Skip to main content
Log in

Social vulnerability and population loss in Puerto Rico after Hurricane Maria

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Population and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Communities in Puerto Rico saw their populations shrink after Hurricane Maria in 2017. Of the archipelago’s 884 populated census tracts, 613 tracts (69.3%) experienced a net population loss with an average loss of 161 people. To understand the relationship between social vulnerability and post-disaster population loss, informed by theories of environmental migration, I compare a measure of social vulnerability in Puerto Rico to population change in each tract. This study also provides an opportunity to evaluate the validity of the social vulnerability index (SVI) in Puerto Rico. Through six spatial regression models, I find that the current 15-variable SVI significantly predicts greater population loss for more vulnerable areas in Puerto Rico, in which the most vulnerable tracts lost 81 more people than tracts at the median. However, a revised 10-variable SVI—created after factor analysis by removing variables for mobile homes, group quarters, multi-unit dwellings, minority status, and limited English proficiency—produces an even larger effect size when predicting population loss, in which the most vulnerable tracts lost about 175 more people than the least vulnerable. Results suggest that a 10-variable SVI may have higher construct validity for the context of Puerto Rico and could become a foundation for a measure that better reflects local experiences with disaster. This is the first study to test the relationship between a social vulnerability index and post-disaster population change in Puerto Rico. These findings highlight the need for further investigation of the link between social vulnerability and post-disaster migration and underscore the importance of context-specific measures of social vulnerability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

(Source: Author, using data from the CDC and U.S. Census Bureau)

Fig. 2

(Source: Author, using NOAA data)

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Data that support these findings are available at https://doi.org/10.17603/ds2-2wys-cx11.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks David Eitelberg and three anonymous reviewers for their contributions to improving this article.

Funding

This work was supported by a National Science Foundation (NSF) Graduate Research Fellowship (#2040434), the Department of Sociology at the University of Colorado Boulder, and the Natural Hazards Center NSF Award #1635593.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jocelyn West.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Below are alternatives to this article’s spatial regression models. The first set of six OLS models in Table 3 uses absolute population change as the dependent variable, and the second uses percent change in population as the dependent variable in Table 4. The level of significance for all models is consistent with those in Table 2, except for model 3, which was not significant in the spatial model. For the SVI-10 model, the most vulnerable tracts experienced a population loss 3.98 percentage points greater than that of the least vulnerable tracts, on average. The general equation for the following models is as follows:

$${Population \;change}_{\mathrm{t}}={\upbeta }_{0}+{\upbeta }_{1}\; {SVI}_{1\mathrm{t}}+{\upbeta }_{2}\hspace{0.17em}{\mathrm{windspeed}}_{2\mathrm{t}}$$
Table 3 Results of OLS regression between SVI and population change by tract
Table 4 Results of OLS regression between SVI and percent population loss by tract

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

West, J. Social vulnerability and population loss in Puerto Rico after Hurricane Maria. Popul Environ 45, 8 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-023-00418-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-023-00418-3

Keywords

Navigation