Plant and Soil

, Volume 369, Issue 1–2, pp 351–363 | Cite as

Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) in rice links to NH4 + toxicity and futile NH4 + cycling in roots

  • Gui Chen
  • Shiwei Guo
  • Herbert J. Kronzucker
  • Weiming Shi
Open Access
Regular Article

Abstract

Aims

Rice is known as an ammonium (NH4 +)-tolerant species. Nevertheless, rice can suffer NH4 + toxicity, and excessive use of nitrogen (N) fertilizer has raised NH4 + in many paddy soils to levels that reduce vegetative biomass and yield. Examining whether thresholds of NH4 + toxicity in rice are related to nitrogen-use efficiency (NUE) is the aim of this study.

Methods

A high-NUE (Wuyunjing 23, W23) and a low-NUE (Guidan 4, GD) rice cultivar were cultivated hydroponically, and growth, root morphology, total N and NH4 + concentration, root oxygen consumption, and transmembrane NH4 + fluxes in the root meristem and elongation zones were determined.

Results

We show that W23 possesses greater capacity to resist NH4 + toxicity, while GD is more susceptible. We furthermore show that tissue NH4 + accumulation and futile NH4 + cycling across the root-cell plasma membrane, previously linked to inhibited plant development under elevated NH4 +, are more pronounced in GD. NH4 + efflux in the root elongation zone, measured by SIET, was nearly sevenfold greater in GD than in W23, and this was coupled to strongly stimulated root respiration. In both cultivars, root growth was affected more severely by high NH4 + than shoot growth. High NH4 + mainly inhibited the development of total root length and root area, while the formation of lateral roots was unaffected.

Conclusions

It is concluded that the larger degree of seedling growth inhibition in low- vs. high-NUE rice genotypes is associated with significantly enhanced NH4 + cycling and tissue accumulation in the elongation zone of the root.

Keywords

Rice Nitrogen-use efficiency NH4+ toxicity Free NH4+ concentration NH4+ efflux Root respiration 

Introduction

Ammonium (NH4 +), one of the two inorganic nitrogen sources used by plants (NH4 + and NO3 ), is beneficial for plant growth under many circumstances and, indeed, serves as a ubiquitous intermediate in plant metabolism (Glass et al. 1997). Its assimilation furthermore entails lower energy costs compared to NO3 (Mehrer and Mohr 1989). Additionally, studies have shown NH4 + can improve the capacity to tolerate water stress in rice in comparison with NO3 (Guo et al. 2007), and has been shown to act as an inducer of resistance against salinity conditions in other species (Fernandez-Crespo et al. 2012). Nevertheless, NH4 + frequently reaches levels in soils that affect plant growth negatively. These negative effects manifest in stunted root growth, yield depression, and chlorosis of leaves (Britto and Kronzucker 2002; Balkos et al. 2010; Li et al. 2011b). However, higher plants display widely differing responses to NH4 + nutrition (Marschner 1995) and, accordingly, can be divided into tolerant and sensitive species (Britto and Kronzucker 2002). Based on a series of comparative studies, more than 18 kinds of plants or plant species, including eight kinds of wild plants, have been classified as highly adapted to NH4 + as a nitrogen source (Britto and Kronzucker 2002; Rios-Gonzalez et al. 2002; Cruz et al. 2006; Dominguez-Valdivia et al. 2008; Omari et al. 2010). Further, more than 22 kinds of plants or plant species, eight of which wild, have been classified as sensitive to the NH4 + source (Britto and Kronzucker 2002; Cruz et al. 2006; Roosta et al. 2009). Rice is regarded as unique in its high degree of NH4 + tolerance (Wang et al. 1993a, b). Studies have suggested that NH4 +-tolerant plants generally possess higher glutamine synthetase (GS) activity and less accumulation of free NH4 + in plant tissues (Magalhaes and Huber 1991; Balkos et al. 2010). In addition, several important hypotheses have been proposed, such as carbon depletion in roots induced by NH4 + assimilation (Finnemann and Schjoerring 1999), NH4 +-induced pH reduction in the root zone (Chaillou et al. 1991), deficiencies of mineral cations (Siddiqi et al. 2002), impairments in the N-glycosylation of proteins (Barth et al. 2010) and futile and energy-costly NH4 + cycling at the plasma membrane of both root and shoot cells (Britto et al. 2001; Kronzucker et al. 2001; Britto and Kronzucker 2002; Szczerba et al. 2008a; Li et al. 2010). However, to date, no single mechanism has been able to fully elucidate NH4 + toxicity (Britto and Kronzucker 2002; Roosta and Schjoerring 2008). On the basis of the fact that all of the hypothesized mechanisms with regard to NH4 + toxicity are linked to the permeation of NH4 + (or perhaps NH3) into the cell, useful clues can be obtained by studying transmembrane NH4 + fluxes. Britto et al. (2001) studied NH4 + fluxes across the root plasma membranes of barley and rice by using a high-precision positron tracing technique and found, at elevated levels of NH4 +, a significantly larger NH4 + efflux, accounting for up to 80 % of primary influx, in barely cells, which carried a high energetic cost and was independent of N metabolism. Britto et al. (2001) furthermore suggested that rice, unlike barley, was resistant to the respiratory drain induced by futile NH4 + cycling.

Despite its reputation as an NH4 +-tolerant species, rice can be affected negatively by elevated NH4 +, particularly at low K+ (Balkos et al. 2010), which, in turn, may be relieved by elevated K+, similar to conclusions reached in Arabidopsis (Li et al. 2010; Zou et al. 2012). Several studies have shown declines in K+-bearing clay minerals over extended cultivation periods in many rice-growing areas of China (Li et al. 2003). In fact, K+ deficiency has been observed in about 70 % of rice paddies in southeastern China (Yang et al. 2005). Similar declines have been noted in other parts of Asia (Cassman et al. 1997). On the other hand, in recent years, excessive use of N fertilizers, irrational fertilization patterns, and deposition of atmospheric NH3/NH4 + (Pearson and Stewart 1993; Li et al. 2011a) have resulted in the accumulation of excess NH4 + in many agricultural soils, and, consequently, soil-solution NH4 + concentrations have been reported in ranges of 2–20 mM, and some as high as 40 mM (Glass et al. 2002; Kronzucker et al. 2003).

China has the second-largest area of rice cultivation and the highest rice production in the world, accounting for 19 % of the world’s rice area and contributing 29 % of the world’s rice production (FAO 2010), and rice is mainly cultivated in irrigated paddy fields, where anaerobic conditions prevail and inorganic nitrogen is maintained as NH4 + (Freney et al. 1985). In recent years, an N-fertilization rate averaging 300–350 kg N ha−1 has been applied in many regions of China in a single rice season, with the goal of obtaining maximal grain yields (Wang et al. 2004). However, the high N-application rate has in fact decreased grain yields (Zhang et al. 2009; Sun et al. 2012; Qiao et al. 2012), and led to a drastic decline in N-utilization efficiency, with the additional consequence of increased N loss to the environment, polluting both the atmosphere and water systems (Zhu et al. 1997; Kondo et al. 2003). NUE, in an agronomic sense, can be defined as the ratio of grain yield to N supplied, namely, NUE = Gw/Ns, where Gw represents plant grain yield and Ns represents plant-available N in the soil including soil-native N and N applied as fertilizer, and is composed of N-uptake efficiency and physiological N-use efficiency (De Macale and Velk 2004). Thus, high-NUE cultivars are designated as such when they display higher grain yield under identical nitrogen supply. With improvements in rice breeding technology, new rice cultivars have been produced that exhibit higher grain yield under identical N-application levels and possess stronger capacity for resistance to high application of N fertilizer in comparison with older cultivars which are usually referred to as relatively low-NUE cultivars. It is speculated that low-NUE rice cultivars suffer from more severe damage in development caused by high amount application of N fertilizer, primarily by excessive NH4 +, compared with high-NUE cultivars.

Here, we examine rice cultivars differing in NUE, with the emphasis on performance on high NH4 + reflective of excessive applications of N. We specifically explore the relationship between root NH4 + fluxes, N content, tissue NH4 + accumulation, root morphology, and the capacity for tolerance to high NH4 +. We hope our experiments will lay a foundation for research into the relationship of NUE and NH4 + tolerance.

Materials and methods

Plant material and treatments

Two rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars, Wuyunjing 23 (W23) and Guidan 4 (GD), were chosen as experimental materials. Our field experiment showed when 200 kg N ha−1 were applied, the grain yields of W23 and GD were 8.93 t ha−1 and 5.09 t ha−1, respectively. Furthermore, when 270 kg N ha−1 were applied, W23 reached 9.28 t ha−1, compared to 4.27 t ha−1 in GD. Based on these results, W23 was defined as a high-NUE cultivar, and GD as a low-NUE cultivar.

After germination on moist filter paper, rice seeds were transferred to a 2.0 mmol L−1 CaSO4 solution for germination. After 3 days, seedlings were transferred to a 1/4-strength mixture of NO3 or NH4 +-containing nutrient solution, according to IRRI rice nutrient solution (Yoshida et al. 1972; for composition, see below). Three days after, seedlings were transferred to a half-strength mixture of NO3 or NH4 +-containing nutrient solution. Four days later, seedlings were supplied with full-strength mixture of NO3 or NH4 +-containing nutrient solution for 1 week, and then seedlings were supplied with either “normal” N (2.86 mol m−3 NH4 +-N, provided as (NH4)2SO4), namely CK treatment, or “high” N (15 mol m−3 NH4 +-N, provided as (NH4)2SO4). In addition, varying NH4 +-N concentrations (10, 20, 30 mol m−3) were also supplied to examine the relationship between NH4 + fluxes and NH4 + tolerance of the two rice cultivars. All treatments had eight replicates, with completely randomized design. The placement of different treatments was randomized to avoid edge effects in the growth chamber.

Rice plants were cultivated in a growth chamber at 25 °C with 70 % relative humidity and a 14-h light and 10-h dark cycle. The light intensity was set at 500 μmol photon m−2 s−1 at plant height. Except for N, composition of the nutrient solution was as follows: macronutrients (mol m−3): 1.02 K as K2SO4 and KH2PO4; 0.32 P as KH2PO4, 1.65 Mg as MgSO4, micronutrients (mmol m−3): 35.8 Fe as Fe-EDTA; 9.10 Mn as MnSO4; 0.15 Zn as ZnSO4; 0.16 Cu as CuSO4; 18.5 B as H3BO3; 0.52 Mo as (NH4)6Mo7O24; 0.1 Si as Na2SiO4. In NH4 +-containing nutrient solution, Ca2+ was supplied as CaCl2 (1.43 mol m−3), the pH of the nutrient solution was maintained at 5.50 ± 0.05 by adding 0.1 mol m−3 HCl or 0.1 mol m−3 NaOH daily, and the nitrification inhibitor DCD was added to each pot to prevent NH4 + oxidation. Nutrient solutions were exchanged every 2 days.

Biomass, total N accumulation and root morphology

15 days after treatments at normal and high N, rice plants were harvested and divided into above-ground parts and roots. All samples were kept in a drying oven at 105 °C for 30 min, and then at 70 °C until constant weight was achieved, at which point dry weight was recorded. Plant samples were digested with H2SO4-H2O2, and the concentration of N was determined using the Kjeldahl method. Root morphology including total root length, root volume, root surface area, average root diameter, and root tip number were analyzed using the root analysis instrument WinRhizo-LA1600 (Regent Instruments Inc., Quebec, Canada).

Tissue ammonium determination

Rice seedlings were harvested and desorbed in 10 mol m−3 CaSO4 for 5 min, so as to remove extracellular NH4 +. Roots and shoots were weighed separately and then transferred to polyethylene plastic vials with liquid N2 for storage at −80 °C. Approximately 0.5 g of root or shoot tissue was homogenized under liquid N2 using a mortar and pestle, followed by addition of 6 ml formic acid (10 mol m−3) to extract NH4 +. Subsamples of the homogenate were centrifuged at 2 °C for 10 min at 25,000 g, and filtered with 0.45 μm nylon filter (Costar, Corning Inc., Lowell, MA, USA) and centrifuged at 5,000 g (2 °C) for 5 min. Ammonium was analyzed by the o-phthalaldehyde (OPA) method using a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) system (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA, equipped with a Phenomenex Gemini C18 analytical column 4.6 mm × 150 mm; particle size 5 μm). The analytical principle was based on detection of fluorescence upon reaction between the fluorochrome OPA and NH4 + as described by Husted et al. (2000).

Measurement of net NH4+ fluxes with the SIET system

Net fluxes of NH4 + were measured non-invasively using SIET (scanning ion-selective electrode technique, SIET system BIO-003A; Younger USA Science and Technology Corp.; Applicable Electronics Inc.; Science Wares Inc., Falmouth, MA, USA). The principle of this method and the instrument are detailed in Sun et al. (2009). Measurements were performed at room temperature (24–26 °C). After growth of rice seedlings in normal-N (2.86 mol m−3 NH4 +-N) and high-N (15 mol m−3 NH4 +-N) nutrient solution for 15 days, the roots of seedlings were equilibrated in measuring solution for 20–30 min. The equilibrated seedlings were then transferred to the measuring chamber, a small plastic dish (3-cm diameter) containing 2–3 mL of fresh measuring solution, and fixed for measurement. The microelectrode was vibrated in the measuring solution between two positions, 5 μm and 35 μm from the root surface, along an axis perpendicular to the root. The background was recorded by vibrating the electrode in measuring solution not containing roots. The glass microelectrodes with 2–4 μm aperture were made and silanized by Xuyue Science and Technology Co., Ltd. 0.1 mol m−3 NH4 + as (NH4)2SO4 was added as back-filling solution, followed by 20 μM of commercially available ionophore cocktail for measuring NH4 + (NH4 + selective liquid ion-exchange cocktail #09879, Fluka Chemicals, Buchs, Switzerland) in front of the microelectrode. Prior to the flux measurements, the ion-selective electrodes were calibrated using NH4 + concentrations of 0.05 and 0.5 mol m−3. The net fluxes of NH4 + at the meristem and elongation zone were measured individually. Each plant was measured once. The final flux values at each zone were the means of more than eight individual plants from each treatment. The measuring solution was composed of 1.02 mol m−3 K as K2SO4 and KH2PO4; 0.32 mol m−3 P as KH2PO4, 1.65 mol m−3 Mg as MgSO4, 1.43 mol m−3 Ca as CaCl2 and 0.5 g/L MES (pH 5.5 adjusted with 1 M NaOH). All measurements of net NH4 + fluxes were carried out at Xuyue Science and Technology Co., Ltd (Beijing, China).

Root respiration

Excised roots of rice seedlings following 15-day treatment at normal and high N were used for root respiration measurements, using a Hansatech oxygen electrode and an Oxygraph control system (Hansatech Instruments, Norfolk, UK). Roots were cut into sections approximately 3 mm long while immersed in solution and using a razor blade, and were aged for a minimum of 3 h in aerated growth solution. About 0.3 g of root material was placed into 3 mL of growth solution, and the cuvette was sealed. The decline in O2 concentration was monitored for 15 min, with the initial, linear decline used to calculated O2 depletion rates (Balkos et al. 2010).

Statistical analysis

All data were statistically analyzed by means of the statistical software package SAS with LSD to identify differences. Significant differences (P < 5 %) between treatments are indicated by different letters.

Results

Total biomass accumulation and ratio of root to shoot

High NH4 + significantly inhibited total biomass accumulation in GD compared to growth on normal N level, by 27.3 %, while there was no statistically significant difference in W23 (Fig. 1a). Elevated NH4 + markedly suppressed the root:shoot ratio in both GD and W23, which indicated rice roots were more affected by elevated NH4 + than shoots. The suppression of the ratio was more substantial (29.5 %) in GD than in W23 (<10.8 %) (Fig. 1b). Figure 1c, d further show that high NH4 + suppressed root growth more than shoot growth, with decreases of 45.5 % and 18.6 % measured in roots of GD and W23, respectively, and only 22.8 % and 8.6 % in shoots.
Fig. 1

Percentage inhibition of total biomass (a), root-to-shoot ratio (b), shoot (c) and root (d) biomass in Wuyunjing 23 (W23) and Guidan 4 (GD) supplied with normal N (CK) and high N (15 mol m−3 NH4 +) levels. In (a), (b), (c), and (d), growth on CK was considered as 100 %. In (a), 100 % corresponds to 0.51 ± 0.10 g plant−1 for W23 and 1.55 ± 0.17 g plant−1 for GD. In (b), 100 % corresponds to 0.26 ± 0.02 for W23 and 0.25 ± 0.01 for GD. In (c), 100 % corresponds to 0.40 ± 0.08 g plant−1 for W23 and 1.25 ± 0.13 g plant−1 for GD. In (d), 100 % corresponds to 0.11 ± 0.02 g plant−1 for W23 and 0.31 ± 0.04 g plant−1 for GD. Bars show standard deviations and different letters indicate significant differences between normal N and high N levels in each rice cultivar (P < 0.05)

Root morphology

As shown in Table 1, under high NH4 +, total root length and root surface area in GD were inhibited compared with growth on normal N. By contrast, no significant differences were observed in W23. In addition, high NH4 + had little effect on root volume, average root diameter, or root tip number, showing that high NH4 + does not affect the formation of lateral roots in rice.
Table 1

Root morphology of W23 and GD supplied with normal N (CK) and high N (15 mol m−3 NH4 +)

Rice cultivar

N (NH4 +) level

Total length (cm)

Volume (cm3)

Surface area (cm2)

Average diameter (cm)

Tip number

W23

CK

229 ± 35.8 a

2.37 ± 0.08 a

82.5 ± 7.62 a

1.16 ± 0.07 a

170 ± 14.6 a

15 mol m−3

220 ± 19.2 a

2.59 ± 0.31 a

84.3 ± 3.63 a

1.23 ± 0.12 a

172 ± 49.9 a

GD

CK

362 ± 44.8 a

2.75 ± 0.26 a

112 ± 8.73 a

0.98 ± 0.06 a

185 ± 30.6 a

15 mol m−3

282 ± 13.9 b

2.68 ± 0.31 a

94.0 ± 3.92 b

1.08 ± 0.07 a

189 ± 15.0 a

Data are means ± SD of three replicates; different letters indicate significant differences between normal N and high N levels in each rice cultivar (P < 0.05)

Total N accumulation and N concentration

N accumulation paralleled biomass accumulation in both cultivars, with smaller N accumulation observed in both root and shoot of GD in the high NH4 + treatment compared to normal N treatments. Moreover, a larger extent of suppression in N accumulation was observed in roots than shoots in GD, by 41.1 % and 28.8 %, respectively. However, no obvious N-accumulation differences were found in either organ of W23 (Fig. 2a, b). In addition, no differences in N content were found, when expressed as a percentage, in either roots or shoots of W23 and GD (Fig. 2c, d).
Fig. 2

Percentage inhibition of shoot-N (a) and root N accumulation (b), as affected by high NH4 +, shoot N concentration (c) and root N concentration (d) of W23 and GD supplied with normal N (CK) and high N (15 mol m−3 NH4 +) levels. In (a), (b), N accumulation on CK was considered as 100 %. In (a), 100 % corresponds to 13.0 ± 2.27 mg plant−1 for W23 and 40.5 ± 3.64 mg plant−1 for GD. In (b), 100 % corresponds to 2.57 ± 0.52 mg plant−1 for W23 and 9.38 ± 1.54 mg plant−1 for GD. Bars show standard deviations and different letters indicate significant differences between normal N and high N levels in each rice cultivar (P < 0.05)

Tissue NH4+ concentration

When supplied with high NH4 +, markedly higher NH4 + concentrations were observed in both shoot and root of W23 and GD in comparison with normal-N treatments. Similarly increased percentages were observed in shoots of both W23 and GD, 40 % and 41 %, respectively (Fig. 3a). However, dramatically larger NH4 + concentrations were detected in roots of GD when supplied with high NH4 + in comparison with those of W23: 255 % for GD, and only 83 % for W23 (Fig. 3b).
Fig. 3

Shoot NH4 + concentration (a) and root NH4 + concentration (b) of W23 and GD supplied with normal N (CK) and high N (15 mol m−3 NH4 +) levels. Bars show standard deviations and different letters indicate significant differences between normal N and high N levels in each rice cultivar (P < 0.05)

Net NH4+ fluxes at the meristem and elongation zones of rice roots

Net NH4 + fluxes at the surfaces of meristem and elongation zones of W23 and GD, assayed by SIET, showed NH4 + influx primarily in the meristem zones in both W23 and GD when supplied with normal N and high NH4 +, whereas high NH4 + stimulated NH4 + efflux in the elongation zones of both cultivars (Fig. 4a, b, c, d). Greater NH4 + influx was observed in the meristem zone of W23 compared with GD, and high NH4 + did not change the NH4 + flux direction in the meristematic zones in either rice cultivar (Fig. 4a, b, e). NH4 + efflux was detected in the elongation zones of both W23 and GD when supplied with high NH4 +, but there was a significantly larger NH4 + efflux in GD, some 670 % higher than W23 (Fig. 4c, d, f).
Fig. 4

Net plasma-membrane NH4 + fluxes in W23 and GD supplied with normal N (CK) and high N (15 mol m−3 NH4 +) levels in the meristematic zones (a), (b), and the elongation zones (c) (d), and mean values of NH4 + fluxes from (a), (b) and (c), (d), respectively. Each point represents the mean ± SD of eight individual plants, and different letters indicate significant differences between normal N and high N levels in each rice cultivar (P < 0.05)

Root respiration

High NH4 + stimulated O2 consumption in roots to differing extents in W23 and GD when compared with normal-N treatments. No significant differences were observed in W23. However, in GD, high NH4 + markedly increased root O2 consumption (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5

Root O2 consumption of W23 and GD supplied with normal N (CK) and high N (15 mol m−3 NH4 +) levels. Bars show standard deviations and different letters indicate significant differences between normal N and high N levels in each rice cultivar (P < 0.05)

The relationship between net NH4+ fluxes and NH4+ tolerance of the two rice cultivars

As shown in Fig. 6a, total biomass accumulation was decreased with increasing NH4 + concentration from CK (2.86 mol m−3 NH4 +) to 30 mol m−3 NH4 +. However, larger degrees of growth suppression were detected in GD with increasing NH4 + concentration in comparison with W23. Meanwhile, a larger degree of gradually increased NH4 + effluxes in the elongation zone was observed in GD with increasing NH4 + concentration. In addition, NH4 + effluxes in the meristematic zone were also detected in GD when NH4 + concentrations were raised to 20 and 30 mol m−3 (Fig. 6b, c). This indicates that NH4 + efflux at the root surface is linked to the capacity for NH4 + tolerance in rice.
Fig. 6

Percentage inhibition of total biomass accumulation (a) as affected by a series of high NH4 + concentrations, and net plasma-membrane NH4 + fluxes in W23 and GD in the meristematic zone (b) and elongation zone (c) of roots, supplied with increasing NH4 + concentration (2.86 (CK), 10, 20, 30 mol m−3 NH4 +-N). In (a), growth on CK was considered as 100 %. In (a), 100 % corresponds to 0.57 ± 0.05 g plant−1 for W23 and 1.55 ± 0.28 g plant−1 for GD. Bars show standard deviations

Discussion

Inhibited development of rice plants and root morphology under high NH4+ in relation to NUE

Excessive NH4 + is known to inhibit the growth of most crop species (Roosta and Schjoerring 2008). In particular, stunted root growth is a principal symptom of the ion’s toxicity (Gerendas et al. 1997; Britto and Kronzucker 2002; Balkos et al. 2010; Roosta and Schjoerring 2008). In our study, a larger degree of inhibition of rice development, in particular in roots, was observed in the lower-NUE cultivar GD compared with the higher-NUE W23 (Fig. 1a, b, c, d), indicating that lower NUE in the two cultivars examined is associated with a lower threshold for NH4 + toxicity. More severe inhibition of rice root than shoot growth was observed in both W23 and GD (Fig. 1c, d), producing reduced root:shoot ratios in both cultivars when NH4 + was elevated (Fig. 1b). This agrees with observations of others, who related the effect to a competition for carbon skeletons between root growth and NH4 + assimilation in NH4 +-fed plants (Roosta and Schjoerring 2008). While carbohydrates were not determined in the present study, we measured enhanced NH4 + efflux (Fig. 4c, d, f) and respiratory oxygen consumption in roots (Fig. 5), which may have contributed to the reduced root:shoot ratio (see later discussion). Root architecture plays an essential role in the efficiency of nutrient and water acquisition from the soil (Lynch 1995), and, therefore, root morphologies of GD and W23 were further analyzed to assess root changes induced by elevated NH4 + and found that both total root length and root surface area were more severely inhibited in GD than in W23 (Table 1). As reported by Li et al. (2010) in Arabidopsis, the distance from the root apex to the first root hair was reduced markedly under high NH4 +, the latter study further demonstrated that cell elongation rather than cell division was affected when the root tip was in direct contact with NH4 +, indicating that root tip may function as a sensor in the perception of NH4 + stress. Based on these findings, the suppressed total root length in GD is attributed to inhibited cell elongation in the root elongation zone where, as in the previous study (Li et al. 2010), markedly larger NH4 + efflux was also detected (Table 1 and Fig. 4d, f). In addition, the number of the root tip itself was not affected by high NH4 + (Table 1), indicating that the “sensor system” for perceiving NH4 + stress remains intact under NH4 + stress in rice. Also interesting was that the formation of lateral roots was not obviously affected by high NH4 +, another conclusion that agrees with the earlier study by Li et al. (2010), who found high NH4 + did not inhibit the formation of lateral roots in Arabidopsis, a relatively NH4 +-sensitive species. Fundamentally, therefore, there appears to be little difference in the manner in which NH4 + affects the root architecture in NH4 +-tolerant and NH4 +-sensitive species, and species as well as cultivar differences are more a matter of threshold and degree than fundamental mechanistic difference.

In our study, high NH4 + also suppressed N accumulation in rice, reflecting the trend in biomass (Fig. 2a, b). As per De Macale and Velk (2004), pertinent to the seedling (vegetative) stage, physiological N-use efficiency is defined as biomass accumulation relative to N accumulation (Shi et al. 2010). In our work, a significantly larger decrease in N accumulation was observed in GD when supplied with high NH4 + relative to W23, which indicated a significantly more reduced N-uptake efficiency in the low-NUE GD when supplied with high NH4 + in the seedling stage (Fig. 2a, b). However, high NH4 + had little effect on physiological N-use efficiency in both W23 and GD, as no significant differences in N content (the ratio of N accumulation to biomass) were found (Fig. 2c, d). Therefore, N-uptake efficiency, rather than physiological N-use efficiency, declined in GD under high NH4 + condition compared to W23 in the seeding stage.

Relationship between free NH4+ content in roots and NUE under high NH4+

Ammonium influx by rice roots has been shown to exhibit a biphasic dependence on external NH4 + concentration (Wang et al. 1993a, b). At low NH4 + concentrations, NH4 + influx is mediated by a saturable HATS (high-affinity transport system), and at higher, including toxic, concentrations of NH4 +, it is mediated by a LATS (low-affinity transport system) (Wang et al. 1993b; Kronzucker et al. 2000; von Wiren et al. 2000; Britto and Kronzucker 2006). Moreover, the activity of LATS is apparently not downregulated, indeed might even be upregulated, and could cause higher fluxes with increased nitrogen status of the plant (Wang et al. 1993b; Rawat et al. 1999; Cerezo et al. 2001), and consequent NH4 + hyperaccumulation in tissues, considered a hallmark symptom of NH4 + toxicity (Britto et al. 2001; Szczerba et al. 2008b; Balkos et al. 2010; Li et al. 2012). In our study, high NH4 + stimulated free NH4 + accumulation in both shoot and root of W23 and GD (Fig. 3a, b). However, a dramatically larger free NH4 + content was detected in the root tissue of GD under high NH4 + compared with W23, an increase, compared to normal-N control, of 83 % in W23, and of 255 % in GD (Fig. 3b). Britto et al. (2001) suggested rice could maintain lower symplastic concentrations of NH4 + than barley (known to be susceptible to NH4 + toxicity) under elevated NH4 +, in part because it is capable of shifting the trans-plasmamembrane electrical potential (Δψ) to more positive values with increasing NH4 +, a response not seen in barely, which, like Arabidopsis (Hirsch et al. 1998), fails to down-regulate Δψ, which has the important biophysical consequence of lowering NH4 + influx through root cation channels and the ceiling for NH4 + accumulation in the rice cytosol. In addition, Wang et al. (1994) furthermore found the decline of membrane polarization with increasing NH4 + in rice was not followed by a restoration of that polarization in the steady state, possibly reflecting rice’s relatively higher NH4 + tolerance. Although this was not measured here and will be the focus of a future study, the relatively lower free root NH4 + content detected in W23 compared with GD (Fig. 3b) may well be related to a stronger capacity of adjusting Δψ across the plasma membrane in W23.

Relationship between NH4+ efflux in the elongation zone and root respiration

In the toxic range of NH4 + supply, NH4 + acquisition is mediated by a high-capacity, energetically passive, low-affinity transport system (LATS), and low-affinity NH4 + influx is accompanied by a nearly equal magnitude of NH4 + efflux, constituting a futile cycle of NH4 + ion across the plasma membrane (Britto and Kronzucker 2001, 2002, 2006). The substantial efflux of NH4 + under high NH4 + conditions has been demonstrated to be associated with high respiratory activity, in particular in NH4 +-sensitive species (Britto et al. 2001; Britto and Kronzucker 2001; Kronzucker et al. 2001; Britto and Kronzucker 2006). In our study, a significantly larger NH4 + efflux was observed in the elongation zone in GD under high NH4 + supply compared with W23 (Fig. 4c, d, f). Furthermore, markedly stronger O2 consumption was detected in GD than in W23 (Fig. 5), and this was in turn associated with suppressed growth, supporting the predictions from earlier models. Li et al. (2010) also observed significant NH4 + efflux in the elongation zone of Arabidopsis, which was coincident with the inhibition of root elongation. It is clear that significantly different thresholds exist within rice in response to NH4 + in terms of NH4 + entry, the degree of futile cycling, the increase in root respiration, and the suppression of growth, and these thresholds relate to NUE. Whether NUE and NH4 + toxicity relate to each other in this manner more generally will be examined in the future using large accessions of rice germplasms.

Conclusion

It is concluded that two rice cultivars with different NUE experience differential tolerance to high NH4 + in the seedling stage. In our study, growth development of relatively low-NUE GD was suppressed by high NH4 + to a larger extent than the higher-NUE W23 in the seedling stage, especially so for root growth. Total root length and root area were particularly affected. Furthermore, dramatically higher free NH4 + was detected in roots of GD than W23, which was related to relatively poor regulation of NH4 + influx at the plasma membrane under high NH4 +. Larger NH4 + efflux in the elongation zone of the root was observed in GD under high NH4 +. This was accompanied by significantly higher root respiration in comparison with W23. In conclusion, the relatively high-NUE W23 showed superior tolerance to high NH4 + compared with the relatively low-NUE GD in the seedling stage, and this was at least partially related to enhanced respiration and futile transmembrane cycling of the NH4 + ion in the sensitive genotype.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This investigation was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41171234 and 30900923), and the projects supported by National Science Technology Program (2012BAD15B03) and Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest (201003014-1) and Jiangsu Agriculture Science and Technology Innovation Fund (JASTIF), SCX(12)3133

References

  1. Balkos KD, Britto DT, Kronzucker HJ (2010) Optimization of ammonium acquisition and metabolism by potassium in rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. IR-72). Plant Cell Environ 33:23–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02046.x PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Barth C, Couzd ZA, Steelt HP, Imperio RM (2010) A mutation in GDP-mannose pyrophosphorylase causes conditional hypersensitivity to ammonium, resulting in Arabidopsis root growth inhibition, altered ammonium metabolism, and hormone homeostasis. J Exp Bot 61:379–394. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp310 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Britto DT, Kronzucker HJ (2001) Constancy of nitrogen turnover kinetics in the plant cell: insights into the integration of subcellular N fluxes. Planta 213:175–181. doi: 10.1007/s004250000497 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Britto DT, Kronzucker HJ (2002) NH4 + toxicity in higher plants: a critical review. J Plant Physiol 159:567–584. doi: 10.1078/0176-1617-0774 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Britto DT, Kronzucker HJ (2006) Futile cycling at the plasma membrane: a hallmark of low-affinity nutrient transport. Trends Plant Sci 11:529–534. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.09.011 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Britto DT, Siddiqi MY, Glass ADM, Kronzucker HJ (2001) Futile transmembrane NH4 + cycling: a cellular hypothesis to explain ammonium toxicity in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98(7):4255–4258. doi: 10.1073/pnas.061034698 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cassman KG, Peng SB, Dobermann A (1997) Nutritional physiology of the rice plants and productivity decline of irrigated rice systems in the tropics. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 43:1101–1106Google Scholar
  8. Cerezo M, Tillard P, Gojon A, Primo-Millo E, Garcia-Agustin P (2001) Characterization and regulation of ammonium transport systems in Citrus plants. Planta 214:97–105. doi: 10.1007/s004250100590 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chaillou S, Vessey JK, Morot-Gaudry JF, Raper CD Jr, Henry LT, Boutin JP (1991) Expression of characteristics of ammonium nutrition as affected by pH of the root medium. J Exp Bot 42:189–196. doi: 10.1093/jxb/42.2.189 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cruz C, Bio AFM, Dominguez-Valdivia MD, Aparicio-Tejo PM, Lamsfus C, Martins-Loucao MA (2006) How does glutamine synthetase activity determine plant tolerance to ammonium? Planta 223:1068–1080. doi: 10.1007/s00425-005-0155-2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Macale MAR, Velk PLG (2004) The role of Azolla cover in improving the nitrogen use efficiency of lowland rice. Plant Soil 263:311–321. doi: 10.1023/B:PLSO.0000047742.67467.50 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dominguez-Valdivia MD, Aparicio-Tejo PM, Lamsfus C, Cruz C, Martins-Loucao MA, Moran JF (2008) Nitrogen nutrition and antioxidant metabolism in ammonium-tolerant and –sensitive plants. Physiol Plant 132:359–369. doi: 10.1111/ppl.2008.132 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fernandez-Crespo E, Camanes G, Garcia-Agustin P (2012) Ammonium enhances resistance to salinity stress in citrus plants. J Plant Physiol 169:1183–1191. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2012.04.011 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Finnemann J, Schjoerring JK (1999) Translocation of NH4 + in oilseed rape plants in relation to glutamine synthetase isogene expression and activity. Physiol Plant 105:469–477. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3054.1999.105311.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2010) Available at http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=567 (verified 27 October 2010)
  16. Freney JR, Leuning R, Simpson JR, Denmead OT, Muirhead WA (1985) Estimating ammonia volatilization from flooded rice fields by simplified techniques. Soil Sci Soc Am J 49:1049–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gerendas J, Zhu Z, Bendixen R, Ratcliffe RG, Sattelmacher B (1997) Physiological and biochemical processes related to ammonium toxicity in higher plants. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 160:239–251. doi: 10.1002/jpln.19971600218 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Glass ADM, Erner Y, Kronzucker HJ, Schjoerring JK, Siddiqi MY, Wang MY (1997) Ammonium fluxes into plant roots: energetics, kinetics, and regulation. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 160:261–268. doi: 10.1002/jpln.19971600220 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Glass ADM, Britto DT, Kaiser BN, Kinghorn JR, Kronzucker HJ, Kumar A, Okamoto M, Rawat S, Siddiqi MY, Unkles SE, Vidmar JJ (2002) The regulation of nitrate and ammonium transport systems in plants. J Exp Bot 53:855–864. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/53.370.855 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guo SW, Chen G, Zhou Y, Shen QR (2007) Ammonium nutrition increases photosynthesis rate under water stress at early development stage of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Soil 296:115–124. doi: 10.1007/s11104-007-9302-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hirsch RE, Lewis BD, Spalding EP, Sussman MR (1998) A role for the AKT1 potassium channel in plant nutrition. Science 8:918–921. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5365.918 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Husted S, Hebbern CA, Mattsson M, Schjoerring JK (2000) A critical experimental evaluation of methods for determination of NH4 + in plant tissue, xylem sap and apoplastic fluid. Physiol Plant 109:167–179. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2000.100209.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kondo M, Pablico PP, Aragones DV, Agbisit R, Abe J, Morita S, Courtois B (2003) Genotypic and environmental variations in root morphology in rice genotype under upland field conditions. Plant Soil 255:189–200. doi: 10.1023/A:1026142904714 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kronzucker HJ, Siddiqi MY, Glass ADM, Kirk GJD (2000) Comparative kinetic analysis of ammonium and nitrate acquisition by tropical lowland rice: implications for rice cultivation and yield potential. New Phytol 145:471–476. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00606.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kronzucker HJ, Britto DT, Davenport RJ, Tester M (2001) Ammonium toxicity and the real cost of transport. Trends Plant Sci 6:335–337. doi: 10.1016/S1360-1385(01)02022-2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kronzucker HJ, Siddiqi MY, Glass ADM, Britto DT (2003) Root ammonium transport efficiency as a determinant in forest colonization patterns: an hypothesis. Physiol Plant 177:164–170. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3054.2003.00032.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li ZP, Velde B, Li DC (2003) Loss of K-bearing clayminerals in flood-irrigated, rice-growing soil in Jiangxi province, China. Clay Clay Miner 51:75–82. doi: 10.1346/CCMN.2003.510109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li Q, Li BH, Kronzucker HJ, Shi WM (2010) Root growth inhibition by NH4 + in Arabidopsis is mediated by the root tip and is linked to NH4 + efflux and GMPase activity. Plant Cell Environ 33:1529–1542. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02162.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li BH, Li Q, Su YH, Chen H, Xiong LM, Mi GH, Kronzucker HJ, Shi WM (2011a) Shoot-supplied ammonium targets the root auxin influx carrier AUX1 and inhibits lateral root emergence in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ 34:933–946. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02295.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Li BH, Shi WM, Su YH (2011b) The differing responses of two Arabidopsis ecotypes to ammonium are modulated by the photoperiod regime. Acta Physiol Plant 33:325–334. doi: 10.1007/s11738-010-0551-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Li GJ, Dong GQ, Li BH, Li Q, Kronzucker HJ, Shi WM (2012) Isolation and characterization of a novel ammonium overly sensitive mutant, amos2, in Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 235:239–252. doi: 10.1007/s00425-011-1504-y PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lynch JP (1995) Root architecture and plant productivity. Plant Physiol 109:7–13. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.1.7 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Magalhaes JR, Huber DM (1991) Response of ammonium assimilation enzymes to nitrogen form treatments in different plant species. J Plant Nutr 14:175–185. doi: 10.1080/01904169109364193 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marschner H (1995) Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Mehrer I, Mohr H (1989) Ammonium toxicity: description of the syndrome in Synapis alba and the search for its causation. Physiol Plant 77:545–554. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1989.tb05390.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Omari REI, Reuda-Lopez M, Avila C, Crespillo R, Nhiri M, Canovas FM (2010) Ammonium tolerance and the regulation of two cytosolic glutamine synthetases in the roots of sorghum. Funct Plant Biol 37:55–63. doi: 10.1071/FP09162 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pearson J, Stewart GR (1993) The deposition of atmospheric ammonia and its effects on plants. New Phytol 125:283–305. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1993.tb03882.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Qiao J, Yang LZ, Yan TM, Xue F, Zhao D (2012) Nitrogen fertilizer reduction in rice production for two consecutive years in the Taihu Lake area. Agr Ecosyst Environ 146:103–112. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2011.10.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rawat SR, Silim SN, Kronzucker HJ, Siddiqi MY, Glass ADM (1999) AtAMT1 gene expression and NH4 + uptake in roots of Arabidopsis thaliana: evidence for regulation by root glutamine levels. Plant J 19:143–152. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00505.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rios-Gonzalez K, Erdei L, Lips SH (2002) The activity of antioxidant enzymes in maize and sunflower seedlings as affected by salinity and different nitrogen sources. Plant Sci 162:923–930. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00040-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Roosta HR, Schjoerring JK (2008) Root carbon enrichment alleviates ammonium toxicity in cucumber plants. J Plant Nutr 31:941–958. doi: 10.1080/01904160802043270 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Roosta HR, Sajjadinia A, Rahimi A, Schjoerring JK (2009) Responses of cucumber plant to NH4 + and NO3 nutrition: the relative addition rate technique vs. cultivation at constant nitrogen concentration. Sci Hortic 121:397–403. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2009.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shi WM, Xu WF, Li SM, Zhao XQ, Dong GQ (2010) Responses of two rice cultivars differing in seedling-stage nitrogen use efficiency to growth under low-nitrogen condition. Plant Soil 326:291–302. doi: 10.1007/s1104-009-0007-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Siddiqi MY, Malhotra B, Min XJ, Glass ADM (2002) Effects of ammonium and inorganic carbon enrichment on growth and yield of a hydroponic tomato crop. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 165:191–197. doi: 10.1002/1522-2624(200204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sun J, Chen SL, Dai SX, Wang RG, Li NY, Shen X, Zhou XY, Lu CF, Zheng XJ, Hu ZM, Zhang ZK, Song J, Xu Y (2009) NaCl-induced alternations of cellular and tissue ion fluxes in roots of salt-resistant and salt-sensitive poplar species. Plant Physiol 149:1141–1153. doi: 10.1104/pp.108.129494 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sun YJ, Ma J, Sun YY, Xu H, Yang ZY, Liu SJ, Jia XW, Zheng HZ (2012) The effects of different water and nitrogen managements on yield and nitrogen use efficiency in hybrid rice of China. Field Crops Res 127:85–98. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.11.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Szczerba MW, Britto DT, Balkos KD, Kronzucker HJ (2008a) Allevation of rapid, futile ammonium cycling at the root plasma membrane by potassium reveals K+-sensitive and -insensitive components of NH4 + transport. J Exp Bot 59:303–313. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erm309 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Szczerba MW, Britto DT, Ali SA, Balkos KD, Kronzucker HJ (2008b) NH4 +-stimulated and -inhibited components of K+ transport in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Exp Bot 59:3415–3423. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern190 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. von Wiren N, Gazzarrini S, Goion A, Frommer WB (2000) The molecular physiology of ammonium uptake and retrieval. Plant Biol 3:254–261. doi: 10.1016/S1369-5266(00)80074-6 Google Scholar
  50. Wang MY, Siddiqi MY, Ruth TJ, Glass ADM (1993a) Ammonium uptake by rice roots. I. Fluxes and subcellular distribution of 13NH4 +. Plant Physiol 103:1249–1258. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.4.1249 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang MY, Siddiqi MY, Ruth TJ, Glass ADM (1993b) Ammonium uptake by rice roots. II. Kinetics of 13NH4 + influx across the plasmalemma. Plant Physiol 103:1259–1267. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.4.1259 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wang MY, Glass ADM, Shaff JE, Kochian LV (1994) Ammonium uptake by rice roots III. Electrophysiology. Plant Physiol 104:899–906. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.3.899 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Wang DJ, Liu Q, Lin JH, Sun RJ (2004) Optimum nitrogen use and reduced nitrogen loss for production of rice and wheat in the Yangtse Delta region. Environ Geochem Health 26:221–227. doi: 10.1023/B:EGAH.0000039584.35434.e0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yang XE, Li H, Kirk GJD, Dobbermann A (2005) Room-induced changes of potassium in the rhizosphere of lowland rice. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 36:1947–1963. doi: 10.1081/CSS-200062529 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yoshida S, Forno DA, Cock JH, Gomez KA (1972) Laboratory manual for physiological studies of rice, 2nd edn. International Rice Research Institute, Philippines, 56ppGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhang YL, Fan JB, Wang DS, Shen QR (2009) Genotypic differences in grain yield and physiological nitrogen use efficiency among rice cultivars. Pedosphere 19(6):681–691. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(09)60163-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhu ZL, Wen QX, Freney JR (1997) Nitrogen in soils of China. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zou N, Li BH, Dong GQ, Kronzucker HJ, Shi WM (2012) Ammonium-induced loss of root gravitropism is related to auxin distribution and TRH1 function, and is uncoupled from the inhibition of root elongation in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot (in press). doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers06

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2013

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gui Chen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shiwei Guo
    • 3
  • Herbert J. Kronzucker
    • 4
  • Weiming Shi
    • 1
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil ScienceChinese Academy of SciencesNanjingChina
  2. 2.Graduate School of Chinese Academy of ScienceBeijingChina
  3. 3.Institute of Food Crops, Jiangsu High Quality Rice R & D CenterJiangsu Academy of Agricultural SciencesNanjingChina
  4. 4.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations