Abstract
Purpose
Simultaneous effects of more than one global change driver on ecosystem functioning have rarely been assessed.
Methods
We disentangled the effects of region encompassing climatic and edaphic conditions, forest-management intensity and community plant diversity on litterfall quantity, quality and turnover in 27 temperate forests across an environmental gradient.
Results
Region significantly influenced litterfall and organic layer mass and chemical quality and litter and element turnover. After accounting for the influence of region, increasing forest-management intensity (ForMI) significantly decreased litterfall mass, N, P and K concentrations and nutrient fluxes and slowed down litter and nutrient turnover. Because increasing ForMI reflected the man-made contributions of coniferous trees, these results can partly be attributed to the lower litterfall at our study sites and slower litter turnover of coniferous than deciduous trees. After accounting for the influences of region and ForMI, increasing diversity of the vascular plant community on the study plots measured as species richness or Shannon index significantly increased C and decreased N, P and S concentrations in litterfall. Together with the significantly decreased N and P concentrations in the organic layer with increasing plant diversity, these results indicated an increased within-stand nutrient-use efficiency and a more complete soil nutrient use with increasing plant diversity.
Conclusions
Our results demonstrate that increasing ForMI, which is associated with increasing conifer shares, leaves element stocks in the organic layer unchanged but slows down C turnover and thus increases temporary C storage in soil organic layers. Moreover, community vascular plant diversity helps close nutrient cycles.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Litterfall and its turnover in the soil organic layer are important components of the C and nutrient cycles in forests (Krishna and Mohan 2017; Prescott and Vesterdal 2021; Vogt et al. 1986). The frequently measured fine litterfall consists of leaves/needles, twigs, flowers, fruits, seeds and other small dead organic materials dropping from the forest canopies to the soil. Fine litterfall is usually collected with several at least 0.25 m2-large traps. Fine litterfall accounts for about one third of the net primary production (Bray and Gorham 1964; Chave et al. 2010). The aboveground fine litterfall primarily accumulates on top of the mineral soil as soil organic layer, which can be differentiated into the Oi (fresh litter), Oe (shredded, hyphenated litter), and the Oa (amorphous organic matter) horizons (IUSS Working Group WRB 2022). The ratio between the organic matter mass and C and nutrient stocks in the soil organic layer including fine and medium roots and the annual litterfall mass and C and nutrient fluxes with litterfall, provides a rough estimate of the residence times of the organic matter and these elements in the organic layer and thus of both C retention and nutrient availability. This ratio can be referred to the fresh litter (Oi horizon) alone or to the whole organic layer (KOi and KOL values with the unit “yrs”, respectively; Vogt et al. 1986). However, considering only aboveground litterfall and neglecting root litter input can result in an overestimation of the residence times of organic matter, C and nutrients in the organic layer (Vogt et al. 1986).
Mass, C and nutrient concentrations of litterfall and organic layers and the residence times of the organic matter, C and nutrients in the organic layer are driven by tree species, stand age and site conditions (Binkley 2021; Vogt et al. 1986). Joly et al. (2023) showed that macroclimate and litter properties are the most important drivers of litter decomposition. Soil properties together with the climate control nutrient availability (Krishna and Mohan 2017; Prescott and Vesterdal 2021; Vogt et al. 1986). In a comprehensive early review, Vogt et al. (1986) have shown that on a global scale litterfall correlates negatively with latitude because of the strong influence of light availability. The N concentration in litterfall was positively correlated with the litterfall mass, while P concentrations did not correlate with litterfall mass. This suggests that the availability of N plays a particularly important role for litterfall production (Vogt et al. 1986). However, in the global meta-analysis of LeBauer and Treseder (2008), litterfall alone did not respond to increasing N availability while aboveground net primary production increased.
The centuries-long management of Central European forests has resulted in a higher share of conifers than would occur naturally (FAO 2011; McGrath et al. 2015; Sala et al. 2000). Coniferous forests are usually managed in shorter rotations. The more frequent tree harvests represent a management intensification (Schmitz et al. 2005). Coniferous forests are reported to produce less litter than deciduous forests (Vogt et al. 1986). Although Neumann et al. (2018) confirmed this for European forests on average (19.4 vs. 24.0 g m−2 yr−1 for coniferous vs. deciduous forests), the reverse was true for regions in the North and the South of Europe. Hansen et al. (2009) even reported that three coniferous and two deciduous tree species did not show significantly different litterfall if growing on similarly fertile soils in a common garden experiment in Denmark. Thus, the influence of conifers on litterfall seems to depend on site conditions including climate and soil fertility. The changed tree composition has implications for chemical litter properties including the concentrations of phenolic compounds and the lignin:N and C:nutrient ratios, which influence litter turnover (Aerts 1997; Hättenschwiler et al. 2005; Vogt et al. 1986). The increased conifer share has additionally impacted biogeochemical nutrient cycling compared to native deciduous forests because of e.g., changed throughfall quality, changed nutrient leaching from the organic layer (Augusto et al. 2002; De Schrijver et al. 2007) and a reduced base pump effect (Achilles et al. 2021a). Forest management can have effects on the C storage of forest soils (Mayer et al. 2020) and the composition of soil biota (Chauvat et al. 2011; Siira-Pietikäinen et al. 2001). Inagaki et al. (2004) have shown that tree age and species composition, which are the result of management in forests available for wood production, drives N mineralization. Thinning, which is a common management treatment particularly of age-class forests, temporally increases litterfall of individual trees but reduces total litterfall and associated nutrient transport to the soil (Blanco et al. 2006; Doukalianou et al. 2022). Thinning also accelerates the turnover of the organic layer, because of increased soil temperatures (Kunhamu et al. 2009). Tree harvesting can compact the soils increasing erosion risks, particularly in wheel ruts. Harvesting can also cause organic matter loss and nutrient removal (Burger and Kelting 1999; Grigal 2000; Mayer et al. 2020). Clear-cutting, the most common forest harvest practice worldwide, drastically changes the microclimate potentially favoring mineralization and thus resulting in C losses (Marshall 2000; Mayer et al. 2020).
Mixtures of tree species increase productivity across tropical and temperate plantations relative to monocultures (Forrester and Bauhus 2016; Piotto 2008). Cardinale et al. (2012) reviewed 20 years of biodiversity-ecosystem functioning research confirming that tree species richness increases wood production in forests. Furthermore, increasing plant species richness enhances aboveground C sequestration in forests, accelerates nutrient mineralization, and increases organic matter storage, although the results concerning the long-term (> 10 yr) C storage were mixed (Cardinale et al. 2012). In line with these results, tree species richness showed weak positive relationships with the decomposition rate of cellulose and the C stock in the topsoil in 209 European forest stands (Dawud et al. 2017; Joly et al. 2017). Similarly, tree diversity was positively related with C and N accumulation in the soils of Canada’s National Forest Inventory (Chen et al. 2023). Alberti et al. (2017) also confirmed that mixing tree species in a temperate forest may accelerate organic matter turnover and nutrient cycling. However in their study, this resulted in lower soil C stocks relative to monocultures. In another study in a temperate Australian forest, Forrester et al. (2013) reported that the C stocks might increase in spite of an accelerated litter turnover in mixed relative to monoculture forests. In a forest biodiversity experiment in Panama, Potvin et al. (2011) observed, in contrast, a decrease of the decomposition rate of coarse woody debris and soil respiration in 3- to 6-species mixtures relative to monocultures and suggested increased C storage with increasing species richness. The contrasting results illustrate that we do not yet fully understand the relationship between plant or tree richness in forests and C turnover and storage.
In the forest biodiversity experiment in Panama, three-species mixtures increased mean Ca concentrations in branches and stems and increased N, P, K, Ca and Mg storage in aboveground biomass compared to monocultures suggesting complementary resource uptake (Oelmann et al. 2010). In contrast, Xu et al. (2020) did not detect significant species richness effects on soil moisture, pH, N and P concentrations, respiration, litter decomposition rate and microbial communities in their global meta-analysis of 95 biodiversity-ecosystem functioning studies. Moreover, Schwarz et al. (2014) found that an increasing species richness improved the N retention from atmospheric deposition in the forest canopy. Schwarz et al. (2016) reported reduced N leaching from mull-type organic layers with increasing plant diversity. Thus, the assumption that species-rich plant assemblages improve community nutrient-use efficiency through complementary nutrient use, which was found in grassland experiments (Tilman et al. 1996; Weisser et al. 2017) and agriculturally used grasslands (Kleinebecker et al. 2014), may also hold true for forests (Scherer-Lorenzen et al. 2005). For forests, Vitousek (1982) proposed to use the inverse of the nutrient concentration in bulk fine litterfall of entire forest stands as easily accessible indicator of within-stand nutrient-use efficiency, because of the widespread measurement of bulk fine litterfall and its chemical properties.
Our overall objective was to disentangle the influences of region (reflecting climatic and edaphic site conditions), forest-management intensity and community vascular plant diversity on litterfall, organic layer mass, residence times of the organic layer, nutrient concentrations in litterfall and organic layer, nutrient fluxes with litterfall and residence times of nutrients in the organic layer. Our study included 27 temperate forests spanning a gradient in environmental conditions, forest-management intensity and associated community vascular plant diversity in Germany. We consider the study forests as representative for a large part of Central Europe. Specifically, we tested the hypotheses that (i) region has an effect on nearly all target variables, (ii) increasing forest-management intensity results in decreasing litter production because of increasing shares of conifers but nevertheless increasing organic layer masses, because of reduced litter turnover and thus longer C residence times in the organic layer, and (iii) after accounting for the effects of region and forest-management intensity, increasing community vascular plant diversity helps close nutrient cycling by increasing the within-stand nutrient-use efficiency, i.e., the bulk fine litterfall produced per unit nutrient in the litter and by more comprehensively exploiting the nutrient pool in the organic layer.
Material and methods
Study area
Our study was conducted on the 27 very intensively studied forest plots of the Biodiversity Exploratories (https://www.biodiversity-exploratories.de) in three regions in Germany, i.e., Schorfheide-Chorin, Hainich-Dün and Schwäbische Alb (from northeast to southwest Germany; Fischer et al. 2010). The three research regions differing in climate, geological parent materials and soil cover are representative for large parts of Central Europe (Fig. S1, Table S1). The studied forests are age-class, i.e., forests consisting of one or more even-aged development stages which are harvested at 80–120 year intervals by clear cut or shelterwood logging, or near-natural stands. Most of them are regularly managed with a different intensity except for some stands that had been protected for at least 60 yr. Between 2008 and 2012, the mean diameter at breast height of the study plots was determined to range from 13 to 85 cm (Schwarz et al. 2014). The study plots had a size of 100 m × 100 m. The tree species composition was dominated by European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.), Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) H. Karst.) or Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) (Table S2). The tree species compositions of the studied forests are representative for large parts of the respective study region (Fischer et al. 2010). We considered a forest stand as coniferous trees- or deciduous trees-dominated if coniferous or deciduous trees included > 50% of the stems with a diameter at breast height > 10 cm.
Field sampling
We collected organic layer samples in 14 replicates per plot with a 15 cm × 15 cm metal frame, determined the thickness of the three organic horizons Oi, Oe, and Oa, dried the samples at 60 °C and weighed the quantitatively collected horizon samples to determine the bulk density of each organic horizon. We used averaged data of the soil sampling campaigns in May 2014 and 2017. An exception were the element concentrations in the organic layer at Hainich-Dün and Schwäbische Alb, which were determined in the samples of the sampling campaign in May 2011. In temperate forests, the thickness of the Oi horizon usually varies in the course of the year. Because we sampled the organic layer in May the element stocks in the Oi horizon and their residence times refer to an intermediate Oi mass.
To collect litterfall, we used five traps per plot. Each trap had a collecting area of 0.25 m2 and consisted of a wooden frame and a polyethylene net. The litterfall was collected biweekly, although this was not always possible because of logistic problems or access restrictions to the plots. Litterfall was collected from the end of October 2013 to the beginning of October 2016 covering three years.
The richness of all vascular plants of the whole community was annually determined in each forest stand in a 20 m × 20 m subplot including all non-woody species (herb layer), shrubs (woody species with a height < 5 m), understory trees (woody species with a height from 5 to 10 m) and canopy trees (woody species with a height > 10 m). The surface area covered by each species was separately estimated for the four vegetation layers. The annual data was combined from two surveys in April and in June–August to make sure that all species, irrespective of their growing time, were recognized. We used averaged data of the years 2010–2015. There were no data from 2012.
We used the Forest Management Intensity Index (ForMI), which is based on inventory data from 2008 to 2012 regarding the living trees, stumps and dead wood. The ForMI is the sum of three component indicators taking into account the proportion of potential total standing tree volume that was harvested in the past approximately 40 years, which was the assumed turnover time of stumps as indicated by stumps, where a cut of a chain saw was visible, the share of tree species in the standing volume that are not part of the natural forest community, and the proportion of the total amount of dead wood with signs of saw cuts indicating that it was generated through harvesting or thinning. Each indicator received a value between 0 (no sign of management) and 1 (intensive management) and the three components were then added up to yield the ForMI, which can assume a value between 0 and 3 (Kahl and Bauhus 2014).
Chemical analyses
For chemical analysis, organic horizon and bulk litterfall samples were ground with a ball mill. We determined total C, N and S concentrations by element analysis via thermal combustion at 1020 °C, catalytic reduction of N and detection by thermal conductivity after chromatographic separation of CO2, N2 and SO2. To determine Ca, K, Mg and P concentrations, we digested aliquots of the ground litterfall and organic horizon samples with 8 mL concentrated HNO3 and 2 mL H2O2 in a microwave oven. The element concentrations in the digests were quantified with Atomic Absorption Spectrometry or Inductively-coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectroscopy. To control for background contamination, we included blank digests, the results of which were subtracted if we detected measurable concentrations of the target element. To check the accuracy of our measurements, we used a certified reference material (NIST 1515, apple tree leaves). Our measurements deviated by < 5% from the certified element concentrations.
Calculations and statistical evaluation
Mean nutrient concentrations in bulk annual litterfall and in the whole organic layer were mass-weighted based on the litterfall of each sampling interval and the mass of the three organic horizons Oi, Oe and Oa, respectively. We calculated the ratio of mass or the stock of C or nutrient in the Oi horizon or whole organic layer to the annual flux of mass, C or nutrient by litterfall (KOi and KOL values, respectively) following Vogt et al. (1986). The KOi and KOL values represent the mean residence times [yrs] of organic matter or an element in the Oi horizon or the whole organic layer. As an indicator of the within-stand nutrient-use efficiency, we used the inverse of the nutrient concentrations in bulk litterfall [i.e., g litterfall mass per mg nutrient] following Vitousek (1982).
For each forest plot, the Shannon index of the vegetation community (i.e., all vascular plant species on the plot including all four vegetation layers) was calculated according to Eq. 1:
where S denotes the total number of plant species present, i identifies an individual species, and pi is the contribution of species i to the total cover of the four vegetation layers.
We used one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference post-hoc test to compare mean properties of the three Exploratories. Data handling and analysis were performed in R version 4.1.1 (R Development Core Team 2021).
We hierarchically analyzed the effects of (i) region (Biodiversity Exploratory, i.e., Schwäbische Alb, Hainich-Dün and Schorfheide-Chorin), (ii) ForMI, and either the (iiia) Shannon index or the (iiib) plant species richness (in separate models) with linear mixed models using the function lmer() of the package lme4 (Bates et al. 2015). The homogeneity of variances was tested with Levene’s test and the normal distribution of residuals by visual inspection. In some cases, we had to transform the data to meet these prerequisites and such transformations are noted in the results tables. We repeated the same analyses for a reduced data set only including the deciduous trees-dominated stands (n = 18) to assess the influence of the conifers on our results.
Results
Schorfheide-Chorin had the significantly highest mean organic layer mass and the longest mean residence time of the organic layer (KOL), while the mean organic layer masses and KOL values at Schwäbische Alb and Hainich-Dün were not different from each other (Table 1). Hainich-Dün had the significantly highest mean K and S concentrations in litterfall and K and Mg concentrations in the organic layer. Schorfheide-Chorin had the significantly lowest Ca and S concentrations in litterfall and C, K and S concentrations in the organic layer. Schorfheide-Chorin had the significantly highest C/S ratio in the litterfall and mean within-stand nutrient-use efficiencies of Ca and S, while Schwäbische Alb had the highest N/P ratio in litterfall and within-stand nutrient-use efficiency of K (Table S3). Schorfheide-Chorin had the highest mean stocks of all elements in the organic layer except for Ca and K, while Hainich-Dün had the highest mean K stock in the organic layer (Table S3). Schorfheide-Chorin had the significantly longest residence times of all elements except for Ca and K in the whole organic layer (KOL), while the KOL values of all elements were not significantly different between Hainich-Dün and Schwäbische Alb (Table S3).
In our hierarchical linear mixed model, region (i.e., Schwäbische Alb, Hainich-Dün and Schorfheide-Chorin) encompassing climatic and edaphic conditions had a marginally significant effect on litterfall and a significant effect on soil organic layer mass and residence time of the total organic layer (KOL, Table 2). Region had an at least marginally significant effect on all element concentrations in litterfall except that of P and on all element fluxes with litterfall except that of C (Table 2). Moreover, region had a significant effect on all element concentrations except that of P and all element stocks in the organic layer except that of Ca. Region did not influence the KOi value of any element but significantly influenced the KOL value of all elements except K (Table S4).
After accounting for region, the forest-management intensity (measured as ForMI) was significantly negatively related with litterfall (Fig. 1a) and significantly positively with the KOL value (Fig. 1d). Moreover, ForMI had a marginally significant positive effect on the organic layer mass and KOi value (Fig. 1b, c). Because ForMI includes a measure of the share of tree species that are not part of the natural forest community, which are mostly coniferous trees, the coniferous trees-dominated stands usually showed a higher ForMI (1.9 ± standard error 0.12, n = 9) than the deciduous stands (0.78 ± 0.14, n = 18). When we omitted the three coniferous trees-dominated stands at each of the three Biodiversity Exploratories and recalculated our linear mixed models, the effects of ForMI on litterfall (p < 0.001) and on the KOi value (p = 0.078) were still (marginally) significant, while the effects of ForMI on the organic layer mass and the KOL value disappeared. Considering all 27 forest stands, ForMI was significantly positively related with the C concentration and C/N and C/S ratios in litterfall but negatively with N, P and K concentrations in litterfall (Tables 2 and S4). When we analyzed the data set without the coniferous trees-dominated stands, only the negative relationship between ForMI and K concentration in litterfall remained. As a consequence, increasing ForMI at least marginally significantly increased within-stand nutrient-use efficiencies of N, P, K and S (Table S4), when all forest stands were considered but only of K when the coniferous trees-dominated stands were omitted. Moreover, increasing ForMI resulted in a decrease of all considered element fluxes with litterfall no matter if all 27 or only the 18 deciduous trees-dominated stands were considered (Table 2). Although ForMI did not influence any element concentration or stock in the organic layer irrespective of the consideration of all sites or of only the deciduous trees-dominated stands, increasing ForMI increased the KOi and KOL values of all elements at least marginally significantly except the KOL value of Ca (Table S4). When the coniferous trees-dominated stands were omitted, only a marginally significant positive effect of ForMI on the KOi value of Ca remained.
After accounting for both the influence of region and ForMI, community vascular plant diversity measured as Shannon index was significantly positively related with the C concentration in litterfall (Fig. 2a) and negatively with N, P and S concentrations (Fig. 2b-d). Species richness influenced the C and nutrient concentrations in litterfall similarly, except that it only had a marginally significant effect on the N and P concentrations and did not influence the S concentration (Table 2). As a consequence, the within-stand nutrient-use efficiency of N, P, Mg and S increased at least marginally significantly with increasing plant diversity (Table S4). The Shannon index was not fully independent of the presence of coniferous trees as indicated by a weak but significant positive correlation with ForMI (r = 0.58, p = 0.002, n = 27). Therefore, we again recalculated our models after omitting the nine coniferous trees-dominated stands. Without the coniferous trees-dominated stands, of the above described relationships only a marginally significant negative effect of species richness on P concentrations in litterfall persisted. However, there was a new significant positive effect of the Shannon index and a marginally significant one of the species richness on the Ca concentration in litterfall and corresponding significant negative ones on the Ca-use efficiency.
The Shannon index and species richness were significantly and marginally significantly negatively related with the P flux with litterfall, respectively, and the Shannon index was significantly positively related with the KOi value of K (Tables 2 and S4). The species richness was marginally significantly positively related with the KOi value and the Shannon index and the species richness were significantly and marginally significantly positively related with the KOL value of Mg (Table S4). Moreover, the Shannon Index was marginally significantly and significantly negatively related with the N and P concentrations in the organic layer, respectively (Fig. 3, Table S4). Species richness was marginally significantly negatively related with the P concentration in the organic layer (Table S4). The Shannon index was marginally significantly positively related with the C/P and N/P ratios in the organic layer. Without the coniferous trees-dominated stands, there was a marginally significant negative effect of the Shannon index on the S concentration in the organic layer and a marginally significant positive one on the C/N ratio of the organic layer. Without the coniferous trees-dominated stands, species richness had a significant negative effect on the S concentration of the organic layer (Fig. S2), significant positive effects on the C/N, C/P and C/S ratios in the organic layer and marginally significant positive effects on the N/P ratio in the organic layer (Fig. S3) and the KOi value of K.
Discussion
Influence of region
The significantly highest organic layer mass and stocks of C and most nutrients in the organic layer, the longest residence times of the organic layer, C and most nutrients, i.e., KOL values, the significantly lowest concentrations of several nutrients in litterfall and in the organic layer and resulting highest C/S ratios in litterfall and within-stand nutrient-use efficiencies at Schorfheide-Chorin among the three regions (Tables 1 and S3) can be attributed to the coarser soil texture, more acidic pH of the dominating soils, and the lower soil fertility than at the other two Exploratories (Table S1; Alt et al. 2011; Fischer et al. 2010). A coarse texture, high acidity and low nutrient availability are known to decrease litter turnover and biological mixing of the litter into the mineral soil (Krishna and Mohan 2017; Prescott and Vesterdal 2021). Among all three regions, Schorfheide-Chorin had the highest mean stocks of most elements in the organic layer, because the slow turnover of the organic layer overcompensated the low element concentrations (Table S3). The significantly highest mean concentrations of some nutrients in litterfall and the organic layer, the lowest C/S ratios in litterfall and thus partly the lowest within-stand nutrient-use efficiencies together with the highest K stock in the organic layer indicated the highest nutrient availability of all three regions at Hainich-Dün, despite similar organic layer masses and KOL values at Schwäbische Alb and Hainich-Dün (Tables 1 and S3). Schwäbische Alb showed the significantly highest N/P ratio in litterfall and the highest within-stand K-use efficiency (Table S3), indicating a low P and K availability. Because the ranges of the soil pH, which is the major driver of base cation availability, were similar at Hainich Dün (3.3–6.4) and Schwäbische Alb (3.9–6.5), while they were lowest at Schorfheide Chorin (3.2–4.3; Alt et al. 2011; Solly et al. 2013), we attribute these differences to the different parent materials at Hainich-Dün and Schwäbische Alb. The soils of Hainich-Dün mostly developed from thick loess deposits with initially moderate calcite concentrations, while those of the Schwäbische Alb mainly developed from the residual material left over after dissolution of the limestone (Fischer et al. 2010). We suggest that at Schwäbische Alb the abundant exchangeable Ca reduced the exchangeable K concentration in the organic layer and mineral soil. The high Ca availability also favors the precipitation of P as little soluble Ca phosphates limiting the P availability.
The finding that in our hierarchical linear mixed model region had significant effects on most of our measured target variables fully supports our first hypothesis and underlines the paramount importance of site conditions including (micro-)climate and soil properties for litter production, quality and turnover (Krishna and Mohan 2017; Prescott and Vesterdal 2021; Vogt et al. 1986). As a consequence, the study of forest-management intensity and biodiversity effects on litter production, quality and turnover requires the prior consideration of the strong influence of site conditions, e.g., in hierarchical ANOVA models, in which region is fitted before forest-management intensity and biodiversity.
Influence of forest-management intensity
The finding that litterfall decreased and the KOL value of the organic layer increased significantly with increasing ForMI (Fig. 1) supports our second hypothesis that increasing forest-management intensity results in decreasing litter production because of increasing shares of conifers but nevertheless increasing organic layer masses, because of reduced litter turnover and thus longer C residence times in the organic layer. The marginally significant positive effects of ForMI on organic layer mass and KOi value further substantiate this claim. Figure 1 illustrates that the coniferous forests (dominated by Norway spruce at Schwäbische Alb and Hainich-Dün and by Scots pine at Schorfheide-Chorin) played an important role in explaining the observed (marginally) significant relationships. This is in line with reports of higher litterfall in deciduous than coniferous tree stands (Neumann et al. 2018; Vogt et al. 1986) and the observation that beech-dominated stands have thinner and more bioactive organic layers with a faster turnover and thus shorter residence times than conifer stands (Achilles et al. 2021b; Albers et al. 2004). Although the assumption of lower litterfall in coniferous than deciduous forests cannot be generalized (Hansen et al. 2009; Neumann et al. 2018), it was true for our study sites, where the beech-dominated stands showed the highest litterfall (0.60 ± 0.04 kg m−2, n = 18) followed by the pine-dominated stands (0.55 ± 0.01, n = 3) and the spruce-dominated stands (0.48 ± 0.02, n = 6). The fact that ForMI still influenced litterfall negatively and the KOi value positively after the coniferous sites had been removed from the analysis suggested that increasing forest-management intensity reduced litterfall and increased the residence time of the Oi horizon irrespective of tree species. One possible explanation for this finding might be a more pronounced thinning with increasing ForMI that reduces the Leaf Area Index and thus litterfall (Blanco et al. 2006; Doukalianou et al. 2022). The increasing removal of biomass and nutrients with increasing ForMI at the same time might have deteriorated the chemical litter quality and consequently reduced the turnover of the Oi horizon (Krishna and Mohan 2017; Prescott and Vesterdal 2021) in spite of the likely increasing soil temperature that should favor organic matter turnover (Kunhamu et al. 2009). In contrast, the mass of the organic layer and its total residence time was different between deciduous trees- (7.5 ± 1.4 kg m−2) and coniferous trees-dominated stands (spruce: 5.3 ± 0.9; pine: 18 ± 2.5). The organic layer mass was only related with ForMI, when the strong significant effect of region was eliminated (Table 2, Fig. 1d).
After the mathematical removal of the influence of region by dividing all values through the regional means, the slope of the regression line of litterfall on ForMI was -0.18 (Fig. 1a). Simultaneously, the slope of the regression line of the KOL value on ForMI was 0.29 indicating a stronger increase of the organic layer mass than reduction of litterfall. We suggest that the reason for longer residence times of the organic layer with increasing ForMI is a deteriorated chemical litter quality and a loss of soil quality, e.g., by the loss of nutrients or soil compaction associated with harvesting and thus reduced biological activity (Burger and Kelting 1999; Grigal 2000; Inagaki et al. 2004; Mayer et al. 2020). Because the mean C concentration in the organic layer (335 ± 17.4 g kg−1) was only approximately 30% lower than in litterfall (475 ± 1.65), the longer residence times of C in the organic layer overcompensated the smaller C input via litterfall resulting in a marginally significant increase of the KOL value of C with increasing ForMI (Table S4). As a consequence, the intermediate-term C storage in the organic layer at the scale of years to a few decades increased with increasing ForMI at our study sites.
The significant increase in the C concentration and C/N and C/S ratios in litterfall with increasing ForMI and the corresponding significant decrease of many nutrient concentrations in litterfall and all nutrient fluxes with litterfall (Table 2) reflect both, a higher share of the nutrient-poorer coniferous trees and the higher biomass extraction associated with continuous nutrient losses that accumulate to decrease soil fertility (Burger and Kelting 1999; Schmitz et al. 2005; Vogt et al. 1986). The associated increase in the within-stand use efficiencies of several nutrients (Table S4) therefore is attributable to the higher share of the inherently more nutrient-efficient coniferous trees but might possibly also indicate an adaptation to the decreasing nutrient availability in response to increasing ForMI. The latter is supported by the finding that increasing ForMI still significantly decreased all nutrient fluxes with litterfall and increased the K-use efficiency and the KOi value of Ca when the coniferous tree-dominated stands were omitted.
Influence of plant diversity
The positive relationship of the Shannon index and partly also plant species richness with the C concentration and the negative ones with several nutrient concentrations in litterfall (Fig. 2, Table 2) went along with an increasing share of conifers. Because in our study the coniferous trees-dominated stands showed a higher diversity of the vascular plant community than the deciduous trees-dominated stands, we were unable to separate the effects of plant diversity and share of conifers. However, P concentrations in litterfall still decreased with increasing plant diversity if the coniferous trees-dominated stand were omitted. In the Jena Experiment, a grassland biodiversity experiment, it was observed that the C/N and C/P ratios in aboveground biomass increased with increasing species richness in most years (Weisser et al. 2017). Milcu et al. (2014) suggested that the increasing C:N ratio with increasing species richness in the Jena experiment was attributable to an increasing N-use efficiency. Similarly, Kleinebecker et al. (2014) reported that the community N-use efficiency of agriculturally used grasslands at the same three Biodiversity Exploratories as studied here increased with increasing species richness because of complementary nutrient use. In line with these findings for N and P, the decreasing P concentration in litterfall with increasing plant diversity irrespective of the inclusion or omission of coniferous trees-dominated stands might indicate an increasing P-use efficiency with increasing plant diversity.
The positive relationship between plant diversity and the Ca concentrations in litterfall of the deciduous trees-dominated stands can be explained by the positive correlation of the pH (in 0.01 M CaCl2) of the A horizon with the Shannon index (r = 0.58, p = 0.012, n = 18) and species richness (r = 0.60, p = 0.08, n = 18), which was not significant if all 27 forest stands were included. In contrast, topsoil pH did not correlate with the P concentration in litterfall irrespective of the inclusion or omission of coniferous trees-dominated stands so that pH did not play a significant role in explaining the increasing P-use efficiency with increasing plant diversity.
The positive effects of the diversity of the vascular plant community (either as Shannon index or as species richness) on the KOi and KOL values of K, Ca and Mg (Table S4) indicated that the cycling of base cations was slowed down with increasing plant diversity. Because the coniferous trees-dominated stands showed a higher plant diversity than the deciduous trees-dominated stands, the slowdown of the base cation cycle with increasing plant diversity is likely attributable to the inherently lower nutrient needs of coniferous than deciduous trees.
The decreasing N and P concentrations in the organic layer with increasing plant diversity (Fig. 3) might be explained via the N and P flux budgets of the organic layer, i.e., higher community plant uptake of N and P from the organic layer with increasing plant diversity as observed in grassland biodiversity experiments (Oelmann et al. 2011; Tilman et al. 1996; Weisser et al. 2017) and agriculturally used grassland (Kleinebecker et al. 2014) and/or higher N and P leaching with increasing plant diversity. The latter is unlikely, because Schwarz et al. (2016) reported for a subset of the same sites only including beech-dominated stands that increasing plant diversity reduced N leaching through the organic layers, while Apostolakis et al. (2022) did not observe a relationship between plant species richness and phosphate leaching risk. However, when the coniferous trees-dominated stands were omitted, there was no longer a significant relationship between the Shannon index or species richness and the N and P concentrations in the organic layer so that the relationships shown in Fig. 3 might again be attributable to the inherently higher N- and P-use efficiencies of coniferous than deciduous trees and the resulting return of N- and P-poorer litterfall to the soil. Nevertheless, the negative effect of the Shannon index on the S concentration in the organic layer and the positive effects of the Shannon index and/or the species richness on the C/N, C/P and C/S ratios in the organic layer (Fig. S3) and (marginally) on some KOi values (Table S4) still indicated that increasing plant diversity helps close nutrient cycling supporting our third hypothesis. A more closed nutrient cycling with increasing plant diversity has up to now mostly been known from grasslands (Karanika et al. 2007; Tilman et al. 1996; Weisser et al. 2017; Oelmann et al. 2021) and hardly been reported for forests (Schwarz et al. 2014, 2016). The positive correlation of species richness with the N/P ratio in the data set without coniferous tree-dominated stand suggests an increasing P limitation with increasing plant diversity.
Conclusions
Our results demonstrate that in line with our first hypothesis, the regionally varying site conditions including climate and soil properties influenced the mass and residence times of the organic layer and the chemical composition of litterfall and the organic layer.
Increasing forest management intensity measured as ForMI decreased litterfall, increased organic layer mass and decreased litter turnover and thus increased the temporary C storage in organic layers in line with our second hypothesis. This finding was influenced by the fact that in our study increasing ForMI was related with an increasing contribution of conifers. Conifers (Norway spruce and Scots pine) produced less litterfall at our study sites with a lower chemical quality and thus slower turnover. However, even when only deciduous forests were considered, increased forest-management intensity still decreased litterfall, K flux with litterfall and the residence times of the Oi horizon and of Ca in the Oi horizon.
Because in our study the share of conifers was positively correlated with plant diversity, it was not possible to differentiate effects of the higher nutrient-use efficiency of the conifers from those of plant diversity in the whole data set. However, the significant negative correlation of plant diversity with the S concentration in the organic layer, the positive one with C/nutrient ratios and residence time of K in the Oi horizon in a subset without the coniferous trees-dominated sites, indicated that increasing plant species richness helped close the nutrient cycles in support of our third hypothesis. Thus, in differently managed temperate forests, there is a positive effect of biodiversity on nutrient cycling after region and forest-management intensity are accounted for in a hierarchical linear mixed model in line with the many studies on grassland that had already demonstrated such a relationship.
Data availability
The data is available in the Biodiversity Exploratories Information System (BEXIS; https://www.bexis.uni-jena.de/ddm/PublicSearch, id no. of the used data sets: 16466, 20045, 20056, 23886, 27246) and will become public after an embargo period.
References
Achilles F, Tischer A, Bernhardt-Römermann M, Chmara I, Achilles M, Michalzik B (2021a) Effects of moderate nitrate and low sulphate depositions on the status of soil base cation pools and recent mineral soil acidification at forest conversion sites with European beech (“Green Eyes”) embedded in Norway spruce and Scots pine stands. Forests 12:573. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12050573
Achilles F, Tischer A, Bernhardt-Römermann M, Heinze M, Reinhardt F, Makeschin F, Michalzik B (2021b) European beech leads to more bioactive humus forms but stronger mineral soil acidification as Norway spruce and Scots pine – Results of a repeated site assessment after 63 and 82 years of forest conversion in central Germany. For Ecol Manage 483:118769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118769
Aerts R (1997) Climate, leaf litter chemistry and leaf litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: a triangular relationship. Oikos 79:439–449. https://doi.org/10.2307/3546886
Albers D, Migge S, Schaefer M, Scheu S (2004) Decomposition of beech leaves (Fagus sylvatica) and spruce needles (Picea abies) in pure and mixed stands of beech and spruce. Soil Biol Biochem 36:155–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2003.09.002
Alberti G, Nock C, Fornasier F, Scherer-Lorenzen M, De Nobili M, Peressotti A, Hoenig L, Bruelheide H, Bauhus J (2017) Tree functional diversity influences belowground ecosystem functioning. Appl Soil Ecol 120:160–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.07.038
Alt F, Oelmann Y, Herold N, Schrumpf M, Wilcke W (2011) Phosphorus partitioning in German grassland and forest soils as related to land-use type, management intensity, and land-use related pH. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 174:195–209. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201000142
Apostolakis A, Schöning I, Klaus VH, Michalzik B, Bischof W-A, Boeddinghaus RS, Bolliger R, Fischer M, Hölzel N, Kandeler E, Kleinebecker T, Manning P, Marhan S, Nevret M, Oelmann Y, Prati D, van Kleunen M, Schwarz A, Schurig E, Schrumpf M (2022) Direct and plant community mediated effects of management intensity on annual nutrient leaching risk in temperate grasslands. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 123:83–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-022-10209-1
Augusto L, Ranger J, Binkley D, Rothe A (2002) Impact of several common tree species of European temperate forests on soil fertility. Ann for Sci 59:233–253. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2002020
Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Binkley D (2021) Forest ecology: an evidence-based approach. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken
Blanco JA, Imbert JB, Castillo FJ (2006) Influence of site characteristics and thinning intensity on litterfall production in two Pinus sylvestris L. forests in the western Pyrenees. For Ecol Manage 237:342–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.09.057
Bray JR, Gorham E (1964) Litter production in forests of the world. Adv Ecol Res 2:101–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60331-1
Burger JA, Kelting DL (1999) Using soil quality indicators to assess forest stand management. For Ecol Manage 122:155–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00039-0
Cardinale BJ, Duffy JE, Gonzalez A, Hooper DU, Perrings C, Venail P, Narwani A, Mace GM, Tilman D, Wardle DA, Kinzig AP, Daily GC, Loreau M, Grace JB, Larigauderie A, Srivastava DS, Naeem S (2012) Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486:59–67. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11148
Chauvat M, Titsch D, Zaytsev AS, Wolters V (2011) Changes in soil faunal assemblages during conversion from pure to mixed forest stands. For Ecol Manage 262:317–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.03.037
Chave J, Navarrete D, Almeida S, Álvarez E, Aragão LEOC, Bonal D, Châtelet P, Silva-Espejo JE, Goret J-Y, von Hildebrand P, Jiménez E, Patiño S, Peñuela MC, Pillips OL, Stevenson P, Malhi Y (2010) Regional and seasonal patterns of litterfall in tropical South America. Biogeosciences 7:43–55. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-43-2010
Chen XL, Taylor AR, Reich PB, Hisano M, Chen HYH, Chang SX (2023) Tree diversity increases decadal forest soil carbon and nitrogen accrual. Nature 618:94–101. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05941-9
Dawud SM, Raulund-Rasmussen K, Ratcliffe S, Domisch T, Finer L, Joly F-X, Hättenschwiler S, Vesterdal L (2017) Tree species functional group is a more important driver of soil properties than tree species diversity across major European forest types. Funct Ecol 31:1153–1162. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12821
De Schrijver A, Geudens G, Augusto L, Staelens J, Mertens J, Wuyts K, Gielis L, Verheyen K (2007) The effect of forest type on throughfall deposition and seepage flux: a review. Oecologia 153:663–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0776-1
Doukalianou F, Spyroglou G, Orfanoudakis M, Radoglou K, Stefanou S, Kitikidou K, Milios E, Lagomarsino A (2022) Effects of forest thinning on soil litter input nutrients in relation to soil CO2, CH4, and N2O fluxes in Greece. Atmosphere 13:376. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13030376
FAO 2011 State of the World’s Forests. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. ISBN 978–92–5–106750–5
Fischer M, Bossdorf O, Gockel S, Hänsel F, Hemp A, Hessenmöller D, Korte G, Nieschulze J, Pfeiffer S, Prati D, Renner S, Schöning I, Schumacher U, Wells K, Buscot F, Kalko EKV, Linsenmair KE, Schulze ED, Weisser WW (2010) Implementing large-scale and long-term functional biodiversity research: the biodiversity exploratories. Bas Appl Ecol 11:473–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2010.07.009
Forrester DI, Bauhus J (2016) A review of processes behind diversity - productivity relationships in forests. Curr For Rep 2:45–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-016-0031-2
Forrester DI, Pares A, O’Hara C, Khanna PK, Bauhus J (2013) Soil organic carbon is increased in mixed-species plantations of Eucalyptus and nitrogen-fixing Acacia. Ecosystems 16:123–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-012-9600-9
Grigal DF (2000) Effects of extensive forest management on soil productivity. For Ecol Manage 138:167–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00395-9
Hansen K, Vesterdal L, Schmidt IK, Gundersen P, Sevel L, Bastrup-Birk A, Pedersen LB, Bille-Hansen J (2009) Litterfall and nutrient return in five tree species in a common garden experiment. For Ecol Manage 257:2133–2144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.02.021
Hättenschwiler S, Tiunov AV, Scheu S (2005) Biodiversity and litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:191–218. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.112904.151932
Inagaki Y, Miura S, Kohzu A (2004) Effects of forest type and stand age on litterfall quality and soil N dynamics in Shikoku district, southern Japan. For Ecol Manage 202:107–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.07.029
IUSS Working Group WRB (2022) World Reference Base for Soil Resources. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. 4th edition. International Union of Soil Sciences (IUSS), Vienna, Austria
Joly F-X, Milcu A, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Jean L-K, Bussotti F, Dawud SM, Müller S, Pollastrini M, Raulund-Rasmussen K, Vesterdal L, Hättenschwiler S (2017) Tree species diversity affects decomposition through modified micro-environmental conditions across European forests. New Phytol 214:1281–1293. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14452
Joly F-X, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Hättenschwiler S (2023) Resolving the intricate role of climate in litter decomposition. Nat Ecol Evol 7:214–223. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01948-z
Kahl T, Bauhus J (2014) An index of forest management intensity based on assessment of harvested tree volume, tree species composition and dead wood origin. Nat Conserv 7:15–27. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.7.7281
Karanika ED, Alifragis DA, Mamolos AP, Veresoglou DS (2007) Differentiation between responses of primary productivity and phosphorus exploitation to species richness. Plant Soil 297:69–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9320-7
Kleinebecker T, Hölzel N, Prati D, Schmitt B, Fischer M, Klaus VH (2014) Evidence from the real world: 15N natural abundances reveal enhanced nitrogen use at high plant diversity in Central European grasslands. J Ecol 102:456–465. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12202
Krishna MP, Mohan M (2017) Litter decomposition in forest ecosystems: a review. Energy Ecol Environ 2:236–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40974-017-0064-9
Kunhamu TK, Kumar BM, Viswanath S (2009) Does thinning affect litterfall, litter decomposition, and associated nutrient release in Acacia mangium stands of Kerala in peninsular India? Can J for Res 39:792–801. https://doi.org/10.1139/X09-008
LeBauer DS, Treseder KK (2008) Nitrogen limitation of net primary productivity in terrestrial ecosystems is globally distributed. Ecology 89:379–379. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-2057.1
Marshall VG (2000) Impacts of forest harvesting on biological processes in northern forest soils. For Ecol Manage 133:43–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00297-2
Mayer M, Prescott CE, Abaker WEA, Augusto L, Cécillon L, Ferreira GWD, James J, Jandl R, Katzensteiner K, Laclau J-P, Laganière J, Nouvellon Y, Paré D, Stanturf JA, Vanguelova EI, Vesterdal L (2020) Tamm review: influence of forest management activities on soil organic carbon stocks: a knowledge synthesis. For Ecol Manage 466:118127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118127
McGrath MJ, Luyssaert S, Meyfroidt P, Kaplan JO, Bürgi M, Chen Y, Erb K, Gimmi U, McInerney D, Naudts K, Otto J, Pasztor F, Ryder J, Schelhaas M-J, Valade A (2015) Reconstructing European forest management from 1600 to 2010. Biogeosciences 12:4291–4316. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-4291-2015
Milcu A, Roscher C, Gessler A, Bachmann D, Gockele A, Guderle M, Landais D, Piel C, Escape C, Devidal S, Ravel O, Buchmann N, Gleixner G, Hildebrandt A, Roy J (2014) Functional diversity of leaf nitrogen concentrations drives grassland carbon fluxes. Ecol Lett 17:435–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12243
Neumann M, Ukonmaanaho L, Johnson J, Benham S, Vesterdal L, Novotný R, Verstraeten A, Lundin L, Thimonier A, Michopoulos P, Hasenauer H (2018) Quantifying carbon and nutrient input from litterfall in European forests using field observations and modeling. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 32:784–798. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017GB005825
Oelmann Y, Potvin C, Mark T, Werther L, Tapernon S, Wilcke W (2010) Tree mixture effects on aboveground nutrient pools of trees in an experimental plantation in Panama. Plant Soil 326:199–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-9997-x
Oelmann Y, Richter AK, Roscher C, Rosenkranz S, Temperton VM, Weisser WW, Wilcke W (2011) Does plant diversity influence phosphorus cycling in experimental grasslands? Geoderma 167–168:178–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.09.012
Oelmann Y, Leimer S, Aburto F, Alt F, Berner D, Boch S, Boeddinghaus RS, Buscot F, Dassen S, De Deyn G, Eisenhauer N, Gleixner G, Hacker N, Hölzel N, Jochum M, Kandeler E, Klaus VH, Kleinebecker T, Lange M, Le Provost G, Manning P, Marhan S, Prati D, Roscher C, Schäfer D, Schöning I, Schrumpf M, Sorkau E, Wagg C, Wubet T, Wilcke W (2021) Above- and belowground biodiversity jointly tighten the P cycle in agricultural grasslands. Nat Commun 12:4431. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24714-4
Piotto D (2008) A meta-analysis comparing tree growth in monocultures and mixed plantations. For Ecol Manage 255:781–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.09.065
Potvin C, Mancilla L, Buchmann N, Monteza J, Moore T, Murphy M, Oelmann Y, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Turner B, Wilcke W, Wolf S (2011) An ecosystem approach to biodiversity effects: C pools in a tropical tree plantation. For Ecol Manage 261:1614–1624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.11.015
Prescott CE, Vesterdal L (2021) Decomposition and transformations along the continuum from litter to soil organic matter in forest soils. For Ecol Manage 498:119522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119522
R Development Core Team (2021) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
Sala OE, Chapin FS III, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sannwald E, Huennecke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, Leemans R, Lodge DM, Mooney HA, Oesterheld M, Poff NL, Sykes MT, Walker B, Walker M, Wall DH (2000) Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770–1774. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5459.1770
Scherer-Lorenzen M, Körner C, Schulze ED (2005) The functional significance of forest diversity: a synthesis. In: Scherer-Lorenzen M, Körner C, Schulze ED (Eds). Forest diversity and function. Ecol Stud 176:377–389 https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26599-6_17
Schmitz F, Polley H, Schwitzgebel F (2005) Die zweite Bundeswaldinventur - BWI2: der Inventurbericht. Bundesministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten, Bonn, Germany. https://www.openagrar.de/receive/timport_mods_00003020
Schwarz MT, Bischoff S, Blaser S, Boch S, Schmitt B, Thieme L, Fischer M, Michalzik B, Schulze E-D, Siemens J, Wilcke W (2014) More efficient aboveground nitrogen use in more diverse Central European forest canopies. For Ecol Manage 313:274–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.11.021
Schwarz MT, Bischoff S, Blaser S, Boch S, Grassein F, Klarner B, Schmitt B, Solly EF, Ammer C, Michalzik B, Schall P, Scheu S, Schöning I, Schrumpf M, Schulze E-D, Siemens J, Wilcke W (2016) Drivers of nitrogen leaching from organic layers in Central European beech forests. Plant Soil 403:343–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-2798-0
Siira-Pietikäinen A, Pietikäinen J, Fritze H, Haimi J (2001) Short-term responses of soil decomposer communities to forest management: clear felling versus alternative forest harvesting methods. Can J for Res 31:88–99. https://doi.org/10.1139/x00-148
Solly E, Schoning I, Boch S, Müller J, Socher SA, Trumbore SE, Schrumpf M (2013) Mean age of carbon in fine roots from temperate forests and grasslands with different management. Biogeosciences 10:4833–4843. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-4833-2013
Tilman D, Wedin D, Knops J (1996) Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems. Nature 379:718–720. https://doi.org/10.1038/379718a0
Vitousek PM (1982) Nutrient cycling and nutrient-use efficiency. Am Natural 119:553–572. https://doi.org/10.1086/283931
Vogt KA, Grier CC, Vogt DJ (1986) Production, turnover, and nutrient dynamics of above- and belowground detritus of world forests. Adv Ecol Res 15:303–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60122-1
Weisser W, Roscher C, Meyer ST, Ebeling A, Luo GJ, Beßler H, Barnard R, Buchmann N, Buscot F, Engels C, Fischer C, Fischer M, Gessler A, Gleixner G, Halle S, Hildebrandt A, Hillebrand H, De Kroon H, Lange M, Leimer S, Le Roux X, Milcu A, Mommer L, Niklaus P, Oelmann Y, Proulx R, Scherber C, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Scheu S, Tscharntke T, Wachendorf M, Wagg C, Weigelt A, Wilcke W, Schulze E-D, Schmid B, Eisenhauer N (2017) Biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning in a 15-year grassland experiment: patterns, mechanisms, and open questions. Bas Appl Ecol 23:1–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2017.06.002
Xu S, Eisenhauer N, Ferlian O, Zhang JL, Zhou GY, Lu XK, Liu CS, Zhang DQ (2020) Species richness promotes ecosystem carbon storage: evidence from biodiversity-ecosystem functioning experiments. Proc Roy Soc B Biol Sci 287:20202063. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.2063
Acknowledgements
We thank the managers of the three Biodiversity Exploratories, Swen Renner, Sonja Gockel, Kerstin Wiesner, and Martin Gorke for their work in maintaining the plot and project infrastructure; Simone Pfeiffer and Christiane Fischer giving support through the central office, Michael Owonibi for managing the central data base, and Eduard Linsenmair, Dominik Hessenmöller, Jens Nieschulze, Markus Fischer, Daniel Prati, François Buscot and the late Elisabeth Kalko for their role in setting up the Biodiversity Exploratories project. We thank Ralph Bolliger, Markus Fischer, Huaiying Gan, Jessica Heublein, Tiemo Kahl, Martin Kaupenjohann, Theresa Klötzing, Daniel Prati, and Susan Trumbore for contributing data for our evaluation. Moreover, we are indebted to Sebastian Bischoff, Sophie Mösch, Lisa Thieme, Martin T. Schwarz and numerous student helpers for their contributions in the field and laboratory. Field work permits were issued by the responsible state environmental offices of Baden-Württemberg, Thüringen, and Brandenburg (according to § 72 BbgNatSchG).
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. The work has been funded by the Priority Program 1374 “Infrastructure Biodiversity Exploratories” of the German Research Foundation (DFG, particularly subproject BECycles, KA139/17, MI927/2, SI1106/4, WI1601/12).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Beate Michalzik, Jan Siemens and Wolfgang Wilcke designed the study making use of the existing plot design of the Biodiversity Exploratories. Jürgen Bauhus, Beate Michalzik, Ingo Schöning, Jan Siemens, Marion Schrumpf and Wolfgang Wilcke contributed to the data collection. Vera Zimmer realized the statistical evaluation. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Wolfgang Wilcke and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors have no relevant fnancial or non-fnancial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Feike A. Dijkstra.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Wilcke, W., Zimmer, V., Bauhus, J. et al. Disentangling the effects of region, forest-management intensity and plant diversity on litterfall quantity, quality and turnover in temperate forests. Plant Soil 497, 397–412 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-023-06403-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-023-06403-x