Skip to main content
Log in

Taking ‘NO’ for an answer: Using negative reproductive intentions to study the childless/childfree

  • Childlessness And Fertility
  • Published:
Population Research and Policy Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, I argue for an approach to the study of the childless/childfree based on negative reproductive intentions. To forward this argument, I present the theoretical justification for a concept based on taking ‘no’ for an answer, demonstrating that such an approach provides both a valid and reliable measure of intended childlessness. Building on earlier work by researchers of childlessness and reacting to their concerns that most studies have not employed either representative sampling or multivariate methods, I incorporate both in empirical tests of this approach. Using 11 years of the General Social Survey and a Trichotomous Logit Analysis, the resulting model simultaneously assesses the effects of the independent variables on the probabilities that the married women in this sample are childless/childfree. This analysis is generally consistent with hypotheses generated from earlier studies and their findings on the correlates of childlessness, thereby supporting the literature that says the voluntarily childless are a distinct group. In effect, the viability of the concept is substantiated, enabling its use in future research. Because this conceptualization recognizes the dynamics of reproductive intentions, it provides a way to better understand the current social milieu of individuals who say they do not intend to parent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bianchi, S.M. & Spain, D. (1986).American women in transition. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, J. (1974a). Coercive pronatalism and American population policy, in E. Peck & J. Senderowitz (eds.),Pronatalism: The myth of mom and apple pie. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, J. (1974b). Can we believe recent data on birth expectation in the United States,Demography 11: 25–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, J. (1979). Is zero preferred? American attitudes toward childlessness in the 1970s,Journal of Marriage and the Family 41(2): 245–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, D. & Bennett, N. (1986). Childless couples,American Demographics 23: 23–25, 54–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, D.E. & Trussel, J. (1984). What are the determinants of delayed and permanent childlessness in the United States,Demography 21(4): 591–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bumpass, L.L. (1973). Is low fertility here to stay?,Family Planning Perspectives 5(2): 67–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, L.G. & Selby, J.W. (1980). Voluntary childlessness, involuntary childlessness, and having children: A study of social perceptions,Family Relations 29: 181–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callan, V.J. (1985). Perceptions of parents, the voluntarily and involuntarily childless: A multidimensional scaling analysis,Journal of Marriage and the Family 47(4): 1045–1050.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, E. (1985).The childless marriage: An exploratory study of couples who do not want children. London/New York: Tavistock Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R.W. (1987).Gender and power. Stanford University Press.

  • Cramer, J.C. (1980). Fertility and female employment: Problems of causal direction,American Sociological Review 45: 167–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, P. & Weingarten, K. (1982).Sooner or later: The timing of parenthood in adult lives. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J.A. & Smith, T.W. (1990).General social surveys, 1972–1990: Cumulative codebook. University of Chicago: National Opinion Research Center (Producer); University of Connecticut: The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research (Distributor).

  • De Jong, G.F. & Sell, R.R. (1977). Changes in childlessness in the United States: A demographic path analysis,Population studies 31(1): 129–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, H. (1981). A comparison of intentional parents and intentionally childless couples,Journal of Marriage and the Family 43(3): 593–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaskin, J. (1986). Conceptions of skill and the work of women: Some historical and political issues, pp. 361–380 in: R. Hamilton & M. Barrett (eds.),The politics of diversity. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerson, K. (1985).Hard choices: How women decide about work, career, and motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimenez, M.E. (1983). Feminism, pronatalism and motherhood, pp. 287–314 in: J. Tribikot (ed.),Mothering: Essays in feminist theory. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Allanheld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grindstaff, C.F. (1976). Trends and incidence of childlessness by race: Indicators of black progress over three decades,Sociological Focus 9(3): 265–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustavus, S.O. & Henley Jr., J.R. (1971). Correlates of voluntary childlessness in a select population,Social Biology 18: 277–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, H.I. (1981). The family as the locus of gender, class, and political struggle: The example of housework,The Journal of Women and Culture and Society 6: 366–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendershot, G.E. & Placek, P.J. (1981).Predicting fertility. Lexington MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. with Machung, A. (1989).The second shift. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollingworth, L.S. (1916). Social devices for impelling women to bear and rear children,American Journal of Sociology 22: 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houseknecht, S.R. (1982). Some promising research developments in the area of nonnormative family sizes,Journal of Family Issues 3(4): 419–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houseknecht, S.R. (1987). Voluntary childlessness, pp. 369–396 in: M.B. Sussman & S.K. Steinmetz (eds.),Handbook of marriage and the family. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J.G. & Hunt, L.L. (1982). The dualities of careers and families: New integrations or new polarizations?,Social Problems 29: 499–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, C.R., Heaton, T.B. & Taylor, R.M. (1989). Childlessness among American women,Social Biology 35: 186–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenkel, W.F. (1985). The desire for voluntary childlessness among low-income youth,Journal of Marriage and the Family 47: 509–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miall, C.E. (1986). The stigma of involuntary chiidlessness,Social problems 33: 268–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M.J. (1981). Findings from Census Bureau surveys, in: G.E. Hendershot & P.J. Placek (eds.),Predicting fertility. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosher, W.D. & Bachrach, C.A. (1982). Childlessness in the United States: Estimates from the National Survey of Family Growth,Journal of Family Issues 3: 517–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nason, E.M. & Poloma, M.M. (1976).Voluntarily childless couples: The emergence of a variant lifestyle. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nave-Herz, R. (1989). Childless marriages,Marriage and Family Review 14: 239–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal, A.G., Groat, H.T. & Wicks, J.W. (1989). Attitudes about having children: A study of 600 couples in the early years of marriage,Journal of Marriage and the Family 51: 313–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connell, M. (1991).Late expectations: Childbearing patterns of American women for the 1990's. US Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports, Series P-23, No. 176. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Connell, M. & Moore, M.J. (1977). New evidence on the value of birth expectations,Demography 14(3): 255–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ory, M.G. (1978). The decision to parent or not: Normative and structural components,Journal of Marriage and the Family 40: 531–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, E. (1971).The Baby Trap. New York: Bernard Geis Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, E. & Senderowitz, J. (eds). 1974.Pronatalism: The myth of mom and apple pie. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pol, L.G. (1983). Childlessness: A panel study of expressed intentions and reported fertility,Social Biology 30(3): 318–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polit, D.F. (1978). Stereotypes relating to family-size status,Journal of Marriage and the Family 40: 105–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poston Jr., D.L. & Gotard, E. (1977). Trends in childlessness in the United States, 1910–1975,Social Biology 24: 212–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poston Jr., D.L. & Kramer, R.B. (1983). Voluntary and involuntary childlessness in the United States, 1955–1973,Social Biology 30(3): 290–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rindfuss, R.R. & Bumpass, L.L. (1976). How old is too old? Age and the sociology of fertility,Family Planning Perspectives 8(5): 226–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rindfuss, R.R., Philip, M.S. & Swicegood, G. (1988).First births in America: Changes in the timing of parenthood. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchey, P.N. & Stokes, C.S. (1974). Correlates of childlessness and expectations to remain childless: USA 1967,Social Forces 52: 349–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roos, P.A. & Reskin, B.F. (1984). Institutional factors contributing to sex segregation in the workplace, pp. 235–260 in: B.F. Reskin (ed.),Sex segregation in the workplace: Trends, explanations, remedies. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Lovin, L. & Tickamyer, A.R. (1978). Nonrecursive-models of labor force participation and sex role attitudes,American Sociological Review 43: 541–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolzenberg, R.M. & Waite, L.J. (1977). Age, fertility expectations and plans for employment,American Sociological Review 42: 769–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Bureau of the Census (1989). Fertility of American women: June 1988, Current Population Reports, Series P-20, No. 436. Washington, DC: Government Printing office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veevers, J.E. (1971a). Childlessness and age at first marriage,Social Biology 18: 292–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veevers, J.E. (1971b). Differential childlessness by color: A further examination,Social Biology 18: 285–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veevers, J.E. (1974). Voluntary childless wives: An exploratory study, pp. 295–314 in E. Peck, & J. Senderowitz (eds.)Pronatalism: The myth of mom and apple pie. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veevers, J.E. (1980).Childless by choice. Toronto: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veevers, J.E. (1983). Voluntary childlessness: A critical assessment of the research, pp. 75–96 in: E.D. Macklin & E.H. Rubin (eds.),Contemporary families and alternative lifestyles. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waite, L.J. (1980). Working wives and the family life cycle,American Journal of Sociological 86(2): 272–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waite, L.J. & Stolzenberg, R.M. (1976). Intended childbearing and labor force participation of young women: Insights from nonrecursive models,American Sociological Review 41: 235–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waugh, L.R. (1982). Marked and unmarked: A choice between unequals in semiotic structure,Semiotica 38: 299–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westoff, C.F. & Ryder, N.B. (1977). The predictive validity of reproductive intentions,Demography 14(3): 431–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. & Sandomirsky, S. (1991). Religious affiliation and the family,Sociological Forum 6(2): 289–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winch, R.F. (1971).The modern family. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rovi, S.L.D. Taking ‘NO’ for an answer: Using negative reproductive intentions to study the childless/childfree. Popul Res Policy Rev 13, 343–365 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01084113

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01084113

Key words

Navigation