Political Behavior

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 175–195 | Cite as

Mission Accomplished: The Wartime Election of 2004

Original Paper

Abstract

The war in Iraq, so the widely accepted view, hurt the reelection of George W. Bush. We contend, to the contrary, that the war helped him get reelected. First, we show that his victory fits the dominant pattern of wartime elections in American history. Second, we find that Bush’s approval ratings benefited from a complex rally where the Iraq war prolonged rather than diminished the 9/11 effect; most Americans affirmed rather than disputed a link between the war in Iraq and the war on terror. Third, while Bush’s approval proves sensitive to U.S. casualties in the Iraq war, any damage to his standing prior to the election was mitigated by sufficient popular support for that war. And finally, on Election Day, Bush was able to garner the vote of two critical blocks with favorable feelings about the Iraq war, be it the decision to invade or the prospect of success.

Keywords

Presidential elections Wartime elections Rally effect 

References

  1. Abramson, P. R., Aldrich, J. H., & Rohde, D. W. (2003). Change and continuity in the 2000 and 2002 elections. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
  2. Baum, M. A. (2006). The new ‘soft’ politics: how soft news brings foreign policy to the masses and why it matters. Prepared for the 2006 meeting of the International Political Science Association.Google Scholar
  3. Baum, M. A., & Groeling, T. (2004). Crossing the water’s edge: elite rhetoric, media coverage and the rally-round-the-flag phenomenon, 1979–2003. Prepared for the 2004 meeting of the American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
  4. Baum, M. A., & Kernell, S. (2001). Economic class and popular support for Franklin Roosevelt in war and peace. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65, 198–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brody, R. A. (1991). Assessing the President: the media, elite opinion, and public support. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bueno de Mesquita, B., & Siverson, R. M. (1995). War and the survival of political leaders: a comparative study of regime types and political accountability. American Political Science Review, 89, 841–855.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, J. E. (2002). The polls: policy specific presidential approval. Part 2. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 32, 779–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., Rusk, J. G., & Wolfe, A. C. (1969). Continuity and change in American politics: Parties and issues in the 1968 election. American Political Science Review, 63, 1083–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eichenberg, R. C. (2005). Victory has many friends: The American public and the use of military force, 1981, 2004. International Security, 30, 140–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Feaver, P. D., & Gelpi, C. (2004). Choosing your battles: American civil-military relations and the use of military force. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Gelpi, C., Feaver, P. D., & Reifler, J. (2006). Success matters: Casualty sensitivity and the War in Iraq. International Security, 30, 7–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huddy, L., Khatib, N., & Capelos, T. (2002). Trends: Reactions to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 418–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. James, P., & Rioux, J. S. (1998). International crises and linkage politics: The experiences of the United States, 1953–1994. Political Research Quarterly, 51, 781–812.Google Scholar
  15. Johnson, D. D. P., & Tierney, D. (2006). Failing to win: Perceptions of victory and defeat in international politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kernell, S. (1978). Explaining presidential popularity. American Journal of Political Science, 72, 506–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kriner, D. L. (2006). Examining variance in presidential approval: The case of FDR in World War II. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. MacKuen, M. B. (1983). Political drama, economic conditions, and the dynamics of presidential popularity. American Journal of Political Science, 27, 165–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. MacKuen, M. B., Erikson, R. S., & Stimson, J. A. (1989). Macropartisanship. The American Political Science Review, 83, 1125–1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. MacKuen, M. B., Erikson, R. S., & Stimson, J. A. (1992). Peasants or bankers? The American electorate and the U.S. economy. American Political Science Review, 86, 597–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. MacKuen, M. B., Erikson, R. S., & Stimson, J. A. (2000). Bankers or peasants revisited: economic expectations and presidential approval. Electoral Studies, 19, 295–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marra, R. F., Ostrom, C. W. Jr., & Simon, D. M. (1990). Foreign policy and presidential popularity: Creating windows of opportunity in the perpetual election. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 34, 588–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Midlarsky, M. I. (1984). Political stability of two-party and multiparty systems: Probabilistic bases for the comparison of party systems. American Political Science Review, 78, 929–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mueller, J. E. (1973). War, presidents and public opinion. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Nadeau, R., et al. (1999). Elite economic forecasts, economic news, mass economic judgments, and presidential approval. Journal of Politics, 61, 109–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nickelsburg, M., & Norpoth, H. (2000). Commander-in-chief or chief economist? The president in the eye of the public. Electoral Studies, 19, 313–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Norpoth, H. (1992). Confidence regained: Economics, Mrs. Thatcher, and the British Voter. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  28. Norpoth, H. (1995). Is Clinton doomed? An early forecast for 1996. PS, 28, 201–07.Google Scholar
  29. Norpoth, H. (1996). Presidents and the prospective voter. Journal of Politics, 58, 776–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Norpoth, H.. (2002). On a short leash: term limits and the economic voter. In H. Dorussen, & M. Taylor (Eds.), The context of economic voting (pp. 121–136) London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Ostrom, C. W. Jr., & Simon, D. M. (1985). Promise and performance: A dynamic model of presidential popularity. American Political Science Review, 79, 334–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stimson, J. A. (1999). Public opinion in America: Mood, cycles, and swings (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  33. Tyler, P. E., & Elder, J. (2003). Threats and responses: poll finds most in U.S. support delaying a war. The New York Times, Feb. 14, A1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Stony Brook UniversityStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations