Skip to main content
Log in

Inter-Jurisdictional Comparison of Public Asset Utilization in Tokyo Metropolitan Local Governments

  • Published:
Public Organization Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Author Correction to this article was published on 05 May 2022

This article has been updated

Abstract

Japanese local governments have been significantly undergoing reform to pursue better efficiency of public services, where public assets play a pivotal role. Optimizing public asset utilization possibly entails efficiency improvement. Using a two-stage Data Envelopment Analysis, this paper estimates efficiency scores, regressed on various composites of public assets for Tokyo’s 49 local governments (23 special wards and 26 Tama cities) over the 2008–2017 period. Our evidence suggests that the special wards could invest more in living and infrastructure and lessen shared services with their higher-tier government. In contrast, the Tama cities could increase their educational assets and curtail infrastructure investment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

Notes

  1. The same applies to the amounts of assets in the second stage of regression as the independent variables.

  2. Tokyo LGs use cash budgeting and evaluate their budget performance via the budgetary accuracy of expenditures and revenue. The former indicator is generally defined as the ratio of actual expenditure to budgeted expenditure. Similarly, the latter refers to the ratio of actual revenue to budgeted revenue.

  3. The covariance structure of the random effects could not be specified for the SWs because the maximum likelihood estimation did not coverage.

  4. The significance for investment disappears in the SWs when the sample is divided into the SWs and TCs. Also, the correlation coefficient changed into a positive sign in the TCs, though statistical significance remained.

  5. The effect of population density on efficiency is still identified for both the SWs and TCs when the samples is separated (β = -0.0895; p < .01 and β =-0.0842; p < 0.10).

References

  • Afonso, A., & Fernandes, S. (2008). Assessing and Explaining the Relative Efficiency of Local Government. Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(5), 1946–1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnaboldi, M., & Lapsley, I. (2010). Asset Management in Sities : Polyphony in Action? Accounting, Auditing, Accountability Journal, 23(3), 392–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balaguer-Coll, M. T., Prior, D., & Tortosa-Ausina, E. (2013). Output Complexity, Environmental Conditions, and the Efficiency of Municipalities. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 39(3), 303–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros, C. (2006). Productivity Growth in the Lisbon Police Force. Public Organization Review, 6, 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borger, B. D., & Kerstens, K. (1996). Cost Efficiency of Belgian Local Governments : A Comparative Analysis of FDH, DEA, and Econometric Approaches. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 26(2), 145–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlin, T. (2005). Debating the Impact of Accrual Accounting and Reporting in the Public Sector. Financial Accountability & Management, 21(August), 309–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. C. (2017). Measuring Departmental and Overall Regional Performance: Applying the Multi-activity DEA Model to Taiwan’s Cities/ Counties. Omega, 67, 60–80. Elsevier.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Local Authorities for International Relations (CLAIR) (2012). Local Government in Japan. Retrieved November 13, 2021, from http://www.clair.or.jp/j/forum/pub/pdf/jichi12_en.pdf

  • Christensen, T. & Laegreid, P. (2007). Transcending new public management: The transformation of public sector reforms. Ashgate.

  • Diefenbach, T. (2009). New Public Management in Public Sector Organizations: The Dark sides of Managerialistic “Enlightenment.” Public Administration, 87(4), 892–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doumpos, M., & Cohen, S. (2014). Applying Data Envelopment Analysis on Accounting Data to Assess and Optimize the Efficiency of Greek Local Governments. Omega, 46, 74–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehalaiye, D., Redmayne, N. B., & Laswad, F. (2020). Does Accounting Information Contribute to a Better Understanding of Public Assets Management? The Case of Local Government Infrastructural Assets. Public Money & Management, 41(2), 88–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fogarty, J., & Mugera, A. (2013). Local Government Efficiency: Evidence from Western Australia. The Australian Economic Review, 46(3), 300–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J. (1998). Application of Accrual Accounting in the Australian Public Sector - rhetoric or Reality. Financial Accountability & Management, 14(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (1995). The “new public management” in the 1980s: Variations on a Theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2–3), 93–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C., & Dixon, R. (2013). A model of Cost-cutting in Government? The Great Management Revolution in UK Central Government Reconsidered. Public Administration, 91(1), 114–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaganova, O. & Kopanyi, M. (2014). Managing Local Assets. In C. D. Farvacque-Vitkovic & M. Kopanyi (Eds), Municipal Finances: A Handbook for Local Governments (pp. 275–324). World Bank.

  • Kaganova, O. & McKellar, J. (2006). Managing government property assets: international experiences. The Urban Institute.

  • Kaganova, O., & Nayyar-Stone, R. (2000). Municipal Real Property Asset Management: An Overview of World Experience, Trends, and Financial Implications. Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 6(4), 307–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaganova, O., & Telgarsky, J. (2018). Management of Capital Assets by Local Governments: An Assessment and Benchmarking Survey. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 22(2), 143–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalb, A. (2012). What Determines Local Governments’ Cost-efficiency? The Case of Road Maintenance. Regional Studies, 48(9), 1483–1498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalb, A., Geys, B., & Heinemann, F. (2012). Value for Money? German Local Government Efficiency in a Comparative Perspective Value for Money? German Local Government Efficiency in a Comparative Perspective. Applied Economics, 44, 201–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi, M., Yamamoto, K., & Ishikawa, K. (2016). The Usefulness of Accrual Information in Non-mandatory Environments: The Case of Japanese Local Government. Australian Accounting Review, 26(2), 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampe, H. W., Hilgers, D., & Ihl, C. (2015). Does Accrual Accounting Improve Municipalities’ Efficiency? Evidence from Germany. Applied Economics, 47(41), 4349–4363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, A., Nolan, J., & Segal, G. F. (2005). Measuring Municipal Service Efficiency in US Cities’. Urban Affair Review, 41(2), 237–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijkamp, P., & Suzuki, S. (2009). A Generalized Goals-Achievement Model in Data Envelopment Analysis: An Application to Efficiency Improvement in Local Government Finance in Japan. Spatial Economic Analysis, 4(3), 249–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, A. (2010). Rationale, Practice, and Outcomes in Municipal Property Asset Management. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 12(3), 157–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, A. (2011). Municipal Property Asset Management–a Comparative Study of UK and Russia. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 9179(4), 416–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. (2016). Budget Reform before and after the Global Financial Crisis. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 16(1), 9–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roje, G., & Redmayne, N. B. (2020). On the Management and Financial Reporting for State Assets — a Comparative Analysis between Croatia and New Zealand. Public Money & Management, 41(2), 118–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohsugi, S. (2011). The Large City System of Japan. Papers on the Local Governance System and its Implementation in Selected Fields in Japan No.20. Tokyo: National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies. Retrieved November 13, 2021, from http://www3.grips.ac.jp/coslog/public_html/activity/01/04/file/Bunyabetsu-20_en.pdf

  • Seol, H., Lee, H., Kim, S., & Park, Y. (2008). The Impact of Information Technology on Organizational Efficiency in Public Services: A DEA-based DT Approach. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59(2), 231–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stefanescu, C. A. (2020). Public Management Reform under the Dome of Accruals. Spanish Accounting Review, 23(1), 91–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storto, C. (2013). Evaluating Technical Efficiency of Italian Major Municipalities: A Data Envelopment Analysis model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 81, 346–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanzi, V. & Prakash, T. (2000). The Cost of Government and the Misuse of Public Assets. IMF Working Paper No. 00/180. Retrieved November 13, 2021, from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1445690

  • Tran, T. V., Drew, J., & Noguchi, M. (2018). The Role of Revenue Volatility in Local Expenditure Volatility: A Comparison of Tokyo Metropolitan Local Governments. Economic Papers: A Journal of Applied Economics and Policy, 37(4), 443–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran, T. V. & Noguchi, M. (2020). Public Efficiency in Tokyo’s Metropolitan Local Governments: The Role of Asset Utilization and Budgeting. Public Money and Management, 0(0), 1–10

  • Worthington, C., & Dollery, B. E. (2001). Measuring Efficiency in Local Government: An Analysis of New South Wales Municipalities’ Domestic Waste Management Function. Policy Studies Journal, 29(2), 232–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto, H. (2003). New Public Management - Japan’s Practice. Tokyo: Institute for International Policy Studies, IIPS Policy Paper 293e. Retrieved November 13, 2021, from http://www.iips.org/en/research/data/bp293e.pdf

  • Yamamoto, K., & Noguchi, M. (2013). Different Scenarios for Accounting Reform in Non-Anglophone Contexts: The Case of Japanese Local Governments since the 1990s. Accounting History, 18(4), 529–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, M., & Peyrache, A. (2017). The Quality and Efficiency of Public Service Delivery in the UK and China. Regional Studies, 51(2), 285–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the Tokyo Metropolitan Government (TMG) research fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thien-Vu Tran.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare they have no financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tran, TV., Shoichiro, H. & Noguchi, M. Inter-Jurisdictional Comparison of Public Asset Utilization in Tokyo Metropolitan Local Governments. Public Organiz Rev 23, 197–218 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-021-00585-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-021-00585-7

Keywords

Navigation