Abstract
Background and aims
In many soils inositol hexakisphosphate in its various forms is as abundant as inorganic phosphate. The organismal and geochemical processes that exchange phosphate between inositol hexakisphosphate and other pools of soil phosphate are poorly defined, as are the organisms and enzymes involved. We rationalized that simple enzymic synthesis of inositol hexakisphosphate labeled with 32P would greatly enable study of transformation of soil inositol phosphates when combined with robust HPLC separations of different inositol phosphates.
Methods
We employed the enzyme inositol pentakisphosphate 2-kinase, IP5 2-K, to transfer phosphate from [γ-32P]ATP to axial hydroxyl(s) of myo-, neo- and 1D-chiro-inositol phosphate substrates.
Results
32P-labeled inositol phosphates were separated by anion exchange HPLC with phosphate eluents. Additional HPLC methods were developed to allow facile separation of myo-, neo-, 1D-chiro- and scyllo-inositol hexakisphosphate on acid gradients.
Conclusions
We developed enzymic approaches that allow the synthesis of labeled myo-inositol 1,[32P]2,3,4,5,6-hexakisphosphate; neo-inositol 1,[32P]2,3,4,[32P]5,6–hexakisphosphate and 1D-chiro-inositol [32P]1,2,3,4,5,[32P]6-hexakisphosphate. Additionally, we describe HPLC separations of all inositol hexakisphosphates yet identified in soils, using a collection of soil inositol phosphates described in the seminal historic studies of Cosgrove, Tate and coworkers. Our study will enable others to perform radiotracer experiments to analyze fluxes of phosphate to/from inositol hexakisphosphates in different soils.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
In consideration of the different forms of inositol hexakisphosphate identified in soils: 1D-chiro-, myo-, neo- and scyllo- ((Anderson 1964; Anderson and Malcolm 1974; Baker 1974, cited in Turner et al. 2002; Cosgrove 1962, 1963, 1966, 1969a, b; Cosgrove and Tate 1963; Halstead and Anderson 1970; L’Annunziata 1975; L’Annunziata and Fuller 1971; L’Annunziata et al. 1972; reviewed, Cosgrove 1980); Irving and Cosgrove 1982), it remains unclear what the biotic or abiotic origins of D-chiro-, neo- and scyllo-inositol phosphates are (L’Annunziata 2007; Turner and Richardson 2004; Turner et al. 2002). A limited number of studies have shown biotic contribution to the epimerization of unsubstituted inositols (Cosgrove 1969b; L’Annunziata 1975; L’Annunziata and Gonzalez 1977 (reviewed L'Annunziata 2007)), or have shown that chemical, and hence, geochemical, epimerization of myo-inositol pentakisphosphate is possible (Cosgrove 1972). It is clear from the foregoing that studies of soil phosphate transformations, particularly those arising from input of myo-inositol hexakisphosphate from plant sources, would be greatly enabled by the provision of 32P or 33P-labelled myo-inositol hexakisphosphate, and, indeed, of other inositol hexakisphosphates. Such materials would, with established extraction and separation techniques, allow facile determination of the exchange of phosphate between organic and inorganic pools and, with appropriate separation techniques, would allow study of transformations of different isomers of inositol hexakisphosphate. With labelled inositol hexakisphosphates and an increasing literature on the ‘pathways’ of myo-inositol hexakisphosphate degradation by phytases of different classes; cysteine phytase, histidine acid phytase, purple-acid phytase, β-propeller phytase (Konietzny and Greiner 2002), it would be possible to begin to describe ‘pathways’ of inositol hexakisphosphate turnover in soils and the contribution of different organisms to that turnover.
With these thoughts in mind, we have sought to synthesize 32P-labeled inositol hexakisphosphates by enzymic means. We have taken opportunity of a recombinant inositol pentakisphosphate 2-kinase (IP5 2-K, also known as IPK1) characterized (Banos-Sanz et al. 2012; Gonzalez et al. 2010; Gosein and Miller 2013; Sweetman et al. 2006). This enzyme transfers the gamma-phosphate) from ATP to the sole axial hydroxyl on carbon 2 of myo-inositol phosphates, and is believed to be the enzyme responsible for synthesis of myo-inositol hexakisphosphate in all kingdoms that make this molecule. We reasoned that the enzyme might be capable of transferring phosphate from ATP to the axial hydroxyl(s) of other inositols bearing equatorial phosphates.
The structures of the different inositol ‘parents’ of the inositol phosphates used in this study are shown in Fig. 1. The rules for numbering of carbon atoms, and hence of inositol phosphates bearing phosphate substituents on particular carbons are given in the IUPAC-IUB rules (IUPAC-IUB 1973, 1977). For myo-inositol phosphates, only, a relaxation of the rules (NC-IUB 1989) allows numbering of carbons by the D- (1D) or L- (1L) nomenclature, e.g. to assist in delineating metabolic sequences. The 1D- and 1L- numbering of myo-inositol is shown in Fig. 1. Supplemental Fig. 1 shows symmetry aspects of the ‘parent’ inositols of the myo-, neo-, 1D-chiro- and scyllo-inositol phosphates discussed hereafter, while Supplemental Fig. 2 shows the structures of the substrates and products obtained therefrom.
The structures of myo-, neo- scyllo- and 1D–chiro-inositols. The projections shown left to right are a Mills projection, a Haworth projection and a three-dimensional structure. Carbon atoms in the ring are numbered according to the IUPAC/IUPAC-IUB recommendations (1973, 1977). For myo-inositol, both 1L- (upper) and 1D- (lower) notation is shown
For the assistance of researchers wishing to adopt these methods, we provide (Table 1) a summary of the methodologies used with an indication of their applicability and a reference to prior use of the method. We also list the figures in this manuscript in which the method is applied.
Methods
Inositol phosphate substrates
The synthesis of neo-inositol 1,3,4,6-tetrakisphosphate (neo-Ins(1,3,4,6)P4), 1D-chiro-inositol 1,3,4,6-tetrakisphosphate (1D-chiro-Ins(1,3,4,6)P4), 1D-chiro-inositol 2,3,4,5-tetrakisphosphate (1D-chiro-Ins(2,3,4,5)P4), myo-inositol 1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate (myo-Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P5), scyllo-inositol pentakisphosphate and of neo- and 1D-chiro inositol hexakisphosphates was described (Diogenous 1999; Liu et al. 1999; Liu et al. 2001; Godage et al. 2013; Riley et al. 2006; Turner et al. 2012)). Myo-inositol hexakisphosphate was obtained from Merck Millipore (Product No. 407125).
Radioisotopes
ATP, [γ-32P]- 3000 Ci mmol−1 was obtained from PerkinElmer.
Cloning and expression of AtIPK1
Arabidopsis thaliana IPK1 (AGI number): At5G42810, was cloned from Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 cDNA with forward primer AAGTTCGTTTTCAGGGCCCGATGGAGATGATTTTGGAGGAGAA and reverse primer ATGGTCTAGAAAGCTTTAGCTGTGGGAAGGTTTTG (vector specific sequence in italics) using Phusion High Fidelity Polymerase (Thermo Scientific). Purified product (Wizard SV Gel and PCR Cleanup System, Promega) was inserted into pOPINF linearized with HindIII and KpnI (Berrow et al. 2007) by ligation independent cloning using In Fusion HD enzyme kit (Clontech). The vector adds a N-terminal hexahistidine tag to the recombinant protein. Recombinant plasmid was transformed into E coli Rosetta (DE3) (Novagen) and protein production induced from an overnight culture grown in LB containing 0.5% (w/v) glucose and ampicillin by transfer to LB containing 0.5 mM IPTG and ampicillin with further growth for 7 h at 25 °C.
Protein purification
AtIPK1 was purified according to (Banos-Sanz et al. 2012).
Enzyme assays
For assays without radiolabel, inositol phosphate-dependent conversion of ATP to ADP was followed by reverse-phase ion pair HPLC and subsequent detection of nucleotides at 260 nm (Caddick et al. 2008). Briefly, 1 μg enzyme was incubated with 500 μM inositol phosphate and 50 μM ATP in 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.3, 1 mM MgCl2 for 2 h at 25 °C, the volume of the assay was 20 μL. Reactions were terminated by the addition of 1 μL of conc. HCl, followed after 5 min on ice by the addition of 50 μL water. Aliquots (50 μL) were analysed by HPLC.
For assays with radiolabel, ATP-dependent conversion of inositol phosphates to higher (more phosphorylated) species was followed by anion-exchange HPLC with on-line detection of 32P. Briefly, 1 μg enzyme was incubated with 500 μM inositol phosphate and 5 μM ATP in the presence of 0.37 MBq [γ-32P]ATP in 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.3, 1 mM MgCl2 for 1 h at 25 °C, the volume of the assay was 20 μL. The reaction products were diluted with water and approximately 1–5% of the products were analysed by HPLC.
HPLC separation of inositol phosphates
Radiolabeled inositol phosphates were separated by anion exchange HPLC on Partisphere SAX columns eluted at a flow rate of 1 mL min−1 with a gradient derived by mixing solvent from reservoirs containing (A) water and (B) 1.25 M (NH4)2HPO4, adjusted to pH 3.8 with H3PO4, according to the following schedule: time (min), % B; 0, 0; 5, 0; 65, 100. Radioactivity was detected by Cerenkov counting in a Radiomatic A500 Series Flo Detector (Canberra Packard, Pangbourne, Bucks, UK) fitted with a 0.5 ml flow cell using an integration interval of 12 s (Hanke et al. 2012).
Non-labelled inositol phosphates were resolved by anion exchange HPLC on a 250 × 3 mm i.d. CarboPac PA200 column (Dionex UK, Ltd) and guard column 50 × 3 mm of the same material, eluted at a flow rate of 0.4 mL min−1 with gradients of either HCl or methanesulfonic acid (Blaabjerg et al. 2010). Inositol phosphates were detected after post-column addition of 0.1% (w/v) ferric nitrate in 2% HClO4 (Phillippy and Bland 1988) delivered at a flow rate of 0.2 mL min−1. The gradient for both eluents was (A) water, (B) 0.6 M acid: time (min), % B; 0, 0; 25, 100; 38, 100.
HPLC separation of nucleotides
Aliquots of the products of enzyme assays were analysed according to (Caddick et al. 2008).
Nomenclature
For the purpose of this article, the term ‘Ins’ with prefix 1D-chiro-, myo-, neo- or scyllo- is used as an abbreviation of the described inositol phosphate. Hence, neo-inositol 1,3,4,6-tetrakisphosphate is abbreviated neo-Ins(1,3,4,6)P 4. It should be noted, however, that the numbering of phosphate substituents (of the carbon atoms to which they are attached) is not necessarily the same for different stereoisomers of inositol. The reader is referred to Shears and Turner (2007) for a concise description of terminology and to (Thomas et al. 2016) for a comprehensive review of inositol and inositol phosphate nomenclature and terminology.
Results
AtIP5 2-K can be used to synthesize a range of inositol phosphate epimers, verifiable by non-radioactive assay of inositol phosphate production
We have previously described the use of AtIP5 2-K to synthesize myo-Ins(1,[32P]2,3,4,5,6)P 6 from [γ-32P]ATP and myo-Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P 5 (Nagy et al. 2009). Here, we have further examined the ability of AtIP5-2 K to phosphorylate myo-Ins(1,3,4,6)P 4. We did so, not only because myo-Ins(1,3,4,6)P 4 possesses an axial 2-OH, but also because of the availability of the neo-inositol epimer, neo-Ins(1,3,4,6)P 4 (Diogenous 1999). This inositol phosphate shares the plane of symmetry that bisects the myo-Ins(1,3,4,6)P 4 molecule between C2 and C5, but also possesses a second axial hydroxyl on C5 which creates a C 2-axis of rotational symmetry that bisects the C1-C6 bond and the C3-C4 bond (Supplementary Figure 1). The consequence of this is that single phosphorylation of C2 generates the same product as phosphorylation of C5, while in contrast phosphorylation of C2 of myo-Ins(1,3,4,6)P 4 is not equivalent to phosphorylation of C5.
We incubated AtIP5 2-K with 500 μM inositol phosphate and 50 μM ATP. The products were resolved by reverse-phase ion-pair HPLC with detection of nucleotides at 260 nm (Fig. 2). Peak areas were integrated and the % of the nucleotide converted to ADP was calculated. A control incubation without inositol phosphate confirmed that AtIP5 2-K is not a phosphatase; the 1.3% of nucleotide recovered as ADP is typical of the level of contamination of commercial ATP with ADP (Fig. 2a). Inclusion of myo-Ins(1,3,4,6)P 4 increased ADP production, 12.1% of total nucleotide was recovered as ADP, without production of AMP (Fig. 2b), whereas for the physiological substrate myo-Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P 5, included at 50 μM, 26% of nucleotide was recovered as ADP (Fig. 2c). Clearly, myo-Ins(1,3,4,6)P4 is a substrate, albeit a poorer one than myo-Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P 5. In contrast, neo-Ins(1,3,4,6)P 4 was a strong substrate with ADP production at 90.8% (Fig. 2d).
Phosphotransferase reactions catalysed by AtIP5 2-K. The nucleotide products of reactions of enzyme, ATP and different inositol phosphates were separated by ion-pair RP-HPLC and detected by absorbance at 260 nm. a no inositol phosphate; b myo-Ins(1,3,4,6)P 4; c myo-Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P 5; d neo-Ins(1,3,4,6)P 4; e 1D–chiro-Ins(2,3,4,5)P 4; f 1D–chiro-Ins(1,3,4,6)P 4
Similarly, inclusion of 1D-chiro-Ins(2,3,4,5)P 4 at 500 μM resulted in 92% conversion of ATP to ADP (Fig. 2e), while 1D-chiro-Ins(1,3,4,6)P 4 whose two hydroxyls, on C2 and C5 are equatorial (Supplementary Figure 1) was not a substrate for AtIP5 2-K, with ADP representing 1.5% of the total nucleotide (Fig. 2f).
These results confirm the utility of neo-Ins(1,3,4,6)P 4 and 1D-chiro-Ins(2,3,4,5)P 4 as substrates from which higher neo- and 1D-chiro-inositol phosphates can be synthesized with AtIP5 2-K. They further confirm the exclusive phosphorylation of axial hydroxyls by this enzyme (Gonzalez et al. 2010; Sweetman et al. 2006).
We additionally tested racemic mixtures of 1D/L-neo-Ins(1,2,4)P 3 and 1D/L -neo-Ins(1,3,4)P 3 as substrates in extended (16 h) incubations at 500 μM concentration with 50 μM ATP. We did not observe production of ADP, thus these molecules are not substrates despite possessing one and two axial hydroxyls at C5, and C2 and C5 respectively (data not shown).
AtIP5 2-K can be used to synthesize a range of 32P-labeled inositol phosphates
Having established that neo-Ins(1,3,4,6)P 4 and 1D-chiro-Ins(2,3,4,5)P 4 are novel substrates of AtIP5 2 K, we performed enzyme assays to produce 32P-labelled inositol phosphates. The substrate concentrations used were 500 μM inositol phosphate and 5 μM ATP. Reactions were terminated and the products spiked with additional ATP to allow online tandem UV-radioactivity monitoring of the chromatography (Fig. 3). We included myo-Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P 5 as the canonical substrate and observed (Fig. 3a) in addition to a major peak of myo-InsP 6 eluting at a retention time of 55 min, a small peak of unidentified material eluting at 38.8 min, a major peak of unreacted ATP at 25.2 min and a peak of inorganic phosphate at 14.6 min. We note that others have reported impurities in commercial [32P]ATP that elute on Partisphere SAX columns with similar chromatographic mobility to myo-InsP 4s (Stephens 1990).
Synthesis of 32P-labelled inositol phosphates with AtIP5 2-K. The inositol phosphate products of reactions of enzyme, [32P]ATP and different inositol phosphates were separated by Partisphere Strong Anion Exchange HPLC and radioactivity estimated by on-line Cerenkov counting. a myo-Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P 5; b neo-Ins(1,3,4,6)P 4; c 1D–chiro-Ins(1,3,4,6)P 4, d 1D–chiro-Ins(2,3,4,5)P 4. The peaks labelled are the 32P labelled products or reactants (ATP)
Provision of neo-Ins(1,3,4,6)P 4 as substrate yielded (Fig. 3b) a major peak of label with the chromatographic property of InsP 5 at 46.4 min and a more polar (highly charged peak) with the chromatographic property of an InsP 6. This peak eluted at 56.4 min, slightly after myo-InsP 6. The trace also showed peaks of assumed impurity, ATP and inorganic phosphate. Considering the structure of neo-Ins(1,3,4,6)P 4 and its C 2 axis of rotational symmetry (Supplemental Figs. 1, 2), the two axial hydroxyls are superposable so there is only one possible InsP 5 product. IUPAC conventions recommend the naming of substituents by the lowest numbered locants, hence single phosphorylation of one axial hydroxyl of neo-Ins(1,3,4,6)P 4 yields neo-Ins(1,2,3,4,6)P 5 = neo-Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P 5 with preferred use of the former name. The addition of 32P to an unlabeled substrate therefore yields neo-Ins(1,[32P]2,3,4,6)P 5. The elution of a second more polar peak, we assume to represent the double phosphorylation of neo-Ins(1,3,4,6)P 4 to give neo-Ins(1,[32P]2,3,4,[32P]5,6)P 6.
We also tested 1D-chiro-Ins(1,3,4,6)P 4 and 1D-chiro-Ins(2,3,4,5)P 4 as co-substrates with [32P]ATP (Fig. 3c, d). Significantly, the former, which bears equatorial hydroxyls on C2 and C5, and lacks axial hydroxyls (Fig. 1; Supplemental Figs. 1, 2), was not a substrate and yielded peaks of unreacted ATP, inorganic phosphate and the assumed contaminant with retention time 39 min (Fig. 3c). In contrast, 1D-chiro-Ins(2,3,4,5)P 4, like neo-Ins(1,3,4,6)P 4, yielded 32P-labeled peaks with the chromatographic mobility of InsP 5, retention time 48 min; and InsP 6, retention time 59.5 min (Fig. 3d). Comparison of the retention time of peaks of InsP 5 and InsP 6 products (Fig. 3a–d) reveals that the InsP 5 and InsP 6 products of different epimers of inositol (tetrakisphosphate) are chromatographically distinct. Again, 1D-chiro-Ins(2,3,4,5)P 4, another substrate with two axial hydroxyls, yielded products which, relative to the substrate, were singly and doubly phosphorylated by AtIP5 2-K. Moreover, 1D-chiro-Ins(2,3,4,5)P 4 possesses a C 2-axis of symmetry, here bisecting the C1-C6 and C3-C4 bonds, which superposes C1 and C2 substituents. Consequently, a common InsP 5 product is generated from phosphorylation of either axial hydroxyl and the product is 1D-chiro-Ins(1,2,3,4,5)P 5, here 1D-chiro-Ins([32P]1,2,3,4,5)P 5. The InsP 6 product is 1D-chiro-Ins([32P]1,2,3,4,5,[32P]6)P 6.
Different phytases yield characteristic product profiles from 32P-labeled myo-inositol hexakisphosphate
By way of illustration of how different phytases yield different product profiles from the same substrate, we show (Fig. 4) the products of progressive dephosphorylation of myo-Ins(1,[32P]2,3,4,5,6)P 6 by histidine acid phytases of fungal and bacterial origin. We chose Aspergillus ficuum phytase, a D-3 phytase (data of Fig. 4c), where D-3 signifies the position of attack on myo-InsP 6 and HD is one of the canonical motifs, D (aspartate) being a proton donor that activates a water molecule that is responsible for the cleavage of scissile phosphate. The other phytase (data of Fig. 4b) is another histidine acid phytase, but is the archetype of a recently described HAE subclass where E (glutamate) is the likely proton donor. This enzyme generates three resolvable InsP 5 products from myo-InsP 6 (Stentz et al. 2014). These data reveal the utility of inositol hexakisphosphate labeled on the axial 2-position for study of phytases in vitro. Clearly, they indicate the potential utility of such compounds and such chromatography for study of soil processes.
Separations of 32P labelled inositol phosphate products of dephosphorylation of myo-Ins(1,[32P]2,3,4,5,6)P 5 by HAE (Bacteroides thetaiotomicron Minpp) and HD (Aspergillus niger) phytases. The products of reactions of a no enzyme control; b BtMinpp and c A ficuum phytase were separated by Partisphere Strong Anion Exchange HPLC and radioactivity estimated by on-line Cerenkov counting. The positions of elution of representative classes of myo-inositol phosphate products and of contaminating ATP in the myo-[32P]InsP 6 preparation are indicated. The difference in retention time of inositol hexakisphosphate between different panels reflects the use of different Partisphere SAX columns for the separations
Separation of inositol hexakisphosphates identified in soils
Using the post-column complexation method (Phillippy and Bland 1988) and a CarboPac PA-200 column eluted with a gradient of HCl, we were able to resolve in order of increasing retention time, neo-InsP 6, muco-InsP 6, 1D-chiro-InsP 6, myo-InsP 6 and scyllo-InsP 6 (Fig. 5a), all samples obtained from the laboratory of the late Dennis Cosgrove. We assume that the muco-InsP 6 was that made by chemical phosphorylation of the inositol (Cosgrove 1975). The gradient shows a strongly sloping baseline arising from the acid eluent and this UV absorbance can be negated when using methanesulfonic acid as the eluent (Blaabjerg et al. 2010); however, at least up to 0.6 M, methanesulfonic acid was not a strong enough eluent to elute scyllo-InsP 6 from this column.
Separations of soil-representative inositol phosphates on a Dionex CarboPac PA200 column. The column was eluted with a gradient of HCl (a) or methanesulfonic acid (b) and inositol phosphates detected by post-column complexation with ferric nitrate in perchloric acid and subsequent detection at 290 nm. a, b Inositol phosphates were obtained from the laboratory of the late DJ Cosgrove. a the traces from individual injections (approximately 20 nmol) of different inositol hexakisphosphates are offset on the Y-scale to aid visualisation. b Samples of individual injections of synthetic neo-InsP 4 with retention time 16–17 min, neo-InsP 5 with retention time 21–22 min and neo-InsP 6 with retention time 26.9 min are overlaid
Separation of neo-inositol phosphates
Methanesulfonic acid was, however, suitable for separation of neo-InsPs: neo-InsP 4s, neo-InsP 5s and neo-InsP 6 (Fig. 5b), again, these compounds were likely produced by chemical phosphorylation of neo-inositol with sodium trimetaphosphate (Cosgrove 1969a). Irving (1980) reported that neo-InsP 6 was a good substrate of both the Pseudomonas (sp. unknown) bacterium (SB2) phytase of Cosgrove (Cosgrove et al. 1970) and A. ficuum phytase (Irving and Cosgrove 1974). We note that there are nine possible neo-InsP 4s, comprised of three pairs of enantiomers and three meso-compounds and there are three possible neo-InsP 5s (Thomas et al. 2016). Of the neo-InsP 5s, two: 1L-neo-Ins(1,2,3,4,5)P 5 = 1D-neo-Ins(1,2,3,5,6)P 5 and 1D-neo-Ins(1,2,3,4,5)P 5 = 1L-neo-Ins(1,2,3,5,6)P 5 are a pair of enantiomers, the third is the meso-compound neo-Ins(1,2,3,4,6)P 5. In the absence of chiral HPLC methods for separating enantiomers of inositol phosphates, the separation of two peaks of neo-InsP 5 from the Cosgrove samples (Fig. 5b) is all that is achievable, but nevertheless could be diagnostic in studies of neo-InsP 6 transformation in soils.
Separation of inositol pentakisphosphates; the initial products of phytase action on inositol hexakisphosphate
Finally, we show (Fig. 6) the separation of a variety of InsP 5s including the four separable peaks of myo-InsP 5, identified in Fig. 6b by the position of the single hydroxyl; the two enantiomeric pairs 1D-1/3-OH and 1D-4/6-OH, indicated [1/3-OH] and [4/6-OH] on the figure, cannot be separated into individual enantiomers on non-chiral HPLC. Figure 6b also shows the single scyllo-InsP 5 and several InsP 5s present in a 1L-chiro-InsP 5 sample. There are three possible 1L-chiro-InsP 5s and, similarly, three possible 1D-chiro-InsP 5s. Minor chiro-InsP 5 peaks with common retention times were observed in the 1D-chiro-InsP 6 sample (Fig. 6a) and the 1L-chiro-InsP 5 sample (Fig. 6b), with two of the three co-eluting precisely with peaks in a 1L-chiro-InsP 5 sample (Fig. 6a). Clearly, this column/eluent combination has great resolving power for all the InsP 5s expected of soil samples.
HPLC separation of soil-representative inositol pentakisphosphates. A Dionex CarboPac PA200 column was eluted with a gradient of methanesulfonic acid. Inositol phosphates were obtained from the laboratory of the late DJ Cosgrove. a The traces from individual injections of different inositol phosphate samples: a 1D-chiro-InsP 6 sample with three 1D-chiro-InsP 5s, a 1L-chiro-InsP 5 sample with two 1L-chiro-InsP 5s and a neo-InsP 5 sample. b The traces from individual injections of different inositol phosphate samples: a 1L-chiro-InsP 6 sample with three 1L-chiro-InsP 5s, a scyllo-InsP 5 sample and an acid hydrolysate of myo-InsP 6 with all four resolvable myo-InsP 5. a, b Traces are offset on the Y-scale (left or right) to aid visualisation
Discussion
Inositol phosphates are major components of total soil phosphate and commonly the dominant organic phosphates in these environments (Turner et al. 2002). Despite their abundance, the origins of neo-, 1D-chiro- and scyllo-inositol hexakisphosphates in soils are poorly defined. It is plausible that they derive from the considerable inputs to soil of plant-derived myo-inositol hexakisphosphate, representing up to several percent of seed dry weight (Raboy 2003). It has been estimated that the sequestration of phosphorus in the myo-inositol hexakisphosphate, phytate, reserves of cropped organs of plants is equivalent to the per annum application of phosphorus as fertilizer to soils (Lott et al. 2000). It is remarkable therefore that we do not know, how plant-derived phytate is, likely, converted to other forms (epimers) of inositol phosphates, nor whether the processes are organismal or geochemical.
The epimerization of unsubstituted inositols by unsterilized soil is well described (L’Annunziata and Gonzalez 1977) and pathways by which myo-inositol and scyllo-inositol are converted have been engineered in Bacillus subtilis (Kang et al. 2017; Tanaka et al. 2013; Yamaoka et al. 2011). Similarly, Geobacillus kaustophilus HTA426, has three dehydrogenases that are capable of acting as epimerases to interconvert myo-, scyllo-, and 1D-chiro- inositols (Yoshida et al. 2012). The American cockroach, Periplaneta americana, was reported to possess epimerase activity producing neo-inositol. (Hipps et al. 1973). Plants have the ability to epimerize a number of methylated inositols, reviewed (Thomas et al. 2016). These studies seem to suggest that epimerase activity is restricted to inositols lacking phosphate substituents. It is intriguing therefore that scyllo-phosphoinositides were detected in barley (Narasimhan et al. 1997) and that highly phosphorylated inositol phosphates and diphosphoinositol phosphates containing neo- rather than myo-inositol are the major form of inositol phosphate in Entamoeba histolytica (Martin et al. 2000), despite earlier suggestion to the contrary (Martin et al. 1993).
Because the axial 2-phosphate is the last phosphate added in the synthesis of myo-inositol hexakisphosphate in plants (Brearley and Hanke 1996) and Dictyostelium discoideum (Stephens and Irvine 1990) it is possible to use the enzyme catalyzing this step to make myo-inositol 1,[32P]2,3,4,5,6-hexakisphosphate. Moreover, because most phytases of plant, bacterial or fungal origin do not remove this phosphate until very late in the sequence of myo-inositol hexakisphosphate degradation, if at all (Konietzny and Greiner 2002), the 32P label will be retained in successive myo-InsP 5, InsP 4, InsP 3 and InsP 2 products of dephosphorylation. Consequently, addition of 32P-labeled myo-InsP 6 to soils will, by simple chromatography using the methods elaborated here, allow researchers to study myo-inositol hexakisphosphate turnover in their soil of choice.
From a practical perspective, the use of a high energy β emitter such as 32P allows facile detection of radioactivity in column eluates by on-line Cerenkov counting, obviating the requirement for the addition of scintillation fluid. The use of flow-detectors therefore allows for simple collection of radiolabelled fractions, albeit in high salt concentrations required to elute highly polar inositol phosphates. For phosphate eluents, it is a simple exercise to desalt the collected fractions on Dowex AG1 X8 resin with volatile ammonium formate / formic acid mixtures, subsequently removed by freeze-drying (Stephens 1990; Brearley et al. 1997), while for HCl eluents the HCl can be removed directly by freeze-drying.
From a diagnostic perspective, because different phytases produce different myo-InsP 5 products (after all, this is the explanation of their classification e.g. as D3, Aspergillus; D6, E.coli or D5, lily pollen alkaline phytases (Konietzny and Greiner 2002)), simple analysis of products at the level of myo-InsP 5 will allow identification of the likely class of enzyme predominantly responsible for initial degradation of myo-InsP 6 in different soils. Indeed, it will be fascinating to correlate myo-inositol hexakisphosphate degradation products with metagenomic characterization of phytase and micoorganism abundance in different soils of the sort recently described (Neal et al. 2017).
In consideration of the routes of degradation of other inositol hexakisphosphates, the other labeled isomers that we describe will be of particular value. Perhaps unsurprisingly, we note the seminal work of Cosgrove (1969a, 1970) and Irving and Cosgrove (1971) in characterization of products of dephosphorylation of myo-inositol-, scyllo-inositol-, and 1D-chiro-inositol hexakisphosphate by a bacterial phytase, and similar studies of wheat phytase by Lim and Tate (1971, 1973) following the methods of Tomlinson and Ballou (1962). These works, reviewed (Irving 1980), show that the axial phosphates of myo- and 1D-chiro-inositol hexakisphosphates are the last to be removed by plant, bacterial and fungal phytases where tested. Similar conclusions can be drawn for fungal phytase action on 1L-chiro-inositol hexakisphosphate (Adelt et al. 2003). With these observations in mind, the use of the labeled InsP 5 and InsP 6 species and the powerful separation approaches identified in the foregoing should allow for facile assessment of the exchange of phosphate between different inositol phosphates in soil contexts.
Abbreviations
- HEPES:
-
4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid
- HPLC:
-
High pressure liquid chromatography
- i.d.:
-
Internal diameter
References
Adelt S, Podeschwa M, Dallmann G, Altenbach H-J, Vogel G (2003) Stereo- and regiospecificity of yeast phytases–chemical synthesis and enzymatic conversion of the substrate analogues neo- and L-chiro-inositol hexakisphosphate. Bioorg Chem 31:44–67
Anderson G (1964) Investigations on the analysis of inositol hexaphosphate in soil. Trans Int Congress Soil Sci 4:563–571
Anderson G, Malcolm RE (1974) The nature of alkali soluble soil organic phosphates. J Soil Sci 25:282–297
Baker RT (1974) Chemical nature and distribution of soil organic phosphate in two chronosequences of soils. PhD thesis, Department of Soil Science, University of Canterbury, New Zealand
Banos-Sanz JI, Sanz-Aparicio J, Whitfield H, Hamilton C, Brearley CA, Gonzalez B (2012) Conformational changes in inositol 1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate 2-kinase upon substrate binding: role of N-terminal lobe and enantiomeric substrate preference. J Biol Chem 287:29237–29249
Berrow NS, Alderton D, Sainsbury S, Nettleship J, Assenberg R, Rahman N, Stuart DI, Owens RJ (2007) A versatile ligation-independent cloning method suitable for high-throughput expression screening applications. Nucleic Acids Res 35:e45
Blaabjerg K, Hansen-Moller J, Poulsen HD (2010) High-performance ion chromatography method for separation and quantification of inositol phosphates in diets and digesta. J Chromatogr B Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci 878:347–354
Brearley CA, Hanke DE (1996) Metabolic evidence for the order of addition of individual phosphate esters in the myo-inositol moiety of inositol hexakisphosphate in the duckweed Spirodela polyrhiza L. Biochem J 314:227–233
Brearley CA, Parmar PN, Hanke DE (1997) Metabolic evidence for PtdIns(4,5)P-2-directed phospholipase C in permeabilized plant protoplasts. Biochem J 324:123–131
Caddick SE, Harrison CJ, Stavridou I, Mitchell JL, Hemmings AM, Brearley CA (2008) A Solanum tuberosum inositol phosphate kinase (StITPK1) displaying inositol phosphate-inositol phosphate and inositol phosphate-ADP phosphotransferase activities. FEBS Lett 582:1731–1737
Cosgrove DJ (1962) Forms of inositol hexaphosphate in soils. Nature 194:1265–1266
Cosgrove DJ (1963) The chemical nature of soil organic phosphorus. I. Inositol phosphates. Aust J Soil Res 1:203–214
Cosgrove DJ (1966) Detection of isomers of phytic acid in some Scottish and Californian soils. Soil Sci 102:42–43
Cosgrove DJ (1969a) Ion-exchange chromatography of inositol polyphosphates. Ann N Y Acad Sci 165:677–686
Cosgrove DJ (1969b) The chemical nature of soil organic phosphorus–II: characterization of the supposed dl-chiro-inositol hexaphosphate component of soil phytate as d-chiro-inositol hexaphosphate. Soil Biol Biochem 1:325–327
Cosgrove DJ (1970) Inositol phosphate phosphatase of microbiological origin. Inositol pentaphosphate intermediates in the dephosphorylation of the hexaphosphates of myo-inositol, scyllo-inositol, and D-chiro-inositol, by a bacterial (Pseudomonas sp.) phytase. Aust J Biol Sci 23:1207–1220
Cosgrove DJ (1972) The origin of inositol polyphosphates in soil. Some model experiments in aqueous systems involving the chemical phosphorylation of myo-inositol and the epimerization of myo-inositol pentaphosphates. Soil Biol Biochem 4:387–396
Cosgrove DK (1975) The phosphorylation of epi-inositol and muco-inositol with polyphosphoric acid. Carbohydr Chem 40:380–384
Cosgrove DJ (1980) Inositol phosphates—their chemistry, biochemistry and physiology. Elsevier Scientific, Amsterdam
Cosgrove DJ, Tate ME (1963) Occurrence of neo-inositol hexaphosphate in soils. Nature 200:568–569
Cosgrove DJ, Irving GC, Bromfield SM (1970) Inositol phosphate phosphatase of microbial origin. The isolation of soil bacteria having inositol phosphate phosphatase activity. Aust J Biol Sci 23:339–343
Diogenous S (1999) Synthesis of novel ligands for intervention in the polyphosphoinositide pathway of cell signalling. Ph.D. Thesis University of Bath
Godage HY, Riley AM, Woodman TJ, Thomas MP, Mahon MF, Potter BVL (2013) Regioselective opening of myo-inositol orthoesters: mechanism and synthetic utility. J Org Chem 78:2275–2288
Gonzalez B, Banos-Sanz JI, Villate M, Brearley CA, Sanz-Aparicio J (2010) Inositol 1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate 2-kinase is a distant IPK member with a singular inositide binding site for axial 2-OH recognition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:9608–9613
Gosein V, Miller GJ (2013) Roles of phosphate recognition in inositol 1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate 2-kinase (IPK1) substrate binding and activation. J Biol Chem 288:26908–26913
Halstead RL, Anderson G (1970) Chromatographic fractionation of organic phosphates from alkali, acid, and aqueous acetylacetone extracts of soils. Can J Soil Sci 50:111–119
Hanke DE, Parmar PN, Caddick SE, Green P, Brearley CA (2012) Synthesis of inositol phosphate ligands of plant hormone-receptor complexes: pathways of inositol hexakisphosphate turnover. Biochem J 444:601–609
Hipps PP, Sehgal RK, Holland WH, Sherman WR (1973) Identification and partial characterization of inositol: NAD+ epimerase and inosose: NAD(P)H reductase from the fat body of the American cockroach, Periplaneta americana L. Biochemistry 12:4507–4512
Irving GCJ (1980) Intermediates in the dephosphorylation of P6-inositols by phytase enzymes. In: Cosgrove DJ (ed) Inositol phosphates: their chemistry biochemistry and physiology. Studies in organic chemistry 4. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp 99–117
Irving GCJ, Cosgrove DJ (1971) Inositol phosphate phosphatases of microbiological origin. Some properties of a partially purified bacterial (Pseudomonas sp.) phytase. Aust J Biol Sci 24:547–557
Irving GCJ, Cosgrove DJ (1974) Inositol phosphate phosphatases of microbiological origin. Some properties of the partially purified phosphatases of Aspergillus ficuum NRRL 3135. Aust J Biol Sci 27:361–368
Irving GCJ, Cosgrove DJ (1982) The use of gas-liquid chromatography to determine the proportions of inositol isomers present as pentakis- and hexakisphosphates in alkaline extracts of soils. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 13:957–967
IUB Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Biochemistry (1989) Numbering of atoms in myo-inositol. Biochem J 258:1–2
IUPAC–IUB Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature (CBN) (1973) Nomenclature of cyclitols. Recommendations 1973. Biochem J 153:23–31
IUPAC–IUB Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature (CBN) (1977) Nomenclature of phosphorus-containing compounds of biochemical importance. Recommendations 1976. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 74:2222–2230
Kang DM, Tanaka K, Takenaka S, Ishikawa S, Yoshida KI (2017) Bacillus subtilis iolU encodes an additional NADP+−dependent scyllo-inositol dehydrogenase. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 1–7
Konietzny U, Greiner R (2002) Molecular and catalytic properties of phytate-degrading enzymes (phytases). Int J Food Sci Technol 37:791–812
L’Annunziata MF (1975) The origin and transformations of the soil inositol phosphate isomers. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 39:377–379
L’Annunziata MF, Fuller WH (1971) Soil and plant relationships of inositol phosphate stereoisomers; the identification of D-chiro- and muco-inositol phosphates in a desert soil and plant system. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 35(587–595):239–253
L’Annunziata MF, Gonzalez J (1977) Soil metabolic transformations of carbon-14-myo-inositol, carbon-14- phytic acid and carbon-14-iron(III) phytate. In: Soil organic matter studies, vol. 1. International Atomic Energy Agency, Publication No. IAEA-SM-211/66, Vienna, Austria, pp
L’Annunziata MF, Fuller WH, Brantley DS (1972) D-chiro-Inositol phosphate in a forest soil. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 36:183–184
L'Annunziata MF (2007) Seed phosphorus and the development of low-phytate crops. In: Turner BL, Richardson AE, Mullaney EJ (eds) Inositol phosphates: linking agriculture to the environment. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 41–59
Lim PE, Tate ME (1971) The phytases I. Lysolecithin-activated phytase from wheat bran. Biochim Biophys Acta 250:155–164
Lim PE, Tate ME (1973) The phytases II. Biochim Biophys Acta 302:316–328
Liu C, Davis RJ, Nahorski SR, Ballereau S, Spiess B, Potter BVL (1999) Synthesis, calcium mobilizing, and physicochemical properties of D-chiro-inositol 1,3,4,6-tetrakisphosphate, a novel and potent ligand at the D-myo-inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor. J Med Chem 42:1991–1998
Liu C, Riley AM, Yang X, Shears SB, Potter BVL (2001) Synthesis and biological activity of D- and L-chiro-inositol 2,3,4,5-tetrakisphosphate: design of a novel and potent inhibitor of Ins(3,4,5,6)P4 1-kinase/Ins(1,3,4)P3 5/6-kinase. J Med Chem 44:2984–2989
Lott JNA, Ockenden I, Raboy V, Batten G (2000) Phytic acid and phosphorus in crop seeds and fruits: a global estimate. Seed Sci Res 10:11–33
Martin JB, Bakker-Grunwald T, Klein G (1993) 31P-NMR analysis of Entamoeba histolytica. Occurrence of high amounts of two inositol phosphates. Eur J Biochem 214:711–718
Martin JB, Laussmann T, Bakker-Grunwald T, Vogel G, Klein G (2000) neo-inositol polyphosphates in the amoeba Entamoeba histolytica. J Biol Chem 275:10134–10140
Nagy R, Grob H, Weder B, Green P, Klein M, Frelet-Barrand A, Schjoerring JK, Brearley C, Martinoia E (2009) The Arabidopsis ATP-binding cassette protein AtMRP5/AtABCC5 is a high affinity inositol hexakisphosphate transporter involved in guard cell signaling and phytate storage. J Biol Chem 284:33614–33622
Narasimhan B, Pliska-Matyshak G, Kinnard R, Carstensen S, Ritter MA, Von Weymarn L, Murthy P (1997) Novel phosphoinositides in barley aleurone cells (additional evidence for the presence of phosphatidyl-scyllo-inositol). Plant Physiol 113:1385–1393
Neal AL, Rossmann M, Brearley C, Akkari E, Guyomar C, Clark IM, Allen E, Hirsch PR (2017) Land-use influences phosphatase gene microdiversity in soils. Environ Microbiol. doi:10.1111/1462-2920.13778
Phillippy BQ, Bland JM (1988) Gradient ion chromatography of inositol phosphates. Anal Biochem 175:162–166
Raboy V (2003) myo-Inositol-1,2,3,4,5,6-hexakisphosphate. Phytochemistry 64:1033–1043
Riley AM, Trusselle M, Kuad P, Borkovec M, Cho J, Choi JH, Qian X, Shears SB, Spiess B, Potter BVL (2006) scyllo-inositol pentakisphosphate as an analogue of myo-inositol 1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate: chemical synthesis, physicochemistry and biological applications. Chembiochem 7:1114–1122
Shears SB, Turner BL (2007) Nomenclature and terminology of inositol phosphates: clarification and a glossary of terms. In: Turner BL, Richardson AE, Mullaney EJ (eds) Inositol phosphates: linking agriculture to the environment. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 1–6
Stentz R, Osborne S, Horn N, Li AW, Hautefort I, Bongaerts R, Rouyer M, Bailey P, Shears SB, Hemmings AM, Brearley CA, Carding SR (2014) A bacterial homolog of a eukaryotic inositol phosphate signaling enzyme mediates cross-kingdom dialog in the mammalian gut. Cell Rep 6:646–656
Stephens LR (1990) Preparation and separation of inositol tetrakisphosphates and inositol pentakisphosphates and the establishment of enantiomeric configurations by the use of L-iditol dehydrogenase. In: Irvine RF (ed) Methods in inositide research. Raven Press, New York, NY, pp 9–30
Stephens LR, Irvine RF (1990) Stepwise phosphorylation of myo-inositol leading to myo-inositol hexakisphosphate in Dictyostelium. Nature 346:580–583
Sweetman D, Johnson S, Caddick SE, Hanke DE, Brearley CA (2006) Characterization of an Arabidopsis inositol 1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate 2-kinase (AtIPK1). Biochem J 394:95–103
Tanaka K, Tajima S, Takenaka S, Yoshida K (2013) An improved Bacillus subtilis cell factory for producing scyllo-inositol, a promising therapeutic agent for Alzheimer's disease. Microb Cell Factories 12:124
Thomas MP, Mills SJ, Potter BVL (2016) The "other" inositols and their phosphates: synthesis, biology, and medicine (with recent advances in myo-inositol chemistry). Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 55:1614–1650
Tomlinson RV, Ballou CE (1962) Myo-inositol polyphosphates intermediates in the dephosphorylation of phytic acid by phytase. Biochemistry 1:166–171
Turner BL, Richardson AE (2004) Identification of scyllo-inositol phosphates in soil by solution phosphorus-31 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:802–808
Turner BL, Paphazy MJ, Haygarth PM, McKelvie ID (2002) Inositol phosphates in the environment. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 357:449–469
Turner BL, Cheesman AW, Godage HY, Riley AM, Potter BVL (2012) Determination of neo- and D-chiro-inositol hexakisphosphate in soils by solution 31P NMR spectroscopy. Environ Sci Technol 46:4994–5002
Yamaoka M, Osawa S, Morinaga T, Takenaka S, Yoshida K (2011) A cell factory of Bacillus subtilis engineered for the simple bioconversion of myo-inositol to scyllo-inositol, a potential therapeutic agent for Alzheimer's disease. Microb Cell Factories 10:69
Yoshida K, Sanbongi A, Murakami A, Suzuki H, Takenaka S, Takami H (2012) Three inositol dehydrogenases involved in utilization and interconversion of inositol stereoisomers in a thermophile, Geobacillus kaustophilus HTA426. Microbiology 158:1942–1952
Acknowledgements
This work was supported with funding from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, UK Grant BB/N002024/1 to CAB and the Wellcome Trust. BVLP is a Wellcome Trust Senior Investigator (Grant 101010). We thank Max Tate (University of Adelaide) for the generous gift of soil-extracted inositol phosphates and thank Alan Richardson (CSIRO) for the gift of the same from the stocks of the late Dennis Cosgrove.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
HW, BVLP, AMR and CAB designed the study. All authors discussed the results, HW and CAB wrote the manuscript with input from other coauthors.
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Daniel Menezes-Blackburn.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplemental Figure 1
The structures of myo-, neo- scyllo- and 1D-chiro-inositols. The projections shown are a Mills projection and a three-dimensional structure. Carbon atoms in the ring are numbered according to the IUPAC/IUPAC-IUB recommendations (1973, 1977). Symmetry elements are shown in the Mills projection: planes of symmetry are indicated by dashed lines marked with an asterisk, rotational axes of symmetry are shown by dashed lines marked with symbol, o. The other dashed lines represent apparent symmetry elements that are not real (Thomas et al. 2016). Myo-inositol is shown in 1L- notation. (GIF 125 kb)
Supplemental Figure 2
The structures of myo-, neo- and 1D-chiro-inositol phosphate substrates and products of AtIP5 2-K. Three-dimensional structures are shown. Carbon atoms in the ring are numbered according to the IUPAC/IUPAC-IUB recommendations (1973, 1977). A,B, for myo-Ins(1,3,4,5,6)P 5, 1L- notation is used to number the carbons, but note that the product is a meso-compound. B, C, D, for neo-Ins(1,3,4,6)P 4, the substrate and products are meso-compounds. E, F, G, for D-chiro-Ins(2,3,4,5)P 4, the substrates and products are chiral. (GIF 310 kb)
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Whitfield, H., Riley, A.M., Diogenous, S. et al. Simple synthesis of 32P-labelled inositol hexakisphosphates for study of phosphate transformations. Plant Soil 427, 149–161 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3315-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3315-9