Skip to main content
Log in

Molecular Characterization and Comparative Analysis of Six Durum Wheat Accessions Including Graziella Ra

  • Published:
Plant Molecular Biology Reporter Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Genetic identity and relatedness of the durum wheat Graziella Ra, four Italian commercial durum cultivars (Cappelli, Grazia, Flaminio and Svevo) and Kamut were evaluated using amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs), simple sequence repeats (SSRs) and α-gliadin gene sequence analysis. Our primary objective was to study molecular genetic diversity in such a set of wheats including three modern (Grazia, Flaminio and Svevo) and three older (Cappelli, Kamut and Graziella Ra) durum accessions. Specifically, we aimed at determining the relationship between the historic accession Graziella Ra and Kamut, which is considered an ancient relative of the durum subspecies. Obtained results revealed that (1) both AFLP and SSR molecular markers detected highly congruent patterns of genetic diversity among the accessions showing nearly similar efficiency; (2) for AFLPs, percentage of polymorphic loci within accession ranged from 6.57% to 19.71% (mean, 12.77%) and for SSRs, from 0% to 57.14% (mean, 28.57%); (3) principal component analysis of genetic distance among accessions showed the first two axes accounting for 58.03% (for AFLPs) and 61.60% (for SSRs) of the total variability; (4) for AFLPs, molecular variance was partitioned into 80% (variance among accessions) and 20% (within accession) and for SSRs, into 73% (variance among accessions) and 27% (within accession); (5) cluster analysis of AFLPs and SSRs datasets displayed Graziella Ra and Kamut constantly grouped into the same cluster; and (6) molecular comparison of α-gliadin gene sequences showed Graziella Ra and Kamut in separate clusters. All these findings support the hypothesis that Graziella Ra and Kamut, although very similar, at least in the little part of the genome investigated by molecular markers employed in this study, might be considered as distinct accessions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baraket G, Chatti K, Saddoud O, Abdelkarim AB, Mars M, Trifi M, Hannachi AS (2011) Comparative assessment of SSR and AFLP markers for evaluation of genetic diversity and conservation of fig, Ficus carica L., genetic resources in Tunisia. Plant Mol Biol Rep 29(1):171–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW (1980) Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 32:314–331

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boutin-Ganache I, Raposo M, Raymond M, Deschepper CF (2001) M13-tailed primers improve the readability and usability of microsatellite analyses performed with two different allele-sizing methods. Biotechniques 31:24–28

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Drummond AJ, Rambaut A (2007) BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol Biol 7:1214–1257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:13–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukatsu E, Isoda K, Hirao T, Takahashi M, Watanabe A (2005) Development and characterization of simple sequence repeat DNA markers for Zelkova serrata. Mol Ecol Notes 5:378–380

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gregorini A, Colomba MS, Ellis HJ, Ciclitira PJ (2009) Immunogenicity characterization of two ancient wheat α-gliadin peptides related to coeliac disease. Nutrients 1:276–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koning F (2005) Celiac disease: caught between a rock and a hard place. Gastroenterology 129:1294–1301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Librado P, Rozas J (2009) DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25:1451–1452

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller MP (1997) Tools for population genetic analyses (TFPGA 1.3): a windows program for the analysis of allozyme and molecular population genetic data. Available at http://www.marksgeneticsoftware.net/

  • Nei M (1978) Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89:583–590

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GenAlEx6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell W, Morgante M, Andre C, Hanafey M, Vogel J, Tingey S, Rafalsky A (1996) The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysis. Mol Breed 2:225–238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schuelke M (2000) An economic method for the fluorescent labelling of PCR fragments. Nat Biotechnol 18:233–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro B, Rambaut A, Drummond AJ (2006) Choosing appropriate substitution models for the phylogenetic analysis of protein-coding sequences. Mol Biol Evol 22:7–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma AD, Gill PK, Singh P (2002) DNA isolation from dry and fresh samples of polysaccharide-rich plants. Plant Mol Biol Rep 20(4):415a–415f

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sneath PHA, Sokal RR (1973) Numerical taxonomy—the principles and practice of numerical classification. WH Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallknecht GF, Gilbertson KM, Ranney JE (1996) Alternative wheat cereals as food grains: Einkorn, Emmer, Spelt, Kamut, and Triticale. In: Janick J (ed) Progress in new crops. ASHS, Alexandria, pp 156–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson P, Glenn B, Kirby J, Collins A, Devosk K, Busso C, Gale M (1998) Fifty new microsatellite loci for the wheat genetic map. Theor Appl Genet 97:946–949

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. doi:10.1093/molbev/msr121. Available at http://www.kumarlab.net/publications

  • Von Buren M (2001) Polymorphism in two homeologous gamma-gliadin genes and the evolution of cultivated wheat. Genet Res Crop Evol 48:205–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, van der Lee TH, Hornes M, Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuiper M, Zabeau M (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res 23:4407–4414

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to P. Bianchi for Fig. 1. This research was supported by CIPE 20/04–DGR 438/2005 to M.S. Colomba and A. Gregorini.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mariastella Colomba.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Colomba, M., Vischi, M. & Gregorini, A. Molecular Characterization and Comparative Analysis of Six Durum Wheat Accessions Including Graziella Ra. Plant Mol Biol Rep 30, 168–175 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-011-0328-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-011-0328-z

Keywords

Navigation