Transportation

, Volume 42, Issue 1, pp 25–43 | Cite as

Mood and mode: does how we travel affect how we feel?

Article

Abstract

How do emotions like happiness, pain, stress, sadness and fatigue vary during travel and by travel mode? Understanding the relationship between how we travel and how we feel offers insight into ways of improving existing transportation services, prioritizing investments and theorizing and modeling the costs and benefits of travel. Drawing on the American Time Use Survey’s well-being module, which surveyed over 13,000 respondents about mood during randomly selected activities, we address these questions using pooled ordinary least squares and fixed-effects panel regression. Controlling for demographics and other individual-specific attributes, we find that, contrary to the common perception that travel is an onerous, derived demand, mood is generally no worse during travel than on average. However, compared to other influences, travel has only a small total impact on how we feel. The estimated relationship between mood and mode tends to be weak and often not statistically significant. Nevertheless, we find that bicyclists have the most positive affect. Next happiest are car passengers, and then car drivers, though when controlling for the pleasure typically derived from interacting with others drivers are at least as happy as passengers. Bus and train riders experience the most negative emotions, though a small part of this can be attributed to the fact that transit is disproportionately used for the unloved work trip. Our findings suggest that bicycle use may have benefits beyond the typically cited health and transportation ones, and that improving transit riders’ emotional experience may be as important as improving traditional service features such as headways and travel speeds. Our findings are ambiguous as to whether the joy of driving will limit the appeal of autonomous vehicles.

Keywords

Happiness Affect Travel Travel mode Commuting Derived demand 

Supplementary material

11116_2014_9521_MOESM1_ESM.docx (22 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 21 kb)

References

  1. Abou-Zeid, M., Ben-Akiva, M.: Travel mode switching: comparison of findings from two public transportation experiments. Transp. Policy 24, 48–59 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abou-Zeid, M., Ben-Akiva, M., Bierlaire, M.: Happiness and travel behavior modification. In: European Transport Conference, October 2008Google Scholar
  3. Abou-Zeid, M.: Measuring and modeling activities and travel well-being. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2009)Google Scholar
  4. Abou-Zeid, M., Witter, R., Bierlaire, M., Kaufmann, V., Ben-Akiva, M.: Happiness and travel mode switching: findings from a Swiss public transportation experiment. Transp. Policy 19(1), 93–104 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andrews, F.M., Withey, S.B.: Social indicators of well-being: America’s perception of life quality. Plenum Press, New York (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ballas, D., Tranmer, M.: Happy people or happy places? A multilevel modeling approach to the analysis of happiness and well-being. Int. Reg. Sci. Rev. 35(1), 70–102 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergstad, C.J., Gamble, A., Gärling, T., Hagman, O., Polk, M., Ettema, D., Olsson, L.E.: Subjective well-being related to satisfaction with daily travel. Transportation 38(1), 1–15 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhat, C.R., Guo, J.Y.: A comprehensive analysis of built environment characteristics on household residential choice and auto ownership levels. Transp. Res. B 41(5), 506–526 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bradburn, N.M.: The structure of psychological well-being. Aldine, Chicago (1969)Google Scholar
  10. Brereton, F., Clinch, J.P., Ferreria, S.: Happiness, geography and the environment. Ecol. Econ. 62(2), 386–396 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brownstone, D.: Key relationships between the built environment and VMT. Report Prepared for the Transportation Research Board & the Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Special Report 298, University of California, Irvine (2008)Google Scholar
  12. Chatman, D.: Residential choice, the built environment, and nonwork travel: evidence using new data and methods. Environ. Plan. A 41(5), 1072–1089 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Choi, J., Coughlin, J.F., D’Ambrosio, L.A.: Travel time and subjective well-being. Paper presented at the 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC (2012)Google Scholar
  14. De Neve, J., Christakis, N.A., Fowler, J.H., Frey, B.S.: Genes, economics, and happiness. J. Neurosci. Psychol. Econ. 5(4), 193–211 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Vos, J., Schwanen, T., Van Acker, V., Witlox, F.: Travel and subjective well-being: a focus on findings, methods, and future research needs. Transp. Rev. 33(4), 421–442 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A.: The independence of positive and negative affect. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 47(5), 1105–1117 (1984)Google Scholar
  17. Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., White, M.: Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. J. Econ. Psychol. 29(1), 94–122 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Duarte, A., Garcia, C., Giannarakis, G., Limão, S., Polydoropoulou, A., Litinas, N.: New approaches in transportation planning: happiness and transport economics. NETNOMICS 11(1), 5–32 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ellaway, A., Macintyre, S., Hiscock, R., Kearns, A.: In the driving seat: psychosocial benefits from private motor vehicle transport compared to public transport. Transp. Res. F 6(3), 217–231 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ettema, D., Gärling, T., Olsson, L.E., Friman, M.: Out of home activities, daily travel, and subjective well-being. Transp. Res. A 44(9), 723–732 (2010)Google Scholar
  21. Ettema, D., Garling, T., Eriksson, L., Friman, M., Olsson, L.E., Fujii, S.: Satisfaction with travel and subjective well-being: development and test of a measurement tool. Transp. Res. F 14(3), 167–175 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ettema, D., Friman, M., Garling, T., Olsson, L.E., Fujii, S.: How in-vehicle activities affect work commuters’ satisfaction with public transport. J. Transp. Geogr. 24, 215–222 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., Frijters, P.: How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? Econ. J. 114(497), 641–659 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gardner, B., Abraham, C.: What drives car use? A grounded theory analysis of commuters’ reasons for driving. Transp. Res. F 10(3), 187–200 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gardner, B., Abraham, C.: Psychological correlates of car use: a meta-analysis. Transp. Res. F 11(4), 300–311 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goulias, K.G., Ravulaparthy, S., Polydoropoulou, A., Yoon, S.Y.: An exploratory analysis of the time-of-day dynamics of episodic hedonic value of activities and travel. Paper presented at 92nd Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC (2013)Google Scholar
  27. Heath, Y., Gifford, R.: Extending the theory of planned behavior: predicting the use of public transportation. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 32(10), 2154–2189 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hiscock, R., Macintyre, S., Ellaway, A., Kearns, A.: Means of transport and ontological security: do cars provide psychosocial benefits to their users? Transp. Res. D 7(2), 119–135 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hupkes, G.: The law of constant travel time and trip-rates. Futures 14, 38–46 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Iseki, H., Smart, M., Taylor, B.D., Yoh, A.: Thinking outside the bus. Access 40, 9–15 (2012)Google Scholar
  31. Jensen, M.: Passion and heart in transport: a sociological analysis of transport behavior. Transp. Policy 6(1), 19–33 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kahneman, D., Krueger, A.B.: Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. J. Econ. Perspect. 20(1), 3–24 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kahneman, D., Krueger, A.B., Schkade, D.A., Schwarz, N., Stone, A.A.: A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: the day reconstruction method. Science 306(5072), 1776–1780 (2004a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kahneman, D., Krueger, A.B., Schkade, D.A., Schwarz, N., Stone, A.A.: The Day Reconstruction Method (DRM). Instrument Documentation. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/data/306/5702/1776/DC1/1 (2004b)
  35. Kahneman, D., Krueger, A.B., Schkade, D., Schwarz, N., Stone, A.A.: Would you be happier if you were richer? Science 312(5782), 1908–1910 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kesebir, P., Diener, E.: In pursuit of happiness: empirical answers to philosophical questions. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 3(2), 117–125 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Knabe, A., Rätzel, S., Schöb, R., Weimann, J.: Dissatisfied with life but having a good day: time use and well-being of the unemployed. Econ. J. 120(547), 867–889 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Macintyre, S., Ellaway, A., Der, G., Ford, G., Hunt, K.: Are housing tenure and car access simply markers of income or self esteem? A Scottish study. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 52(10), 657–664 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Macintyre, S., Hiscock, R., Kearns, A., Ellaway, A.: Housing tenure and car access: further exploration of the nature of their relationships with health in a UK setting. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 55(5), 330–331 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Manaugh, K., Larsen, J., El-Geneidy, A.M.: Does distance matter? Exploring the links among values, motivations, and satisfaction in walking trips. Paper presented at the 91st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC (2012)Google Scholar
  41. Mann, E., Abraham, C.: The role of affect in UK commuters’ travel mode choices: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Br. J. Psychol. 97(2), 155–176 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McFadden, D.: Economic choices. Am. Econ. Rev. 91(3), 351–378 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mokhtarian, P.L., Cao, X.: Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behavior: a focus on methodologies. Transp. Res. B 42(3), 204–228 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mokhtarian, P.L., Salomon, I.: How derived is the demand for travel? Some conceptual and measurement considerations. Transp. Res. A 35(8), 695–719 (2001)Google Scholar
  45. Morris, E.A.: Access and outcomes: transportation, location and subjective well-being. Paper presented at the 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC (2013)Google Scholar
  46. Nes, R.B., Røysamb, E., Tambs, K., Harris, J.R., Reichborn-Kjennerud, T.: Subjective well-being: genetic and environmental contributions to stability and change. Psychol. Med. 36(7), 1033–1042 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Olsson, L.E., Gärling, T., Ettema, D., Friman, M., Fujii, S.: Happiness and satisfaction with work commute. Soc. Indic. Res. 11(1), 255–263 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ory, D.T., Mokhtarian, P.L.: When is getting there half the fun? Modeling the liking for travel. Transp. Res. A 39(2–3), 97–123 (2005)Google Scholar
  49. Ory, D.T., Mokhtarian, P.L., Redmond, L., Salomon, I., Collantes, G.O., Choo, S.: When is commuting desirable to the individual? Growth Change 35(3), 334–359 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pucher, J., Renne, J.L.: Socioeconomics of urban travel: evidence from the 2001 NHTS. Transp. Q. 57(3), 49–77 (2003)Google Scholar
  51. Redmond, L.S., Mokhtarian, P.L.: The positive utility of the commute: modeling ideal commute time and relative desired commute amount. Transportation 28(2), 179–205 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Salomon, I.: Telecommunications and travel: substitution or modified mobility? J. Transp. Econ. Policy 19(3), 219–235 (1985)Google Scholar
  53. Small, K.: Project evaluation. In: Gomez-Ibanez J., Tye W., Winston C. (eds.), Essays in Transportation Economics and Policy: A Handbook in Honor of John R. Meyer, pp. 137–177. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC (1999)Google Scholar
  54. Small, K., Verhoef, E.: The Economics of Urban Transportation, 2nd edn. Routledge, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  55. Stradling, S., Carreno, M., Rye, T., Noble, A.: Passenger perceptions and the ideal urban bus journey experience. Transp. Policy 14(4), 283–292 (2007a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stradling, S.G., Anable, J., Carreno, M.: Performance, importance and user disgruntlement: a six-step method for measuring satisfaction with travel modes. Transp. Res. A 1, 98–106 (2007b)Google Scholar
  57. Stutzer, A., Frey, B.S.: Stress that doesn’t pay: the commuting paradox. Scand. J. Econ. 110(2), 339–366 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tertoolen, G., Van Kreveld, D., Verstraten, B.: Psychological resistance against attempts to reduce private car use. Transp. Res. A 32(3), 171–181 (1998)Google Scholar
  59. United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics: American Time Use Survey. http://www.bls.gov/tus/ (2013)
  60. Van Acker, V., Mokhtarian, P.L., Witlox, F.: Going soft: on how subjective variables explain modal choices for leisure travel. Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res. 11(2), 115–147 (2011)Google Scholar
  61. Van Wee, B., Holwerda, H., van Baren, R.: Preferences for modes, residential location and travel behaviour: the relevance for land-use impacts on mobility. Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res. 2(3/4), 305–316 (2002)Google Scholar
  62. Wardman, M., Hine, J., Stradling, S.G.: Interchange and travel choice. Scottish Executive Central Research Unit, Edinburgh (2001)Google Scholar
  63. Weinstein, A.: Customer satisfaction among transit riders: how customers rank the relative importance of various service attributes. Transp. Res. Rec. 1735, 123–132 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. White, M.P., Dolan, P.: Accounting for the richness of daily activities. Psychol. Sci. 20(8), 1000–1008 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.City and Regional PlanningClemson UniversityClemsonUSA
  2. 2.City and Regional PlanningUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations