Abramson, S. F., Koçak, K., & Magazinnik, A. (2019). What do we learn about voter preferences from conjoint experiments? Working paper, University of Rochester.
Anderson, C. J., Blais, A., Bowler, S., Donovan, T., & Listhaug, O. (2005). Losers’ consent: Elections and democratic legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Auspurg, K., & Hinz, T. (2015). Factorial survey experiments. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Bansak, K., Hainmueller, J., & Hangartner, D. (2016). How economic, humanitarian, and religious concerns shape European attitudes toward asylum seekers. Science, 354(6309), 217–222.
Becker, S. O., Fetzer, T., & Novy, D. (2017). Who voted for Brexit? A comprehensive district-level analysis. Economic Policy, 32(92), 601–50.
Bowler, S., & Donovan, T. (2002). Democracy, institutions and attitudes about citizen influence on government. British Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 371–390.
Bowler, S., Donovan, T., & Tolbert, C. J. (1998). Citizens as legislators: Direct democracy in the United States. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.
Broder, D. S. (2000). Democracy derailed: Initiative campaigns and the power of money. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Butler, D., & Ranney, A. (1978). Referendums: A comparative study of practice and theory. Washington: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
Butler, D., & Ranney, A. (Eds.). (1994). Referendums around the world: The growing use of direct democracy. Washington: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
Christin, T., Hug, S., & Sciarini, P. (2002). Interests and information in referendum voting: An analysis of Swiss voters. European Journal of Political Research, 41(6), 759–776.
Clarke, H. D., Goodwin, M., & Whiteley, P. (2017). Brexit. Why Britain voted to leave the European Union. Cambridge University Press.
Colantone, I., & Stanig, P. (2018). Global competition and Brexit. American Political Science Review, 112(2), 201–218.
Curtice, J. (2017). Why Leave won the UK’s EU referendum. Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(S1), 19–37.
Eleftheriadis, P. (2017). Constitutional illegitimacy over Brexit. The Political Quarterly, 88(2), 182–188.
Ellis, R. J. (2002). Democratic delusions: The initiative process in America. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Esaiasson, P. (2011). Electoral losers revisited: How citizens react to defeat at the ballot box. Electoral Studies, 30(1), 102–113.
Esaiasson, P., Gilljam, M., & Persson, M. (2012). Which decision-making arrangements generate the strongest legitimacy beliefs? Evidence from a randomized field experiment. European Journal of Political Research, 51(6), 785–808.
Esaiasson, P., Persson, M., Gilljam, M., & Lindholm, T. (2019). Reconsidering the role of procedures for decision acceptance. British Journal of Political Science, 49(1), 291–314.
European Commission. 2017. Terms of reference for the article 50 treaty on European Union negotiations. Published 19 June 2017. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/publications/terms-reference-article-50-treaty-european-union-negotiations_en
Evans, G. & Menon, A. (2017). Brexit and British politics. Polity.
Evans, G., & Tilley, J. (2017). The new politics of class: The political exclusion of the British working class. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fisher, S. D. (2019). What kind of Brexit would honour the referendum. DeltaPoll blog post. https://www.deltapoll.co.uk/steve-fisher-honour-brexit.
Fisher, S. D., & Renwick, A. (2018). The UK’s referendum on EU membership of June 2016: how expectations of Brexit’s impact affected the outcome. Acta Politica, 53(4), 590–611.
Ford, R., & Goodwin, M. (2017). Britain after Brexit: A nation divided. Journal of Democracy, 28, 17–30.
Franklin, M. N., Van der Eijk, C., & Marsh, M. (1995). Referendum outcomes and trust in government: Public support for Europe in the wake of Maastricht. West European Politics, 18(3), 101–117.
Gallego, A., & Marx, P. (2017). Multi-dimensional preferences for labour market reforms: a conjoint experiment. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(7), 1027–1047.
Gamble, B. S. (1997). Putting civil rights to a popular vote. American Journal of Political Science, 41(1), 245–269.
Garry, J., Marsh, M., & Sinnott, R. (2005). ‘Second-order’ versus ‘issue-voting’ effects in EU referendums: Evidence from the Irish Nice treaty referendums. European Union Politics, 6(2), 201–221.
Gerber, E. R. (1999). The populist paradox: Interest group influence and the promise of direct legislation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
Gerber, E. R., Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M. D. (2004). When does government limit the impact of voter initiatives? The politics of implementation and enforcement. Journal of Politics, 66(1), 43–68.
Goodwin, M., & Heath, O. (2016). The 2016 referendum, Brexit and the left behind: An aggregate-level analysis of the result. The Political Quarterly, 87(3), 323–332.
Hainmueller, J., & Hopkins, D. J. (2015). The hidden American immigration consensus: A conjoint analysis of attitudes toward immigrants. American Journal of Political Science, 59, 529–548.
Hainmueller, J., Hopkins, D. J., & Yamamoto, T. (2014). Causal inference in conjoint analysis: Understanding multidimensional choices via stated preferences experiments. Political Analysis, 22(1), 1–30.
Hobolt, S. B. (2009). Europe in Question: Referendums on European integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hobolt, S. B. (2016). The Brexit vote: a divided nation, a divided continent. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(9), 1259–1277.
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2009). A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1–23.
Jasso, G. (2006). Factorial survey methods for studying beliefs and judgements’. Sociological Methods & Research, 34(3), 334–423.
Leeper, T., Hobolt, S. B., & Tilley, J. (2020). Measuring subgroup preferences in conjoint experiments. Political Analysis, 28(2), 207–221.
LeDuc, L., & Pammett, J. H. (1995). Referendum voting: Attitudes and behaviour in the 1992 constitutional referendum. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 28, 3–34.
Lupia, A. (1994). Shortcuts versus encyclopedias: Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections. American Political Science Review, 88, 63–76.
Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M. D. (1998). The Democratic Dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know?. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Magleby, D. B. (1984). Direct legislation: Voting on ballot propositions in the United States. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Marien, S., & Kern, A. (2018). The winner takes it all: Revisiting the effect of direct democracy on citizens’ political support. Political Behavior, 40(4), 857–882.
Matsusaka, J. G. (2004). For the many or the few: The initiative process, public policy, and American democracy. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press.
Matsusaka, J. G. (2005). The eclipse of legislatures: Direct democracy in the 21st century. Public Choice, 124(1–2), 157–177.
Mendez, F., & Germann, M. (2018). Contested sovereignty: Mapping referendums on sovereignty over time and space. British Journal of Political Science, 48(1), 141–165.
Menon, A., & Fowler, B. (2016). Hard or soft? The politics of Brexit. National Institute Economic Review, 238(1), 4–12.
Nadeau, R., & Blais, A. (1993). Accepting the election outcome: The effect of participation on losers’ consent. British Journal of Political Science, 23(4), 553–563.
Richards, L., Heath, A., & Carl, N. (2018). Red lines and compromises: Mapping underlying complexities of Brexit preferences. The Political Quarterly, 89(2), 280–290.
Rose, R. (2019). Referendum challenges to the EU’s policy legitimacy—and how the EU responds. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(2), 207–225.
Rose, R., & Borz, G. (2013). What determines demand for European Union referendums? Journal of European Integration, 35(5), 619–633.
Setälä, M. (1999). Referendums and democratic government: Normative theory and the analysis of institutions. New York: Springer.
Smith, G. (2009). Democratic innovations: Designing institutions for citizen participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tolbert, C. J., & Smith, D. A. (2006). Representation and direct democracy in the United States. Representation, 42(1), 25–44.
Torgler, B. (2005). Tax morale and direct democracy. European Journal of Political Economy, 21(2), 525–531.
UK Department for Exiting the European Union. (2017). The United Kingdom’s exit from and new partnership with the European Union White Paper. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-united-kingdoms-exit-from-and-new-partnership-with-the-european-union-white-paper.
UK Prime Minister. (2017a). Prime Minister’s letter to Donald Tusk triggering Article 50. Published 29 March 2017. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/prime-ministers-letter-to-donald-tusk-triggering-article-50.
UK Prime Minister. (2017b). Prime Minister's Commons statement on triggering Article 50. Published 29 March 2017. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/prime-ministers-commons-statement-on-triggering-article-50.
Van Egmond, M., van der Brug, W., Hobolt, S. B., Franklin, M., & Sapir, E. V. (2011). European parliament election study 2009, voter study. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5055 Data file Version, 1(0).
Vasilopoulou, S. (2016). UK Euroscepticism and the Brexit referendum. The Political Quarterly, 87(2), 219–227.
Walter, S., Dinas, E., Jurado, I., & Konstantinidis, N. (2018). Non-cooperation by popular vote: Expectations, foreign intervention, and the vote in the 2015 Greek bailout referendum. International Organization, 72(4), 969–994.