Skip to main content
Log in

Public Corporate e-Learning: Antecedents and Results

  • Published:
Public Organization Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between technology, content, responsiveness, usability, and outcomes of public corporate asynchronous e-learning. PLS-SEM was used to analyze the data of 1097 valid questionnaires collected electronically. Results indicate that positive student perceptions on (1) technology can positively influence their perceptions about the constructs and on (2) content, responsiveness and usability can positively and directly impact the perception of results. These impacts may increase the willingness to reuse the system, thus helping to reduce evasion. The new model deepens the understanding of the factors linked to inefficiency and helps in pointing directions for improving e-learning courses and environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrifoglio, R., Metallo, C., & Di Nauta, P. (2021). Understanding knowledge management in public organizations through the organizational knowing perspective: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Public Organization Review, 21(1), 137–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alias, N., Othman, M. S., Marin, V. I., & Tur, G. (2018). A model of factors affecting learning performance through the use of social media in Malaysian higher education. Computers and Education, 121, 59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, J., Farias, J., & Carvalho, H. (2017). Drivers of the Technology Adoption In Healthcare. Brazilian Business Review, 14(3), 336–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attali, Y., & van der Kleij, F. (2017). Effects of feedback elaboration and feedback timing during computer-based practice in mathematics problem solving. Computers and Education, 110, 154–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayuni, D., & Mulyana, A. (2019). Applying Service Quality Model as a Determinant of Success in E-learning: The Role of Institutional Support and Outcome Value. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 8(1), 145–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonatto, K. S., Motoki, F. Y. S., Bezerra Filho, J. E., & Mainardes, E. W. (2021). Social accountability: E-monitoring public management in an emerging economy. Public Organization Review 1-18.

  • Brazilian Association of Distance Learning. (2018). 2017 Brazilian Census for distance learning: analytic report of distance learning in Brazil. Brazilian Association of Distance Learning. http://abed.org.br/arquivos/CENSO_EAD_BR_2018_digital_completo.pdf

  • Chang, V. (2016). Review and discussion: E-learning for academia and industry. International Journal of Information Management, 36(3), 476–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. M. (2012). Effects of quality antecedents on e-learning acceptance. Internet Research, 22(3), 361–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, V., Cheng, T. C. E., & Lai, W. M. J. (2009). The role of perceived user-interface design in continued usage intention of self-paced e-learning tools. Computers and Education, 53(2), 216–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, D. H., Kim, J., & Kim, S. H. (2007). ERP training with a web-based electronic learning system: The flow theory perspective. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 65(3), 223–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cidral, W. A., Oliveira, T., Di Felice, M., & Aparicio, M. (2018). E-learning success determinants: Brazilian empirical study. Computers and Education, 122, 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gameel, B. G. (2017). Learner Satisfaction with Massive Open Online Courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 31(2), 98–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Market Insights. (2019). Global E-Learning Market Size by Technology 2019-2025. https://www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/elearning-market-size

  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications Inc.

  • Heath, M. K. (2018). What kind of (digital) citizen? A between-studies analysis of research and teaching for democracy. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 35(5), 342–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, D. I. (2018). Adopting and refining e-services: The role of organization size. Public Organization Review, 18(1), 111–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joo, Y. J., So, H. J., & Kim, N. H. (2018). Examination of relationships among students’ self-determination, technology acceptance, satisfaction, and continuance intention to use K-MOOCs. Computers and Education, 122, 260–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, Y., & Lee, J. (2018). Learning Engagement and Persistence in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCS). Computers and Education, 122, 9–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG. (2017). Online Education in India: 2021. KPMG. https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/in/pdf/2017/05/Online-Education-in-India2021.pdf

  • Krause, U. M., Stark, R., & Mandl, H. (2009). The effects of cooperative learning and feedback on e-learning in statistics. Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 158–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liaw, S. S., & Huang, H. M. (2013). Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments. Computers and Education, 60(1), 14–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins, M., Farias, J. S., Albuquerque, P. H. M., & Pereira, D. S. (2018). Adoption of technology for reading purposes: A study articles of e-books acceptance. Brazilian Business Review, 15(6), 568–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, D. R., & Wolff, F. G. (1998). An experiment with WWW interactive learning in university education. Computers and Education, 31(3), 255–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paepe, L. D., Zhu, C., & DePryck, K. (2018). Drop-out, Retention, Satisfaction and Attainment of Online Learners of Dutch in Adult education. International Journal on E-Learning, 17(3), 303–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Malhotra, A. (2005). E-S-QUAL a multiple-item scale for assessing electronic service quality. Journal of Service Research, 7(3), 213–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, F. A. D. M., Ramos, A. S. M., Gouvêa, M. A., & Da Costa, M. F. (2015). Satisfaction and continuous use intention of e-learning service in Brazilian public organizations. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 139–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shee, D. Y., & Wang, Y. S. (2008). Multi-criteria evaluation of the web-based e-learning system: A methodology based on learner satisfaction and its applications. Computers and Education, 50(3), 894–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, E., & Bagarukayo, K. (2019). Online Education in Emerging Knowledge Economies: Exploring Factors of Motivation, De-Motivation and Potential Facilitators; and Studying the Effects of Demographic Variables. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 15(2), 5–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugant, R. (2014). A Framework for Measuring Service Quality of E-Learning Services. Third International Conference on Global Business, Economics, Finance and Social Sciences 19–21.

  • Sugant, R., & Srilakshminarayana, G. (2018). E-learning service quality: Assessment of factors. SCMS Journal of Indian Management, 15(1), 110–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers and Education, 50(4), 1183–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. S. (2003). Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Information and Management, 41(1), 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, W.-T., & Huang, N.-T.N. (2011). The Effects of E-Learning System Service Quality and Users’ Acceptance on Organizational Learning. International Journal of Business and Information, 6(2), 205–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J., Benbasat, I., & Cenfetelli, R. T. (2013). Integrating Service Quality with System and Information Quality: An Empirical Test in the E-Service Context. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 777–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq/Brazil), project 304209/2018-0, by Foundation for Research Support of Espírito Santo (FAPES/Brazil), projects 84513772 (599/2018) and 85395650 (228/2019), by Portuguese Science Foundation (FCT/Portugal) through NECE (Núcleo de Estudos em Ciências Empresariais), project UID/GES/04630/2020, and by IFTS (Instituto Fucape de Tecnologias Sociais), project 2021-2024.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emerson Wagner Mainardes.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest Statement

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Souza, F.V., Motoki, F.Y.S., Mainardes, E.W. et al. Public Corporate e-Learning: Antecedents and Results. Public Organiz Rev 22, 1139–1156 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-021-00588-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-021-00588-4

Keywords

Navigation