Affect, Social Pressure and Prosocial Motivation: Field Experimental Evidence of the Mobilizing Effects of Pride, Shame and Publicizing Voting Behavior
Citizens generally try to cooperate with social norms, especially when norm compliance is monitored and publicly disclosed. A recent field experimental study demonstrates that civic appeals that tap into social pressure motivate electoral participation appreciably (Gerber et al., Am Polit Sci Rev 102:33–48, 2008). Building on this work, I use field experimental techniques to examine further the socio-psychological mechanisms that underpin this effect. I report the results of three field experiments conducted in the November 2007 elections designed to test whether voters are more effectively mobilized by appeals that engender feelings of pride (for reinforcing or perpetuating social and cultural values or norms) or shame (for violating social and cultural values or norms). Voters in Monticello, Iowa and Holland, Michigan were randomly assigned to receive a mailing that indicated the names of all verified voters in the November 2007 election would be published in the local newspaper (pride treatment). In Ely, Iowa voters were randomly assigned to receive a mailing that indicated the names of all verified nonvoters would be published in the local newspaper (shame treatment). The experimental findings suggest shame may be more effective than pride on average, but this may depend on who the recipients are. Pride motivates compliance with voting norms only amongst high-propensity voters, while shame mobilizes both high- and low-propensity voters.
KeywordsSocial pressure Voting Field experiment Pride Shame Emotions Prosocial behavior Public surveillance
- Barrett, K. C., & Campos, J. J. (1987). Perspectives on emotional development II: A functionalist approach to emotions. In J. D. Osofsky (Ed.), Handbook of infant development (2nd ed., pp. 555–578). Oxford, England: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Belli, R. F., Traugott, M. W., & Beckmann, M. N. (2001). What leads to voting overreports? Contrasts of overreporters to validated voters and admitted nonvoters in the American national election studies. Journal of Official Statistics, 17(4), 479–498.Google Scholar
- Blais, A. (2000). To vote or not to vote?. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
- Brader, T. (2005). Campaigning for hearts and minds: How emotional appeals in political ads work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control (pp. 327–343). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2000). Evolutionary psychology and the emotions. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (2nd ed., pp. 91–115). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Curry, G. (2004). How to increase black voter turnout. Commentary, District Chronicles. August 26. Accessed online November 8, 2008 at http://media.www.districtchronicles.com/media/storage/paper263/news/2004/08/26/Commentary/How-To.Increase.Black.Voter.Turnout-706004.shtml.
- Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
- Fitzgerald, M. (2008). ‘Tennessee tribune’ list of non-voters stirs controversy. Editor & Publisher. October 16. Accessed online November 8, 2008 at http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003874959.
- Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Funk, P. (2006). Modern voting tools, social incentives and voter turnout: Theory and evidence. Mimeo, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar
- Gerber, A. S., & Green, D. P. (2005). Do phone calls increase voter turnout? An update. The Science of Voter Mobilization. Special Editors D. P. Green & A. S. Gerber. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 601, 142–154.Google Scholar
- Gollwitzer, P. M., & Moskowitz, G. B. (1996). Goal effects on action and cognition. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 361–399). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Kropf, M., & Knack, S. (2003). Viewers like you: Community norms and contributions to public broadcasting. Political Research Quarterly, 56(2), 187–197.Google Scholar
- LeDoux, J. E. (1996). The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
- Marcus, G., Neuman, W. R., & MacKuen, M. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Mascolo, M. F., & Fischer, K. W. (1995). Developmental transformations in appraisals for pride, shame and guilt. In J. P. Tangney & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Self-conscious emotions: The psychology of shame, guilt, embarrassment and pride (pp. 64–113). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Neuman, W. R., Marcus, G., Cigler, A., & MacKuen, M. (Eds.). (2007). The affect effect: Dynamics of emotion in political thinking and behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Niven, D. (2004). The mobilization solution? Face-to-face contact and voter turnout in a municipal election. Journal of Politics, 66, 868–884.Google Scholar
- Opp, K.-D. (2001). Why do people vote? The cognitive-illusion proposition and its test. Kyklos, 54, 355–378.Google Scholar
- Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Posner, R., & Rasmusen, E. (1999). Creating and enforcing norms, with special reference to sanctions. International Review of Law and Economics, 19, 66–84.Google Scholar
- Tadelis, S. (2007). The power of shame and the rationality of trust. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1006169.