Abstract
The purpose of this study is to describe population-level trends in intentions to remain childless (ITRC) among men and women in the United States in the first decades of the twenty-first century. We use a sample of 31,739 women and 24,524 men aged 18–44 from a cross-sectional and nationally representative survey, the National Survey of Family Growth. Our analyses utilize five of the survey's cycles: from 2002 through 2015–2017. Trends in the unadjusted proportions of men and women who report ITRC are presented, along with predicted probabilities of reporting ITRC from multivariate regressions. At the beginning of the twenty-first century, the prevalence of ITRC increased in the general population of men and women in the United States as well as among the youngest adults aged 18–24. If ITRC are realized, permanent childlessness rates could increase in the near future, contributing to the ongoing fertility decline in the United States. Further analyses uncover similarities and differences in the ITRC trends and correlates between men and women. Increases in ITRC among women are connected to changes in the socio-demographic composition of the population but ITRC increases among men are not connected to population composition changes. In addition, a positive education gradient is observed in ITRC among women but not among men. These variations in ITRC prompt a call for further research into gender and intentions for childlessness.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Almeling, R. (2015). Reproduction. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 423–442.
Abma, J. C., & Martinez, G. M. (2006). Childlessness among older women in the United States: Trends and profiles. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(4), 1045–1056.
Berrington, A. (2004). Perpetual postponers? Women's, men’s and couple’s fertility intentions and subsequent fertility behaviour. Population Trends, 117, 9–19.
Blackstone, A., & Stewart, M. D. (2012). Choosing to be childfree: Research on the decision not to parent. Sociology Compass, 6(9), 718–727.
Blair-Loy, M. (2005). Competing devotions: Career and family among women executives. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bumpass, L. L., & Raley, R. K. (1995). Redefining single-parent families: Cohabitation and changing family reality. Demography, 32(1), 97–109.
Bumpass, L., & Lu, H. H. (2000). Trends in cohabitation and implications for children s family contexts in the United States. Population Studies, 54(1), 29–41.
Brinton, M. C., Bueno, X., Oláh, L., & Hellum, M. (2018). Postindustrial fertility ideals, intentions, and gender inequality: A comparative qualitative analysis. Population and Development Review, 44(2), 281–309.
Chancey, L., & Dumais, S. A. (2009). Voluntary childlessness in marriage and family textbooks, 1950–2000. Journal of Family History, 34(2), 206–223.
Ruggles, S., Genadek, K., Goeken, R., Grover, J., & Sobek, M. (2017). Integrated public use microdata series, current population survey: Version 4.0. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
Gauthier, A. H., Smeeding, T. M., & Furstenberg, F. F., Jr. (2004). Are parents investing less time in children? Trends in selected industrialized countries. Population and Development Review, 30(4), 647–672.
Gerson, K. (1985). Hard choices: How women decide about work, career, and motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gerson, K. (2010). The unfinished revolution: Coming of age in a new era of gender, work, and family. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
Hagewen, K. J., & Morgan, S. P. (2005). Intended and ideal family size in the United States, 1970–2002. Population and Development Review, 31(3), 507–527.
Hamilton, B. E., Martin, J. A., Osterman, M. J. K., & Rossen, L. M. (2019). Births: Provisional data for 2018. Vital Statistics Rapid Release; no 7. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. May 2019.
Heaton, T. B., Jacobson, C. K., & Holland, K. (1999). Persistence and change in decisions to remain childless. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 531–539.
Hochschild, A. R. (1989). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. New York: Viking.
Jacobson, C. K., & Heaton, T. B. (1991). Voluntary childlessness among American men and women in the late 1980's. Social Biology, 38(1–2), 79–93.
Kennedy, S., & Bumpass, L. (2008). Cohabitation and children's living arrangements: New estimates from the United States. Demographic Research, 19, 1663.
Kornrich, S., & Furstenberg, F. (2013). Investing in children: Changes in parental spending on children, 1972–2007. Demography, 50(1), 1–23.
Kravdal, Ø., & Rindfuss, R. R. (2008). Changing relationships between education and fertility: A study of women and men born 1940 to 1964. American Sociological Review, 73(5), 854–873.
Lesthaeghe, R., & Van de Kaa, D. J. (1986). Twee demografische transities (Two demographic transitions?). In: DJ. van de Kaa, R. Lesthaeghe (eds) Bevolking: groei en krimp.(Population: Growth and Decline), pp. 9–24. Deventer: Van Loghum Slaterus.
Lundquist, J. H., Budig, M. J., & Curtis, A. (2009). Race and childlessness in America, 1988–2002. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(3), 741–755.
Lunneborg, P. (1999). The chosen lives of childfree men. Contemporary Sociology, 30, 31.
Mathews, T.J. & Hamilton, B.E. (2016). Mean age of mothers is on the rise: United States, 2000–2014. NCHS data brief, no 232. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
Miettinen, A., & Szalma, I. (2014). Childlessness intentions and ideals in Europe. Finnish Yearbook of Population Research, 49, 31–55.
Rovi, S. L. (1994). Taking ‘no’for an answer: Using negative reproductive intentions to study the childless/childfree. Population Research and Policy Review, 13(4), 343–365.
Ryan, C. L., & Siebens, J. (2012). Educational attainment in the United States: 2009. Population Characteristics. Current Population Reports. P20-566. US Census Bureau.
Rybińska, A., & Morgan, S. P. (2019). Childless expectations and childlessness over the life course. Social Forces, 94, 1571.
Schneider, D. (2015). The great recession, fertility, and uncertainty: Evidence from the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(5), 1144–1156.
Schoen, R., Kim, Y. J., Nathanson, C. A., Fields, J., & Astone, N. M. (1997). Why do Americans want children? Population and Development Review, 23, 333–358.
Sweeney, M. M., & Raley, R. K. (2014). Race, ethnicity, and the changing context of childbearing in the United States. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 539–558.
Testa, M. R., Cavalli, L., & Rosina, A. (2014). The effect of couple disagreement about child-timing intentions: A parity-specific approach. Population and Development Review, 40(1), 31–53.
Thomson, E. (1997). Couple childbearing desires, intentions, and births. Demography, 34(3), 343–354.
Thomson, E., McDonald, E., & Bumpass, L. L. (1990). Fertility desires and fertility: Hers, his, and theirs. Demography, 27(4), 579–588.
Thornton, A., & Young-DeMarco, L. (1990s). Four decades of trends in attitudes toward family issues in the United States: The 1960s through the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(4), 1009–1037.
Traister, R. (2016). All the single ladies: Unmarried women and the rise of an independent nation. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Van de Kaa, D. J. (1987). Europe's second demographic transition. Population Bulletin, 42(1), 1–59.
Acknowledgements
The Author is grateful for comments on this paper to Kenneth A. Bollen, Yong Cai, Kathleen M. Harris, S. Philip Morgan, Lisa D. Pearce, and Katherine I. Tierney. Preliminary stages of this research were conducted during Author's stay at the Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, which receives funding from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P2C HD050924).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.
Ethical Approval
We further confirm that no aspect of the work covered in this manuscript has involved either animals or human patients. The research covered in this manuscript was conducted solely using secondary data from publicly available sources.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rybińska, A. Trends in Intentions to Remain Childless in the United States. Popul Res Policy Rev 40, 661–672 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-020-09604-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-020-09604-9