Abstract
Background and aims
Plants continuously interact with soil microbiota. These plant-soil feedbacks (PSFs) are considered a driving force in plant community dynamics. However, most PSF information comes from inter-family studies, with limited information on possible causes. We studied the variation of PSFs between and within grass species and identified the soil microbes that are associated with the observed PSFs effects.
Methods
We grew monocultures of ten cultivars of three grass species (Lolium perenne, Poa pratensis, Schedonorus arundinaceus) using a two-phase PSF experiment. We measured plant total biomass to determine PSFs between and within species and correlated it with sequenced rhizosphere bacteria and fungi.
Results
In the soil conditioning phase, grass species developed microbial legacies that affected the performance of other grass species in the feedback phase. We detected overall negative interspecific PSFs. While we show that L. perenne and P. pratensis increased their performance respectively in conspecific and heterospecific soils, S. arundinaceus was not strongly affected by the legacies of the previous plant species. Contrary to our expectation, we found no evidence for intraspecific variation in PSFs. Bacterial taxa associated with PSFs included members of Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Verrucomicrobia and Planctomycetes whereas fungal taxa included members of Ascomycota.
Conclusion
Our results suggest differences in PSF effects between grass species, but not between cultivars within species. Thus, in the studied grass species, there might be limited potential for breeding on plant traits mediated by PSFs. Furthermore, we point out potential microbial candidates that might be driving the observed PSF effects that could be further explored.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The raw sequencing data generated in this work can be accessed through the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) under project PRJEB59473. Plant biomass data are deposited into Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7575226).
References
Abarenkov K, Henrik Nilsson R, Larsson K-H, Alexander IJ, Eberhardt U, Erland S, Høiland K et al (2010) The Unite database for molecular identification of fungi – recent updates and future perspectives. New Phytol 186(2):281–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03160.x
Aguilera Anna G, Colón-Carmona Adán, Kesseli Rick, Dukes Jeffrey S (2011) No accession-specific effect of rhizosphere soil communities on the growth and competition of Arabidopsis Thaliana accessions. Edited by Mari Moora. PLoS ONE 6(11):e27585. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027585
Allen WJ, Meyerson LA, Flick AJ, Cronin JT (2017) Intraspecific variation in indirect plant-soil feedbacks as a driver of a wetland plant invasion. Preprint. Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1101/160523
Allen WJ, Meyerson LA, Flick AJ, Cronin JT (2018) Intraspecific variation in indirect plant-soil feedbacks influences a wetland plant invasion. Ecology 99(6):1430–1440. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.2344
Allen WJ, DeVries AE, Bologna NJ, Bickford WA, Kowalski KP, Meyerson LA, Cronin JT (2020) Intraspecific and biogeographical variation in foliar fungal communities and pathogen damage of native and invasive Phragmites Australis. Edited by Angela Moles. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 29(7):1199–1211. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13097
Antoun H, Beauchamp CJ, Goussard N, Chabot R, Lalande R (1998) Potential of Rhizobium and Bradyrhizobium species as plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria on non-legumes: effect on radishes (Raphanus Sativus L.). In: G Hardarson, WJ Broughton (Eds) Molecular microbial ecology of the soil. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2321-3_5
Apprill A, McNally S, Parsons R, Weber L (2015) Minor Revision to V4 region SSU RRNA 806R gene primer greatly increases detection of SAR11 Bacterioplankton. Aquat Microb Ecol 75(2):129–137. https://doi.org/10.3354/ame01753
Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using Lme4. J Stat Softw 67(1). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc S B Methodol 57(1):289–300
Bever JD, Westover KM, Antonovics J (1997) Incorporating the soil community into plant population dynamics: the utility of the feedback approach. J Ecol 85(5):561. https://doi.org/10.2307/2960528
Bolnick DI, Amarasekare P, Araújo MS, Bürger R, Levine JM, Novak M, Rudolf VHW, Schreiber SJ, Urban MC, Vasseur DA (2011) Why intraspecific trait variation matters in community ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 26(4):183–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.01.009
Bukowski AR, Petermann JS (2014) Intraspecific plant-soil feedback and intraspecific overyielding in A Rabidopsis Thaliana. Ecol Evol 4(12):2533–2545. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1077
Callahan, Benjamin J, Paul J McMurdie, Michael J Rosen, Andrew W Han, Amy Jo A Johnson, and Susan P Holmes. 2016. “DADA2: High-Resolution Sample Inference from Illumina Amplicon Data.” Nature Methods 13 (7): 581–83. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3869.
Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Huntley J, Fierer N, Owens SM et al (2012) Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J 6(8):1621–1624. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2012.8
Cavagnaro TR (2016) Soil moisture legacy effects: impacts on soil nutrients, plants and mycorrhizal responsiveness. Soil Biol Biochem 95(April):173–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.12.016
Chabot R, Antoun H, Kloepper JW, Beauchamp CJ (1996) Root colonization of maize and lettuce by bioluminescent rhizobium Leguminosarum Biovar Phaseoli. Appl Environ Microbiol 62(8):2767–2772. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.62.8.2767-2772.1996
Cong W-F, van Ruijven J, van der Werf W, De Deyn GB, Mommer L, Berendse F, Hoffland E (2015) Plant species richness leaves a legacy of enhanced root litter-induced decomposition in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 80(January):341–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.10.017
Cortois R, Deyn GBD (2012) The curse of the black box. Plant Soil 350(1–2):27–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-011-0963-z
Cortois R, Schröder-Georgi T, Weigelt A, Putten WH, De Deyn GB (2016) Plant-soil feedbacks: role of plant functional group and plant traits. Edited by Marcel Heijden. J Ecol 104(6):1608–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12643
De Deyn GB, Quirk H, Bardgett RD (2011) Plant species richness, identity and productivity differentially influence key groups of microbes in grassland soils of contrasting fertility. Biol Lett 7(1):75–78. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2010.0575
De Long JR, Heinen R, Jongen R, Emilia Hannula S, Huberty M, Kielak AM, Steinauer K, Martijn Bezemer T (2021) How plant-soil feedbacks influence the next generation of plants. Ecol Res 36(1):32–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1703.12165
der Putten V, Wim H, Peters BAM (1997) How soil-borne pathogens may affect plant competition. Ecology 78(6):1785–1795. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1785:HSBPMA]2.0.CO;2
Ehrenfeld JG, Ravit B, Elgersma K (2005) Feedback in the plant-soil system. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30(1):75–115. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144212
Fraser LH, Grime JP (1998) Top-down control and its effect on the biomass and composition of three grasses at high and low soil fertility in outdoor microcosms. Oecologia 113(2):239–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050374
Gloor GB, Macklaim JM, Pawlowsky-Glahn V, Egozcue JJ (2017) Microbiome datasets are compositional: and this is not optional. Front Microbiol 8(November):2224. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.02224
Gweon HS, Oliver A, Taylor J, Booth T, Gibbs M, Read DS, Griffiths RI, Schonrogge K (2015) PIPITS : an automated pipeline for analyses of fungal internal transcribed spacer sequences from the I Llumina sequencing platform. Edited by Michael Bunce. Methods Ecol Evol 6(8):973–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12399
Hannula SE, Morriën E, de Hollander M, van der Putten WH, van Veen JA, de Boer W (2017) Shifts in rhizosphere fungal community during secondary succession following abandonment from agriculture. ISME J 11(10):2294–2304. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2017.90
Hannula SE, Heinen R, Huberty M, Steinauer K, De Long JR, Jongen R, Martijn Bezemer T (2021) Persistence of plant-mediated microbial soil legacy effects in soil and inside roots. Nat Commun 12(1):5686. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25971-z
Heinen R, van der Sluijs M, Biere A, Harvey JA, Martijn Bezemer T (2018) Plant community composition but not plant traits determine the outcome of soil legacy effects on plants and insects. Edited by Franciska de Vries. J Ecol 106(3):1217–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12907
Heinen R, Hannula SE, De Long JR, Huberty M, Jongen R, Kielak A, Steinauer K, Zhu F, Martijn Bezemer T (2020) Plant community composition steers Grassland vegetation via soil legacy effects. Edited by Forest Isbell. Ecol Lett 23(6):973–982. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13497
Kirchhoff L, Kirschbaum A, Joshi J, Bossdorf O, Scheepens JF, Heinze J (2019) Plant-soil feedbacks of Plantago Lanceolata in the field depend on plant origin and herbivory. Front Ecol Evol 7(November):422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00422
Klironomos JN (2002) Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities. Nature 417(6884):67–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/417067a
Kulmatiski A, Kardol P (2008) Getting plant—Soil feedbacks out of the greenhouse: experimental and conceptual approaches. In: U Lüttge, W Beyschlag, J Murata (Eds) Progress in botany, vol 69. Progress in Botany. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 449–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72954-9_18
Lau JA, Lennon JT (2011) Evolutionary ecology of plant-microbe interactions: soil microbial structure alters selection on plant traits. New Phytol 192(1):215–224. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03790.x
Maron JL, Marler M, Klironomos JN, Cleveland CC (2011) Soil fungal pathogens and the relationship between plant diversity and productivity: soil pathogens, productivity and invasibility. Ecol Lett 14(1):36–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01547.x
Maron JL, Smith AL, Ortega YK, Pearson DE, Callaway RM (2016) Negative plant-soil feedbacks increase with plant abundance, and are unchanged by competition. Ecology 97(8):2055–2063. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.1431
Metcalfe DB, Fisher RA, Wardle DA (2011) Plant communities as drivers of soil respiration: pathways, mechanisms, and significance for global change. Biogeosciences 8(8):2047–2061. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-2047-2011
Nguyen NH, Song Z, Bates ST, Branco S, Tedersoo L, Menke J, Schilling JS, Kennedy PG (2016) FUNGuild: an open annotation tool for parsing fungal community datasets by ecological guild. Fungal Ecol 20(April):241–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funeco.2015.06.006
Oksanen J, Guillaume Blanchet F, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Henry M, Stevens H, Wagner H (2013) Community ecology package. R Package Version 2(0)
Putten WH, Bradford MA, Pernilla Brinkman E, Voorde TFJ, Veen GF (2016) Where, when and how plant-soil feedback matters in a changing world. Edited by Joseph K Bailey. Funct Ecol 30(7):1109–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12657
Real LA, McElhany P (1996) Spatial pattern and process in plant-pathogen interactions. Ecology 77(4):1011–1025. https://doi.org/10.2307/2265572
Saikkonen K, Young CA, Helander M, Schardl CL (2016) Endophytic Epichloë species and their grass hosts: from evolution to applications. Plant Mol Biol 90(6):665–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-015-0399-6
Tedersoo L, Anslan S, Bahram M, Põlme S, Riit T, Liiv I, Kõljalg U et al (2015) Shotgun metagenomes and multiple primer pair-barcode combinations of amplicons reveal biases in metabarcoding analyses of fungi. MycoKeys 10(May):1–43. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.10.4852
Thakur MP, van der Putten WH, Wilschut RA, Veen GF, Kardol P, van Ruijven J, Allan E, Roscher C, van Kleunen M, MartijnBezemer T (2021) Plant–soil feedbacks and temporal dynamics of plant diversity-productivity relationships. Trends Ecol Evol 36(7):651–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2021.03.011
van der Putten WH, Bardgett RD, Bever JD, Martijn Bezemer T, Casper BB, Fukami T, Kardol P et al (2013) Plant-soil feedbacks: the past, the present and future challenges. Edited by Michael Hutchings. J Ecol 101(2):265–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12054
Verhoeven KJF, Simonsen KL, McIntyre LM (2005) Implementing false discovery rate control: increasing your power. Oikos 108(3):643–647. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13727.x
Vincenot CE, Cartenì F, Bonanomi G, Mazzoleni S, Giannino F (2017) Plant-soil negative feedback explains vegetation dynamics and patterns at multiple scales. Oikos 126(9):1319–1328. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.04149
Wagg C, Boller B, Schneider S, Widmer F, van der Heijden MGA (2015) Intraspecific and intergenerational differences in plant-soil feedbacks. Oikos 124(8):994–1004. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.01743
Zandt D, Herben T, Brink A, Visser EJW, Kroon H (2021) Species abundance fluctuations over 31 years are associated with plant-soil feedback in a species-rich mountain meadow. Edited by Paul Kardol. J Ecol 109(3):1511–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13574
Zanne AE, Abarenkov K, Afkhami ME, Aguilar-Trigueros CA, Bates S, Bhatnagar JM, Busby PE et al (2020) Fungal functional ecology: bringing a trait-based approach to plant-associated fungi. Biol Rev 95(2):409–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12570
Acknowledgements
We thank Barenbrug grass seed company research facility (Wolfheze, The Netherlands) for providing plant material and soil, and Piet Arts for discussing our approach in various stages of the work. We thank Slavica Ivanovic, Tanja Bakx, Eke Hengeveld and Renske Jongen for the assistance with the field and greenhouse work. Figure 1 had been created with BioRender.com. The sequencing was done by McGill University and Génome Québec Innovation Centre.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
P.R., K.J.F.V., J.K AND W.H.v.d.P. designed the study; P.R. and F.C.H conducted the greenhouse study and laboratory work; S.E.H. conducted the fungal annotations, P.R., S.E.H, J.K.V., J.K, and W.H.v.d.P. discussed the data analysis; P.R. lead the writing of the manuscript; all authors contributed critically to the drafts and gave final approval for publication.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Felipe E. Albornoz.
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Rallo, P., Hannula, S.E., ten Hooven, F.C. et al. Inter- and intraspecific plant-soil feedbacks of grass species. Plant Soil 486, 575–586 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-023-05893-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-023-05893-z