Abstract
Ecosystem responses to environmental change are usually studied solely using aboveground (usually leaf) traits. However, belowground plant traits, such as fine roots and coarse belowground organs, likely play a crucial role in ecosystem response, especially under aridifcation. We conducted a literature survey on belowground plant traits along aridity gradients in temperate grasslands to propose which effect traits might be connected with abrupt vegetation changes that would occur with aridification due to environmental change. With increasing aridity, seasonal regeneration decreasingly relies on recruitment from the belowground bud bank and increasingly relies on regeneration from seeds. This leads to greater inter-annual variability in biomass production. Other belowground traits, such as bud bearing organs and fine root distribution in the soil, also shifts along the aridity gradient. As aridifcation begins, we propose that plants would become more conservative in their belowground traits producing lower amounts of belowground litter. Increasing aridifcation would lead to the loss of rhizomatous plants from the community and a prevalence of deep rooting plants leading to changes in soil resource utilization and increasing susceptibility to soil erosion. Under extreme aridification, perennial plants, except those with bulbs, would be lost from the community and replaced by annuals which produce low amounts of litter and use only ephemeral water resources in the upper soil layers. Belowground plant traits, such as belowground clonal growth organs, bud banks, and fine root distributions, may provide a more mechanistic understanding behind shifts in ecosystem functioning due to environmental change.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Plant traits are characteristics that affect not only plant fitness (Violle et al. 2007) but they may also affect ecosystem functions (response versus effect traits; Lavorel and Garnier 2002). For example, thin, nitrogen-rich leaves photosynthesize effectively and are favorable for a plant growing in a surplus of water and nutrients. At the same time, thin nitrogen-rich leaves are short-lived and easily decompose, thereby speeding up nutrient cycles in an ecosystem (Lavorel and Garnier 2002). While aboveground traits (e.g. leaf traits) are extensively studied, our understanding of belowground plant traits, such as those of roots, rhizomes, tubers or bulbs, lags behind (Freschet and Roumet 2017). Therefore we still have limited knowledge not only about the response of traits on belowground organs to environmental gradients (e.g., Klimešová et al. 2016; Weemstra et al. 2021) but especially about their possible effect on ecosystem properties and services (Jackson et al. 2000; Cornelissen et al. 2014).
Belowground plant parts encompass fine roots and also bud-bearing and storage organs such as coarse roots, rhizomes, bulbs and tubers. These organs provide plants with key functions concerning their response to the environment such as acquiring water and nutrients, storing carbohydrates for growth and regeneration, enabling clonal multiplication and lateral spread, and providing belowground connections between fine roots and aboveground parts as well as between neighboring ramets (Klimešová et al. 2018a). The same organs and their traits affect ecosystem functions. The horizontal growth of rhizomes versus the vertical growth of coarse roots determines the distribution of fine roots in the soil and subsequently the system’s resistance to soil erosion (Yu et al. 2008; Vannoppen et al. 2017) and the portion of the soil profile that is accessible for nutrient and water uptake (Bayala and Prieto 2020; Querejeta et al. 2021; Klimešová and Herben 2023). The connection of individual shoots into clones by the rhizome system allows homogenization of the environment by redistribution of resources and signals (Stuefer et al. 1996). Rhizodeposition and root and rhizome litter affect microbial communities and nutrient cycling (Kaštovská et al. 2015).
Our current understanding of how belowground plant traits affect ecosystem functions is based mainly on case studies examining individual species or processes and a systematic exploration at the ecosystem level is missing. Nevertheless, we think that increased consideration of belowground plant organ traits would improve our mechanistic understanding of changes in ecosystem functions due to land use or global change. To outline a framework for systematic exploration of effect traits of belowground plant organs, we present an example focusing on aridification in temperate grasslands. Due to aridification resulting from climate change, dryland ecosystems worldwide are experiencing abrupt changes in function leading to loss of biodiversity, reduction of primary productivity, and soil degradation (Berdugo et al. 2020). Recently, the possible mechanisms behind the collapse of dryland ecosystem functions along an aridity gradient were proposed by Berdugo et al. (2022) and focused on soil biology, rooting depth and aboveground plant characteristics, such as spatial distribution of vegetation, leaf traits, and aboveground productivity (Fig. 1). As the cited work aspires to be a basis for developing future research and monitoring strategies as aridification intensifies, we see an opportunity to incorporate belowground plant parts and their functions into the conceptual model to fully understand the mechanisms driving abrupt changes along aridity gradients and provide more robust hypotheses for testing mechanisms underlying aridity thresholds.
First, we aim to review available literature about belowground plant traits along aridity gradients that align with the three parameters of biotic processes mentioned by Berdugo et al. (2022): decreasing biomass production, loss of perennial plants and the dominance of annuals, and changing root structure and decrease in leaf nitrogen content. Then, we will propose how traits of belowground organs may be indicative of aridification in each of three aridity thresholds by Berdugo et al. (2022): Vegetation decline phase, Soil disruption phase, and Systemic breakdown phase.
Biotic processes along an aridity gradient
Decreasing biomass production
Grasslands represent a majority of global drylands where herbs dominate (Maestre et al. 2021). Herbaceous plants maintain the pool of dormant meristems and carbohydrate storage enabling regrowth after an unfavorable season or following a disturbance. In such herb-dominated systems, the pool of dormant meristems (bud bank sensu Harper 1977) is mainly located very close to the soil surface or belowground where it is protected by litter, snow, or soil and remains out of reach of most ecosystem disturbances, such as grazing and fire (Clarke et al. 2013; Ott et al. 2019; Lubbe et al. 2021). The bud bank provides populations with a long-term buffer to environmental intra- and inter-annual climatic perturbations and ensures steady biomass production thanks to an established root system accompanied by carbohydrate storage and lower dependence on environmental triggering factors than germination from the seed bank (Ott and Hartnett 2012; Ott et al. 2019). With decreasing precipitation across herbaceous ecosystems, biomass production decreases while year-to-year variability increases (Knapp and Smith 2001; Berdugo et al. 2020). This was proposed to result in more vegetation cover and a larger pool of reserve meristems along the wetter portion of the gradient occupied by grasslands in contrast to deserts at the dry end of the gradient (Knapp and Smith 2001). The biomass of a herbaceous community and its variability over years is therfore expected to be closely related to the density of bud bank.
The hypothesis that bud bank density in grasslands decreases with aridity was tested in large grassland systems on two continents by looking at bud bank density along mesic to arid grassland gradients in North American Prairie and Inner Mongolian Steppe (Dalgleish and Hartnett 2006; Qian et al. 2017). The studied gradients spanned aridity from an Aridity Index (AI) of 0.36 to 0.91 and crossed all 3 AI thresholds (0.54, 0.70, and 0.80) recognized by Berdugo et al. (2020, 2022). On both North American and Asian continents, bud density ranged from hundreds to thousands per square meter (Fig. 2). The North American bud densities sharply declined after Berdugo et al.’s first proposed threshold (Fig. 2A), while the Inner Mongolian bud densities sharply declined after the second proposed threshold (Fig. 2B). Differences between continents could be due to differences in species composition and/or grazing pressure (higher in Inner Mongolia). Bud bank and bud bearing organs filled with carbohydrates might be considered as important characteristics enabling resistance of dryland community to perturbations and ensuring steady biomass production.
The composition of bud-bearing belowground organs also differed along an aridity gradient (studied only by Qian et al. 2017 in Inner Mongolia) (Fig. 2C). The majority of buds were located on grass tiller bases in tussock grasses along the whole gradient. Grass rhizome buds and dicot buds were absent above the third aridity threshold, while bulbs dominated the most arid sites (Fig. 1C). Bud protection by the grass stem leaf sheaths at the base of the tiller and by storage leaves in bulbous species becomes more important with increasing aridity as both growth forms occurred at the highest aridity sites where annual plants prevailed. The absence of rhizomes at the most arid sites was likely caused by a lack of resources and coarse soil limiting rhizome growth. This supports Berdugo’s view of systemic breakdown as rhizomes are critical for preventing soil erosion (Yu et al. 2008).
Loss of perennial plants, dominance of annuals
The bud bank is typical for perennial herbs in temperate grasslands and is the source of the majority of aboveground shoots rather than the seed bank (Benson and Hartnett 2006; Vítová et al. 2017). Vegetative regeneration from the bud bank prevails over generative regeneration from the seed bank in grasslands because, under competition with neighboring vegetation, it is easier to rebuild an individual supported by a bud-bearing organ with storage carbohydrates and an established root system rather than establish a new individuum from a small seed. Nevertheless, with increasing aridity, the bud bank is decreasing in density and perennial plants that are not able to support their bud-bearing organs anymore are replaced by annuals relying on a seed bank and generative regeneration (Qian et al. 2017). Regrowth from the seed bank, however, is much more dependent on triggering factors for germination than regrowth from the bud bank. If the signals do not occur, germination is poor and biomass production is low.
Typical disturbances of arid grasslands are fire and grazing – both disturbance types support germination from the seed bank by creating gaps in the vegetation (Benson et al. 2004). Overgrazing could initially increase bud banks at intermediate aridities as plants may mitigate the dual stressors by increasing bud production. At higher aridities, overgazing could accelerate grassland degradation by causing shifts from perennial grasses to annual species (Jiang et al. 2006). The dramatic shift in belowground bud bank densities observed at AI = 0.70 in Inner Mongolia (Fig. 2B) could demonstrate how the interaction of aridity and overgrazing creates an abrupt systemic breakdown. Low productivity, low plant cover in the growing season and bare soil in winter are responsible for wind erosion vulnerability in the most arid sites.
Changing root structure and decrease in leaf nitrogen content
Decreasing productivity and lower leaf nitrogen content along the aridity gradient results in decreasing input of litter quantity and quality into the soil (Berdugo et al. 2022). The decline in litter quality is due to the more conservative growth of plants in arid conditions as plants invest into long-lived plant organs and reutilize nutrients when those organs senesce rather than investing in short-lived organs. This strategy is not limited to leaves but also to belowground organs, e.g. roots and rhizomes, which also contribute to litter inputs following their death. As conservation of acquired resources becomes the dominant strategy with increasing aridity, short-lived belowground structures are lost from the community. This mainly concerns rhizomatous plants that produce new rhizome increments with new roots each year and, at the same time, lose old increments bearing old roots (Klimešová and Herben 2022). This type of growth is connected with the relatively shallow rooting of rhizomatous plants (Klimešová and Herben 2023), which is also not an advantageous plant trait under increasing drought. First, with increasing aridity, only rhizomatous plants with persistent and slowly growing rhizomes prevail (Jónsdóttir and Watson 1997; Klimeš 2008), later majority of rhizomatous plants are lost from the community (Qian et al. 2017). When a community loses its rhizomatous plants, it is losing a growth form that typically occupies a large horizontal spatial extent and shares resources within its clones promoting community homogeneity (Klimešová et al. 2018b).
Aridity thresholds in grasslands
On the base of available literature reviewed in the previous section, we can outline which belowground traits are indicative of the aridity gradient and may be used for understanding the mechanism behind aridification or for monitoring.
The vegetation decline phase
In this phase (Tables 1 and 2; Fig. 1), we see an increase in the proportion of long-lived bud-bearing organs and an associated increase in bud number and bud longevity (Fig. 2B). Increased belowground bud and organ longevity leads to a decreased input of belowground litter into the soil. Belowground plant traits shift (e.g., more long-lived plant parts with lower lateral spread) and parallel the change in aboveground plant traits (e.g., increasing leaf dry matter content, decreasing leaf nitrogen content) to more conservative strategies (Berdugo et al. 2022). Fine roots are still abundant.
The soil disruption phase
The soil disruption phase (Tables 1 and 2; Fig. 1) is connected with a loss of rhizomatous species and their substitution by short-lived plants (bulbous perennials and annuals) and by perennials with deep root systems. Loss of rhizomatous species causes a decline in water and nutrient redistribution across the community via the rhizome network and also increases vulnerability to soil erosion. A change toward deep rooting plants and shrubs with an integrated modular hydraulic system also occurs at this stage (Schenk et al. 2008). The transition from rhizomatous to non-rhizomatous vegetation also leads to a further decline in root and rhizome litter input into the soil which contributes to altered soil nutrient cycling. Decreasing amounts of fine roots would lead to a reduction of root surface area that is important in maintaining belowground mycorrhizal associations. This is a key shift in soil disruption (Berdugo et al. 2022), and further makes the soil prone to erosion as mycorrhizal fungi are soil stabilizers (Bearden and Petersen 2000). An alternative steady state may be annual vegetation in a case of overgrazing and loss of perennial plants.
The systemic breakdown phase
This phase (Tables 1 and 2; Fig. 1) is characterized by further reduction of the belowground bud bank and bud-bearing organs, leaving only those with well-protected buds (bulbs) capable of prolonged dormancy while utilizing temporary surface water. The dominant vegetation becomes annual plants that depend on unpredictable conditions for germination. Their biomass production, therefore, highly varies from year to year. Loss of perennial plants results in overall unprotected soil that may be easily eroded by wind or rare heavy rainfall events (Li et al. 2005; Su et al. 2005; Xu et al. 2021). Sparse plant cover also further reduces litter inputs from above and belowground plant organs. Litter of annuals and bulbs may more easily decompose than the litter of perennials due to their shorter lifespan. However, water scarcity would prohibit effective utilization of the litter in nutrient cycling in the system. An alternative steady state might be a dominance of shrubs with deep rooting.
Conclusion
Belowground plant organs are of immense importance for plants in arid environments. Consideration of them along with aboveground plant parts substantially contributes to a mechanistic understanding of vegetation processes under land use or climate change.
Data availability
The study is based on published papers.
References
Bartušková A, Lubbe FC, Qian J, Herben T, Klimešová J (2022) The effect of moisture, nutrients, and disturbance on storage organ size and persistence in temperate herbs. Funct Ecol 36:314–325
Bayala J, Prieto I (2020) Water acquisition, sharing and redistribution by roots: applications to agroforestry systems. Plant Soil 453:17–28
Bearden BN, Petersen L (2000) Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on soil structure and aggregate stability of a vertisol. Plant Soil 218:173–183
Benson E, Hartnett DC (2006) The role of seed and vegetative reproduction in plant recruitment and demography in tallgrass prairie. Plant Ecol 187:163–177
Benson E, Hartnett DC, Mann KH (2004) Belowground bud banks and meristem limitation in tallgrass prairie plant populations. Am J Bot 91:416–421
Berdugo M, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Soliveres S, Hernández-Clemente R, Zhao Y, Gaitán JJ, Gross N, Saiz H, Maire V, Lehmann A, Rillig MC, Solé RV, Maestre FT (2020) Global ecosystem thresholds driven by aridity. Science 367:787–790
Berdugo M, Vidiella B, Solé RV, Maestre FT (2022) Ecological mechanisms underlying aridity thresholds in global drylands. Funct Ecol 36:4–23
Clarke PJ, Lawes MJ, Midgley JJ et al (2013) Resprouting as a key functional trait: how buds, protection and resources drive persistence after fire. New Phytol 197:19–35
Cornelissen JHC, Song YB, Yu FH, Dong M (2014) Plant traits and ecosystem effects of clonality: a new research agenda. Ann Bot 114:369–376
Dalgleish HJ, Hartnett DC (2006) Below-ground bud banks increase along a precipitation gradient of the north American Great Plains: a test of the meristem limitation hypothesis. New Phytol 171:81–89
Dong M, Alaten B (1999) Clonal plasticity in response to rhizome severing and heterogeneous resource supply in the rhizomatous grass Psammochloa villosa in an inner Mongolian dune, China. Plant Ecol 141:53–58
Freschet GT, Roumet C (2017) Sampling roots to capture plant and soil functions. Funct Ecol 31:1506–1518
Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants. Academic Press, London
Herben T, Klimešová J (2020) Evolution of clonal growth forms in angiosperms. New Phytol 225:999–1010
Jackson RB, Schenk HJ, Jobbágy EG, Canadell J, Colello GD, Dickinson RE, Field CB, Friedlingstein P, Heimann M, Hibbard K, Kicklighter DW, Kleidon A, Neilson RP, Parton WJ, Sala OE, Sykes MT (2000) Belowground consequences of vegetation change and their treatment in models. Ecol Monogr 10:470–483
Janeček Š, Kantorová J, Bartoš M, Klimešová J (2008) Integration in the clonal plant Eriophorum angustifolium: an experiment with a three-member-clonal system in a patchy environment. Evol Ecol 22:325–336
Jiang G, Han X, Wu J (2006) Restoration and management of the Inner Mongolia grassland require a sustainable strategy. AMBIO 35:269–270. https://doi.org/10.1579/06-S-158.1
Jónsdóttir IS, Watson MA (1997) Extensive physiological integration: an adaptive trait in resource-poor environments? In: de Kroon H, van Groenendael J (eds) The ecology and evolution of clonal plants. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp 109–136
Kaštovská E, Edwards K, Picek T, Šantrůčková H (2015) A larger investment into exudation by competitive versus conservative plants is connected to more coupled plant–microbe N cycling. Biogeochemistry 122:47–59
Klimeš L (2008) Clonal splitters and integrators in harsh environments of the trans-Himalaya. Evol Ecol 22:351–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-007-9195-3
Klimešová J, Herben T (2023) The hidden half of the fine root differentiation in herbs: nonacquisitive belowground organs determine fine-root traits. Oikos e08794. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.08794
Klimešová J, Tackenberg O, Herben T (2016) Herbs are different: clonal and bud bank traits can matter more than leaf–height–seed traits. New Phytol 210:13–17
Klimešová J, Danihelka J, Chrtek J, de Bello F, Herben T (2017) CLO-PLA: a database of clonal and bud-bank traits of the central European flora. Ecology 98:1179
Klimešová J, Martínková J, Herben T (2018a) Horizontal growth: an overlooked dimension in plant trait space. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 32:18–21
Klimešová J, Martínková J, Ottaviani G (2018b) Belowground plant functional ecology: towards an integrated perspective. Funct Ecol 32:2115–2126
Knapp AK, Smith MD (2001) Variation among biomes in temporal dynamics of aboveground primary production. Science 291:481–484
Lavorel S, Garnier E (2002) Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the holy grail. Funct Ecol 16:545–556
Li F-R, Kang L-F, Zhang H, Zhao L-Y, Shirato Y, Taniyama I (2005) Changes in intensity of wind erosion at different stages of degradation development in grasslands of Inner Mongolia, China. J Arid Environ 62:567–585
Lubbe FC, Klimešová J, Henry HAL (2021) Winter belowground: changing winters and the perennating organs of herbaceous plants. Functional Ecology 35:1627–1639
Maestre FT, Benito BM, Berdugo M, Concostrina-Zubiri L, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Eldridge DJ, Guirado E, Gross N, Kéfi S, Le Bagousse-Pinguet Y, Ochoa-Hueso R, Soliveres S (2021) Biogeography of global drylands. New Phytol 231:540–558
Mudrák O, Doležal J, Hájek M, Dančák M, Klimeš L, Klimešová J (2012) Plant seedlings in a species-rich meadow: effect of management, vegetation type and functional traits. Appl Veg Sci 16:286–295
Ott JP, Hartnett DC (2012) Contrasting bud bank dynamics of two co-occurring grasses in tallgrass prairie: implications for grassland dynamics. Plant Ecol 213:1437–1448
Ott JP, Klimešová J, Hartnett DC (2019) The ecology and significance of below-ground bud banks in plants. Ann Bot 123:1099–1118
Prieto I, Ryel RJ (2014) Internal hydraulic redistribution prevents the loss of root conductivity during drought. Tree Physiol 34:39–48
Qian J, Wang Z, Klimešová J, Lü X, Kuang W, Liu Z, Han X (2017) Differences in below-ground bud bank density and composition along a climatic gradient in the temperate steppe of northern China. Ann Bot 120:755–764
Qian J, Guo Z, Muraina TO, Te N, Griffin-Nolan RJ, Song L, Xu C, Yu Q, Zhang Z, Luo W (2022) Legacy effects of a multi-year extreme drought on belowground bud banks in rhizomatous vs bunchgrass-dominated grasslands. Oecologia 198:763–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-022-05133-8
Querejeta JI, Ren W, Prieto I (2021) Vertical decoupling of soil nutrients and water under climate warming reduces plant cumulative nutrient uptake, water-use efficiency and productivity. New Phytol 2021(230):1378–1393
Schenk HJ, Jackson RB (2005) Mapping the global distribution of deep roots in relation to climate and soil characteristics. Geoderma 126:129–140
Schenk HJ, Espino S, Goedhart CM, Nordenstahl M, Martinez Cabrera HI, Jones CS (2008) Hydraulic integration and shrub growth form linked across continental aridity gradients. PNAS 105:11248–11253
Stuefer JF, de Kroon H, During HJ (1996) Exploitation of environmental hetergeneity by spatial division of labor in a clonal plant. Funct Ecol 10:328–334
Su Y-Z, Li Y-L, Cui J-Y, Zhao W-Z (2005) Influences of continuous grazing and livestock exclusion on soil properties in a degraded sandy grassland, Inner Mongolia, northern China. Catena 59:267–278
University of Montana Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group (2015) World Evapotransipiration. https://landscape6.arcgis.com/arcgis/rest/services/World_Evapotranspiration/ImageServer Accessed 4 March 2022
Vannoppen W, De Baets S, Keeble J, Dong Y, Poesen J (2017) How do root and soil characteristics affect the erosion-reducing potential of plant species? Ecol Eng 109:186–195
Violle C, Navas M-L, Vile D, Kazakou E, Fortunel C, Hummel I, Garnier E (2007) Let the concept of trait be functional! Oikos 116:882–892
Vítová A, Macek P, Lepš J (2017) Disentangling the interplay of generative and vegetative propagation among different functional groups during gap colonization in meadows. Funct Ecol 31:458–468
Weaver JE (1919) The ecological relations of roots. Press of Gibson Brother
Weemstra M, Freschet GT, Stokes A, Roumet C (2021) Patterns in intraspecific variation in root traits are species-specific along an elevation gradient. Funct Ecol 35:342–356
Xu X, Liu H, Wang W, Hu G, Wu X, Song Z (2021) Effects of manipulated precipitation on aboveground net primary productivity of grassland fields: controlled rainfall experiments in Inner Mongolia, China. Land Degrad Dev 32:1981–1992
Ye XH, Zhang YL, Liu ZL, Gao SQ, Song YB, Liu FH, Dong M (2016) Plant clonal integration mediates the horizontal redistribution of soil resources, benefiting neighboring plants. Front Plant Sci 7:77. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00077
Yu FH, Wang N, He WM, Chu Y, Dong M (2008) Adaptation of rhizome connections in drylands: increasing of clones to wind erosion. Ann Bot 102:571–577. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcnll9
Acknowledgements
The study was supported by Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic Inter-Excellence project (LTAUSA18007) and Praemium Academiae awarded by the Czech Academy of Sciences to JK, and by the USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station. The findings and conclusions in this publication are those of the authors and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy.
Funding
Open access publishing supported by the National Technical Library in Prague.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
J.K. conceived the idea and led the writing of the manuscript. All authors contributed critically to the drafts and gave final approval for publication.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Financial interests
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Wen-Hao Zhang.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Klimešová, J., Martínková, J., Bartušková, A. et al. Belowground plant traits and their ecosystem functions along aridity gradients in grasslands. Plant Soil 487, 39–48 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-023-05964-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-023-05964-1