Skip to main content
Log in

Soil drought increases the retention time of plant water in Pinus thunbergii saplings

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

Efficient fog water utilization under soil drought conditions is important for improving the water status and growth of forest trees. However, importance of fog water retention for trees during drought is yet to be completely examined. The aim of this study was to examine changes in fog water retention in different organs of Japanese black pine (Pinus thunbergii) saplings under well-watered and drought conditions.

Methods 

P. thunbergii saplings were grown under well-watered and drought conditions in a glasshouse for 19 days and exposed to 2 H-enriched water vapor under a high relative humidity (~ 95%) for 1 h in a growth chamber under a uniform light condition. The exposed trees were harvested 48 h after the fog exposure experiment and the 2 H concentration of water in current needles, old needles, current branches, old branches, roots, and soil was determined.

Results

Absorbed fog water was detected in the needles, branches, and roots 48 h after exposure to fog. The amount of water in the current needles, old needles, and current branches contributed by fog water was significantly higher in drought-stressed trees than in well-irrigated trees. Small amount of absorbed fog water was redistributed to the soil, irrespective of soil water conditions.

Conclusion

We found that larger amount of absorbed fog water was retained in drought-stressed trees than that in well-watered trees, which may improve the water status of plants under drought. Our results also suggest that hydraulic redistribution from the roots to the soil may occur irrespective of soil drought conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Y. Ishikawa at the Institute for Environmental Sciences (IES) for helping in measuring the hydrogen isotope ratio in the extracted water samples. We thank Dr. T. Tani for the internal review for the manuscript. We also thank the three anonymous reviewers for their contributions to improve the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI (Grant Number JP 17K15290 to S.I).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.I. conceived and designed the research; S.I. and H.K. performed water extraction using a cryogenic vacuum extraction system; M.N. provided data on the relationships between VWC and pF of the soil; S.I. collected and analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript; all authors have read the manuscript and commented on it.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shogo Imada.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Rafael S. Oliveira.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 3.50 MB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Imada, S., Kakiuchi, H. & Nagai, M. Soil drought increases the retention time of plant water in Pinus thunbergii saplings. Plant Soil 489, 667–679 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-023-06053-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-023-06053-z

Keywords

Navigation