Abstract
Mobility as a service (MaaS) promises a bold new future where bundled public transport and shared mobility options (carsharing, ridesharing, bikesharing and microtransit) will provide consumers with seamless mobility on par with and exceeding that of private vehicle ownership. Whilst there is a growing body of work examining the market and end user demand for MaaS, there remains a limited understanding of the supply-side around new business models for delivering these integrated mobility services. Mobility broker/aggregator models have been proposed, but to date there exists no quantitative evidence to empirically test the conditions around which interested businesses might invest or supply in this new entrepreneurial model. In this paper, the idea of mode-agnostic mobility contracts [first proposed in Wong et al. (in: 40th Australasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF), Darwin, 2018)] are tested as the interface for bringing together specialised businesses as part of a future transport ecosystem. Data is collected from 202 organisations across 28 countries and mixed logit models estimated to identify the importance of contract attributes like modal mix, role of government, return on investment expectations, branding and equity contribution on respondent interest to partake in a MaaS business. Willingness-to-pay estimates are then devised to identify the potential value proposition of a mobility broker/aggregator to the business community.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
See http://ubigo.se (and involved in many European projects).
See https://whimapp.com (operated by MaaS Global and based on the SkedGo platform).
See https://zipster.io (operated by MobilityX, an SMRT start-up).
Held as part of the 15th International Conference on Competition and Ownership in Land Passenger Transport (Thredbo 15) in Stockholm, Sweden.
Organisation size was determined by the number of employees: small enterprises have ≤ 999 employees; medium enterprises have 1000–9999 employees; and large enterprises have ≥ 10,000 employees.
Including Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR) of the People's Republic of China.
References
Balbontin, C., Hensher, D.A.: Firm-Specific and Location-Specific Drivers of Business Location and Relocation Decisions. Working Paper. Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies (ITLS), University of Sydney Business School, Sydney (2018)
De Reuver, M., Bouwman, H., Haaker, T.: Business model roadmapping: a practical approach to come from an existing to a desired business model. Int. J. Innov. Manag. 17, 1340006 (2013)
Domencich, T.A., Mcfadden, D.: Urban Travel Demand—A Behavioral Analysis. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1975)
Guidon, S., Wicki, T., Bernauer, T., Axhausen, K.: Transportation service bundling for whose benefit? Consumer valuation of pure bundling in the passenger transportation market. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 131, 91–106 (2020)
Hensher, D.A.: Future bus transport contracts under a mobility as a service (MaaS) regime in the digital age: Are they likely to change? Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 98, 86–96 (2017)
Hensher, D.A., Greene, W.H.: The mixed logit model: the state of practice. Transportation 30, 133–176 (2003)
Hensher, D.A., Rose, J.M., Greene, W.H.: Applied Choice Analysis, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2015)
Hensher, D.A., Ho, C.Q., Mulley, C., Nelson, J.D., Smith, G., Wong, Y.Z.: Understanding Mobility as a Service (MaaS): Past, Present and Future. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2020)
Hensher, D.A., Ho, C.Q., Reck, D.J., Smith, G., Wong, Y.Z., Sarkar, N., Lormier, S., Lu, I.: The Sydney mobility as a service (MaaS) trial: design, implementation and lessons. Pap. Progr. (2020b)
Ho, C., Hensher, D.A., Mulley, C., Wong, Y.Z.: Potential uptake and willingness-to-pay for mobility as a service (MaaS): a stated choice study. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 117, 218–302 (2018)
Ho, C.Q., Hensher, D.A., Mulley, C.: Public preferences for mobility as a service: Insights from stated preference surveys. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 131, 70–90 (2020)
Jittrapirom, P., Caiati, V., Feneri, A.-M., Ebrahimigharehbaghi, S., González, M.J.A., Narayan, J.: Mobility as a service: a critical review of definitions, assessments of schemes, and key challenges. Urban Plan. 2, 13–25 (2017)
Jittrapirom, P., Marchau, V., Van Der Heijden, R., Meurs, H.: Future Implementation of Mobility as a Service (MaaS): Results of an International Delphi Study. Working Paper. Radboud Repository (2018)
Kamargianni, M., Matyas, M.: The business ecosystem of mobility-as-a-service. In: 96th Transportation Research Board (TRB) Annual Meeting. Washington, DC (2017)
Kamargianni, M., Li, W., Matyas, M., Schäfer, A.: A critical review of new mobility services for urban transport. Transp. Res. Procedia 14, 3294–3303 (2016)
Karlsson, I., Mukhtar-Landgren, D., Smith, G., Koglin, T., Kronsell, A., Lund, E., Sarasini, S., Sochor, J.: Development and implementation of Mobility-as-a-Service—a qualitative study of barriers and enabling factors. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 131, 283–295 (2020)
Louviere, J.J., Hensher, D.A., Swait, J.D.: Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)
Matyas, M.: Opportunities and barriers to multimodal cities: lessons learned from in-depth interviews about attitudes towards mobility as a service. Eur. Trans. Res. Rev. 12, 7 (2020)
Matyas, M., Kamargianni, M.: Stated preference design for exploring demand for “mobility as a service” plans. In: 5th International Conference of Choice Modelling. Cape Town (2017)
Mulley, C.: Mobility as a services (MaaS)—Does it have critical mass? Transp. Rev. 37, 247–251 (2017)
Mulley, C., Kronsell, A.: Workshop 7 report—the ‘uberisation’ of public transport and mobility as a service (MaaS): implications for future mainstream public transport. Res. Transp. Econ. 69, 568–572 (2018)
Polydoropoulou, A., Pagoni, I., Tsirimpa, A., Roumboutsos, A., Kamargianni, M., Tsouros, I.: Prototype business models for mobility-as-a-service. Transp. Res. A Policy Pract. 131, 149–162 (2020)
Romanyuk, J.: Mobility as a Service—Hype or the Future of Transportation? Master of Science in Economics and Business Administration, Aalto University (2018)
SmitH, G., Sochor, J., Karlsson, I.M.: Public–private innovation: barriers in the case of mobility as a service in West Sweden. Public Manag. Rev. 21, 116–137 (2019)
Vij, A., Ryan, S., Sampson, S., Harris, S.: Consumer preferences for mobility-as-a-service (MaaS) in Australia. In: 40th Australasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF). Darwin (2018)
Wong, Y.Z.: Mobility as a Service (MaaS): What Does It Mean for the NSW Bus & Coach Industry? Bulletin. BusNSW, Sydney (2018)
Wong, Y.Z.: Whimpact: More Questions than Answers. Thinking Outside the Box (2019). https://sydney.edu.au/business/news-and-events/news/2019/04/30/whimpact–more-questions-than-answers.html. Accessed 30 Apr 2019
Wong, Y.Z., Hensher, D.A.: The Thredbo story: A journey of competition and ownership in land passenger transport. Res. Transp. Econ. 69, 9–22 (2018)
Wong, Y.Z., Hensher, D.A., Mulley, C.: Stated preference design for mobility as a service (MaaS) broker/aggregator contracts. In: 40th Australasian Transport Research Forum (ATRF). Darwin (2018)
Wong, Y.Z., Hensher, D.A., Mulley, C.: Mobility as a service (MaaS): Charting a future context. Transp. Res. A: Policy Pract. 131, 5–19 (2020)
Acknowledgements
This paper contributes to the research program of the Volvo Research and Educational Foundations Bus Rapid Transit (BRT+) Centre of Excellence. We acknowledge the Foundation for funding support. Edward Wei (ITLS) programmed our survey instrument. We thank the many experts and business leaders around the world who agreed to be interviewed and assisted in outreach, without which this study would not have been possible.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by YW under guidance from DH. The first draft of the manuscript was written by YW and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
See Fig. 4.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wong, Y.Z., Hensher, D.A. Delivering mobility as a service (MaaS) through a broker/aggregator business model. Transportation 48, 1837–1863 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-020-10113-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-020-10113-z
Keywords
- Mobility as a service (MaaS)
- Intelligent mobility
- Service delivery
- Broker/aggregator
- Public transport contract
- Stated choice experiment
- Willingness-to-pay