Ang, X. L. (2015). The effects of cash transfer fertility incentives and parental leave benefits on fertility and labor supply: Evidence from two natural experiments. Journal of Family Economic Issues, 36, 263–288.
Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Bernhardt, E., Noack, T., & Lyngstad, T. H. (2008). Shared housework in Norway and Sweden: Advancing the gender revolution. Journal of European Social Policy, 18(3), 275–288.
Cedstrand, S. (2011). Från idé till politisk verklighet: Föräldrapolitiken i Sverige och Danmark (From idea to political reality: Family policy in Sweden and Denmark). Umeå: Boréa Bokförlag.
Cooke, L. P. (2004). The gendered division of labor and family outcomes in Germany. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 66, 1246–1259.
Cooke, L. P. (2009). Gender equity and fertility in Italy and Spain. Journal of Social Policy, 38(1), 123–140.
Cools, S., Fiva, J. H., & Johannessen Kirkebøen, L. (2015). Causal effects of paternity leave on children and parents. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 117(3), 801–828.
Cygan-Rehm, K. (2016). Parental leave benefit and differential fertility responses: Evidence from a German reform. Journal of Population Economics, 29, 73.
Dahl, G. B., Löken, K. V., & Mogstad, M. (2014). Peer effect in program participation. American Economic Review, 104(7), 2049–2074.
Dommermuth, L., Hohmann-Marriott, B., & Lappegard, T. (2017). Gender equality in the family and childbearing. Journal of Family Issues, 38(3), 1803–1824.
Duvander, A., & Andersson, G. (2006). Gender equality and fertility in Sweden: A study on the impact of the father’s uptake of parental leave on continued childbearing. Marriage and Family Review, 39, 121–142.
Duvander, A., & Johansson, M. (2012). What are the effects of reforms promoting fathers’ parental leave use? Journal of Europan Social Policy, 22(3), 319–330.
Duvander, A., & Johansson, M. (2014). Parental leave use for different fathers. A study of the impact of three Swedish parental leave reforms. In T. Rostgard & G. Eydal (Eds.), Fatherhood in the Nordic welfare states—Comparing care policies and practice (pp. 349–369). Bristol: Policy Press.
Duvander, A., & Johansson, M. (2019). Does fathers’ care spill over? Evaluating reforms in the Swedish parental leave program. Feminist Economics, 25(2), 67–89.
Duvander, A. & Lammi-Taskula, J. (2011). Parental leave. In I. Gislason & G.B. Eydal (Eds.), Parental leave, childcare and gender equality in the Nordic countries (pp. 29–62). Tema Nord 2011:562, Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.
Duvander, A., Lappegard, T., & Andersson, G. (2010). Family policy and fertility: Fathers’ and mothers’ use of parental leave and continued childbearing in Norway and Sweden. Journal of European Social Policy, 20(1), 45–57.
Duvander, A., Lappegard, T., Andersen, N. S., Neyer, G., & Viklund, I. (2019). Parental leave policies and continued childbearing in Iceland, Norway, and Sweden. Demographic Research, 40(51), 1501–1528.
Ellingsaeter, A. (2007). Old’ and ‘new’ politics of time to care: Three Norwegian reforms. Journal of European Social Policy, 17, 49–60.
Ellingsaeter, A. L., & Leira, A. (2006). Politicising parenthood in Scandinavia. Gender relations in welfare states. Bristol: Policy Press.
Ferrarini, T., & Duvander, A. (2010). Earner-carer model at the crossroads: Reforms and outcomes of Sweden’s family policy in a comparative perspective. International Journal of Health Services, 40(3), 373–398.
Garganta, S., Gasparini, L., Marchionni, M., & Tappatá, M. (2017). The effect of cash transfers on fertility: Evidence from Argentina. Population Research and Policy Review, 36, 1–24.
Gauthier, A. (2007). The impact of family policies on fertility in industrialized countries: A review of the literature. Population Research and Policy Review, 26, 323–346.
Geisler, E., & Kreyenfeld, M. (2019). Policy reform and fathers’ use of parental leave in Germany: The role of education and workplace characteristics. Journal of European Social Policy, 29(2), 273–291.
Goldscheider, F., Bernhardt, E., & Brandén, M. (2013). Domestic gender equality and childbearing in Sweden. Demographic Research, 29, 1097–1126.
Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift. New York: Viking.
Hook, J. (2006). Care in context: Men’s unpaid work in 20 countries, 1965–2003. American Sociological Review, 71(4), 639–660.
Johansson, E-A. (2010). The effect of own and spousal parental leave on earnings. IFAU Working paper 2010:4. Uppsala: Institute for labor market policy evaluation.
Karimi, A., Lindahl, E., & Skogman Thoursie, P. (2012). Labour supply responses to paid parental leave’, IFAU Working paper. 2012:22. Uppsala: Institute for labor market policy evaluation.
Kato, T., Kumamaru, H., & Fukuda, S. (2018). Men’s participation in childcare and housework and parity progression: A Japanese population-based study. Asian Population Studies, 14(3), 290–309.
Lappegård, T. (2008). Changing the gender balance in caring: Fatherhood and the division of parental leave in Norway. Population Research and Policy Review, 27, 139–159.
Lappegård, T. (2010). Family policies and fertility in Norway. European Journal of Population, 26, 99–116.
Luci-Greulich, A., & Thévenon, O. (2013). The impact of family policies on fertility trends in developed countries. European Journal of Population, 29, 387–416.
Lundkvist, Å. (2011). Family policy paradoxes. Gender equality and labour market regulation in Sweden, 1930–2010. Bristol: Policy Press.
McDonald, P. (2000). Gender equity in theories of fertility transition. Population and Development Review, 26(3), 427–439.
McDonald, P. (2013). Social foundation for explaining fertility: Gender equity. Demographic research, 28, 981–994.
Mencarini. L. (2018). Does gender equality affect fertility decisions in Europe? In A.H. Gauthier, I.E. Kotowska & D. Vono de Vilhena (eds.) Gender (in)equality over the life course. Evidence from the Generations & Gender Programme. Discussion Paper No. 10. Population Europe.
Nagase, N., & Brinton, M. (2017). The gender division of labor and second births: Labor market institutions and fertility in Japan. Demographic Research, 36, 339–370.
Neyer, G., & Andersson, G. (2008). Consequences of family policies on childbearing behaviour: Effects or artefacts? Population and Development Review, 34(4), 699–724.
Oláh, L. S. (2003). Gendering fertility: Second births in Sweden and Hungary. Population Research and Policy Review, 22(2), 171–200.
Oláh, L. S. (2011). Should governments in Europe be more aggressive in pushing for gender equality to raise fertility? The second “YES”. Demographic Research, 24(9), 217–224.
Oláh, L. S. & Bernhardt, E. (2008). Sweden: Combining childbearing and gender equality. Demographic research, special collection 7: Childbearing trends and policies in Europe, edited by Tomas Frejka et al., 19 (28), 1105–1144. https://www.demographic-research.org/
Rege, M., & Solli, I. (2013). The impact of paternity leave on fathers’ future earnings. Demography, 50, 2255–2277.
Røstgaard, T., & Lausten, M. (2014). The coming and going of the father’s quota in Denmark: Consequences for fathers’ parental leave take-up. In T. Rostgaard & G. Eydal (Eds.), Fatherhood in the Nordic welfare states—Comparing care policies and practice (pp. 277–302). Bristol: Policy Press.
Schober, P. (2014). Parental leave and domestic work of mothers and fathers: A longitudinal study of two reforms in West Germany. Journal of Social Policy, 43(2), 351–372.
Swedish Inspectorate of the Social insurance. (2012). Ett jämställt uttag? Reformer inom föräldraförsäkringen (Equal use? Reforms within the parental leave), report 2012:4. Stockholm: The Inspectorate for the Social Insurance.
Swedish Social Insurance Agency. (2012). Föräldrapenning. Analys av användandet 1974–2011 (Parental leave. Analysis of use 1974–2011) Socialförsäkringsrapport 2012:9. Stockholm: Swedish Social Insurance Agency.
Swedish Social Insurance Agency. (2014). Social insurance in figures. Stockholm: Swedish Social Insurance Agency.
Thevenon, O. (2011). Family policies in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. Population and Development Review, 37, 57–87.