618 | 0.473 | 1.307 | |||
D_Bus02*H_In ← BE*SD | − 0.800 | 0.563 | 1.420 | 0.440 | 0.327 | 1.346 | |||
D_Bus02*H_Sz ← BE*SD | 0.649 | * | 0.380 | 1.708 | 0.306 | 0.269 | 1.137 | ||
D_Bus02*I_Ag ← BE*SD | 0.795 | * | 0.482 | 1.649 | − 0.157 | 0.286 | 0.550 | ||
D_Bus02*I_Gn ← BE*SD | − 0.974 | 0.650 | 1.498 | 0.139 | 0.201 | 0.694 | |||
D_Bus02*I_Mr ← BE*SD | 0.983 | 0.649 | 1.515 | 0.008 | 0.245 | 0.031 | |||
D_Bus05*At_E_At ← BE*AT | 0.896 | *** | 0.190 | 4.712 | 0.159 | 0.185 | 0.859 | ||
D_Bus05*At_E_Bk ← BE*AT | 0.918 | *** | 0.191 | 4.813 | 0.507 | 0.340 | 1.490 | ||
D_Bus05*At_E_Bs ← BE*AT | 0.964 | *** | 0.193 | 5.005 | 0.122 | 0.154 | 0.788 | ||
D_Bus05*At_E_Cl ← BE*AT | 0.961 | *** | 0.205 | 4.676 | − 0.456 | 0.337 | 1.351 | ||
D_Bus05*At_E_Jb ← BE*AT | 0.958 | *** | 0.213 | 4.509 | − 0.014 | 0.194 | 0.071 | ||
D_Bus05*At_E_Mt ← BE*AT | − 0.949 | *** | 0.224 | 4.241 | 0.096 | 0.178 | 0.537 | ||
D_Bus05*At_E_Rs ← BE*AT | 0.980 | *** | 0.196 | 5.013 | − 0.444 | 0.370 | 1.200 | ||
D_Bus05*At_E_Sc ← BE*AT | 0.935 | *** | 0.202 | 4.639 | 0.204 | 0.202 | 1.012 | ||
D_Bus05*At_E_Sp ← BE*AT | − 0.830 | *** | 0.232 | 3.580 | − 0.190 | 0.200 | 0.951 | ||
D_Bus05*At_E_St ← BE*AT | 0.968 | *** | 0.192 | 5.036 | − 0.429 | 0.339 | 1.265 | ||
D_Bus05*At_E_Wl ← BE*AT | − 0.312 | ** | 0.143 | 2.174 | 0.364 | 0.254 | 1.435 | ||
D_Bus05*At_M_At ← BE*AT | 0.751 | *** | 0.174 | 4.308 | 0.251 | 0.249 | 1.006 | ||
D_Bus05*At_M_Bk ← BE*AT | 0.966 | *** | 0.201 | 4.804 | − 0.062 | 0.157 | 0.394 | ||
D_Bus05*At_M_Bs ← BE*AT | − 0.979 | *** | 0.206 | 4.760 | 0.008 | 0.139 | 0.060 | ||
D_Bus05*At_M_Mt ← BE*AT | − 0.971 | *** | 0.210 | 4.619 | 0.013 | 0.151 | 0.087 | ||
D_Bus05*At_M_Wl ← BE*AT | − 0.871 | *** | 0.210 | 4.141 | − 0.075 | 0.165 | 0.456 | ||
D_Bus05*H_Ad ← BE*SD | − 0.963 | 0.666 | 1.446 | 0.633 | 0.479 | 1.322 | |||
D_Bus05*H_Ch05 ← BE*SD | 0.962 | 0.656 | 1.467 | 0.633 | 0.479 | 1.321 | |||
D_Bus05*H_Ch19 ← BE*SD | 0.940 | 0.604 | 1.556 | 0.633 | 0.479 | 1.321 | |||
D_Bus05*H_In ← BE*SD | − 0.808 | 0.568 | 1.424 | 0.499 | 0.358 | 1.392 | |||
D_Bus05*H_Sz ← BE*SD | 0.660 | * | 0.387 | 1.706 | 0.308 | 0.269 | 1.147 | ||
D_Bus05*I_Ag ← BE*SD | 0.787 | * | 0.478 | 1.646 | − 0.138 | 0.279 | 0.494 | ||
D_Bus05*I_Gn ← BE*SD | − 0.974 | 0.650 | 1.498 | 0.137 | 0.209 | 0.653 | |||
D_Bus05*I_Mr ← BE*SD | 0.983 | 0.649 | 1.514 | 0.026 | 0.246 | 0.107 | |||
D_Emp*At_E_At ← BE*AT | 0.892 | *** | 0.187 | 4.763 | 0.052 | 0.141 | 0.371 | ||
D_Emp*At_E_Bk ← BE*AT | 0.913 | *** | 0.190 | 4.819 | 0.099 | 0.208 | 0.479 | ||
D_Emp*At_E_Bs ← BE*AT | 0.967 | *** | 0.193 | 5.010 | 0.244 | 0.222 | 1.097 | ||
D_Emp*At_E_Cl ← BE*AT | 0.966 | *** | 0.204 | 4.727 | − 0.031 | 0.171 | 0.183 | ||
D_Emp*At_E_Jb ← BE*AT | 0.963 | *** | 0.209 | 4.597 | 0.133 | 0.137 | 0.976 | ||
D_Emp*At_E_Mt ← BE*AT | − 0.948 | *** | 0.222 | 4.261 | 0.153 | 0.216 | 0.705 | ||
D_Emp*At_E_Rs ← BE*AT | 0.982 | *** | 0.196 | 4.996 | − 0.199 | 0.231 | 0.862 | ||
D_Emp*At_E_Sc ← BE*AT | 0.938 | *** | 0.200 | 4.684 | 0.073 | 0.173 | 0.424 | ||
D_Emp*At_E_Sp ← BE*AT | − 0.834 | *** | 0.232 | 3.599 | 0.312 | 0.268 | 1.165 | ||
D_Emp*At_E_St ← BE*AT | 0.972 | *** | 0.192 | 5.054 | − 0.274 | 0.263 | 1.041 | ||
D_Emp*At_E_Wl ← BE*AT | − 0.301 | ** | 0.139 | 2.167 | 0.160 | 0.228 | 0.702 | ||
D_Emp*At_M_At ← BE*AT | 0.758 | *** | 0.173 | 4.383 | 0.174 | 0.181 | 0.964 | ||
D_Emp*At_M_Bk ← BE*AT | 0.967 | *** | 0.203 | 4.765 | − 0.179 | 0.243 | 0.736 | ||
D_Emp*At_M_Bs ← BE*AT | − 0.978 | *** | 0.206 | 4.739 | 0.075 | 0.150 | 0.502 | ||
D_Emp*At_M_Mt ← BE*AT | − 0.973 | *** | 0.211 | 4.609 | 0.079 | 0.184 | 0.429 | ||
D_Emp*At_M_Wl ← BE*AT | − 0.885 | *** | 0.211 | 4.195 | − 0.038 | 0.181 | 0.210 | ||
D_Emp*H_Ad ← BE*SD | − 0.957 | 0.665 | 1.438 | 0.618 | 0.518 | 1.192 | |||
D_Emp*H_Ch05 ← BE*SD | 0.967 | 0.659 | 1.466 | 0.618 | 0.518 | 1.192 | |||
D_Emp*H_Ch19 ← BE*SD | 0.952 | 0.616 | 1.546 | 0.618 | 0.518 | 1.192 | |||
D_Emp*H_In ← BE*SD | − 0.777 | 0.552 | 1.408 | 0.128 | 0.210 | 0.608 | |||
D_Emp*H_Sz ← BE*SD | 0.632 | * | 0.370 | 1.709 | − 0.083 | 0.168 | 0.496 | ||
D_Emp*I_Ag ← BE*SD | 0.785 | * | 0.474 | 1.655 | − 0.133 | 0.188 | 0.709 | ||
D_Emp*I_Gn ← BE*SD | − 0.975 | 0.651 | 1.498 | − 0.062 | 0.168 | 0.368 | |||
D_Emp*I_Mr ← BE*SD | 0.982 | 0.647 | 1.518 | − 0.058 | 0.179 | 0.324 | |||
D_Int02*At_E_At ← BE*AT | 0.897 | *** | 0.187 | 4.786 | 0.039 | 0.175 | 0.225 | ||
D_Int02*At_E_Bk ← BE*AT | 0.914 | *** | 0.190 | 4.819 | 0.404 | 0.324 | 1.246 | ||
D_Int02*At_E_Bs ← BE*AT | 0.967 | *** | 0.193 | 5.011 | 0.286 | 0.237 | 1.207 | ||
D_Int02*At_E_Cl ← BE*AT | 0.966 | *** | 0.205 | 4.723 | − 0.338 | 0.297 | 1.141 | ||
D_Int02*At_E_Jb ← BE*AT | 0.963 | *** | 0.210 | 4.581 | 0.040 | 0.206 | 0.193 | ||
D_Int02*At_E_Mt ← BE*AT | − 0.948 | *** | 0.222 | 4.268 | 0.239 | 0.245 | 0.975 | ||
D_Int02*At_E_Rs ← BE*AT | 0.982 | *** | 0.196 | 5.004 | − 0.380 | 0.350 | 1.087 | ||
D_Int02*At_E_Sc ← BE*AT | 0.939 | *** | 0.200 | 4.686 | 0.212 | 0.229 | 0.922 | ||
D_Int02*At_E_Sp ← BE*AT | − 0.832 | *** | 0.232 | 3.586 | 0.290 | 0.252 | 1.151 | ||
D_Int02*At_E_St ← BE*AT | 0.972 | *** | 0.192 | 5.056 | − 0.413 | 0.350 | 1.181 | ||
D_Int02*At_E_Wl ← BE*AT | − 0.307 | ** | 0.141 | 2.187 | 0.508 | 0.341 | 1.488 | ||
D_Int02*At_M_At ← BE*AT | 0.757 | *** | 0.174 | 4.363 | 0.100 | 0.157 | 0.638 | ||
D_Int02*At_M_Bk ← BE*AT | 0.966 | *** | 0.203 | 4.758 | 0.001 | 0.189 | 0.005 | ||
D_Int02*At_M_Bs ← BE*AT | − 0.979 | *** | 0.207 | 4.736 | 0.089 | 0.169 | 0.526 | ||
D_Int02*At_M_Mt ← BE*AT | − 0.974 | *** | 0.211 | 4.609 | 0.100 | 0.189 | 0.530 | ||
D_Int02*At_M_Wl ← BE*AT | − 0.885 | *** | 0.211 | 4.206 | − 0.010 | 0.187 | 0.056 | ||
D_Int02*H_Ad ← BE*SD | − 0.959 | 0.667 | 1.438 | 0.844 | 0.600 | 1.405 | |||
D_Int02*H_Ch05 ← BE*SD | 0.968 | 0.661 | 1.465 | 0.843 | 0.600 | 1.405 | |||
D_Int02*H_Ch19 ← BE*SD | 0.950 | 0.614 | 1.547 | 0.844 | 0.600 | 1.405 | |||
D_Int02*H_In ← BE*SD | − 0.774 | 0.549 | 1.409 | 0.726 | 0.465 | 1.562 | |||
D_Int02*H_Sz ← BE*SD | 0.638 | * | 0.374 | 1.706 | 0.271 | 0.266 | 1.019 | ||
D_Int02*I_Ag ← BE*SD | 0.781 | * | 0.472 | 1.654 | − 0.157 | 0.256 | 0.614 | ||
D_Int02*I_Gn ← BE*SD | − 0.974 | 0.650 | 1.498 | 0.015 | 0.226 | 0.066 | |||
D_Int02*I_Mr ← BE*SD | 0.982 | 0.647 | 1.518 | 0.017 | 0.220 | 0.077 | |||
D_Int05*At_E_At ← BE*AT | 0.900 | *** | 0.188 | 4.796 | 0.060 | 0.175 | 0.341 | ||
D_Int05*At_E_Bk ← BE*AT | 0.916 | *** | 0.190 | 4.819 | 0.402 | 0.312 | 1.288 | ||
D_Int05*At_E_Bs ← BE*AT | 0.967 | *** | 0.193 | 5.011 | 0.291 | 0.235 | 1.236 | ||
D_Int05*At_E_Cl ← BE*AT | 0.965 | *** | 0.205 | 4.719 | − 0.347 | 0.302 | 1.151 | ||
D_Int05*At_E_Jb ← BE*AT | 0.962 | *** | 0.211 | 4.568 | 0.007 | 0.208 | 0.036 | ||
D_Int05*At_E_Mt ← BE*AT | − 0.949 | *** | 0.222 | 4.267 | 0.231 | 0.238 | 0.970 | ||
D_Int05*At_E_Rs ← BE*AT | 0.982 | *** | 0.196 | 5.011 | − 0.354 | 0.341 | 1.039 | ||
D_Int05*At_E_Sc ← BE*AT | 0.939 | *** | 0.200 | 4.694 | 0.204 | 0.224 | 0.910 | ||
D_Int05*At_E_Sp ← BE*AT | − 0.831 | *** | 0.232 | 3.584 | 0.273 | 0.243 | 1.127 | ||
D_Int05*At_E_St ← BE*AT | 0.972 | *** | 0.192 | 5.057 | − 0.372 | 0.322 | 1.155 | ||
D_Int05*At_E_Wl ← BE*AT | − 0.310 | ** | 0.141 | 2.198 | 0.498 | 0.333 | 1.493 | ||
D_Int05*At_M_At ← BE*AT | 0.756 | *** | 0.174 | 4.343 | 0.250 | 0.254 | 0.987 | ||
D_Int05*At_M_Bk ← BE*AT | 0.965 | *** | 0.203 | 4.758 | − 0.006 | 0.185 | 0.031 | ||
D_Int05*At_M_Bs ← BE*AT | − 0.980 | *** | 0.207 | 4.736 | 0.129 | 0.172 | 0.750 | ||
D_Int05*At_M_Mt ← BE*AT | − 0.973 | *** | 0.211 | 4.607 | 0.100 | 0.187 | 0.535 | ||
D_Int05*At_M_Wl ← BE*AT | − 0.883 | *** | 0.210 | 4.204 | − 0.003 | 0.183 | 0.016 | ||
D_Int05*H_Ad ← BE*SD | − 0.960 | 0.667 | 1.440 | 0.851 | 0.574 | 1.484 | |||
D_Int05*H_Ch05 ← BE*SD | 0.969 | 0.661 | 1.465 | 0.851 | 0.574 | 1.483 | |||
D_Int05*H_Ch19 ← BE*SD | 0.949 | 0.613 | 1.549 | 0.851 | 0.574 | 1.483 | |||
D_Int05*H_In ← BE*SD | − 0.775 | 0.550 | 1.408 | 0.659 | 0.431 | 1.529 | |||
D_Int05*H_Sz ← BE*SD | 0.644 | * | 0.378 | 1.705 | 0.303 | 0.278 | 1.091 | ||
D_Int05*I_Ag ← BE*SD | 0.775 | * | 0.469 | 1.654 | − 0.182 | 0.266 | 0.685 | ||
D_Int05*I_Gn ← BE*SD | − 0.974 | 0.650 | 1.499 | 0.065 | 0.214 | 0.304 | |||
D_Int05*I_Mr ← BE*SD | 0.982 | 0.647 | 1.518 | − 0.011 | 0.221 | 0.050 | |||
D_Mtr02*At_E_At ← BE*AT | 0.892 | *** | 0.188 | 4.753 | 0.071 | 0.173 | 0.408 | ||
D_Mtr02*At_E_Bk ← BE*AT | 0.913 | *** | 0.189 | 4.822 | 0.168 | 0.241 | 0.697 | ||
D_Mtr02*At_E_Bs ← BE*AT | 0.966 | *** | 0.193 | 5.014 | 0.139 | 0.203 | 0.686 | ||
D_Mtr02*At_E_Cl ← BE*AT | 0.966 | *** | 0.205 | 4.723 | − 0.116 | 0.202 | 0.573 | ||
D_Mtr02*At_E_Jb ← BE*AT | 0.963 | *** | 0.210 | 4.590 | 0.046 | 0.196 | 0.236 | ||
D_Mtr02*At_E_Mt ← BE*AT | − 0.948 | *** | 0.222 | 4.264 | 0.173 | 0.231 | 0.747 | ||
D_Mtr02*At_E_Rs ← BE*AT | 0.982 | *** | 0.196 | 4.999 | − 0.348 | 0.322 | 1.079 | ||
D_Mtr02*At_E_Sc ← BE*AT | 0.938 | *** | 0.200 | 4.685 | − 0.061 | 0.192 | 0.316 | ||
D_Mtr02*At_E_Sp ← BE*AT | − 0.834 | *** | 0.232 | 3.603 | 0.238 | 0.222 | 1.075 | ||
D_Mtr02*At_E_St ← BE*AT | 0.972 | *** | 0.192 | 5.052 | − 0.343 | 0.302 | 1.137 | ||
D_Mtr02*At_E_Wl ← BE*AT | − 0.300 | ** | 0.139 | 2.167 | 0.206 | 0.242 | 0.851 | ||
D_Mtr02*At_M_At ← BE*AT | 0.757 | *** | 0.173 | 4.382 | 0.213 | 0.225 | 0.948 | ||
D_Mtr02*At_M_Bk ← BE*AT | 0.967 | *** | 0.203 | 4.771 | − 0.189 | 0.262 | 0.721 | ||
D_Mtr02*At_M_Bs ← BE*AT | − 0.978 | *** | 0.207 | 4.736 | 0.141 | 0.198 | 0.712 | ||
D_Mtr02*At_M_Mt ← BE*AT | − 0.974 | *** | 0.211 | 4.614 | 0.078 | 0.218 | 0.358 | ||
D_Mtr02*At_M_Wl ← BE*AT | − 0.885 | *** | 0.211 | 4.191 | − 0.112 | 0.216 | 0.520 | ||
D_Mtr02*H_Ad ← BE*SD | − 0.957 | 0.666 | 1.437 | 0.837 | 0.595 | 1.406 | |||
D_Mtr02*H_Ch05 ← BE*SD | 0.966 | 0.659 | 1.467 | 0.837 | 0.596 | 1.406 | |||
D_Mtr02*H_Ch19 ← BE*SD | 0.952 | 0.615 | 1.547 | 0.837 | 0.595 | 1.406 | |||
D_Mtr02*H_In ← BE*SD | − 0.778 | 0.552 | 1.410 | 0.658 | 0.410 | 1.605 | |||
D_Mtr02*H_Sz ← BE*SD | 0.633 | * | 0.370 | 1.709 | 0.117 | 0.178 | 0.655 | ||
D_Mtr02*I_Ag ← BE*SD | 0.784 | * | 0.474 | 1.655 | − 0.076 | 0.217 | 0.350 | ||
D_Mtr02*I_Gn ← BE*SD | − 0.975 | 0.651 | 1.498 | − 0.062 | 0.206 | 0.302 | |||
D_Mtr02*I_Mr ← BE*SD | 0.982 | 0.647 | 1.518 | 0.040 | 0.206 | 0.192 | |||
D_Mtr05*At_E_At ← BE*AT | 0.893 | *** | 0.188 | 4.755 | 0.032 | 0.178 | 0.182 | ||
D_Mtr05*At_E_Bk ← BE*AT | 0.913 | *** | 0.189 | 4.823 | 0.253 | 0.255 | 0.989 | ||
D_Mtr05*At_E_Bs ← BE*AT | 0.966 | *** | 0.193 | 5.013 | 0.184 | 0.196 | 0.935 | ||
D_Mtr05*At_E_Cl ← BE*AT | 0.966 | *** | 0.205 | 4.723 | − 0.213 | 0.229 | 0.928 | ||
D_Mtr05*At_E_Jb ← BE*AT | 0.963 | *** | 0.210 | 4.590 | 0.083 | 0.194 | 0.428 | ||
D_Mtr05*At_E_Mt ← BE*AT | − 0.948 | *** | 0.222 | 4.263 | 0.215 | 0.231 | 0.932 | ||
D_Mtr05*At_E_Rs ← BE*AT | 0.982 | *** | 0.196 | 4.999 | − 0.283 | 0.295 | 0.961 | ||
D_Mtr05*At_E_Sc ← BE*AT | 0.938 | *** | 0.200 | 4.686 | 0.011 | 0.193 | 0.055 | ||
D_Mtr05*At_E_Sp ← BE*AT | − 0.834 | *** | 0.232 | 3.602 | 0.301 | 0.262 | 1.150 | ||
D_Mtr05*At_E_St ← BE*AT | 0.972 | *** | 0.192 | 5.053 | − 0.320 | 0.283 | 1.130 | ||
D_Mtr05*At_E_Wl ← BE*AT | − 0.301 | ** | 0.139 | 2.168 | 0.288 | 0.256 | 1.125 | ||
D_Mtr05*At_M_At ← BE*AT | 0.757 | *** | 0.173 | 4.381 | 0.246 | 0.250 | 0.982 | ||
D_Mtr05*At_M_Bk ← BE*AT | 0.967 | *** | 0.203 | 4.770 | − 0.142 | 0.236 | 0.600 | ||
D_Mtr05*At_M_Bs ← BE*AT | − 0.978 | *** | 0.207 | 4.736 | 0.203 | 0.221 | 0.917 | ||
D_Mtr05*At_M_Mt ← BE*AT | − 0.974 | *** | 0.211 | 4.613 | 0.120 | 0.212 | 0.564 | ||
D_Mtr05*At_M_Wl ← BE*AT | − 0.884 | *** | 0.211 | 4.191 | − 0.108 | 0.205 | 0.526 | ||
D_Mtr05*H_Ad ← BE*SD | − 0.957 | 0.666 | 1.438 | 0.838 | 0.548 | 1.527 | |||
D_Mtr05*H_Ch05 ← BE*SD | 0.966 | 0.659 | 1.467 | 0.838 | 0.549 | 1.527 | |||
D_Mtr05*H_Ch19 ← BE*SD | 0.952 | 0.615 | 1.547 | 0.838 | 0.549 | 1.527 | |||
D_Mtr05*H_In ← BE*SD | − 0.779 | 0.552 | 1.411 | 0.637 | 0.401 | 1.587 | |||
D_Mtr05*H_Sz ← BE*SD | 0.634 | * | 0.371 | 1.709 | 0.193 | 0.204 | 0.945 | ||
D_Mtr05*I_Ag ← BE*SD | 0.784 | * | 0.474 | 1.655 | − 0.100 | 0.226 | 0.443 | ||
D_Mtr05*I_Gn ← BE*SD | − 0.975 | 0.651 | 1.498 | − 0.006 | 0.198 | 0.030 | |||
D_Mtr05*I_Mr ← BE*SD | 0.982 | 0.647 | 1.518 | 0.050 | 0.224 | 0.224 | |||
D_Ppl*At_E_At ← BE*AT | 0.893 | *** | 0.188 | 4.755 | 0.021 | 0.119 | 0.175 | ||
D_Ppl*At_E_Bk ← BE*AT | 0.914 | *** | 0.190 | 4.812 | 0.437 | 0.304 | 1.437 | ||
D_Ppl*At_E_Bs ← BE*AT | 0.967 | *** | 0.193 | 5.009 | 0.113 | 0.154 | 0.733 | ||
D_Ppl*At_E_Cl ← BE*AT | 0.966 | *** | 0.205 | 4.720 | − 0.310 | 0.259 | 1.195 | ||
D_Ppl*At_E_Jb ← BE*AT | 0.963 | *** | 0.210 | 4.585 | − 0.044 | 0.174 | 0.253 | ||
D_Ppl*At_E_Mt ← BE*AT | − 0.947 | *** | 0.222 | 4.270 | 0.037 | 0.165 | 0.221 | ||
D_Ppl*At_E_Rs ← BE*AT | 0.982 | *** | 0.197 | 4.997 | − 0.323 | 0.301 | 1.073 | ||
D_Ppl*At_E_Sc ← BE*AT | 0.939 | *** | 0.201 | 4.680 | 0.291 | 0.226 | 1.289 | ||
D_Ppl*At_E_Sp ← BE*AT | − 0.833 | *** | 0.232 | 3.590 | − 0.169 | 0.187 | 0.906 | ||
D_Ppl*At_E_St ← BE*AT | 0.972 | *** | 0.193 | 5.050 | − 0.294 | 0.268 | 1.095 | ||
D_Ppl*At_E_Wl ← BE*AT | − 0.303 | ** | 0.139 | 2.173 | 0.295 | 0.215 | 1.376 | ||
D_Ppl*At_M_At ← BE*AT | 0.758 | *** | 0.173 | 4.368 | 0.221 | 0.224 | 0.983 | ||
D_Ppl*At_M_Bk ← BE*AT | 0.967 | *** | 0.203 | 4.766 | − 0.092 | 0.169 | 0.542 | ||
D_Ppl*At_M_Bs ← BE*AT | − 0.979 | *** | 0.206 | 4.742 | 0.075 | 0.152 | 0.492 | ||
D_Ppl*At_M_Mt ← BE*AT | − 0.974 | *** | 0.211 | 4.610 | − 0.010 | 0.133 | 0.079 | ||
D_Ppl*At_M_Wl ← BE*AT | − 0.885 | *** | 0.211 | 4.201 | − 0.093 | 0.166 | 0.560 | ||
D_Ppl*H_Ad ← BE*SD | − 0.958 | 0.667 | 1.437 | 0.688 | 0.481 | 1.431 | |||
D_Ppl*H_Ch05 ← BE*SD | 0.968 | 0.660 | 1.466 | 0.687 | 0.481 | 1.430 | |||
D_Ppl*H_Ch19 ← BE*SD | 0.952 | 0.615 | 1.547 | 0.688 | 0.481 | 1.430 | |||
D_Ppl*H_In ← BE*SD | − 0.780 | 0.553 | 1.411 | 0.338 | 0.272 | 1.240 | |||
D_Ppl*H_Sz ← BE*SD | 0.630 | * | 0.369 | 1.708 | 0.224 | 0.211 | 1.060 | ||
D_Ppl*I_Ag ← BE*SD | 0.782 | * | 0.473 | 1.654 | − 0.103 | 0.262 | 0.393 | ||
D_Ppl*I_Gn ← BE*SD | − 0.974 | 0.650 | 1.498 | 0.068 | 0.167 | 0.408 | |||
D_Ppl*I_Mr ← BE*SD | 0.982 | 0.647 | 1.518 | − 0.023 | 0.234 | 0.099 | |||
Ent*At_E_At ← BE*AT | 0.117 | ** | 0.056 | 2.098 | − 0.004 | 0.070 | 0.054 | ||
Ent*At_E_Bk ← BE*AT | 0.064 | 0.063 | 1.010 | − 0.034 | 0.105 | 0.328 | |||
Ent*At_E_Bs ← BE*AT | 0.025 | 0.060 | 0.412 | − 0.022 | 0.112 | 0.193 | |||
Ent*At_E_Cl ← BE*AT | 0.031 | 0.064 | 0.488 | 0.128 | 0.133 | 0.962 | |||
Ent*At_E_Jb ← BE*AT | 0.059 | 0.090 | 0.656 | 0.125 | 0.132 | 0.946 | |||
Ent*At_E_Mt ← BE*AT | − 0.053 | 0.088 | 0.609 | − 0.036 | 0.102 | 0.356 | |||
Ent*At_E_Rs ← BE*AT | 0.067 | 0.070 | 0.950 | 0.077 | 0.114 | 0.680 | |||
Ent*At_E_Sc ← BE*AT | 0.086 | 0.076 | 1.123 | − 0.042 | 0.109 | 0.387 | |||
Ent*At_E_Sp ← BE*AT | − 0.095 | 0.071 | 1.326 | − 0.199 | 0.190 | 1.049 | |||
Ent*At_E_St ← BE*AT | 0.053 | 0.071 | 0.744 | 0.013 | 0.104 | 0.125 | |||
Ent*At_E_Wl ← BE*AT | 0.052 | 0.050 | 1.042 | − 0.130 | 0.122 | 1.065 | |||
Ent*At_M_At ← BE*AT | − 0.012 | 0.056 | 0.220 | − 0.170 | 0.213 | 0.800 | |||
Ent*At_M_Bk ← BE*AT | 0.080 | 0.073 | 1.086 | − 0.052 | 0.095 | 0.550 | |||
Ent*At_M_Bs ← BE*AT | − 0.132 | 0.117 | 1.133 | − 0.046 | 0.096 | 0.476 | |||
Ent*At_M_Mt ← BE*AT | − 0.057 | 0.065 | 0.866 | 0.069 | 0.112 | 0.618 | |||
Ent*At_M_Wl ← BE*AT | 0.049 | 0.087 | 0.557 | − 0.032 | 0.097 | 0.334 | |||
Ent*H_Ad ← BE*SD | 0.126 | 0.135 | 0.929 | − 0.778 | 0.521 | 1.494 | |||
Ent*H_Ch05 ← BE*SD | 0.056 | 0.071 | 0.781 | − 0.776 | 0.520 | 1.493 | |||
Ent*H_Ch19 ← BE*SD | 0.021 | 0.090 | 0.239 | − 0.777 | 0.520 | 1.493 | |||
Ent*H_In ← BE*SD | 0.026 | 0.067 | 0.385 | − 0.214 | 0.203 | 1.058 | |||
Ent*H_Sz ← BE*SD | 0.167 | 0.147 | 1.141 | − 0.157 | 0.150 | 1.043 | |||
Ent*I_Ag ← BE*SD | 0.187 | 0.156 | 1.196 | − 0.031 | 0.170 | 0.185 | |||
Ent*I_Gn ← BE*SD | − 0.253 | 0.194 | 1.307 | − 0.071 | 0.126 | 0.563 | |||
Ent*I_Mr ← BE*SD | 0.258 | 0.187 | 1.376 | − 0.058 | 0.160 | 0.363 | |||
Cronbach α: 0.586 (AT), 0.979 (BE), 0.928 (BE*AT), and 0.864 (BE*SD) Mean R2: 0.295 | Cronbach α: 0.615 (AT), 0.840 (BE), 0.901 (BE*AT), and 0.918 (BE*SD) Mean R2: 0.105‡ | ||||||||
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gim, TH.T. Residential self-selection or socio-ecological interaction? the effects of sociodemographic and attitudinal characteristics on the built environment–travel behavior relationship. Transportation 50, 1347–1398 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-022-10280-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-022-10280-1