Abstract
The concept of accessibility and its related indicators have been in use for a long time, with still diverging interpretations of their significance and formulation. In this paper, a review is made of various existing theoretical bases, with special emphasis on recent behavioural approaches. It is suggested that this theoretical framework now allows a better appraisal of accessibility indicators and precise recommendations are proposed for their practical formulation and use. Various examples are given, especially for disaggregate analysis where a calculation “for a given person” is proposed instead of the conventional calculation .“by a given mode”. Finally, the relations between accessibility and trip rate are examined; from a study made in French cities, it is suggested that accessibility is a powerful determinant of trip rate.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ben Akiva, M. and Lerman, S. R. (1978). “Disaggregate travel and mobility choice models and measures of accessibility,” in D. A. Hensher and P. R. Stopher, eds., Behavioural Travel Modelling. London: Croom Helm.
CETUR (1976). Analyse et prévision du trafic urbain: recherche d'un modèle d'équilibre. Paris: Centre d'Etude des Transports Urbains, Ministère des Transports.
Cochrane, R. A. (1975). “A possible economic basis for the gravity model,” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 9 (1): 34–49.
C.R.A. (1972). A Disaggregate Behavioural Model of Urban Travel Demand. Washington DC: Charles River Associates, Federal Highway Administration.
Dalvi, M. Q. (1978). “Behavioural modelling accessibility, mobility and need: concepts and measurement,” in D. A. Hensher and P. R. Stopher, eds., Behavioural Travel Modelling. London: Croom Helm.
Dalvi, M. Q. and Martin, K. (1976). “Estimate of non work trip demand: a disaggregated approach”, in P. Bonsall, M. Q. Dalvi and P. J. Hills, eds., Urban Transportation Planning: Current Problems and Future Prospects. Tunbridge Wells: Abacus Press.
Domencich, T. and McFadden, T. (1975). Urban Travel Demand: A Behavioural Analysis. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Hansen, W. G. (1959). ”How accessibility shapes land use,” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 25: 73–76.
Koenig, J. G. (1974). “La théorie de l'accessibilité urbaine, un nouvel outil au service de l'aménageur,” Revue Générale des Routes et Aérodromes June; English summary: “A theory of urban accesibility,” in OECD-Road Research, “Urban Traffic Models: Possibilities for Simplification ” Appx. 4, Paris, August 1974.
Koenig, J. G. (1975a). “A Theory of Urban Accessibility,” Paper presented at the PTRC Summer Annual Meeting, University of Warwick, U.K., July.
Koenig, J. G. (1975b). “Théorie de l'Accessibilité Urbaine”, doctorate thesis, University of Paris-VI, June.
Neuburger, H. (1971). “User benefits in the evaluation of transport and land use plans,” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 5 (1): 52–75.
Poulit, J. (1974). Urbanisme et transport: les critères d'accessibilité et de développement urbain. Paris: Ministère des Transports/SETRA (Division Urbaine).
Weibull, J. W. (1976). “An axiomatic approach to the measurement of accessibility,” Regional Science and Urban Economics 6: 357–379.
Williams, H. C. W. L. (1976). “Travel demand models, duality relations and user benefit analysis,” Journal of Regional Science 16 (2): 147–166.
Williams, H. C. W. L. and Senior, M. L. (1978). “Accessibility, spatial interaction and spatial benefit analysis of land use — transportation plans”, in A. Karlquist, L. Lundquist, F. Snickars and J. W. Weibull, eds., Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koenig, J.G. Indicators of urban accessibility: Theory and application. Transportation 9, 145–172 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167128
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167128