Abstract
Research on educational mobility for Chinese born in or before 1976–85 abounds. Although the Compulsory Education Law implemented in 1986 and the expansion of higher education introduced in 1999 changed Chinese millennials’ educational achievements, little is known about the educational mobility for the 1986–95 birth cohort and where it stands in the long-term trends. In this study, we calculated population-level educational percentile ranks by birth cohort and gender using data from the 1982 to 2020 China Censuses before linking these ranks to respondents in Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS) or China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) to document 1986–95 birth cohort's educational mobility and its historical position. We also explored the role played by offspring's hukou origin (urban or rural) and ethnicity (Han or ethnic minorities). In the 1986–95 birth cohort, women's educational percentile ranks for secondary and tertiary levels fell below men's for the first time in China, suggesting that the proportion of women in higher education overtook men's. From 1976–85 to 1986–95 birth cohorts, while educational rank-rank correlations remained stable in all parent–child dyads and were constantly higher for offspring with urban hukou origin, there is suggestive evidence on increased educational mobility for women with rural hukou origin. Ethnicity differences were not found. Our findings imply that China's Compulsory Education Law and higher education expansion may have contributed to greater educational mobility for women with rural hukou origin in the 1986–95 birth cohort and their diminished disadvantage in education.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Intergenerational educational mobility indicates to what extent an individual's educational achievement (destination) is correlated with his/her parent's education (origin). Greater educational mobility reflects weaker contributions from family background, which is of vital importance in tackling inequality, fostering fairness, encouraging aspirations, and promoting sustainable development (Narayan et al., 2018). However, empirical studies revealed varying levels of educational mobility across countries and continents, suggesting regional and global inequalities in educational opportunities (Azam & Bhatt, 2015; Breen et al., 2019; Causa & Johansson, 2010; Hertz et al., 2008; Hu & Qian, 2023; Kye, 2011; Skopek & Leopold, 2020; Torche, 2021; Wittemann, 2023).
For decades education policies increasing elementary education and expanding higher education implemented to promote equal educational opportunities (Torche, 2021) have not necessarily achieved intended effects. For example, Demirel-Derebasoglu and Okten (2022) noted that after Turkey's compulsory schooling reform, gender gap decreased in completing new compulsory schooling but remained unchanged at the post-compulsory schooling level. Urbina (2018) found that Mexico’s “11-year plan” education reform led to greater mobility in primary and lower-secondary schooling but lower mobility at higher levels of education. These findings are consistent with the “maximally maintained inequality (MMI)” hypothesis formulated from empirical evidence in Ireland (Raftery & Hout, 1993) that educational expansion will translate to less inequalities in educational opportunity only when the advantaged groups have reached saturation at a particular level of education.
In China, educational mobility continue to spark public debates and academic interests (Gruijters et al., 2019; Hannum et al., 2019). Following its founding, China implemented various egalitarian education policies such as the waiver of tuition fees, rapid roll-out of primary and secondary education in rural areas, and favoring political criterion over academic ability for admission to universities (Deng & Treiman, 1997). As a result, there was exceptionally high educational mobility for the 1950s and 1960s birth cohorts, but the educational mobility declined for the 1966–75 and 1976–85 birth cohorts (Xie et al., 2022; Zhou & Xie, 2019). Ample research repeatedly found huge inequality in educational mobility tied with an individual's ascribed characteristics such as urban/rural hukou (household registration) status (Fang & Feng, 2020; Wu, 2019; Wu & Treiman, 2004), place/province of birth (Hannum & Wang, 2006), gender (Huo & Golley, 2022), and ethnicity (There are 55 ethnic minorities in China who account for less than 10% of China's population) (Hannum, 2002).
China implemented the Compulsory Education Law in 1986 to promote universal 9-year schooling and introduced the expansion of higher education in 1999 to boost human capital accumulation (Golley & Kong, 2018). Higher education expansion was found to increase educational mobility in general (Liu & Wan, 2019) and benefit women from rural areas or women with intermediately educated parents in receiving higher education (Zhang & Chen, 2014). However, Guo et al., (2019) showed that these two policies led to greater educational mobility for the urban population but lower mobility for the rural population. Gruijters, (2022) found that educational expansion in China diminished disparities in obtaining basic education, but inequality persisted or even increased at the more advanced levels for the 1985–89 and 1990–94 birth cohorts. These studies used years of schooling or probabilities of transitions between adjacent educational levels which, compared with rank-based measures, are less comparable across birth cohorts and gender (Hannum et al., 2019; Xie et al., 2022). Although a few studies used sample-wide or population-level educational percentile ranks (Emran et al., 2020, 2023), less is known about educational mobility, its variation by gender, hukou status, and ethnicity, and where it stands in the long-term trends for China’s 1986–95 birth cohort who were exposed to major education policy changes and had reached the last leg of their educational advancement (master or PhD) by 2020.
Data and Methods
Data and Sample
We primarily drew on data from Censuses and surveys. First, we used the 1982 China Census microdata (1% of the population) from the Integrated Public Use Microdata Series (IPUMS) (Minnesota Population Center, 2020), as well as the 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2020 China Censuses aggregated statistics compiled by China's National Bureau of Statistics. The purpose was to capture the population-level distribution of educational attainment for men and women from various birth cohorts to generate educational percentile rank for each educational level. Then, as parent–child dyads could not be identified in Censuses, we turned to survey data from Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS) and China Family Panel Studies (CFPS). Both nationally representative, CGSS was launched in 2003 and adopts a repeated cross-sectional design (Bian & Li, 2012) while CFPS is a longitudinal survey fielded biannually from 2010 (Xie & Hu, 2014). Although CFPS does not suffer from sample truncation due to coresidency restrictions on nonresident family members (Emran et al., 2020), information on nonresident family members' hukou origin and ethnicity is missing and they do not have individual-level sampling weights. Despite sample truncation which only applies to respondents' nonresident children, CGSS data were used for our main analysis following prior work (Xie et al., 2022) and we performed sensitivity analysis using CFPS data (details are given in the Supplementary Material). We pooled 11 waves (2003, 2005, 2006, 2008, 2010, 2011, 2013, 2015, 2017, 2018, 2021) of the CGSS and selected respondents aged 25 or above in the interview year who fell in birth cohorts 1946–55, 1956–65, 1966–75, 1976–85, and 1986–95. Our study sample included 83,569 respondents (as expected, the number of respondents in the 1986–95 birth cohort was relatively small, n = 5079) whose fathers’ and mothers’ birth cohorts varied from 1896–1905 to 1976–85.
Educational Percentile Rank
Margin-free (Hannum et al., 2019) and less prone to bias (Emran & Shilpi, 2018; Emran et al., 2018; Nybom & Stuhler, 2017), rank-based measures of intergenerational mobility become increasingly popular in economics literature (Chetty et al., 2014). Less sensitive to education expansion (Torche, 2021), educational percentile rank tells a person's position in educational achievement relative to peers of the same gender in the same birth cohort (Xie et al., 2022). We used China Censuses to calculate educational percentile ranks for seven educational levels ((semi-)illiterate, primary school, middle school, high school, junior college, bachelor, and master/PhD) which run from 0 (lowest) to 100 (highest). Informed by Xie et al., (2022), wherever possible we calculated a birth cohort's educational percentile rank when they were 25–34 years old in a specific wave of Census to handle survival selection by education.
Rank-Rank Correlation
We linked educational percentile ranks to pooled CGSS data matching respondents’ and their parents’ birth cohort and gender. We estimated weighted ordinary least-squares (OLS) regressions to examine parent–child rank-rank correlation in education to explore relative educational mobility in father-son, father-daughter, mother-son, and mother-daughter dyads (Hu & Qian, 2023) by respondents’ (i.e., offspring’s) birth cohort and gender. The weights were constructed from the original sampling weight in each wave of CGSS to account for variation in sample size by birth cohort across multiple waves (Song et al., 2020) and we reported standardized coefficients.
Results
Trends in Educational Percentile Rank
Table 1 presents the trends in educational percentile rank by gender in China for ten 10-year birth cohorts from 1896–1905 to 1986–95. The educational percentile rank for each educational level persistently trended downward for both genders with few exceptions (e.g., the educational percentile rank of junior college and bachelor degree for men and women from the 1946–55 birth cohort). Until the 1976–85 birth cohort, women's rank for each educational level had always been higher than men's, implying a persistent higher proportion of women in lower educational levels. However, the gap continued to narrow and among the 1986–95 birth cohort, for the first time for each educational level from middle school to master/PhD, women's ranks fell below men’s.
Trends in Rank-Rank Correlation in Education
We calculated rank-rank correlation in education for father-son, father-daughter, mother-son, and mother-daughter dyads by offspring’s birth cohort for all respondents in CGSS and by respondents’ hukou origin and ethnicity from birth cohort 1946–55 to 1976–85. We visualized the results in Figs. 1, 2, and 3 and presented the estimates in the Supplementary Material (Table S1). Figure 1 shows that from birth cohort 1946–55 to 1976–85, parent–child educational rank-rank correlation trended upward for all four dyads and parent-daughter correlation was generally higher than parent-son correlation. Between 1976–85 and 1986–95 birth cohorts, educational mobility remained stable in all parent–child dyads. We used seemingly unrelated estimation to test if the coefficients varied between groups and found that the slight rise in father-son rank-rank correlation (from 0.41 to 0.43) and the little dip in mother-daughter rank-rank correlation (from 0.47 to 0.45) were not statistically significant.
Figure 2 shows that from birth cohort 1946–55 to 1986–95, the rank-rank correlation in education trended upward for Chinese with urban hukou origin. In comparison, it ascended less markedly for Chinese with rural hukou origin and decreased slightly in the 1986–95 birth cohort for parent-daughter dyads. As noted previously, we formally tested the differences and found that the small increases in educational mobility for women with rural hukou origin in father-daughter and mother-daughter dyads in the 1986–95 birth cohort were not significant (p > 0.1 in both cases). Figure 2 also shows that the rank-rank correlation in education had been generally higher for Chinese with urban hukou origin in all four dyads and the gap continued to widen in the 1986–95 birth cohort (e.g., standing at 0.51 (urban hukou origin) versus 0.27 (rural hukou origin) in father-daughter dyads). As shown in Fig. 3, the rank-rank correlation in education trended upward for both Han Chinese and ethnic minorities, but we did not find ethnicity differences in educational mobility for any parent–child dyad in any birth cohort.
The low response rates in CGSS 2005 or 2006 may cause sample selection problems so we removed respondents in these waves (n = 15,625), repeated the analyses, and found similar results (Figures S1, S2, and S3 in Supplementary Material). Sensitivity analysis using CFPS data implied greater decreases in rank-rank correlation (i.e., greater increases in educational mobility) for women with rural hukou origin in father-daughter dyad (p > 0.05) and mother-daughter dyad (p < 0.01) in the 1986–95 birth cohort (Figure S5). However, there were discrepancies in regards to other findings (e.g., in Figure S4 the drop in rank-rank correlation for women from the mother-daughter dyad in the 1986–95 birth cohort was also significant, but it was insignificant in Fig. 1). These discrepancies are possibly driven by the very high proportion of respondents with rural hukou origin in CFPS (around 84%, compared with about 64% in CGSS). Taken together, evidence on the increased educational mobility for women with rural hukou origin in the 1986–95 birth cohort may be best interpreted as suggestive.
Discussion and Conclusion
In this study, against the backdrop of China's Compulsory Education Law implemented in 1986 and the expansion of higher education introduced in 1999, we documented China’s 1986–95 birth cohort’s educational attainment and education mobility and situated them in long-term trends. The educational percentile rank for each educational level dropped continuously among men and women in China, reflecting steady absolute upward educational mobility. The few exceptions found in the 1946–55 birth cohort were caused by the tumultuous Cultural Revolution (1966–76) during which the hiatus of tertiary education left multiple cohorts of young adults seeking a limited number of openings (Deng & Treiman, 1997). The reversal of women's disadvantage in education was observed in the 1986–95 birth cohort where women's educational percentile rank from high school to master/PhD fell below men's for the first time, suggesting a higher proportion of women in secondary and tertiary education. This remarkable progress testifies reduced gender inequality in education in China after higher education expansion (Treiman, 2013; Wu & Zhang, 2010; Zeng et al., 2014) and follows the trend in high-income countries (DiPrete & Buchmann, 2013).
We found an upward long-term trend in parent–child rank-rank correlation in education from 1946–55 to 1976–85 birth cohorts in China, implying reduced educational mobility and echoing Huo and Golley (2022) and Xie et al. (2022). However, this upward trend stagnated in all parent–child dyads from 1976–85 to 1986–95 birth cohorts. Future work is required to investigate whether this stagnation truly holds in China and resembles the long-term stability found in the United States (Xie et al., 2022).
For Chinese with urban hukou origin, the rank-rank correlations continued to climb in all parent–child dyads from the 1976–85 to 1986–95 birth cohorts. This indicates the reinforced effect of family background on urbanites' education regardless of gender, confirming that hukou is a critical ascriptive factor in social mobility in China (Li, 2021). Both daughters and sons with urban hukou origin were beneficiaries of exclusive parental investment after the one-child policy was implemented in the late 1970s (Fong, 2002). Consequently, they were more likely to acquire an advantageous position in education their parents once held. In contrast, analyses based on CGSS and CFPS data hinted at suggestive evidence that women with rural hukou origin in the 1986–95 birth cohort may have had greater educational mobility. These women, historically disadvantaged in education, may benefit noticeably from the Compulsory Education Law and higher education expansion that offered more educational opportunities (Guo et al., 2019; Liu & Wan, 2019; Zhang & Chen, 2014). However, there may be inequality in the ranking of higher education institutes respondents attended (e.g., elite versus ordinary universities) (Charles & Bradley, 2009) as predicted by the "effectively maintained inequality (EMI)" hypothesis (Lucas, 2001), which cannot be examined here due to lack of information.
We did not find differences in educational mobility in China between Han Chinese and ethnic minorities. Although mobility and inequality are two different dimensions of social stratification (Xie et al., 2022), our finding echoes Golley and Kong (2018) who showed the persistent minor role played by ethnicity, compared with hukou status at young age, in the inequality of opportunities in education. However, this finding shall be interpreted with caution due to small sample size (reflected in wider confidence intervals) and the heterogeneity in socio-economic status among various ethnic minority groups in China.
We acknowledge some limitations in this study such as not considering the nonlinear (e.g., convex or concave) relationships (Emran et al., 2020) in rank-rank correlations, not examining absolute mobility at the 25th/75th percentile of the parental educational rank distribution (Emran & Shilpi, 2018), or not further investigating if educational mobility varied between parental farm/nonfarm occupations in the rural sample (Emran et al., 2023). Overall, our results imply that the long-term decline in educational mobility in China may have plateaued for China’s 1986–95 birth cohort at the population level. Our short report documents the reversal of female disadvantage in education and provides time-sensitive suggestive evidence on increased educational mobility for women with rural hukou origin in the 1986–95 birth cohort following China’s Compulsory Education Law and higher education expansion introduced before 2000. These findings based on CGSS and CFPS data invite more research into evaluating the effects of education policies and call for policy-makers to take continued actions to tackle inequality and promote fairness.
References
Azam, M., & Bhatt, V. (2015). Like father, like son? Intergenerational educational mobility in India. Demography, 52(6), 1929–1959. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-015-0428-8
Bian, Y., & Li, L. (2012). The Chinese general social survey (2003–8). Chinese Sociological Review, 45(1), 70–97. https://doi.org/10.2753/CSA2162-0555450104
Breen, R., Ermisch, J., & Helske, S. (2019). Educational reproduction in Europe: a descriptive account. Demographic Research, 41(49), 1373–1400. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2019.41.49
Causa, O., & Johansson, Å. (2010). Intergenerational social mobility in OECD countries. OECD Journal: Economic Studies. https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2010-5km33scz5rjj
Charles, M., & Bradley, K. (2009). Indulging our gendered selves? Sex segregation by field of study in 44 countries. American Journal of Sociology, 114(4), 924–976. https://doi.org/10.1086/595942
Chetty, R., Hendren, N., Kline, P., & Saez, E. (2014). Where is the land of opportunity? The geography of intergenerational mobility in the United States. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(4), 1553–1623. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qju022
Demirel-Derebasoglu, M., & Okten, C. (2022). Gender gap in intergenerational educational persistence: can compulsory schooling reduce it? Population Research and Policy Review, 41(5), 2037–2083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-022-09741-3
Deng, Z., & Treiman, D. J. (1997). The impact of the cultural revolution on trends in educational attainment in the People’s Republic of China. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 391–428. https://doi.org/10.1086/231212
DiPrete, T. A., & Buchmann, C. (2013). Rise of women: the growing gender gap in education and what it means for american schools. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Emran, M. S., Ferreira, F. H. G., Jiang, Y., & Sun, Y. (2023). Occupational dualism and intergenerational educational mobility in the rural economy: evidence from China and India. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 21(3), 743–773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-023-09599-1
Emran, M. S., Jiang, H., & Shilpi, F. (2020). Gender bias and intergenerational educational mobility: theory and evidence from China and India. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Emran, M. S., & Shilpi, F. (2018). Estimating intergenerational mobility with incomplete data: coresidency and truncation bias in rank-based relative and absolute mobility measures. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Emran, S., William, G., & Forhad, S. (2018). When measure matters. Journal of Human Resources, 53(3), 589. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.53.3.0216-7737R1
Fang, C., & Feng, X. (2020). Social origin and educational attainment in China: a historical analysis of 70 birth cohorts. The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 7(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-020-00131-w
Fong, V. L. (2002). China’s one-child policy and the empowerment of urban daughters. American Anthropologist, 104(4), 1098–1109. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2002.104.4.1098
Golley, J., & Kong, S. T. (2018). Inequality of opportunity in China’s educational outcomes. China Economic Review, 51, 116–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2016.07.002
Gruijters, R. J. (2022). Trends in educational stratification during China’s great transformation. Oxford Review of Education, 48(3), 320–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2021.1987207
Gruijters, R. J., Chan, T. W., & Ermisch, J. (2019). Trends in educational mobility: how does China compare to Europe and the United States? Chinese Journal of Sociology, 5(2), 214–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057150x19835145
Guo, Y., Song, Y., & Chen, Q. (2019). Impacts of education policies on intergenerational education mobility in China. China Economic Review, 55, 124–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2019.03.011
Hannum, E. (2002). Educational stratification by ethnicity in China: enrollment and attainment in the early reform years. Demography, 39(1), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088366
Hannum, E., Ishida, H., Park, H., & Tam, T. (2019). Education in East Asian societies: postwar expansion and the evolution of inequality. Annual Review of Sociology, 45(1), 625–647. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073018-022507
Hannum, E., & Wang, M. (2006). Geography and educational inequality in China. China Economic Review, 17(3), 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2006.04.003
Hertz, T., Jayasundera, T., Piraino, P., Selcuk, S., Smith, N., & Verashchagina, A. (2008). The inheritance of educational inequality: international comparisons and fifty-year trends. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy. https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1682.1775
Hu, Y., & Qian, Y. (2023). Gender, education expansion and intergenerational educational mobility around the world. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(4), 583–595. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01545-5
Huo, Y., & Golley, J. (2022). Intergenerational education transmission in China: the gender dimension. China Economic Review, 71, 101710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2021.101710
Kye, B. (2011). Intergenerational transmission of women’s educational attainment in South Korea: an application of a multi-group population projection model. Demographic Research, S10(3), 79–112. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2011.24.3
Li, Y. (2021). Social mobility in China: a case study of social mobility research in the global south. In V. Iversen, A. Krishna, & K. Sen (Eds.), Social mobility in developing countries: concepts, methods, and determinants (pp. 221–246). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Liu, L., & Wan, Q. (2019). The effect of education expansion on intergenerational transmission of education: evidence from China. China Economic Review, 57, 101327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2019.101327
Lucas, S. R. (2001). Effectively maintained inequality: education transitions, track mobility, and social background effects. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1642–1690. https://doi.org/10.1086/321300
Minnesota Population Center. (2020). Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, International: Version 7.3 . Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS. https://doi.org/10.18128/D020.V7.3
Narayan, A., Van der Weide, R., Cojocaru, A., Lakner, C., Redaelli, S., Gerszon Mahler, D., Ramasubbaiah, R. G. N., & Thewissen, S. (2018). Fair progress?: Economic mobility across generations around the world. The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1210-1
Nybom, M., & Stuhler, J. (2017). Biases in standard measures of intergenerational income dependence. Journal of Human Resources, 52(3), 800–825. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.52.3.0715-7290R
Raftery, A. E., & Hout, M. (1993). Maximally maintained inequality: expansion, reform, and opportunity in Irish education, 1921–75. Sociology of Education, 66(1), 41–62. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112784
Skopek, J., & Leopold, T. (2020). Educational reproduction in germany: a prospective study based on retrospective data. Demography, 57(4), 1241–1270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-020-00896-2
Song, X., Massey, C. G., Rolf, K. A., Ferrie, J. P., Rothbaum, J. L., & Xie, Y. (2020). Long-term decline in intergenerational mobility in the United States since the 1850s. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(1), 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1905094116
Torche, F. (2021). Educational mobility in the developing world. In V. Iversen, A. Krishna, & K. Sen (Eds.), Social mobility in developing countries: concepts, methods, and determinants. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Treiman, D. (2013). Trends in educational attainment in China. Chinese Sociological Review, 45, 3–25. https://doi.org/10.2753/CSA2162-0555450301
Urbina, D. R. (2018). Intergenerational educational mobility during expansion reform: evidence from Mexico. Population Research and Policy Review, 37(3), 367–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-018-9466-4
Wittemann, V. (2023). Educational reproduction in Sweden: a replication of Skopek and Leopold 2020 using Swedish data. Demographic Research, 48(25), 733–774. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2023.48.25
Wu, X. (2019). Inequality and social stratification in postsocialist China. Annual Review of Sociology, 45(1), 363–382. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073018-022516
Wu, X., & Treiman, D. J. (2004). The household registration system and social stratification in China: 1955–1996. Demography, 41(2), 363–384. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2004.0010
Wu, X., & Zhang, Z. (2010). Changes in educational inequality in China, 1990–2005: evidence from the population census data. In E. Hannum, H. Park, & Y. Goto Butler (Eds.), Globalization, changing demographics, and educational challenges in East Asia. Leeds: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Xie, Y., Dong, H., Zhou, X., & Song, X. (2022). Trends in social mobility in postrevolution China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(7), e2117471119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2117471119
Xie, Y., & Hu, J. (2014). An introduction to the China family panel studies (CFPS). Chinese Sociological Review, 47(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.2753/CSA2162-0555470101.2014.11082908
Zeng, J., Pang, X., Zhang, L., Medina, A., & Rozelle, S. (2014). Gender inequality in education in China: a meta-regression analysis. Contemporary Economic Policy, 32(2), 474–491. https://doi.org/10.1111/coep.12006
Zhang, Z., & Chen, Q. (2014). The expansion of higher education admissions and the gender equalization of higher education opportunity: an empirical study based on Chinese general social survey (CGSS2008) data. The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-014-0001-7
Zhou, X., & Xie, Y. (2019). Market transition, industrialization, and social mobility trends in postrevolution China. American Journal of Sociology, 124(6), 1810–1847. https://doi.org/10.1086/703346
Funding
Open access funding provided by International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA). This work was supported by Research Fund for International Scientists of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant number 72250610226]. The authors wish to acknowledge the statistical office that provided the underlying data making this research possible: National Bureau of Statistics, China.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
No potential competing interests was reported by the author(s).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, J., Marois, G. Education Policies and Intergenerational Educational Mobility in China: New Evidence for the 1986–95 Birth Cohort. Popul Res Policy Rev 43, 43 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-024-09887-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-024-09887-2