Abstract
Aims (main purpose and research question)
Soil properties, including microbial composition and nutrient availability, can influence the emissions of plant volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that serve as host-location cues for insect pests and their natural enemies. Agricultural practices have profound effects on soil properties, but how these influence crop VOCs remains largely unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of agricultural practices on constitutive and herbivore-induced VOC emissions by a major staple crop through soil legacy effects.
Methods
In a full factorial experiment, we measured VOC emissions by wheat (Triticum aestivum) grown in soil inoculum from wheat-fallow or wheat-cover crop rotations that was subjected to feeding by larval Cephus cinctus.
Results (main findings)
Under herbivory, plants grown in cover crop inoculum emitted greater total VOCs, including higher concentrations of 2-pentadecanone, an insect repellent, and nonanal, a compound important in the recruitment of natural enemies. Plants grown in fallow inoculum showed no differences in emissions whether under herbivory or not. Soil inoculum did not influence VOC emissions of plants in the absence of larval feeding.
Conclusions
These results suggest that agricultural practices influence crop VOC emissions through soil legacy effects. Additionally, crops grown in wheat-fallow rotations may be less successful recruiting natural enemies of pests through herbivore-induced VOC signaling.
Abbreviations
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs); herbivore-induced plant volatiles (HIPV); green leaf volatiles (GLVs); northern Great Plains (NGP); wheat stem sawfly (WSS); gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS); non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS); generalized linear mixed-effects model (GLMM).
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Plant volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have multiple ecological roles including attracting pollinators, acting as cues for foraging herbivores, and functioning as direct and indirect defense against herbivores (Dudareva et al. 2013; Heil 2014; Heil and Karban 2010; Parachnowitsch and Manson 2015). Given their central role in mediating plant-insect interactions, it is no surprise that many forms of pest management employ plant VOCs to influence the behavior of pests and their natural enemies (Pickett and Khan 2016; Shrivastava et al. 2010). For example, trap crops, or unharvested crops planted around the protected field, emit attractive VOCs that ‘intercept’ pests before they damage the cash crop (Adler and Hazzard 2009; Buteler et al. 2010; Morrill et al. 2001). Intercropping, the simultaneous cultivation of multiple plant species, can lower pest pressure by masking volatile cues necessary for pests to locate appropriate hosts (Lopes et al. 2016). Additionally, specific crop varieties are known to differ in constitutive, or always present VOC emissions, making them less attractive to pests compared to other varieties of the same crop species (Buteler and Weaver 2012; Weaver et al. 2009). Crop varieties may also vary in VOCs emitted upon herbivore attack, also known as herbivore-induced plant volatiles (HIPVs), influencing their ability to recruit natural enemies (Kappers et al. 2011; Rasmann et al. 2005). Exciting evidence suggests that pest management utilizing plant volatiles can be applied to existing farming practices through the concept of plant-soil feedbacks (Kaplan et al. 2018; Mutyambai et al. 2019).
Plant-soil feedbacks occur when plants alter soil properties, which in turn, influence subsequent plant growth and performance (Bever 1994; Kulmanski et al. 2008; Wardle et al. 2004). While plant-soil feedbacks can influence soil nutrients, chemistry, moisture, physical structure, and macrofauna, many of these feedbacks are mediated by microbes in the soil (Putten et al. 2013; Wang et al. 2019). Through their root exudates, plants recruit and inhibit different bacteria and fungi, shaping distinct microbiomes (Babin et al. 2019; Frasier et al. 2016) that ultimately influence the growth and performance of plants grown subsequently in the same soil. As such, plant-soil feedbacks are inherent features of existing agricultural practices, in particular, the use of cover crops in crop rotations (Mariotte et al. 2018; Vukicevich et al. 2016).
Unlike cash crops which are planted for harvest, cover crops are traditionally planted to manage soil erosion, fertility, and water, and to abate weeds, pests, and diseases (Fageria et al. 2005). However, cover crops may provide additional modes of pest management to the subsequent crop through their impact on the soil (Kaplan et al. 2018). Compared to fallow practices, cover crops, and the way in which they are managed, cause significant shifts in soil properties, including increased microbial abundance, activity, and diversity (Kim et al. 2020; Lupwayi et al. 1998), improved soil structure (Fageria et al. 2005), and increased nutrient availability (Blanco-Canqui et al. 2013; Fageria et al. 2005). Diversified management of cover crops, such as cover crop termination via grazing, is also likely to increase nutrient availability and soil microbe diversity through nutrient-rich manure inputs by grazers (Hartmann et al. 2015; Navarro-Noya et al. 2013). Therefore, cover crops and management practices have the potential to differentially influence the performance of the subsequent cash crop through plant-soil feedbacks, particularly when compared to traditional fallow rotations (Kaplan et al. 2018; Pineda et al. 2017).
While it has long been recognized that cover crops may decrease negative plant-soil feedbacks (i.e. ‘soil sicknesses’), recent work has focused on using cover crops to promote beneficial plant-soil feedbacks that improve the pest resistance of plants (Huang et al. 2013; Kaplan et al. 2018; Pineda et al. 2017). Specifically, cover crops may improve nutrient availability for the cash crop or increase the presence of beneficial soil microbes that can prime cash crop defense pathways (Gouinguené and Turlings 2002; Sharifi et al. 2018). Indeed, such beneficial effects have been demonstrated in various agricultural systems. For example, organically managed soils (Blundell et al. 2020) and the use of mycorrhizal-associated cover crops (Murrell et al. 2019) have been shown to reduce plant attractiveness to pests through increased foliar chemical defense. While these and other studies demonstrate that agricultural soils can influence plant-insect interactions through changes to foliar chemistry (Carrillo et al. 2019; Ingerslew and Kaplan 2018), how they may alter constitutive and herbivore-induced VOC emissions is largely unknown.
Here, we evaluate how soil legacy effects, driven by plant-soil feedbacks and management practices in contrasting agricultural practices, alter constitutive and herbivore-induced VOC emissions by wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), a major crop of the northern Great Plains (NGP; Fig. 1). Wheat grown in the NGP faces intense pest pressure from the wheat stem sawfly (WSS; Cephus cinctus Norton), a stem-mining pest that causes $350 million dollars of lost revenue annually in North America (Beres et al. 2011). Females use volatile cues to locate appropriate plant hosts where they oviposit eggs into the stems of wheat and other grasses (Buteler and Weaver 2012; Piesik et al. 2008; Weaver et al. 2009). Upon hatching, the developing larvae mine and feed upon the parenchyma of the stem throughout the growing season, which impairs photosynthesis and movement of assimilate to the developing seed head (Delaney et al. 2010; Macedo et al. 2007). Destructive feeding increases via larval boring through stem nodes over the growing season resulting in reduced grain quality, protein content, and grain yield (Ainslie 1929; Morrill and Kushnak 1996). Like many plants that elicit herbivore-induced defense mechanisms, wheat infested with larvae generally emit altered VOCs (Peck 2004; Pérez 2009; but see Piesik et al., 2009), some of which are used as host location cues by braconid parasitoids, natural enemies of the WSS (Pérez 2009). Braconid parasitoids can effectively reduce WSS populations and lower yield loss by providing high irreplaceable larval mortality (Buteler et al. 2015; Buteler et al. 2008; Peterson et al. 2011); however, this is contingent upon adequate parasitoid abundance which can have significant spatial and management-driven variability (Peterson et al. 2011; Runyon et al. 2002; Weaver et al. 2004). Thus, agricultural practices have the potential to improve the biological control of WSS through improved VOC signaling and subsequent parasitoid recruitment.
Experimental framework and overarching hypothesis. Crop rotations have the potential to modify crop-pest interactions through their soil legacy effects. (a) High diversity rotations influence soil properties, such as microbial abundance and nutrient availability, differentially than low diversity rotations. (b) Soil properties persist into the next growing season where they (c) interact with subsequent crops, potentially modifying VOC emissions. (d) Altered VOCs may differentially attract pests and their natural enemies, conferring different levels of pest resistance of crops
Understanding the potential of cover crop rotations to influence crop VOCs will help inform whether agricultural practices might be leveraged to enhance pest-resistance in crops. In this study, we assess the influence of the cropping system and subsequent herbivory on the chemical plasticity of wheat VOC emissions in a full factorial greenhouse experiment. Wheat plants were grown in sterilized soil mixed with live soil inoculum from established rotations: (1) wheat-fallow or (2) wheat-cover crop rotations terminated by grazing cattle to represent low and high diversity cropping systems, respectively. To observe the effect of crop rotation on constitutive and induced volatiles of wheat, we measured VOCs emitted by WSS-infested and uninfested wheat plants grown in soil from the two different cropping systems. We hypothesized that (1) larval feeding would increase VOC emissions by wheat relative to constitutive VOCs. Furthermore, given that more diverse cropping systems increase the potential for beneficial soil legacy effects, including the priming of defenses through beneficial plant-microbe associations and increased nutrient availability, we hypothesized that (2) wheat grown in cover crop inoculum would produce greater amounts of constitutive and induced VOCs compared to wheat grown in fallow inoculum.
Materials and methods
Soil collection
Soil was collected from the Northern Agriculture Research Center located south of Havre, MT (48°29’48.8"N, 109°48’10.4"W). The site is a water-limited agroecosystem of the Northern Great Plains (NGP) with an average annual precipitation of 305 mm. Average annual high and low temperatures at the site are 13.6 and 0.0 °C, respectively (Western Regional Climate Center 2020). Since 2012, two replicate fields (40 m x 360 m, each) have been planted in an alternating rotation of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L., Judee variety) with either cover crop mixtures or fallow (Fig. 1). Within each field, each treatment is randomly repeated in 3 separate plots (8 m x 14 m). The location of each treatment was randomized in 2012 and has been maintained through time.
This study used inoculums of soil collected from low and high diversity cropping systems: (1) winter wheat rotated with fallow and (2) winter wheat rotated with a 7-species mixture of cover crops that was terminated by grazing cattle. Hereafter, soil from these cropping systems will be referred to as ‘fallow inoculum’ and ‘cover crop inoculum’, respectively. The cover crop mixture consisted of radish (Raphanus raphanistrum L.), lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus), field pea (Pisum sativum L.), oat (Avena sativa L.), turnip (Brassica rapa L.), sorghum x sudan grass (Sorghum drummondii Nees ex. Steud.), and soybean (Glycine max L.). Species were selected based on USDA-ARS recommendations for the NGP and represent a range of functional groups with potential for the provision of various ecosystem services (https://www.ars.usda.gov/plains-area/mandan-nd/ngprl/docs/cover-crop-chart/). Cover crop plots were planted mid-May and terminated early-July to protect soil moisture, as practiced in the region (O’Dea et al. 2013). Termination of cover crops was achieved by targeted cattle grazing, an ecologically based management approach to enhance economic and environmental sustainability of growing cover crops (McKenzie et al. 2017; Thiessen Martens and Entz 2011). Both cropping systems were spot treated with glyphosate to manage rare postharvest weeds during July and September.
Soil collection occurred on 2018 July 4 immediately before cattle grazing to attain peak season microbe diversity (Ishaq et al. 2017). We collected soil that would be planted in wheat later that fall; thus, soil was collected from plots that were either planted in cover crops or laid fallow, depending on the rotation. Surface litter was cleared and approximately 2,000 g of soil was collected to a depth of 30 cm with a sterilized shovel at three random locations within each plot. Bags of soil were stored on ice and transported back to Montana State University (Bozeman, MT) where all samples of a single soil type were homogenized and stored at -18 °C until later use in the greenhouse.
Plant growth
Wheat seeds of the commonly grown spring wheat cultivar Reeder were collected from a single spike grown in Big Sandy, MT during fall of 2018 and grown to maturity in the Montana State University Plant Growth Center. We used these genetically identical seeds to control for chemotypic variation between plants (Gouinguené et al. 2001). Mature seeds were surface-sterilized in 5% bleach, rinsed twice with deionized water, allowed to dry completely, and stored at -18 °C until planting. Upon planting, seeds were sown in washed and sterilized conical pots in a 1:1 mix of autoclaved Sunshine Mix #1 soil (Gro Horticulture Inc., Bellevue, WA) and MSU soil with a 15%-by-mass inoculum of live field soil. Previous studies conducted in agroecosystems have shown that a small amount of inoculum allows the evaluation of the impact of biologically mediated plant-soil feedbacks on ecosystem processes (Brinkman et al. 2010; Menalled et al. 2020; Seipel et al. 2019). Sunshine Mix #1 soil is comprised of Canadian sphagnum peat moss, perlite, vermiculite, starter nutrient charge, wetting agent, and dolomitic lime. MSU soil is equal parts of Bozeman silt loam soil, washed concrete sand, and Canadian sphagnum peat moss. AquaGro 2000 g wetting agent (Aquatrols, Paulsboro, NJ) was blended in at one pound per cubic yard of soil mix and aerated steam pasteurized at 80 °C for 45 min.
To minimize any effect of variation in plant development stage on infestation and VOC emissions, we planted one cohort of plants each week from late March 2019 to early May 2019. During each planting, 600 g of soil inoculum were homogenized in 3400 g of sterilized soil and divided equally between 30 conical pots (17.8 cm height x 6.9 cm diameter; Stuewe & Sons, Tangent, OR). This was repeated for the second soil type, always sterilizing equipment in between each treatment with 70% isopropyl alcohol.
Plants were fertilized biweekly with 60 ml of 20-20-20 (N-P-K, 50 ppm) fertilizer (Peters General Purpose Fertilizer, Allentown, PA) starting 3 weeks after planting. We fertilized at a 50% rate of 50 ppm compared to the standard rate of 100 ppm to preserve the functional diversity inherent in the field inoculum while also ensuring plants received nutrients necessary for development. While fertilizers are known to affect microbial community structure and biomass (Donnison et al. 2000; Sarathchandra et al. 2001), low fertilizer rates have been shown to preserve the functional diversity of soil microbial communities (Marschner et al. 2003). The position of plants was randomized to control for environmental variations along the greenhouse bench. Plants were watered ad libitum and grown in a greenhouse with supplemental light (GE Multi-Vapor MVR1000/C/U, GE Lighting, Cleveland, OH) under a 15 L:9 D photoperiod. Mean daytime temperatures were 22 °C and mean night temperatures were 20 °C (\(\pm 1.5 ^\circ \text{C}\)).
Wheat stem sawfly (WSS) collection and infestation
WSS larvae were collected from naturally occurring populations near Amsterdam-Churchill, MT (45°45’26.8"N 111°24’13.4"W). Wheat stubs—in which larvae diapause—were collected from heavily infested fields in the fall of 2018 and spring of 2019. Stubs were stored in plastic Ziplock bags at 0 °C for a minimum of 100 days to facilitate completion of larval diapause. Approximately three weeks prior to infestation, stubs were transferred to perforated plastic containers where adults were held at room temperature (22–27 °C) until adult emergence began. WSS adults are sexually mature and females do not require copulation to oviposit (Holmes 1977), thus, newly emerged adults could be used immediately to infest plants. To ensure newly emerged females were used, we removed all adults from the plastic container every 24 h. These adults were immediately used for infestation and any surplus adults were stored in Mason glass jars at 2 °C for up to two days for later use before they were discarded.
We exposed plants to adult WSS at stem elongation (Zadoks growth stages 32–34; Zadoks et al. 1974) when wheat is first susceptible to infestation under field conditions (Buteler et al. 2010; Weaver et al. 2009). Individual transparent polycarbonate cylindrical cages (60–65 cm x 3.8 cm) were placed over each plant to be infested. The top of the cage was covered in cloth-mesh and sterilized soil was placed around the bottom of the cage to prevent adults from escaping. Each cage had three cloth-mesh covered holes (3.8 cm diameter) distributed along its length for air circulation, and an additional 1 cm diameter hole, plugged with removable cotton cloth through which adults were introduced. One male and three female adults were added to each cage for a three-day oviposition period. Cages were also placed over control plants, but no adults were added. After infestation, the cages and adults were removed.
Volatile organic compound (VOC) collections
Volatiles were collected immediately after anthesis and the onset of milk development (Zadoks growth stage 71), which was approximately 21 days post-infestation. The sampling system allowed collection of VOCs from 12 plants each day. As such, on each sample day we collected VOCs from 12 individual plants: six plants grown in each soil inoculum, four of which had been exposed to adults and two of which had not. We chose to expose more than half of the plants because infestation is variable and cryptic, and this ensured we had an adequate number of infested plants for analysis. We collected VOCs two to four times a week from a total of 238 plants. We sampled from late May through early July, always infesting plants 19–22 days before VOC sampling.
For each VOC collection, plants were placed in 1 L glass collection chambers in a volatile collection system (VCS, Analytical Research Systems, Inc., Gainesville, FL) as previously described by Piesik et al. (2006). The apparatus features 12 glass chambers attached to a volatile collection port on one end and open on the other end to enclose one individual plant per chamber. Chambers were placed atop Teflon guillotine stands, which separated plant roots and potting soil from the collection chamber. Gaps between the plant stem and Teflon guillotines were filled with cotton to prevent soil VOCs from entering the collection chamber. Purified, humidified air was delivered at a rate of 1.0 L min− 1 over the plants and the flow and pressure were maintained by a regulated vacuum pump. Two volatile collector traps—one purge trap and one sample trap—containing 30 mg of HayeSep Q solid-phase adsorbent (Sigma Scientific, Gainesville, FL) were inserted into each volatile collection port. In order to clear ambient air from the chamber, air was initially collected on purge traps for 10 min before switching to the sample traps. Both the purge and the sample traps were set to a flow rate of 1.0 L min− 1. We collected volatiles on the sample traps for 8 h from approximately 9:00 to 17:00 each day. After sampling, volatile collection traps were removed, wrapped in aluminum foil, and eluted within 24 h (see below).
To account for the effects of environmental variables on VOC emissions, Thermochron temperature sensors (Maxim Integrated, San Jose, CA) were placed in each chamber and set to measure temperature every five minutes. Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), measured every hour, was acquired from the local university weather station. Both temperature data (over the 8 h sampling period) and PAR data (from start of day until the end of the sampling period) were averaged to yield a cumulative value for each of the variables per sampling day. To normalize emissions for comparison, we used these cumulative values to calculate basal emission volatile rates standardized to 30 °C according to Guenther (1997).
After VOC collections, plants were cut at the base of the stem to determine aboveground biomass. To determine whether plants were infested, stems were split along their length with a scalpel. Plants were considered infested when one or more larvae (alive or dead) and/or frass were observed in any stem of the plant. For all infested plants, larvae were always present in the main stem, and of these plants only 3% had larvae present in additional tillers. Therefore, we focused on infestation occurring in the main stem. For each infested main stem, we measured the proportion of stem bored (length of stem bored / total length of stem), proportion of internodes bored (internodes bored / total internodes), and the total mass of live larvae present. Plants exposed to adults that were not infested were initially characterized as ‘exposed’ but later aggregated with control plants due to no difference in total volatiles (F1,113.6 = 0.027, P = 0.87).
Analysis and identification of VOCs
We determined the identities and relative amounts of VOCs using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Volatile traps were eluted with 200 µl of methylene chloride (Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ). 10 µl of a 30 ng µL− 1 solution of nonyl acetate (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO) in methylene chloride was added as an internal standard following elution and samples were stored at -70 °C until analysis. For chemical analysis, 3 µl of each sample was injected onto an Agilent Technologies 6890 GC-5973 MS fitted with an HP-5MS column (30 m x 0.25 mm, 0.25 µm film thickness; J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA). Helium was used as the carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.2 mL min− 1 and injector temperature was set to 250 °C. The oven profile consisted of an initial temperature of 50 °C followed by a ramp of 5 °C min− 1 to 200 °C, then a second ramp of 25 °C min− 1 to 280 °C. Volatile compounds were identified by comparing retention times and mass spectra with commercial standards using ChemStation software (Agilent Technologies, Wilmington, DE) and the NIST Mass Spectral Library (National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD). All standards were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Saint Louis, MO) with the exception of decanal and β-ocimene (The Good Scents Company, Oak Creek, WI). When we could not identify compounds with commercial standards, we used the mass spectra to determine the compound family (i.e. monoterpene, alkane, etc.) (Table 1). We quantified the relative concentrations of each compound by comparing its peak area with that of the internal standard, nonyl acetate, in order to determine nonyl acetate equivalents. Concentrations of volatile compounds were standardized for the number of hours for which they were collected and for aboveground plant biomass (ng g− 1 h− 1). In total, we collected the VOC emissions of 238 plants. For seven of these, we could not accurately determine peak areas and they were omitted from our analysis. Thus, we quantified the relative VOC emissions for 231 plants (nFallow/Uninfested = 66, nFallow/Infested = 51, nCover/Uninfested = 68, nCover/Infested = 46).
Data analysis
We performed all analyses in R version 3.5.2 (R Core Team, 2018). Raw emission rates were converted to basal emission rates standardized to 30 °C using cumulative temperature and PAR from each volatile collection (Guenther 1997). We assessed the relative (nonyl acetate equivalent) emissions of individual compounds and their sum, hereafter called ‘total VOCs’. Given the relative quantification of all compounds to a single internal standard, the reported emission rates are not absolute values and results are discussed as relative differences in VOC emissions among treatments. To compare the effects of soil inoculum and infestation on induced VOC emissions, we fit linear mixed models using the ‘lmer’ function in the ‘lm4’ package (Bates et al. 2015). Measures of individual or total VOCs were the dependent variables and soil inoculum, infestation, and their interactions were fixed effects. Sample day was used as a random effect to account for day-to-day variability in other unmeasured environmental factors from each trial. All response variables were transformed as needed to meet the assumption of normality and homoskedasticity. To assess if cropping system, infestation, and their interaction accounted for variation, we performed Type III ANOVA using the ‘anova’ function in the ‘lmerTest’ package (Kuznetsova et al. 2017). When our fixed effects accounted for variation, we compared post-hoc differences using pairwise Tukey comparisons with the ‘emmeans’ function (Lenth et al. 2020).
We evaluated differences in the volatile community composition among soil inoculum, infestation, and their interaction using permutational multivariate ANOVA (PERMANOVA; Anderson et al. 2017; Oksanen et al. 2019). To do so, we calculated dissimilarities among treatments using the Bray-Curtis metric with the ‘vegdist’ function in the ‘vegan’ package (Oksanen et al. 2019).
To evaluate the probability of infestation by soil inoculum for plants exposed to adults, we used a generalized linear mixed-effects model (GLMM) with soil inoculum as the fixed effect, sample day as the random effect, and infestation as the response variable. To do this, we calculated the mean odds of plant infestation when exposed to adults using the ‘glmer’ function in the ‘lme4’ package using a binomial error distribution (Bates et al. 2015). Plant biomass was modeled using a linear mixed model using the ‘lmer’ function in the ‘lm4’ package with soil, infestation, and their interaction as fixed effects and sample day as a random effect (Bates et al. 2015). We used Pearson’s correlation test to assess the influence of soil type on the proportion of stem length bored, proportion of internodes bored, and total live larval mass.
Results
A total of 26 volatile compounds were quantified using GC-MS analysis from the headspace of wheat plants. Volatile compounds quantified include five monoterpenes, two sesquiterpenes, nine alkanes, five ketones, three aldehydes, one green leaf volatile (GLV), and one irregular terpene (Table 1). Plants grown in different soil inoculums emitted the same 26 compounds but in different relative amounts. The overall VOC composition varied in response to the interaction of soil inoculum and larval feeding (PERMANOVA Infestation x Soil: F1, 104 = 2.91, P = 0.034), though it only explained a small amount of variation among treatments (R2 = 0.03). Total relative VOC emissions also varied in response to the interaction of soil and feeding (Fig. 2; Soil x Infestation: F1, 211.8 = 5.78, P = 0.017), and sample day explained a significant amount of the overall variation (variance explained by fixed effects, \({R}_{m}^{2}\) = 0.03; variance explained by entire model, \({R}_{c}^{2}\) = 0.33).
Total VOC (ng nonyl acetate equivalents gFW− 1 h− 1) as a function of soil inoculum and larval feeding (Soil x Infestation: F1, 211.8 = 5.78, P = 0.017). Soil inoculum originated from either a wheat-fallow rotation (Fallow) or wheat-cover crop rotation where the cover crops were terminated by grazing cattle (Cover). Individual wheat plants were infested with wheat stem sawfly larvae (+ WSS) or remained unninfested (-WSS) to assess induced and constitutive VOCs, respectively (nFallow/Uninfested = 66, nFallow/Infested = 51, nCover/Uninfested = 68, nCover/Infested = 46). Means ± SEM are shown. (*) denotes a significance level < 0.05
Constitutively, soil inoculum did not influence VOC emissions (t210 = 0.62, P = 0.926) and regardless of soil inoculum, plants emitted an average of 13.53 ng gFW− 1 h− 1 total constitutive VOCs (95% CI: 11.04 to 16.60 ng gFW− 1 h− 1). We found that in the absence of feeding injury plants did not differ in their emissions of individual volatile compounds (Table 1). We observed no effect of soil inoculum on the probability of infestation for plants exposed to ovipositing females (F1 = 0.53, P = 0.469). Infestation rates were 65% (95% CI: 54–75%) for wheat grown in fallow inoculum and 60% (95% CI: 48–70%) for wheat grown in cover crop inoculum.
Induced VOC emissions caused by larval feeding varied among soil inoculum. VOC emissions did not vary for plants grown in fallow inoculum after feeding (t213 = 1.01, P = 0.744), and plants emitted the same amounts of total and individual VOCs whether infested with larvae or not (Fig. 2; Table 1). Plants grown in cover crop inoculum, however, emitted 28% more total volatiles (3.17 ng gFW− 1 h− 1) when fed upon by larvae compared to constitutive levels (t212 = -2.38, P = 0.084) and 34% more total volatiles than infested plants grown in fallow inoculum (t211 = -2.66, P = 0.041).
Six of the 26 compounds differed in response to either soil inoculum, larval feeding (infestation), or their interaction. Plants grown in cover crop inoculum emitted 35% more nonanal when infested than when not infested (Fig. 3; t210 = -2.87, P = 0.024). We also observed treatment effects on the emissions of 2-pentadecanone (Fig. 4; Soil x Infestation: F1, 217.0 = 6.44, P = 0.012) and four alkane compounds including unknown alkane 2 (Fig. 5a; Soil: F1, 208.8 = 10.16, P = 0.002), tridecane (Fig. 5b; Soil: F1, 208.8 = 16.72, P < 0.001), tetradecane (Fig. 5c; Soil: F1, 208.7 = 8.74, P = 0.003), and unknown alkane 3 (Fig. 5d; Soil: F1, 208.8 = 13.94, P < 0.001). Under larval feeding, these compounds were emitted at higher rates from plants grown in cover crop inoculum than those grown in fallow inoculum (Table 1; 2-pentadecanone: t214 = -2.51, P = 0.013; unknown alkane 2: t211 = -2.85, P = 0.025; tridecane: t211 = -3.09, P = 0.012; tetradecane: t211 = -2.68, P = 0.039; unknown alkane 3: t211 = -2.59, P = 0.050). Finally, we found that infested plants grown in cover crop inoculum emitted ~ 35% more total alkanes compared to those grown in fallow (Table 1; t211 = -3.06, P = 0.013).
Emissions (ng nonyl acetate equivalents gFW− 1 h− 1) of nonanal as a function of soil and larval feeding (Infestation: F1, 210.2 = 6.65, P = 0.011). Soil inoculum originated from either a wheat-fallow rotation (Fallow) or wheat-cover crop rotation where the cover crops were terminated by grazing cattle (Cover). Individual wheat plants were infested with wheat stem sawfly larvae (+ WSS) or remained uninfested (-WSS). Means ± SEM are shown. (*) denotes a significance level < 0.05
Emissions (ng nonyl acetate equivalents gFW− 1 h− 1) of 2-pentadecanone as a function of soil and larval feeding (Soil x Infestation: F1, 217.0 = 6.44, P = 0.012). Soil inoculum originated from either a wheat-fallow rotation (Fallow) or wheat-cover crop rotation where the cover crops were terminated by grazing cattle (Cover). Individual wheat plants were infested with wheat stem sawfly larvae (+ WSS) or remained uninfested (-WSS). Means ± SEM are shown. (*) denotes a significance level < 0.05
Emissions (ng nonyl acetate equivalents gFW− 1 h− 1) of unknown alkane 2 (panel a; Soil: F1, 208.8 = 10.16, P = 0.002), tridecane (panel b; Soil: F1, 208.8 = 16.72, P < 0.001), tetradecane (panel c; Soil: F1, 208.7 = 8.74, P = 0.003), and unknown alkane 3 (panel d; Soil: F1, 208.8 = 13.94, P < 0.001) as a function of soil and larval feeding. Soil inoculum originated from either a wheat-fallow rotation (Fallow) or wheat-cover crop rotation where the cover crops were terminated by grazing cattle (Cover). Individual wheat plants were infested with wheat stem sawfly larvae (+ WSS) or remained uninfested (-WSS). Means ± SEM are shown. (*) denotes a significance level < 0.05
Soil inoculum also influenced plant biomass (Fig. 6; Soil: F1, 209.7 = 3.93, P = 0.049) with a 5.4% mean increase in biomass (0.424 g ± 0.216) for plants grown in cover crop inoculum. While three weeks post-infestation plants only trended towards lower biomass compared to non-infested plants (Infestation: F1, 214.1 = 3.20, P = 0.075), it is likely that this trend would have become more prominent had larval feeding progressed further into plant development. The soil inoculum did not influence the proportion of stem bored by larvae (t153 = -0.02, P = 0.98, mean = 0.15), the proportion of internodes bored (t153 = -0.61, P = 0.54, mean = 0.39), or larval weight (t153 = 1.01, P = 0.32, mean = 0.014 g).
Plant biomass (g) as a function of soil inoculum and larval feeding (Soil: F1, 209.7 = 3.93, P = 0.049). Soil inoculum originated from either a wheat-fallow rotation (Fallow) or wheat-cover crop rotation where the cover crops were terminated by grazing cattle (Cover). Individual wheat plants were infested with wheat stem sawfly larvae (+ WSS) or remained uninfested (-WSS). Means ± SEM are shown. (*) denotes a significance level < 0.05
Discussion
Despite the important role of the soil physical-chemical and biological characteristics in agroecosystem functioning (Brussaard et al. 2007), we still have limited knowledge of its role in mediating crop-insect interactions through modification of plant VOCs. In this study, we found that inoculation of plants with soil from two different cropping systems did not alter constitutive emissions of VOCs but did influence their emissions following larval feeding. Wheat VOCs from plants grown in fallow inoculum were not induced by WSS larval feeding. In contrast, wheat grown in cover crop inoculum produced more total volatiles in response to larval feeding, including increased emissions of key compounds known to repel insect pests and attract natural enemies. Our findings indicate that soil from different agricultural practices have the potential to influence pest-resistance of crops through altered HIPVs, leading to enhanced direct defense through repellence of pests and enhanced indirect defense through attraction of their natural enemies.
Contrary to our hypothesis, we found that soil from two different cropping systems had no effect on the quantity or quality of constitutive VOCs emitted by plants. Alternatively, VOC emissions did vary among soil inoculum when plants were infested with larvae. Wheat grown in soil with inoculum from the cover crop rotation exhibited elevated emissions of VOCs in response to infestation while VOCs of wheat grown in soil with inoculum from wheat-fallow rotation were unaffected by herbivory. These results are consistent with a previous study measuring the effect of soil type and herbivory on foliar plant defenses: following insect feeding, some soil treatments showed no induced response to herbivory, even at the transcriptional level, whereas other soil treatments showed robust herbivore-induced upregulation of defense-related genes (Zhu et al. 2018). Because many soil legacy effects are mediated by microbes in the soil (Huang et al. 2013; Wang et al. 2019), the patterns we observed may be due to priming mechanisms where microbes present in the cover crop inoculum, but not the fallow inoculum, induced systemic resistance in the plants (Conrath et al. 2006; Pozo and Azcón-Aguilar 2007). Compared to fallow systems, cover crops increase microbe abundance and diversity (Kim et al. 2020), minimizing the accumulation of soil-borne pathogens and leading to proliferation of beneficial microbes in the rhizosphere (Vukicevich et al. 2016). Beneficial microbes, upon colonization of roots, can cause the induction of a unique physiological state within the plant known as “priming”. Primed plants display faster and stronger activation of defense pathways following attack by herbivores (Conrath et al. 2006), including altered emissions of VOCs. Indeed, studies have observed microbially-driven differences in VOC emissions that were significant only after herbivore feeding (Pangesti et al. 2015; Pineda et al. 2013), suggesting that soil microbes present in cover crop soils primed plant defenses, altering HIPVs but not constitutive volatiles.
Alternatively, it is possible that the differences in induced VOCs by soil type were due to other soil properties affecting plant vigor, including nutrient availability and the accumulation of autotoxins (Gouinguené and Turlings 2002; Huang et al. 2013). Plants grown in cover crop soils had ~ 5% greater biomass than those grown in fallow soil. While we tried to minimize any effects of inherent nutrient differences between soil inoculums by fertilizing all plants at a constant rate, it is possible that the soil inoculations altered nutrient availability for plant growth among treatments. Cover crop inoculums having higher nutrient availability than fallow inoculums could be a direct effect of the farming practice (e.g. manure inputs from grazing cattle) or indirect effect (e.g. beneficial plant-microbe interactions that increase plant nutrient acquisition) (Koricheva et al. 2009; Rasmann et al. 2017). Finally, it is possible that other feedback mechanisms, such as accumulation of autotoxic compounds, may have hindered plant growth in fallow soil inoculums. Wheat straw residues—such as those found in fallow fields—are a source of autotoxins, including ferulic and p-coumaric acids. In fallow rotations, autotoxin may accumulate in the soil and exert negative plant-soil feedbacks on wheat, hindering photosynthesis and overall carbon acquisition (Huang et al. 2013; Lodhi et al. 1987). Thus, the greater inducibility of wheat grown in cover crop plants may be due to greater carbon availability for investment in VOC metabolism upon herbivory, which is ultimately mediated by soil legacy effects that vary between cropping systems.
Biological control of pests offers an effective strategy for managing damaging species without the use of pesticides (Runyon et al. 2002; Rand et al. 2016). Given that natural enemies of herbivores rely on induced volatile cues for effective host-foraging (Arimura et al. 2009; Bruce et al. 2005; De Moraes et al. 1998; Heil 2014), biological control is often dependent on effective volatile signaling by herbivore-attacked crops. While plants commonly alter VOCs in response to herbivory (Heil 2014), lack of induction or modification to VOC blends has been shown to reduce recruitment of natural enemies (Megali et al. 2015; Pineda et al. 2013), which may lead to increased pest abundance. The absence of HIPVs observed in our study by wheat grown in fallow inoculum suggests that these crop rotations may be less effective at recruiting natural enemies for biological control of pests through reduced host-searching efficacy. As such, biological control efforts may be less effective when used in tandem with agricultural practices and crop rotations that diminish the crops’ ability to induce indirect VOC defenses.
In addition to increasing emissions of total VOCs, we found that wheat grown in soils from cover crops emitted more nonanal and 2-pentdadecanone when infested by larvae. Nonanal is known to serve as an attractant to natural enemy insects (Yu et al. 2008) but can also have synergistic properties for insect herbivores (Dickens 2006). Nonanal has also been shown be important in plant-plant communication in lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus), triggering resistance expression against a bacterial pathogen in uninfected lima bean plants (Yi and Heil 2009), however this role for nonanal has not been demonstrated in cereal crops. 2-pentadecanone has been shown to repel insect herbivores, including a major pest of wheat, the grain aphid (Sitobion avenae) (Drakulic et al. 2015; Sun et al. 2016). Clearly, altered emissions of nonanal and 2-pentadecanone has the potential to alter multitrophic plant-insect interactions, and these should be further studied to better understand how cropping systems can influence pest resistance in agroecosystems.
Finally, it is worth noting that HIPVs by wheat grown in cover crop inoculum consisted of significantly more alkane compounds, especially the lower alkane species (C11-C13). Higher alkanes (C21-C35) found in cuticular waxes (Lavergne et al. 2018) are often used by phytophagous insects to determine whether plants are suitable for feeding and laying eggs (Eigenbrode and Espelie, 1995; Müller and Riederer 2005). However, less is known about how lower alkanes are metabolically regulated in plants and their role in mediating plant-insect interactions. Lower alkanes are known to be produced by insects and help to mediate intraspecific insect interactions (Blum et al. 1960; Lenz et al. 2013). Many common insect VOC signals, including a number of lower alkanes, are also produced by plants, suggesting that plants and insects can converge in patterns of volatile production, both for attraction and defense (Schiestl et al. 2014). As such, plants producing greater amounts of lower alkanes may do so to mimic signals displayed by insects; however, while a number of studies report plant emissions of lower alkanes (Kigathi et al. 2009; Pierre et al. 2011), they have not been shown to influence insect behavior (Weissteiner and Schütz, 2006; Pierre et al. 2011). For insects such as the WSS and its braconid parasitoids that employ GLVs, terpenes, and ketones to locate appropriate plant (Piesik et al. 2008; Weaver et al. 2009) and insect hosts (Pérez, 2009), respectively, whether altered alkane emissions are synergistic or antagonistic remains unknown and should be tested with insect bioassays.
This study demonstrates the effect of system-level farming practices, such as the use of cover crops and animal grazing, on plant VOCs. These effects were likely driven by the interaction of multiple soil properties, including soil microbe community, nutrient availability, and chemistry. Unraveling the primary drivers of suchsystem-level responses will enhance our mechanistic understanding of soil-plant interactions influencing crop VOCs. While the interactions observed in this greenhouse study were made in isolation of a number of other environmental factors known to impact emission profiles, they allowed us to test specific hypotheses on the impact of soil legacy effects from cover crops on constitutive and herbivore-induced volatile emissions. Our results are characteristic of agricultural practices at one point in the growing season, and we recognize that many soil features experience temporal shifts independent of agricultural practice in response to seasonality and crop phenology (Ishaq et al. 2020). Thus, more work is needed to elucidate specific mechanisms and temporal trends in soil-mediated pest resistance, and future research should investigate how soil legacy effects of agricultural practices modify crop VOCs over a range of abiotic and biotic conditions including climate, crop variety, and plant development.
Here, we provide evidence that the soil legacy effects of diversified agricultural systems can be important drivers for insect-plant interactions in agroecosystems via their influence on HIPVs of crops. Our findings indicate that cropping system diversification may have substantial effects on multitrophic interactions and differentially influence recruitment of natural enemies of pests through altered herbivore-induced VOC signaling.
Data availability
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available in the Dryad repository, https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.2jm63xskm.
Abbreviations
- VOCs:
-
Volatile organic compounds
- HIPV:
-
herbivore-induced plant volatiles
- GLVs:
-
green leaf volatiles
- NGP:
-
northern Great Plains
- WSS:
-
wheat stem sawfly
- GC-MS:
-
gas chromatography-mass spectrometry
- NMDS:
-
non-metric multidimensional scaling
- GLMM:
-
generalized linear mixed-effects model
References
Adler LS, Hazzard RV (2009) Comparison of perimeter trap crop varieties: effects on herbivory, pollination, and yield in butternut squash. Environ Entomol 1:207–215
Ainslie CN (1929) The western grass-stem sawfly—a pest of small grains. US Dept of Agric Bull 841:23
Anderson MJ (2017) Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance (PERMANOVA). In: Balakrishnan N et al (eds) Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online. Wiley, Hoboken
Arimura G, Matsui K, Takabayashi J (2009) Chemical and molecular ecology of herbivore-induced plant volatiles: proximate factors and their ultimate functions. Plant Cell Physiol 5:911–923
Babin D, Deubel A, Jacquiod S, Sørensen SJ, Geistlinger J, Grosch R, Smalla K (2019) Impact of long-term agricultural management practices on soil prokaryotic communities. Soil Biol Biochem 129:17–28
Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 1:1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Beres BL, Dosdall LM, Weaver DK, Cárcamo HA, Spaner DM (2011) Biology and integrated management of wheat stem sawfly and the need for continuing research. Can Entomol 2:105–125
Bever JD (1994) Feedback between plants and their soil communities in an old field community. Ecology 7:1965–1977
Blanco-Canqui H, Holman JD, Schlegel AJ, Tatarko J, Shaver TM (2013) Replacing fallow with cover crops in a semiarid soil: effects on soil properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J 3:1026–1034
Blum MS, Traynham JG, Chidester JB, Boggus JD (1960) n-Tridecane and trans-2-heptenal in scent gland of the rice stink bug Oebalus pugnas (F.). Science 3438:1480–1481
Blundell R, Schmidt JE, Igwe A, Cheung AL, Vannette RL, Gaudin ACM, Casteel CL (2020) Organic management promotes natural pest control through altered plant resistance to insects. Nat Plants 6:483–491
Brinkman EP, der Putten WHV , Bakker E-J, Verhoeven KJF (2010) Plant–soil feedback: experimental approaches, statistical analyses and ecological interpretations. J Ecol 5:1063–1073
Bruce TJA, Wadhams LJ, Woodcock CM (2005) Insect host location: a volatile situation. Trends Plant Sci 6:269–274
Brussaard L, de Ruiter PC, Brown GG (2007) Soil biodiversity for agricultural sustainability. Agr Ecosyst Environ 3:233–244
Buteler M, Peterson RKD, Hofland ML, Weaver DK (2015) A multiple decrement life table reveals that host plant resistance and parasitism are major causes of mortality for the wheat stem sawfly. Environ Entomol 6:1571–1580
Buteler M, Weaver DK (2012) Host selection by the wheat stem sawfly in winter wheat and the role of semiochemicals mediating oviposition preference. Entomol Exp Appl 2:138–147
Buteler M, Weaver DK, Bruckner PL, Carlson GR, Berg JE, Lamb PF (2010) Using agronomic traits and semiochemical production in winter wheat cultivars to identify suitable trap crops for the wheat stem sawfly. Can Entomol 3:222–233
Buteler M, Weaver DK, Miller PR (2008) Wheat stem sawfly-infested plants benefit from parasitism of the herbivorous larvae. Agr For Entomol 4:347–354
Carrillo J, Ingwell LL, Xiaohong L, Kaplan I (2019) Domesticated tomatoes are more vulnerable to negative soil feedbacks than their wild relatives. J Ecol 107:1753–1766
Conrath U, Beckers GJM, Flors V, García-Agustín P, Jakab G, Mauch F, Newman MA, Pieterse CMJ, Poinssot B, Pozo MJ, Pugin A, Schaffrath U, Ton J, Wendehenne D, Zimmerli L, Mauch-Mani B (2006) Priming: getting ready for battle. Mol Plant Microbe In 10:1062–1071
De Moraes CM, Lewis WJ, Paré PW, Alborn HT, Tumlinson JH (1998) Herbivore-infested plants selectively attract parasitoids. Nature 6685:570–573
Delaney KJ, Weaver DK, Peterson RKD (2010) Photosynthesis and yield reductions from wheat stem sawfly (Hymenoptera: Cephidae): interactions with wheat solidness, water stress, and phosphorus deficiency. J Econ Entomol 2:516–524
Dickens JC (2006) Plant volatiles moderate response to aggregation pheromone in Colorado potato beetle. J Appl Entomol 1:26–31
Donnison LM, Griffith GS, Hedger J, Hobbs PJ, Bardgett RD (2000) Management influences on soil microbial communities and their function in botanically diverse haymeadows of northern England and Wales. Soil Biol Biochem 2:253–263
Drakulic J, Caulfield J, Woodcock C, Jones SPT, Linforth R, Bruce TJA, Ray RV (2015) Sharing a host plant (Triticum aestivum) increases the fitness of Fusarium graminearum and the severity of fusarium head blight but reduces the fitness of grain aphids (Sitobion avenae). Appl Environ Microbiol 10:3492–3501
Dudareva N, Klempien A, Muhlemann JK, Kaplan I (2013) Biosynthesis, function and metabolic engineering of plant volatile organic compounds. New Phytol 1:16–32
Eigenbrode SD, Espelie KE (1995) Effects of plant epicuticular lipids on insect herbivores. Annu Rev Entomol 40:171–194
Fageria NK, Baligar VC, Bailey BA (2005) Role of cover crops in improving soil and row crop productivity. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 19–20:2733–2757
Frasier I, Noellemeyer E, Figuerola E, Erijman L, Permingeat H, Quiroga A (2016) High quality residues from cover crops favor changes in microbial community and enhance C and N sequestration. Global Ecol Con 6:242–256
Gouinguené S, Degen T, Turlings TCJ (2001) Variability in herbivore-induced odour emissions among maize cultivars and their wild ancestors (teosinte). Chemoecology 1:9–16
Gouinguené SP, Turlings TCJ (2002) The effects of abiotic factors on induced volatile emissions in corn plants. Plant Physiol 3:1296–1307
Guenther A (1997) Season and spatial variations in natural volatile organic compound emissions. Ecol App 1:34–45
Hartmann M, Brey B, Mayer J, Mader P, Widmer F (2015) Distinct soil microbial diversity under long-term organic and conventional farming. ISME J 9:1177–1194
Heil M (2014) Herbivore-induced plant volatiles: targets, perception and unanswered questions. New Phytol 2:297–306
Heil M, Karban R (2010) Explaining evolution of plant communication by airborne signals. Trends Ecol Evol 3:137–144
Holmes ND (1977) The effect of the wheat stem sawfly, Cephus cinctus (Hymenoptera: Cephidae), on the yield and quality of wheat. Can Entomol 109(12):1591–1598
Huang LF, Song LX, Xia XJ, Mao WH, Shi K, Zhou YH, Yu JQ (2013) Plant-soil feedbacks and soil sickness: from mechanisms to application in agriculture. J Chem Ecol 2:232–242
Ingerslew KS, Kaplan I (2018) Distantly related crops are not better rotation partners for tomato. J Appl Ecol 55:2506–2516
Ishaq SL, Johnson SP, Miller ZJ, Lehnhoff EA, Olivo S, Yeoman CJ, Menalled FD (2017) Impact of cropping systems, soil inoculum, and plant species identity on soil bacterial community structure. Microb Ecol 2:417–434
Ishaq SL, Seipel T, Yeoman CJ, Menalled FD (2020) Soil bacterial communities of wheat vary across the growing season and among dryland farming systems. Geoderma 358:113989
Kaplan I, Pineda A, Bezemer M (2018) Application and theory of plant–soil feedbacks on aboveground herbivores. In: Aboveground–belowground community ecology, Ohgushi T, Wurst S, Johnson SN (eds). Springer Int Publ, Berlin, pp 319–343
Kappers IF, Hoogerbrugge H, Bouwmeester HJ, Dicke M (2011) Variation in herbivory-induced volatiles among cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) varieties has consequences for the attraction of carnivorous natural enemies. J Chem Ecol 37:150–160
Kigathi RN, Unsicker SB, Reichelt M, Kesselmeier J, Gershenzon J, Weisser WW (2009) Emission of volatile organic compounds after herbivory from Trifolium pratense L. under laboratory and field conditions. J Chem Ecol 11:1335–1348
Kim N, Zabaloy MC, Guan K, Villamil MB (2020) Do cover crops benefit soil microbiome? A meta-analysis of current research. Soil Biol Biochem 142:107701
Koricheva J, Gange AC, Jones T (2009) Effects of mycorrhizal fungi on insect herbivores: a meta-analysis. Ecology 8:2088–2097
Kulmanski A, Beard KH, Stevens JR, Cobbold SM (2008) Plant-soil feedback: a meta-analytical review. Ecol Lett 11:980–992
Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB (2017) lmerTest Package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. J Stat Softw 13. Available via: https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/lmertest-package-tests-in-linear-mixed-effects-models
Lavergne FD, Broeckling CD, Cockrell DM, Haley SD, Peairs FB, Jahn CE, Heuberger AL (2018) GC-MS metabolomics to evaluate the composition of plant cuticular waxes for four Triticum aestivum cultivars. Int J Mol Sci 19:249
Lenth R, Singmann H, Love J, Buerkner P, Herve M (2020) emmeans: estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans
Lenz EL, Krasnec MO, Breed MD (2013) Identification of undecane as an alarm pheromone of the ant Formica argentea. J Insect Behav 1:101–108
Lodhi MAK, Bilal R, Malik KA (1987) Allelopathy in agroecosystems: wheat phytotoxicity and its possible roles in crop rotation. J Chem Ecol 8:1881–1891
Lopes T, Hatt S, Xu Q, Chen J, Liu Y, Francis F (2016) Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)-based intercropping systems for biological pest control. Pest Manag Sci 72:2193–2202
Lupwayi NZ, Rice WA, Clayton GW (1998) Soil microbial diversity and community structure under wheat as influenced by tillage and crop rotation. Soil Biol Biochem 13:1733–1741
Macedo TB, Weaver DK, Peterson RKD (2007) Photosynthesis in wheat at the grain filling stage is altered by larval wheat stem sawfly (Hymenoptera: Cephidae) injury and reduced water availability. J Entomol Sci 2:228–238
Mariotte P, Mehrabi Z, Bezemer TM, De Deyn GB, Kulmatiski A, Drigo B, Veen (Ciska) GF, van der Heijden MGA, Kardol P (2018) Plant–soil feedback: bridging natural and agricultural sciences. Trends Ecol Evol 2:129–142
Marschner P, Kandeler E, Marschner B (2003) Structure and function of the soil microbial community in a long-term fertilizer experiment. Soil Biol Biochem 3:453–461
McKenzie SC, Goosey HB, O’Neill KM, Menalled FD (2017) Integration of sheep grazing for cover crop termination into market gardens: agronomic consequences of an ecologically based management strategy. Renew Agric Food Syst 5:389–402
Megali L, Schlau B, Rasmann S (2015) Soil microbial inoculation increases corn yield and insect attack. Agron Sustain Dev 4:1511–1519
Menalled U, Seipel T, Menalled F (2020) Farming system and crop rotation effects on biologically mediated plant-soil feedbacks. Renew Agri Food Syst, 1–7
Morrill WL, Kushnak GD (1996) Wheat stem sawfly (Hymenoptera: Cephidae) adaptation to winter wheat. Environ Entomol 5:1128–1132
Morrill WL, Weaver DK, Johnson GD (2001) Trap strip and field border modification for management of the wheat stem sawfly (Hymenoptera: Cephidae). J Entomol Sci 1:34–45
Muller C, Riederer M (2005) Plant surface properties in chemical ecology. J Chem Ecol 31:2621–2651
Murrell EG, Ray S, Lemmon ME, Luthe DS, Kaye JP (2019) Cover crop species affect mycorrhizae-mediated nutrient uptake and pest resistance in maize. Renew Agr Food Syst 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170519000061
Mutyambai DM, Bass E, Luttermoser T, Proveda K, Midega CAO, Khan ZR, Kessler A (2019) More than “push” and “pull”? Plant-soil feedbacks of maize companion cropping increase chemical plant defense against herbivores. Front Ecol Evol 7:217
Navarro-Noya YE, Gómez-Acata S, Montoya-Ciriaco N, Rojas-Valdez A, Suárez-Arriaga MC, Valenzuela-Encinas C, Jimenez-Bueno N, Verhulst N, Govaerts B, Dendooven L (2013) Relative impacts of tillage, residue management and crop-rotation on soil bacterial communities in a semi-arid agroecosystem. Soil Biol Biochem 65:86–95
O’Dea JK, Miller PR, Jones CA (2013) Greening summer fallow with legume green manures: on-farm assessment in north-central Montana. J Soil Water Conserv 4:270–282
Oksanen J, Guillaume F, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson L, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs Eduard, Wagner H (2019) vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.5-6. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
Pangesti N, Weldegergis BT, Langendorf B, van Loon JJA, Pineda A (2015) Rhizobacterial colonization of roots modulates plant volatile emission and enhances the attraction of a parasitoid wasp to host-infested plants. Oecologia 4:1169–1180
Parachnowitsch AL, Manson JS (2015) The chemical ecology of plant-pollinator interactions: recent advances and future directions. Curr Opin Insect Sci 8:41–46
Peck GE (2004) Potential semiochemicals of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) induced by oviposition and feeding of the wheat stem sawfly, Cephus cinctus Norton (Hymenoptera: Cephidae) (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from ScholarWorks (Accession No. 2013-06-25T18:39:16Z). Available via: https://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/handle/1/2031
Pérez OG (2009) Behavioral and sensory responses of endemic braconid parasitoids to changes in volatile emissions induced by wheat stem sawfly, Cephus cinctus herbivory (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ScholarWorks (Accession No. 2013-06-25T18:42:34Z). Available via: https://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/handle/1/2041
Peterson RKD, Buteler M, Weaver DK, Macedo TB, Sun Z, Perez OG, Pallipparambil GR (2011) Parasitism and the demography of wheat stem sawfly larvae. Cephus cinctus. BioControl 56(6):831–839
Pickett JA, Khan ZR (2016) Plant volatile-mediated signaling and its application in agriculture: successes and challenges. New Phytol 4:856–870
Pierre PS, Jansen JJ, Hordijk CA, van Dam NM, Cortesero A-M, Dugravot S (2011) Differences in volatile profiles of turnip plants subjected to single and dual herbivory above- and belowground. J Chem Ecol 4:368–377
Piesik D, Weaver DK, Peck GE, Morrill WL (2006) Mechanically injured wheat plants release greater amounts of linalool and linalool oxide. J Plant Protect Res 46:29–39
Piesik D, Weaver DK, Runyon JB, Buteler M, Peck GE, Morrill WL (2008) Behavioural responses of wheat stem sawflies to wheat volatiles. Agr Forest Entomol 3:245–253
Piesik D, Wenda-Piesik A, Weaver D, Macedo T, Morrill W (2009) Influence of fusarium and wheat stem sawfly infestation on volatile compounds production by wheat plants. J Plant Prot Res 2:167–174
Pineda A, Kaplan I, Bezemer TM (2017) Steering soil microbiomes to suppress aboveground insect pests. Trends Plant Scie 9:770–778
Pineda A, Soler R, Weldegergis BT, Shimwela MM, VAN Loon JJA, Dicke M (2013) Non-pathogenic rhizobacteria interfere with the attraction of parasitoids to aphid-induced plant volatiles via jasmonic acid signaling. Plant Cell Environ 2:393–404
Pozo MJ, Azcón-Aguilar C (2007) Unraveling mycorrhiza-induced resistance. Curr Opin Plant Biol 4:393–398
van der Putten WH , Bardgett RD, Bever JD, Bezemer TM, Casper BB, Fukami T, Kardol P, Klironomos JN, Kulmatiski A, Schweitzer JA, Suding KN, Van de Voorde TFJ, Wardle DA (2013) Plant–soil feedbacks: the past, the present and future challenges. J Ecology 2:265–276
R Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available online at https://www.R-project.org/
Rand TA, Morrill WL, Runyon JB, Hoelmer KA, Shanower TG, Littlefield JL, Weaver DK (2016) Assessing phenological synchrony between the Chinese sawfly, Cephus fumipennis (Hymenoptera: Cephidae), its egg-larval parasitoid, Collyria catoptron (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae), and the North American sawfly, Cephus cinctus: implications for biological control. The Can Entomol 4:482–492
Rasmann S, Köllner TG, Degenhardt J, Hiltpold I, Toepfer S, Kuhlmann U, Gershenzon J, Turlings TCJ (2005) Recruitment of entomopathogenic nematodes by insect-damaged maize roots. Nature 7034:732–737
Rasmann S, Bennett A, Biere A, Karley A, Guerrieri E (2017) Root symbionts: Powerful drivers of plant above- and belowground indirect defenses. Insect Sci 6:947–960
Runyon JB, Morrill WL, Weaver DK, Miller PR (2002) Parasitism of the wheat stem sawfly (Hymenoptera: Cephidae) by Bracon cephi and B. lissogaster (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in wheat fields bordering tilled and untilled fallow in Montana. J Econ Entomol 6:1130–1134
Sarathchandra SU, Ghani A, Yeates GW, Burch G, Cox NR (2001) Effect of nitrogen and phosphate fertilisers on microbial and nematode diversity in pasture soils. Soil Biol Biochem 33(7–8):953–964
Schiestl FP, Kirk H, Bigler L, Cozzolino S, Desurmont GA (2014) Herbivory and floral signaling: phenotypic plasticity and tradeoffs between reproduction and indirect defense. New Phytol 1:257–266
Seipel T, Ishaq SL, Menalled FD (2019) Agroecosystem resilience is modified by management system via plant–soil feedbacks. Basic Appl Ecol 39:1–9
Sharifi R, Lee S-M, Ryu C-M (2018) Microbe-induced plant volatiles. New Phytol 3:684–691
Shrivastava G, Rogers M, Wszelaki A, Panthee DR, Chen F (2010) Plant volatiles-based insect pest management in organic farming. Crit Rev Plant Sci 2:123–133
Sun Z, Liu Z, Zhou W, Jin H, Liu H, Zhou A, Zhang A, Wang MQ (2016) Temporal interactions of plant-insect-predator after infection of bacterial pathogen on rice plants. Sci Rep 1:26043
Thiessen Martens J, Entz M (2011) Integrating green manure and grazing systems: a review. Can J Plant Sci 5:811–824
Vukicevich E, Lowery T, Bowen P, Úrbez-Torres JR, Hart M (2016) Cover crops to increase soil microbial diversity and mitigate decline in perennial agriculture: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 3:48
Wang M, Ruan W, Kostenko O, Carvalho S, Hannula SE, Mulder PPJ, Bu F, van der Putten WH, Bezemer TM (2019) Removal of soil biota alters soil feedback effects on plant growth and defense chemistry. New Phytol 3:1478–1491
Wardle DA, Bardgett RD, Klironomos JN, Setala H, van der Putten WH, Wall D (2004) Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota. Science 5677:1629
Weaver DK, Buteler M, Hofland ML, Runyon JB, Nansen C, Talbert LE, Lamb P, Carlson GR (2009) Cultivar preferences of ovipositing wheat stem sawflies as influenced by the amount of volatile attractant. J Econ Entomol 3:1009–1017
Weaver DK, Sing SE, Runyon JB, Morrill WL (2004) Potential impact of cultural practices on wheat stem sawfly (Hymenoptera: Cephidae) and associated parasitoids. J Agr Urban Entomol 21:271–287
Weissteiner S, Schütz S (2006) Are different volatile pattern influencing host plant choice of belowground living insects? Mitt Dtsch Ges Allg Angew Ent 15
Western Regional Climate Center (2020) Available from: https://wrcc.dri.edu
Yi H-S, Heil M (2009) Airborne induction and priming of plant defenses against a bacterial pathogen. Plant Phys 151:2152–2161
Yu H, Zhang Y, Wu K, Gao XW, Guo YY (2008) Field-testing of synthetic herbivore-induced plant volatiles as attractants for beneficial insects. J Chem Ecol 6:1410–1415
Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF (1974) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Res 6:415–421
Zhu F, Heinen R, van der Sluijs M, Raaijmakers C, Biere A, Bezemer TM (2018) Species-specific plant–soil feedbacks alter herbivore-induced gene expression and defense chemistry in Plantago lanceolata. Oecologia 3:801–811
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by a grant from the U.S. Department of Agriculture and National Institute of Food and Agriculture (USDA-NIFA; 2018-67013-27919) and by the Montana Wheat and Barley (DKW 2018–2020; TS 2018). We gratefully acknowledge Toby Leppicello for assistance with data collection and compilation and Drs. Maryse Bourgault and Darrin Boss for cropping system administration.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
D.K.W., T.F.S., F.D.M., and A.M.T., conceived the project; S.C.M. conducted the experiments with assistance from M.L.H.; S.C.M. analyzed the data with assistance from T.F.S.; S.C.M. drafted the initial manuscript, and all co-authors revised, read, and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Hans Lambers
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Malone, S.C., Weaver, D.K., Seipel, T.F. et al. Herbivore-induced volatile emissions are altered by soil legacy effects in cereal cropping systems. Plant Soil 455, 171–186 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04674-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-020-04674-2