Abstract
Little empirical work explores the impact of female managers on organizational performance. This paper uses Miles and Snow’s management strategies to empirically determine if female and male managers use different strategies and what influence these strategies have on organizational performance. Using data and superintendent survey responses from Texas school districts from the years 2000 through 2005, differences between male and female managers are discovered. Female managers and the strategies they use have a positive influence on performance. These results are discussed in the context of the gender and management literature and in the general field of public management.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
To determine if one is more likely to prospect or defend, researchers must examine the priorities attached to the strategies.
Data were collected and provided to me by Ken Meier and the Project for Equity, Representation and Governance at Texas A&M University.
References
Andrews, R., Boyne, G. A., & Walker, R. M. 2006. Strategy content and organizational performance: An empirical analysis. Public Administration Review, 66(1): 52–63.
Boyne, G. A., & Walker, R. M. 2004. Strategy content and public service organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(2): 231–252.
Donnell, S. M., & Hall, J. 1980. Men and women as managers: A significant case of no significant difference. Organizational Dynamics, Spring: 60–77.
Duerst-Lahti, G., & Johnson, C. M. 1992. Management styles, stereotypes, and advantages. In Guy, M. E. (Ed.). Women and men of the states: Public administrators at the state level. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.
Duerst-Lahti, G., & Kelly, R. M. (eds) (1995). Gender power, leadership, and governance. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. 1990. Gender and leadership style: A meta analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2): 233–256.
Evans, J. D., & Green, C. L. 2000. Marketing strategy, constituent influence and resource allocation: An application of the miles and snow typology to closely held firms in chapter 11 bankruptcy. Journal of Business Research, 50(2): 2225–2231.
Guy, M. E. (ed) 1992. Women and men of the states: Public administrators at the state level. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.
Hambrick, D. C. 1983. Some tests of the effectiveness and functional attributes of miles and snow’s strategic types. Academy of Management Journal, 26(1): 5–26.
Helgesen, S. 1990. The female advantage: Women’s ways of leadership. New York: Doubleday.
Jencks, C., & Phillips, M. (eds) 1998. The black-white test score gap. Washington: The Brookings Institution.
Kanter, R. M. 1977. Men and women of the corporation. New York: BasicBooks.
Karsten, M. F. 1994. Management and gender: Issues and attitudes. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
Karsten, M. F. 2006. Management, gender, and race in the 21st Century. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J., Jr. 1999. Modeling the impact of public management: Implications of structural context. Journal of Public Administration Review and Theory, 9(4): 505–526.
Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J., Jr. 2001. Managerial strategies and behavior in networks: A model with evidence from U.S. public education. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(3): 271–293.
Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J., Jr. 2005. Managerial networking: Issues of measurement and research design. Administration and Society, 37(5): 523–541.
Meier, K. J., O’Toole, L. J., Jr., & Goerdel, H. T. 2006. Management activity and program performance: Gender as management capital. Public Administration Review, 66(1): 24–36.
Meier, K. J., O’Toole, L. J., Jr., Boyne, G. A., & Walker, R. M. 2007. Strategic management and the performance of public organizations. Journal of Public Administration and Theory, 17: 357–377.
Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. 1978. Organizational strategy, structure, and process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman, H. J., Jr. 1978. Organizational strategy, structure, and process. Academy of Management Review, July: 546–562.
Nicholson-Crotty, J., & Meier, K. J. 2002. Benevolent dictator or queen of hearts: Women managers at the top of the organization. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, April 25–28.
Rosener, J. B. 1990. Ways women lead. Harvard Business Review, November–December: 119–125.
Rosener, J. B. 1995. American’s Competitive Secret: Utilizing Women as a Management Strategy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Shortell, S. M., & Zajac, E. J. 1990. Perceptual and archival measures of miles and snow’s strategic types: A comprehensive assessment of reliability and validity. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4): 817–832.
Snow, C. C., & Hrebiniak, L. G. 1980. Strategy, distinctive competence, and organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(2): 317–336.
Stivers, C. 2002. Gender images in public administration: Legitimacy and the administrative state, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Walker, O., & Ruekert, R. 1987. Marketing’s role in the implementation of business strategies: A critical review and conceptual framework. Journal of Marketing, 51: 71–87.
Warner, R. L., Steel, B. S., & Lovrich, N. P. 1989. Conditions associated with the advent of representative bureaucracy: The case of women in policing. Social Science Quarterly, 70(3): 562–578.
Woodside, A. G., Sullivan, D. P., & Trappey, R. J. 1999. Assessing relationships among strategic types. Journal of Business Research, 45(2): 135–146.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johansen, M.S. The Effect of Female Strategic Managers on Organizational Performance. Public Organiz Rev 7, 269–279 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-007-0036-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-007-0036-1