Abstract
To analyze the effect of customer enterprises’ behavior on freight transport markets with various products, a bi-level programming model for freight pricing is developed. The transport companies make decisions in the upper level, a large number of customer enterprises make decisions at the lower level. Cumulative prospect theory is adopted to depict customers’ bounded rationality. The complex network model is introduced to construct the interactions among customer enterprises where the changes in their risk attitudes are depicted by dynamic evolution of their heterogeneous reference points. The existence of the generalized Nash equilibrium is proved and verified. A comparison of the optimal solutions of the new model and the traditional logit based choice model is conducted. The results show that (1) the new model fully embodies the characteristics of cumulative prospect theory and can also improve customers’ utility; (2) the equilibrium freight price and the total profits of transport companies increase with increases in the customers’ interaction intensity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alho, André, Bhavathrathan, B.K., Stinson, M., et al.: A multi-scale agent-based modelling framework for urban freight distribution. Transp. Res. Procedia 27, 188–196 (2017)
Avineri, E., Prashker, J.N.: Sensitivity to uncertainty: need for a paradigm shift. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 1854(1), 90–98 (2003)
Avineri, E., Prashker, J.N.: Sensitivity to travel time variability: travelers’ learning perspective. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 13(2), 157–183 (2005)
Cavalcante, R.A., Roorda, M.J.: Freight market interactions simulation (FREMIS): an agent-based modeling framework. Procedia Comput. Sci. 19, 867–873 (2013)
Chen, J.H.: Models and Algorithms for the Railway Ticket Pricing Optimization. Beijing Jiaotong university, Beijing (2007). (in Chinese)
Crisalli, U., Comi, A., Rosati, L.: A methodology for the assessment of rail-road freight transport policies. Procedia—Soc. Behav. Sci. 87, 292–305 (2013)
Di Febbraro, A., Sacco, N., Saeednia, M.: An agent-based framework for cooperative planning of intermodal freight transport chains. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 64, 72–85 (2016)
Facchinei, F., Kanzow, C.: Generalized nash equilibrium problems. Q. J. Oper. Res. 5(3), 173–210 (2007)
Feo-Valero, M., Arencibia, A.I., Román, C., et al.: Analyzing discrepancies between willingness to pay and willingness to accept for freight transport attributes. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 89, 151–164 (2016)
Ferrari, P.: Instability and dynamic cost elasticities in freight transport systems. Transp. Policy 49, 226–233 (2016)
Gao, Z., Sun, H., Shan, L.L.: A continuous equilibrium network design model and algorithm for transit systems. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 38(3), 235–250 (2004)
Guo, Z., Yue, X., Yang, H., et al.: Enhancing social emotional optimization algorithm using local search. Soft. Comput. 21(24), 7393–7404 (2017)
Ho, T.H., Yeung, C.: Giving feedback to clients. Manag. Sci. 60(8), 1926–1944 (2014)
Jing, X., Xie, J.: Group buying: a new mechanism for selling through social interactions. Manag. Sci. 57(8), 1354–1372 (2011)
Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2), 140–170 (1979)
Kemel, E., Paraschiv, C.: Prospect theory for joint time and money consequences in risk and ambiguity. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 56(10), 81–95 (2013)
Le Pira, M., Inturri, G., Ignaccolo, M., et al.: Finding shared decisions in stakeholder networks: an agent-based approach. Phys. A 466, 277–287 (2017)
Li, X.Y., Li, X.M., Li, X.W., et al.: Multi-agent fare optimization model of two modes problem and its analysis based on edge of chaos. Phys. A 469, 405–419 (2017)
Li, X.Y., Li, X.M., Yang, L.R., et al.: Dynamic route and departure time choice model based on self-adaptive reference point and reinforcement learning. Phys. A 502, 77–92 (2018)
Lo, H.K., Luo, X.W., Siu, B.W.Y.: Degradable transport network: travel time budget of travelers with heterogeneous risk aversion. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 40(9), 792–806 (2006)
Mandala, S.R., Kumara, S.R.T., Rao, C.R., et al.: Clustering social networks using ant colony optimization. Oper. Res. Int. J. 13(1), 47–65 (2013)
Marcucci, E., Le Pira, M., Gatta, V., et al.: Simulating participatory urban freight transport policy-making: accounting for heterogeneous stakeholders’ preferences and interaction effects. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 103, 69–86 (2017)
Masiero, L., Hensher, D.A.: Analyzing loss aversion and diminishing sensitivity in a freight transport stated choice experiment. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 44(5), 349–358 (2010)
Masiero, L., Hensher, D.A.: Shift of reference point and implications on behavioral reaction to gains and losses. Transportation 38(2), 249–271 (2011)
Masiero, L., Rose, J.M.: The role of the reference alternative in the specification of asymmetric discrete choice models. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 53(1), 83–92 (2013)
Matteis, T., Liedtke, G., Wisetjindawat, W.: A framework for incorporating market interactions in an agent-based model for freight transport. Transp. Res. Procedia 12, 925–937 (2016)
Porter, Michael: The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Free Press, New York (2007)
Prelec, D.: The probability weighting function. Econometrica 66(3), 497–527 (1998)
Puckett, S.M., Hensher, D.A.: The role of attribute processing strategies in estimating the preferences of road freight stakeholders. Transp. Research Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 44(3), 379–395 (2008)
Reis, V.: Analysis of mode choice variables in short-distance intermodal freight transport using an agent-based model. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 61(3), 100–120 (2014)
Reis, V.: A disaggregated freight transport market model based on agents and fuzzy logic. Transportmetr. B 7(1), 363–385 (2018)
Rincon, J.A., De la Prieta, F., Zanardini, D., et al.: Influencing over people with a social emotional model. Neurocomputing 231, 47–54 (2017)
Schimit, P.H.T., Santos, B.O., Soares, C.A.: Evolution of cooperation in Axelrod tournament using cellular automata. Phys. A 437, 204–217 (2015)
Si, B.F., Zhong, M., Gao, Z.Y.: Bilevel programming for evaluating revenue strategy of railway passenger transport under multimodal market competition. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board 2117, 1–6 (2009)
Simon, H.A.: Behavioral model of rational choice. Q. J. Econ. 69, 99–120 (1955)
Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertain. 5(4), 297–323 (1992)
Valente, T.W.: Network interventions. Science 337(6090), 49–53 (2012)
Wang, W., Sun, H.J.: Cumulative prospect theory-based user equilibrium model with stochastic perception errors. J. Cent. South Univ. 23(9), 2465–2474 (2016)
Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H.: Collective dynamics of small world networks. Nature 393(6684), 440–442 (1998)
Xu, H.L., Zhou, J., Xu, W.: A decision-making rule for modeling travelers’ route choice behavior based on cumulative prospect theory. Transp. Res. Part C 19, 218–228 (2011a)
Xu, H.L., Lou, Y., Yin, Y., et al.: A prospect-based user equilibrium model with endogenous reference points and its application in congestion pricing. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 45(2), 311–328 (2011b)
Yang, H.: Heuristic algorithms for the bilevel origin-destination matrix estimation problem. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 29(4), 231–242 (1995)
Zhang, B., Juan, Z.C., Lin, X.X.: Stochastic dynamic user optimum model with departure time choice based on cumulative prospect theory. J. Ind. Eng. Eng. Manag. 27(1), 68–76 (2013). (in Chinese)
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Natural Science Fund of China (Grant No. 51778047).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
XL: Model establishing, Manuscript Writing and revising, JL: Manuscript revising.
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Theorem 1
There exists Generalized Nash Equilibrium in the bi-level programming of (19) and (20).
Proof
According to formula (19) and (20), for company \( i \), the freight optimization problem can be written as:
The variables of the optimization problem (29) are \( p_{i1}^{t} , \) \( p_{i2}^{t} , \ldots ,p_{iM}^{t} \). Let \( p_{i1}^{t} = x_{1} \), \( p_{i2}^{t} = x_{2} \), \( \ldots ,p_{iM}^{t} = x_{M} \); let \( q_{i1}^{t - 1} = a_{1} \), \( q_{i2}^{t - 1} = a_{2} \), \( \ldots ,q_{1M}^{t - 1} = a_{M} \); \( \frac{{\partial q_{i1} }}{{\partial p_{i1} }} = b_{1} \), \( \frac{{\partial q_{12} }}{{\partial p_{12} }} = b_{2} \), \( \ldots \), \( \frac{{\partial q_{1M} }}{{\partial p_{1M} }} = b_{M} \), \( p_{i1}^{t - 1} = d_{1} \),\( p_{12}^{t - 1} = d_{2} \), \( \ldots \), \( p_{1M}^{t - 1} = d_{M} \); \( \mathop \sum \limits_{k \ne i} \frac{{\partial q_{i1} }}{{\partial p_{k1} }}\left( {p_{k1}^{t} - p_{k1}^{t - 1} } \right) = e_{1} \), \( \mathop \sum \limits_{k \ne i} \frac{{\partial q_{i2} }}{{\partial p_{k2} }}\left( {p_{k2}^{t} - p_{k2}^{t - 1} } \right) = e_{2} \),\( \ldots \), \( \mathop \sum \limits_{k \ne i} \frac{{\partial q_{iM} }}{{\partial p_{kM} }}\left( {p_{kM}^{t} - p_{kM}^{t - 1} } \right) = e_{M} \); \( c_{i1} = c_{1} \), \( c_{i2} = c_{2} , \ldots , c_{iM} = c_{M} \).
Therefore, optimization problem (29) can be shown as:
The Hessian matrix of quadratic programming (30) is \( \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} { - 2b_{1} } & \cdots & 0 \\ \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ 0 & \cdots & { - 2b_{M} } \\ \end{array} } \right) \), for each transport company, rising freight price will lead to the decline of transportation demand, which means that the derivative of the transportation volume with respect to the freight price is less than 0 (\( b_{1} < 0 \),\( \ldots \),\( b_{M} < 0 \)). The Hessian matrix of quadratic programming (30) is positive definite. Therefore, the quadratic programming (30) has the unique optimal solution and the Generalized Nash Equilibrium does exist.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, X., Li, J. A freight transport price optimization model with multi bounded-rational customers. Transportation 48, 477–504 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-019-10064-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-019-10064-0