Aalberg, T., Strömbäck, J., & De Vreese, C. H. (2012). The framing of politics as strategy and game: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 162–178.
Akkerman, T. (2005). Anti-immigration parties and the defence of liberal values: The exceptional case of the List Pim Fortuyn. Journal of Political Ideologies, 10(3), 337–354.
Akkerman, T. (2011). Friend or foe? Right-wing populism and the popular press in Britain and the Netherlands. Journalism: Theory, Practice and Criticism, 12(8), 931–945.
Barkan, S. E. (2006). Criminal prosecution and the legal control of protest. Mobilization, 11(2), 181–194.
Bélanger, É., & Meguid, B. M. (2008). Issue salience, issue ownership, and issue-based vote choice. Electoral Studies, 27(3), 477–491.
Belknap, M. R. (1994). Introduction: Political trials in the American past. In M. R. Belknap (Ed.), American political trials. London: Praeger.
Berntzen, L. E., Bjånesøy, L., & Ivarsflaten, E. (2017). Patterns of legitimacy on the far right. In Paper presented at ECPR general conference, Oslo.
Bleich, E. (2011). The freedom to be racist: How the United States and Europe struggle to preserve freedom and combat racism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Blinder, S., Ford, R., & Ivarsflaten, E. (2013). The better angels of our nature: How the antiprejudice norm affects policy and party preferences in Great Britain and Germany. American Journal of Political Science, 57(4), 841–857.
Bos, L., Lefevere, J. M., Thijssen, R., & Sheets, P. (2017). The impact of mediated party issue strategies on electoral support. Party Politics, 23(6), 760–771.
Bos, L., & Van der Brug, W. (2010). Public images of leaders of anti-immigration parties: Perceptions of legitimacy and effectiveness. Party Politics, 16(6), 777–799.
Burscher, B., Van Spanje, J., & De Vreese, C. H. (2015). Owning the issues of crime and immigration: The relation between immigration and crime news and anti-immigrant voting in 11 countries. Electoral Studies, 38, 59–69.
Capoccia, G. (2005). Defending democracy: Reactions to extremism in interwar Europe. London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Capoccia, G. (2013). Militant democracy: The institutional bases of democratic self-preservation. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 9(1), 207–226.
Carter, E. (2005). The extreme right in Western Europe: Success or failure?. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Cutts, D., Ford, R., & Goodwin, M. J. (2011). Anti-immigrant, politically disaffected or still racist after all? Examining the attitudinal drivers of extreme right support in Britain in the 2009 European elections. European Journal of Political Research, 50(3), 418–440.
Damstra, A., Jacobs, L., Boukes, M., & Vliegenthart, R. (in press). The impact of immigration news on anti-immigrant party support: Unpacking the issue ownership effect over time. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties.
Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
Eatwell, R. (2003). Ten theories of the extreme right. In P. Merkl & L. Weinberg (Eds.), Right-wing extremism in the twenty-first century. London: Frank Cass.
Fennema, M. (1997). Some conceptual issues and problems in the comparison of anti-immigrant parties in Western Europe. Party Politics, 3(4), 473–492.
Fennema, M. (2000). Legal repression of extreme-right parties and racial discrimination. In R. Koopmans & P. Statham (Eds.), Challenging immigration and ethnic relations politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Friedman, L. (1970). Political power and legal legitimacy: A short history of political trials. The Antioch Review, 30(2), 156–170.
Green, J., & Hobolt, S. B. (2008). Owning the issue agenda: Party strategies and vote choices in British elections. Electoral Studies, 27(3), 460–476.
Hakman, N. (1972). Political trials in the legal order: A political scientist’s perspective. Journal of Public Law, 21, 73–126.
Hameleers, M., Bos, L., & de Vreese, C. H. (2017). The appeal of media populism: The media preferences of citizens with populist attitudes. Mass Communication and Society, 20(4), 481–504.
Harcup, T., & O’Neill, D. (2017). What is news? News values revisited (again). Journalism Studies, 18(12), 1470–1488.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional Process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press. Hillygus.
Hopmann, D. N., Vliegenthart, R., De Vreese, C. H., & Albaek, E. (2010). Effects of election news coverage: How visibility and tone influence party choice. Political Communication, 27(4), 389–405.
Jacobs, L. & van Spanje, J. (2018). Prosecuted, but popular? Hate speech prosecution of anti-immigrant politicians in the news and electoral support. In Paper presented at ECPR Joint Sessions, Nicosia.
Jagers, J., & Walgrave, S. (2007). Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research, 46(3), 319–345.
Kirchheimer, O. (1961). Political justice. The use of legal procedure for political ends. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kitschelt, H., & McGann, A. (1995). The radical right in Western Europe: A comparative analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
Lahav, G., & Courtemanche, M. (2012). The ideological effects of framing threat on immigration and civil liberties. Political Behavior, 34, 477–505.
Loewenstein, K. (1937). Militant democracy and fundamental rights, II. American Political Science Review, 31(4), 638–658.
Mendelberg, T. (2001). The race card: Campaign strategy, implicit messages, and the norm of equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Minkenberg, M. (2006). Repression and reaction: Militant democracy and the radical right in Germany and France. Patterns of Prejudice, 40(1), 25–44.
More, G. (1994). Undercover surveillance of the Republikaner Party: Protecting a militant democracy or discrediting a political rival? German Politics, 3(2), 284–292.
Petrocik, J. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 825–850.
Pettigrew, T. F., & Meertens, R. W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25(1), 57–75.
Posner, E. A. (2014). Political trials in domestic and international law. Duke Law Journal, 55(1), 75–152.
Rooduijn, M. (2014). Vox populismus: A populist radical right attitude among the public? Nations and Nationalism, 20(1), 80–92.
Rooduijn, M., Van der Brug, W., & De Lange, S. L. (2016). Expressing or fuelling discontent? The relationship between populist voting and political discontent. Electoral Studies, 43(1), 32–40.
Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20.
Sheafer, T. (2007). How to evaluate it: The role of story-evaluative tone in agenda setting and priming. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 21–39.
Stockemer, D. (2017). The success of radical right-wing parties in Western European regions—New challenging findings. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 25(1), 41–56.
Thiel, M. (2009). Introduction. In M. Thiel (Ed.), The “Militant Democracy” principle in modern democracies. Farnham: Ashgate.
Van Aelst, P., Maddens, B., Noppe, J., & Fiers, S. (2008). Politicians in the news: Media or party logic? Media attention and electoral success in the Belgian election campaign of 2003. European Journal of Communication, 23(2), 193–210.
Van der Brug, W. (2004). Issue ownership and party choice. Electoral Studies, 23(2), 209–233.
Van der Brug, W., Fennema, M., & Tillie, J. (2005). Why some anti-immigrant parties fail and others succeed. A two-step model of aggregate electoral support. Comparative Political Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414004273928.
Van der Eijk, C., Van der Brug, W., Kroh, M., & Franklin, M. (2006). Rethinking the dependent variable in voting behavior: On the measurement and analysis of electoral utilities. Electoral Studies, 25(3), 424–47.
Van Donselaar, J. (1995). De staat paraat? De bestrijding van extreem-rechts in West-Europa. The Hague: Babylon-De Geus.
Van Heerden, S. H., & Van der Brug, W. (2017). Demonisation and electoral support for populist radical right parties: A temporary effect. Electoral Studies, 47(1), 36–45.
Van Spanje, J. (2011). The wrong and the right: A comparative analysis of “anti-immigration” and “far right” parties. Government and Opposition, 46(3), 293–320.
Van Spanje, J., & Azrout, R. (2019). Tainted love: How stigmatization of a political party in news media reduces its electoral support. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 31(2), 283–308.
Van Spanje, J., & De Vreese, C. H. (2015). The good, the bad and the voter: The impact of hate speech prosecution of a politician on electoral support for his party. Party Politics, 21(1), 115–130.
Vliegenthart, R., Boomgaarden, H. G., & Van Spanje, J. (2012). Anti-immigrant party support and media visibility: A cross-party, over-time perspective. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 22(3), 315–358.
Vrielink, J. (2010). Van haat gesproken? Een rechtsantropologisch onderzoek naar de bestrijding van rasgerelateerde uitingsdelicten in Belgie. Antwerpen: Maklu.
Vrielink, J. (2016). Do we want more or fewer prosecutions of opinions: The Geert Wilders trial 2.0. Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, 45(2), 2–11.
Walgrave, S., & De Swert, K. (2004). The making of the (issues of the) Vlaams Blok. Political Communication, 21(4), 479–500.
Walgrave, S., Lefevere, J., & Tresch, A. (2012). The associative dimension of issue ownership. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(4), 771–782.
Weaver, D. H. (2007). Thoughts on agenda setting, framing, and priming. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 142–147.
Weber, A. (2009). Manual on hate speech. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.