Abstract
The influence of accessibility to opportunities in trip generation continues to be debated in the specialised literature given its relevance to simulate phenomena such as induced demand. This article estimates multiple linear regression models (MLR), spatial autoregressive models (SAR), spatial autoregressive models in the error term (SEM) and spatially filtered Poisson regression models (SPO) to discover whether or not accessibility is a significant factor in trip generation using data from the urban area of Santander (Spain). The results obtained provide evidence which shows that, on an intraurban scale, more accessibility to opportunities decreases trip production in private vehicle for work purpose, whereas it increases trip production in other transport modes for non—mandatory purposes. For the correct interpretation of the estimated parameters it was important to consider the direct and indirect effects of the independent variables in the SAR production models. Finally, the validation of the models showed that the SAR and SEM models had a mean squared error slightly lower than the MLR models in predicting overall trip production. This was because the spatial models reduced the correlation of the residuals present in the MLR models. Furthermore, the SPO models performed better in validation mode than all the continuous models.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anselin, L.: Spatial econometrics: methods and models. In: Studies in operational regional science 4 Kluwer. Academic Publishers, Dordrech (1988)
Anselin, L.: Under the hood: issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression models. Agric. Econ. 27, 247–267 (2002)
Bamberg, S., Hunecke, M., Blöbaum, A.: Social context, personal norms and the use of public transportation: two field studies. J. Env. Psychol. 27, 190–203 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.04.001
Bivand, R.: Spatial econometrics functions in R, Classes and methods. J. Geograph. Syst. 4, 405–421 (2002). doi:10.1007/s101090300096
Bivand, R., et al.: Package ‘spdep’. Weighting Schemes, Statistics and Models, Spatial Dependence (2015)
Cameron, A.C., Trivedi, P.K.: Regression-based tests for overdispersion in the Poisson model. J. Econom. 46, 347–364 (1990). doi:10.1016/0304-4076(90)90014-K
Carrasco, J.A., Farber, S.: Selected papers on the study of the social context of travel behaviour. Trans. Res. Part. A. 68, 1–2 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.tra.2014.09.011
Cascetta, E.: Transportation systems analysis: Models and applications. In: Springer optimization and its applications. 2nd edn, vol. 29. Springer, New York (2009)
Cervero, R.: Induced Travel Demand: research Design. Empir. Evid. Norm. Pol. J. Plan. Lit. 17, 3–20 (2002). doi:10.1177/088122017001001
Cervero, R., Kockelman, K.: Travel demand and the 3Ds: density, diversity, and design. Transp. Res. Part. D 2, 199–219 (1997). doi:10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6
Cervero, R., Sarmiento, O.L., Jacoby, E., Gomez, L.F., Neiman, A.: Influences of built environments on walking and cycling: lessons from Bogotá. Inter. J. Sustain. Transp. 3, 203–226 (2009). doi:10.1080/15568310802178314
Clark, A.F., Scott, D.M.: Does the social environment influence active travel? An. Investig. walk. Hamilt. Can. J. Transp. Geogr. 31, 278–285 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.06.005
Clifton, K.J., Currans, K.M., Muhs, C.D.: Adjusting ITE’s Trip Generation Handbook for urban context. J. Trans. Land. Use. 8, 5–29 (2015)
Coppola, P., Nuzzolo, A.: Changing accessibility, dwelling price and the spatial distribution of socio-economic activities. Res. Transp. Econ. 31, 63–71 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.retrec.2010.11.009
Chang, J.S., Jung, D., Kim, J., Kang, T.: Comparative analysis of trip generation models: results using home-based work trips in the Seoul metropolitan area. Transp. Lett. 6, 78–88 (2014). doi:10.1179/1942787514Y.0000000011
Ewing, R., DeAnna, M., Li, S.-C.: Land use impacts on trip generation rates. Transp. Res. Rec. 1518, 1–6 (1996)
Gamas, J., Anderson, W., Pastor, C.: Estimation of trip generation in Mexico City,Mexico, with Spatial Effects and Urban Densities Transportation Research Record. J. Transp. Res. Board. 1985, 49–60 (2006). doi:10.3141/1985-06
Glaeser, E.L.: Agglomeration economics National Bureau of Economic Research conference report. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2010)
Goodwin, P.: Empirical evidence on induced traffic Transportation 23, 35–54 (1996). doi:10.1007/BF00166218
Greene, W.H.: Econometric analysis. Prentice-Hall International, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey (2003)
Griffith, D.A.: Spatial autocorrelation and spatial filtering: gaining understanding through theory and scientific visualization. Springer Science & Business Media, New York (2013)
Handy, S.L., Niemeier, D.A.: Measuring accessibility: an exploration of issues and alternatives. Env. Plan. A. 29, 1175–1194 (1997)
Hanson, S., Schwab, M.: Accessibility and intraurban travel. Env. Plan. A. 19, 735–748 (1987). doi:10.1068/a190735
Horner, M.W.: Spatial dimensions of urban commuting: a review of major issues and their implications for future geographic research. Prof. Geogr. 56, 160–173 (2004). doi:10.1111/j.0033-0124.2004.05602002.x
Hymel, K.M., Small, K.A., Dender, K.V.: Induced demand and rebound effects in road transport. Trans. Res. Part. B 44, 1220–1241 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.trb.2010.02.007
INE: National Population and Housing Census. Spanish National Institute of Statistics (2011)
Institute of Transportation Engineers: Trip Generation Manual, 9th edn. ITE, Washington, DC (2012)
James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R.: An Introduction to statistical learning: with applications in R. Springer, New York (2014)
Kim J-H, Chung J-H, Kim I, Lim U(2009) Spatial Dependence in Trip Generation Models: Spatial Econometric Perspective. In: Transportation Research Board 88th Annual Meeting, p 23
Kitamura, R., Akiyama, T., Yamamoto, T., Golob, T.: Accessibility in a metropolis: toward a better understanding of land use and travel. Transp. Res. Rec. 1780, 64–75 (2001)
Koenig, J.G.: Indicators of urban accessibility: theory and application. Transportation 9, 145–172 (1980). doi:10.1007/BF00167128
Kohavi, R.: A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. Paper presented at the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Montreal, Quebec (1995)
Kwigizile, V., Teng, H.: Comparison of methods for defining geographical connectivity for variables of trip generation models. J. Transp. Eng 135, 454–466 (2009). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2009)135:7(454)
LeSage, J.P., Pace, R.K.: Introduction to spatial econometrics. Statistics, textbooks and monographs. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2009)
Lesage, J.P., Pace, R.K.: The biggest myth in spatial econometrics. Available at SSRN: http://www.ssrncom/abstract=1725503, 10.2139/ssrn1725503 (2010a)
LeSage, J.P., Pace, R.K.: Spatial Econometric Models. Handbook of Applied Spatial Analysis: Software Tools, pp. 355–376. Methods and Applications. Springer, Berlin (2010b)
Lim, K.-K., Srinivasan, S.: Comparative analysis of alternate econometric structures for trip generation models. Transp. Res. Rec. 2254, 68–78 (2011)
Lopes, S., Brondino, N., Rodrigues da Silva, A.: GIS-based analytical tools for transport planning: spatial regression models for transportation demand forecast. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 3, 565–583 (2014)
Martínez, F.J.: Towards a Land-use and transport interaction framework. In: Hensher, D.A., Button, K.J. (eds.) Handbook of transport modelling, pp. 145–164. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2000)
McNally, M.G.: The Four-Step Model. In: Hensher, D.A., Button, K.J. (eds.) Handbook of transport modelling (2nd Edition). Emerald Inc, Jodhpur (2008)
Millard-Ball, A.: Phantom trips: Overestimating the traffic impacts of new development. J. Transp. Land. Use. 8, 31–49 (2015)
Minnen, J., Glorieux, I., van Tienoven, T.P.: Transportation habits: evidence from time diary data. Transp. Res. Part A 76, 25–37 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.tra.2014.12.013
Ord, J.K., Getis, A.: Local spatial autocorrelation statistics: distributional issues and an application. Geogr. Anal. 27, 286–306 (1995). doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00912.x
Ortúzar, JdD, Willumsen, L.G.: Modelling transport, 3rd edn. J. Wiley, Chichester New York (2001)
Purvis, C., Iglesias, M., Eisen, V.: Incorporating work trip accessibility in nonwork trip generation models in san francisco bay area transportation research record. J. Transp. Res. Board. 1556, 37–45 (1996). doi:10.3141/1556-06
Roorda, M.J., Páez, A., Morency, C., Mercado, R., Farber, S.: Trip generation of vulnerable populations in three Canadian cities: a spatial ordered probit approach. Transportation 37, 525–548 (2010)
Scott, D.M., Dugundji, E.R., Páez, A.: The social dimension of activity, travel and location choice behavior. J. Transp. Geogr. 31, 212–215 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.06.009
Sherwin, H., Chatterjee, K., Jain, J.: An exploration of the importance of social influence in the decision to start bicycling in England. Transp. Res. Part A 68, 32–45 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.tra.2014.05.001
Thill, J.-C., Kim, M.: Trip making, induced travel demand, and accessibility. J. Geograph. Syst. 7, 229–248 (2005). doi:10.1007/s10109-005-0158-3
Vickerman, R.W.: Accessibility, attraction, and potential: a review of some concepts and their use in determining mobility. Env. Plan. A. 6, 675–691 (1974). doi:10.1068/a060675
Walters, J., Bochner, B., Ewing, R.: Getting trip generation right. Eliminating the Bias Against Mixed Use Development, American Planning Association (APA) (2013)
Wu, D., Sall, E., Newhouse, S.: Trip rates and accessibility: gleaning basic planning information from activity-based travel demand model. Transp. Res. Rec. 2303, 81–88 (2012)
Zeileis, A., Kleiber, C., Jackman, S.: Regression models for count data in R. J. Stat. Softw. 27, 1–25 (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cordera, R., Coppola, P., dell’Olio, L. et al. Is accessibility relevant in trip generation? Modelling the interaction between trip generation and accessibility taking into account spatial effects. Transportation 44, 1577–1603 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-016-9715-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-016-9715-5