Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Modelling the impact of microbial grazers on soluble rhizodeposit turnover

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rhizodeposition represents a relatively large carbon flow from a plant’s root into the surrounding soil. This carbon flow may have important implications for nitrogen mineralisation and carbon sequestration, but is still poorly understood. In this paper we use a simple compartment model of carbon flow in the rhizosphere to investigate the proposed benefits of rhizodeposition and the effect of microbial grazers. Model parameters were fitted to published, experimental data. Analysis of the model showed that dead organic matter (necromass) had a much longer time-scale than the other carbon pools (soluble, microbial and grazer carbon), which allowed an approximate, mathematical solution of the model to be derived. This solution shows that the level of necromass in the soil is an important factor in many processes of interest. The short-term carbon and nitrogen turnover increases with the level of necromass. Microbial grazers decrease carbon turnover at high levels of necromass, whilst at lower, and possibly more realistic, levels of necromass grazers increase turnover. However, the largest effect of grazers was to increase carbon turnover by 10%, suggesting that grazers are relatively unimportant in larger scale models of soil organic matter turnover. The marginal benefits of rhizodeposition increase with the level of necromass. The model suggests that the short-term benefits of rhizodeposition to a plant are marginal, but long-term benefits may still occur.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alphei J, Bonkowski M and Scheu S 1996 Protozoa, Nematoda and Lumbricidae in the rhizosphere of Hordelymus europaeus (Poceae): Faunal interactions, response of microorganisms and effects on plant growth. Oecologia 106, 111–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auger P and Poggiale J-C 1998 Aggregation and emergence in systems of ordinary differential equations. Math. Comp. Model 27, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloem J, Veninga M and Shephers J 1995 Fully-automatic determination of soil bacterium numbers, cell volumes, and frequencies of dividing cells by confocal laser-scanning microscopy and image-analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61, 926–936.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonkowski M, Cheng W, Griffiths B S, Alphei J and Schau S 2000 Microbial-faunal interactions in the rhizosphere and effects on plant growth. Europ. J. Soil. Biol 36, 135–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breland T A and Hansen S 1996 Nitrogen mineralization and microbial biomass as affected by soil compaction. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 28, 655–663.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clarholm M 1985 Interactions of bacteria, protozoa and plants leading mineralisation of soil nitrogen. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 17, 181–187.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Curl E A and Truelove B 1986 The Rhizosphere. Springer Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corless R M, Gonnet G H, Hare D G E, Jeffrey D J and Knuth, DE 1996 On the Lambert W function. Adv. Comput. Math. 5, 329–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darrah P R 1991a Models of the rhizosphere I. Microbial population dynamics around a root releasing soluble and insoluble carbon. Plant Soil 133, 187–199.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Darrah P R 1991b Models of the rhizosphere II. A quasi three-dimensional simulation of microbial population dynamics around a growing root releasing soluble exudates. Plant Soil 138, 147–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darrah P R 1996 Rhizodeposition under ambient and elevated CO2 levels. Plant Soil 187, 265–275.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • De Ruiter P C, Moore J C, Zwart K B, Boouwman L A, Hassink J, Bloem J, De Vos J A, Marinissen J C Y, Didden WA M, Lebbink G and Brussard L 1993 Simulation of nitrogen mineralisation in the below-ground food webs of two winter wheat fields. J. Appl. Ecol. 30, 95–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott E T and Cambardella C A 1991 Physical separation of soil organic matter. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 34, 407–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris H, Eyre M, Venette R C and Lau S S 1996 Population energetics of bacterial-feeding nematodes: stage-specific development and fecundity rates. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 28, 271–280.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris H, Venette R C and Lau S S 1997 Population energetics of bacterial-feeding nematodes: carbon and nitrogen budgets. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 29, 1183–1194.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foereid B and Høgh-Jensen H 2004 Carbon sequestration potential of organic agriculture in northern Europe-a modelling approach. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 68, 13–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fontaine S, Mariotti A and Abbadie L 2003 The priming effect of organic matter: a question of microbial competition? Soil. Biol. Biochem. 35, 837–843.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths B and Robinson D 1992 Root-induced nitrogen mineralisation: A nitrogen balance model. Plant Soil 139, 235–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassink J, Bouwman L A, Zwart K B and Brussard L 1993 Relationships between habitable pore space, soil biota and mineralisation rates in grassland soils. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 25, 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastings A 2004 Transients: the key to long-term ecological understanding? Trends in Ecol. Evol. 19, 39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiltner L 1904 Uber neuerre erfahrungen und probleme auf dem gebiet der bodenbacteriologie und unter besonderer berucksichtung der grundung und brache. Arbeiten der Deutchen Landwirtshafts Gesellschaft 98, 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson G 1992 Below-ground carbon distribution in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) with and without nitrogen fertilisation. Plant Soil 144, 93–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan D W and Smith P 1987 Nonlinear ordinary differential equations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 381 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurgens K and Sala M M 2000 Predator-mediated shifts in size distribution of microbial biomass and activity during detritius decomposition. Oikos 91, 29–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaye J P and Hart S C 1997 Competition for nitrogen between plants and soil microorganisms. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12, 139–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiem R and Koegel-Knabner I 2003 Contribution of lignin and polysaccharides to the refractory carbon pool in C-depleted arable soils. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 35, 101–118.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuikman P J, Jansen A G, van Veen J A and Zehnder A J B 1990a Protozoan predation and the turnover of soil organic carbon and nitrogen in the presence of plants. Biol. Fertil. Soils 10, 22–28.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuikman P J, van Elsas J D, Jansen A G, Burgers S L G E and van Veen J A 1990b Population dynamics and activity of bacteria and protozoa in relation to their spatial distribution in soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 22, 1063–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuzyakov Y, Kretzchmar A and Stahr K 1999 Contribution of Lolium perenne rhizodeposition to carbon turnover of pasture soil. Plant Soil 213, 127–136.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuzyakov Y, Friedel K J and Stahr K 2000 Review of mechanisms and quantification of priming effects. Soil Biol. Biochem. 32, 1485–1498.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lambers H 1987 Does Variation in Photosynthetic Rate Explain Variation in Growth-Rate and Yield. Netherlands J. Agric. Sci. 35, 505–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebaron P, Servais P, Trousselier M, Courties C, Muyzer G, Bernard L, Schafer H, Pukall R, Stackenbrandt E, Guidulain T and Vives-Rego J 2001 Microbial community dynamics in Mediterranean nutrient-enriched seawater mesocosm: changes in abundances, activity and composition. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 34, 255–266.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch J M and Whipps J M 1990 Substrate flow in the rhizosphere. Plant Soil 129, 1–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meharg A A and Killham K 1988 Factors Affecting the Pattern of Carbon Flow in a Grass Soil System. J. Sci. Food Agric. 45, 135–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meharg A A and Killham K 1991 A novel method of quantifying root exudation in the presence of soil microflora. Plant Soil 133, 111–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meharg A A and Killham K 1995 Loss of exudates from roots of perennial rye grass with a range of microorganisms. Plant Soil 170, 345–349.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newman E I and Watson A 1977 Microbial abundance in the rhizosphere: A computer model. Plant Soil 48, 17–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman E I 1978 Root microorganisms: their significance in the ecosystem. Biol. Rev. 53, 511–554.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parton W J, Schimel D S, Cole C V and Ojima D S 1987 Analysis of Factors Controlling Soil Organic Matter Levels in Great Plain Grasslands. Soil Sci. Am. J. 51, 1173–1179.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson E, Rattay E A S and Killham K 1996 Effect of elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration on C-partitioning and rhizosphere C-flow for three plant species. Soil Biol. Biochem. 28, 195–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paustian K, Cole V C, Sauerback D and Sampson N 1998 CO2 mitigation by agriculture: An overview. Climatic Change 40, 135–162.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pussard, M, Alabouvette, C and Levrat, P 1994 Protozoan Interactions with the Soil Microflora and Possibilities for Biocontrol of Plant Pathogen. In Soil Protozoa, (Ed.) J F Darbyshire. pp. 123–146. CAB INTERNATIONAL, Wallingford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rattray E A S, Paterson E and Killham K 1995 Characterisation of the dynamics of C-partitioning within Lolium perenne and to the rhizosphere microbial biomass using 14C pulse chase. Biol. Fertil. Soils 19, 280–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson D, Griffiths B, Ritz K and Wheatley R 1989 Root-induced nitrogen mineralisation: A theoretical analysis. Plant Soil 117, 185–193.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford P M and Juma N G 1992 Influence of texture on habitable pore space and bacterial-protozoan populations in soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils 12, 221–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith P, Powlson D S, Glendining M J and Smith J 1997 Potential for carbon sequestration in European soils: preliminary estimates for five scenarios using results from long-term experiments. Global Change Biol. 3, 67–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith P, Powlson D S, Smith J U, Fallon P and Coleman K 2000 Meeting Europe’s climate change commitments: quantitative estimates of the potential for carbon mitigation by agriculture. Global Change Biol. 6, 525–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinnen J, van Veen J A and Merckx R 1995 Root decay and turnover of rhizodeposits in field-grown winter wheat and spring barley estimated by 14C pulse-labelling. Soil Biol. Biochem. 27, 211–217.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sylvia D M, Fuhrmann J J, Hartel P G and Zuberer D A 1998 Principles and Applications of Soil Microbiology. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

  • Thornton B, Paterson E, Midwood A J, Sim A and Pratt S M 2004 Contribution of current assimilation in supplying root exudates of Lolium Perenne L. measured using steady-state 13C labelling. Physiol. Plant 120, 434–441.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Toal M E, Yeomans C, Killham K and Meharg A A 2000 A review of rhizosphere carbon flow modelling. Plant Soil 222, 263–281.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uren N C 2001 Types, Amounts, and Possible Functions of Compounds Released into the Rhizosphere by Soil-Grown Plants. Eds. Pinton, R, Varanini, Z, Nannipieri, P The Rhizosphere Biochemistry and Organic Substances at the Soil-Plant Interface, pp. 19–40. Marcel Dekker, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wardle D 1999 How soil food webs make plants grow. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 418–420.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zelenev V V van Bruggen A H C and Semenov A M 2000 ‘BACWAWE’, a Spatial-Temporal Model for Travelling Waves of Bacterial Populations in Response to a Moving Carbon Source in Soil. Microb. Ecol. 40, 260–272.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng D W, Bengtsson J and Ågren G I 1997 Soil food webs and ecosystem processes: decomposition in donor-control and Lotka-Volterra systems. Am. Nat. 149, 125–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwart K B and Brussard L 1991 Soil fauna and cereal crops. In The Ecology of Temperate Cereal Fields (Eds) L G Furbank N Carter J F Darbyshire and G R Potts. pp. 139–167. 32th Symposium of the British Ecological Society, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 469 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwart K B and Darbyshire J F 1992 Growth and nitrogenous excretion of a common soil flagellate Spumella sp. — A laboratory experiment. J. Soil Sci. 43, 145–157.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Macaulay Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen, AB15 8QH, UK

    Bente Foereid & Jon M. Yearsley

Authors
  1. Bente Foereid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jon M. Yearsley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bente Foereid.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Foereid, B., Yearsley, J.M. Modelling the impact of microbial grazers on soluble rhizodeposit turnover. Plant Soil 267, 329–342 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-0139-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-0139-9

Key words

Search

Navigation