Skip to main content

Pituitary metastases from neuroendocrine neoplasms: case report and narrative review

Abstract

Purpose

Pituitary metastases (PM) are uncommon findings and are mainly derived from breast and lung cancers. No extensive review of PM from neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) is on record. Here we describe a clinical case of PM from pancreatic NEN and review the clinical features of PM from NENs reported in the literature.

Methods

A case of PM from a pancreatic NEN followed at our institution is described. We also reviewed the 43 cases of PM from NENs reported in the literature.

Results

A 59-year old female patient, previously submitted to duodeno-cephalo-pancreasectomy for a well-differentiated pancreatic NEN, with known hepatic metastases, underwent a 68 Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT that revealed an uptake in the pituitary gland. A subsequent MRI displayed a pituitary lesion, with suprasellar extension. After a hormonal and genetic diagnostic workup that excluded the diagnosis of MEN 1, the worsening of headache and visual impairment and the growth of the lesion lead to its surgical removal. A pituitary localization of the pancreatic NEN was identified. Regarding the published cases of PM from NENs, the most common tumour type was small cell lung cancer (SCLC), accounting for nearly half of the cases, followed by bronchial and pancreatic well differentiated NENs. The most frequent symptom was a variable degree of visual impairment, while headache was reported in half of the cases. Partial or total anterior hypopituitarism was present in approximately three quarters of the cases, while diabetes insipidus was less common. The most frequent treatment for PM was surgical resection, followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The clinical outcome was in line with previous reports of PM from solid tumours, with a median survival of 14 months. Surgery of PM was associated with prolonged survival.

Conclusions

PM from NENs have clinical features similar to metastases derived from other solid tumours, albeit the involvement of the anterior pituitary seems more frequent; a thorough pituitary hormonal evaluation is mandatory, after focused radiological studies, particularly if a surgical approach is considered. The optimal management of PM remains disputed and seems mainly driven by the aggressiveness of the primary tumour and the presence of symptoms. In well-differentiated NENs, particularly in the case of symptomatic PM, surgical removal may be a reasonable approach.

Introduction

Pituitary metastases (PM) are uncommon findings and their reported incidence is variable. Being often asymptomatic, their prevalence is higher in autopsy series [1]; moreover, they can be incidentally found during imaging workup in patients with advanced neoplastic disease [2]. Given the absence of pathognomonic radiological or clinical findings and the risk of hormonal disarrangement derived from pituitary tissue invasion, differentiating PM from pituitary adenomas can be difficult [2, 3]. Breast and lung cancer are the tumours that most frequently metastasize to the pituitary gland [1]. However, PM derived from neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) have been increasingly reported especially in the last decades [4,5,6]. While extensive reviews regarding clinical presentations and management of PM from several solid tumours have already been published [1, 3], no studies specifically regarding PM from NENs are on record. Here we reported the case of a PM from a pancreatic NEN managed at our centre and we reviewed the published literature regarding PM from NENs (both single case reports and case series), describing their main clinical, diagnostic and therapeutic features.

Case presentation

We report the case of a 59-years old female patient who was followed-up at our tertiary centre for metastatic pancreatic NEN. The tumour was incidentally detected in 2008 by an abdominal CT scan and, therefore, the patient underwent duodenocephalopancreasectomy with lymphadenectomy. The pathology report was consistent with a G1 well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour (NET) (Ki-67 index: 4%) with metastasis in 1 out of 32 excised lymph nodes. Tumour cells did not express pancreatic hormones but intense and diffuse immunoreactivity for the general neuroendocrine marker chromogranin A reactivity was observed. In addition, inhibin expression was detected, as rarely occurring in NETs with clear cell changes [7] (see Fig. 1). Given the absence of residual disease, no adjuvant therapy with somatostatin analogues was administered at that time.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Pancreatic NEN progressed with metastasis to the pituitary gland. a microscopic features of the pancreatic NEN with an organoid growth made of occasionally clear cells with scant atypias; b the ki-67 proliferative index was low (1%) and the tumour was graded G1; c, d chromogranin A and synaptophysin were diffusely positive; e the tumour was also strongly reactive for inhibin. The resected PM had a similar architecture (f), but tumour cells had no clear cytoplasm, and rather showed an increased ki-67 proliferative activity (8%) g tumour cells also shared the immunoprofile of the primary pancreatic tumour, with diffuse reactivity for chromogranin A (h), synaptophysin (i) and inhibin (l). NEN neuroendocrine neoplasm, PM pituitary metastasis

In 2017, after 9 years of complete remission, the tumour relapsed and a small lesion in the liver with several enlarged abdominal lymph nodes was detected by means of MRI. At that time, the patient refused therapy with somatostatin analogues. In June 2018, a restaging 68 Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT confirmed the presence of the known metastatic lesions, apparently stable in size after 11 months, and revealed a slightly increased accumulation of the radiotracer in the pituitary gland. At the time, the patient complained about the onset of bilateral galactorrhea but denied any headache, polyuria or polydipsia. The subsequent MRI scan described the presence of a large (20-mm in its largest diameter) pituitary lesion, that was supposed to be a pituitary adenoma. In particular, the lesion had a suprasellar extension with compression of the optic chiasm and the suprasellar cistern, and displacement of the pituitary stalk. It was dyshomogeneously hypointense and hyperintense in T1-and T2-weighted sequences, respectively, and showed a strong and premature contrast enhancement (see Fig. 2). The visual field campimetry showed bitemporal impairment. The biochemical and hormonal tests (see Table 1) demonstrated normal levels of sodium, potassium, calcium, parathyroid hormone (PTH), gonadotropins (considering the postmenopausal condition) and IGF-1 by age; in contrast, prolactin was moderately increased and the evaluation of the pituitary-thyroid axis was consistent with secondary hypothyroidism. The normal response of cortisol to 1 µg Cosyntropin ruled out a possible secondary adrenal insufficiency. We started treatment with cabergoline and levothyroxine and galactorrhea subsequently disappeared. A genetic test for multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) 1 syndrome was performed, but mutations in the MEN1 gene were ruled out.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Coronal (left) and sagittal (right) pre-operative MRI scans showing the inhomogeneous sellar lesion with suprasellar extension. MRI magnetic resonance imaging

Table 1 Hormonal and electrolyte values before and after TSS

Given the gradual onset of headache, the worsening of the visual impairment, and the radiological evidence of progressive enlargement of the pituitary mass at a subsequent MRI scan after 6 months, a 3D extended endoscopic endonasal approach to sellar and suprasellar region was performed [8] in June 2019. Postoperative clinical course was characterized by the development of diabetes insipidus (DI) that required therapy with desmopressin. The histopathological examination of the surgical specimen was consistent with a pituitary localization of a well-differentiated NEN, but the differential diagnosis of a pituitary adenoma from a metastatic NET was not possible on morphological ground, only (see Fig. 1). Immunohistochemical stainings for pituitary hormones (prolactin, ACTH, GH, FSH, LH, TSH) as well as those for pituitary markers TPIT, Pit1 and GATA3 were all negative. Despite the pituitary tumour did not contain clear cells, inhibin immunostaining was diffusely positive, with a pattern similar to that of the primary pancreatic NET. The proliferative index (assessed by the MIB1 monoclonal antibody to Ki-67) was 8%, almost double than that of the primary pancreatic NET. Pathology of the resected tumour was eventually interpreted as a PM of the pancreatic G2 NET resected 11 years earlier.

The post-surgical hormonal tests (see Table 1) confirmed the secondary hypothyroidism and revealed the onset of secondary hypocortisolism. Hence, glucocorticoid hormonal replacement therapy was added to the levothyroxine and desmopressin treatment.

Given the progression of the liver disease, therapy with monthly octreotide was started after surgery. Three and six months after surgery, follow-up MRI scans showed no sign of residual tissue in the sellar region. Unfortunately, no improvement was demonstrated at the visual field campimetry evaluation. One year after surgery, the patient underwent restaging scans with both 68 Ga- and 18F-FDG PET/CT, which showed no uptake in the pituitary region and stability of the known liver and lymph node metastases.

The patient is currently in good clinical conditions and pituitary deficiencies are well controlled by replacement therapy two years after pituitary surgery and 13 years after pancreatic NET resection. Her therapy continues with monthly octreotide with good tolerance.

Literature review

We thoroughly reviewed all cases of PM from NENs available from the literature. We searched PubMed and MEDLINE database using the following, variously combined, keywords: “pituitary metastasis”, “sellar metastasis”, “neuroendocrine tumour”, “neuroendocrine neoplasm”, “neuroendocrine carcinoma”, “small cell lung cancer”, “carcinoid tumour”. A review of the abstract of each retrieved study was then carried out. Only publications with abstract and/or full text in English language were included. Studies in which the histological diagnosis of the primary NEN and of PM was lacking were excluded. Figure 3 shows the process of identification, screening and exclusion of the retrieved articles.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Flowchart for the literature review

For each case, the following data were gathered: year of publication, gender and age of the patient, primary tumour and PM histology, known metastatic disease before discovery of PM, presenting signs and symptoms, and treatment of PM. In those PM who were not surgically treated, histology of PM was obtained through either autopsy or biopsy of the lesion. When available, also hormonal alterations, radiological features at the time of diagnosis as well as survival data were collected and analysed. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier method and survival distribution comparison was done using the logrank test.

Finally, 42 reported cases of pituitary masses histopathologically consistent with a pituitary localization of NENs were found between 1984 and 2020 [4,5,6, 9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46]; by adding our patient, a total of 43 cases were analysed. The relevant data are summarized in Table 2. The average age of patients at PM diagnosis was 58 years (range 23–82 years) with a slight female predominance (56%).

Table 2 Demographic, pathological, clinical, hormonal, imaging and therapeutic characteristics of the 43 reported cases of PM from NENs

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) was the most represented primary NEN (49%), followed by atypical bronchial carcinoid (14%), pancreatic well-differentiated NENs (9%), and medullary thyroid cancer (MTC; 7%). The primary site of the remaining cases is listed in Table 2. Only one patient (with metastatic MTC) had a definitive diagnosis of multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) 2B syndrome [32]. No patients with MEN 1 syndrome were present among the cases retrieved.

PM appeared as a manifestation of an already known metastatic disease in only 23% of patients. In the remaining cases, mainly consisting of SCLC, PM was the first presentation of a neoplastic disease of unknown primary.

Hormonal data were available for 86% (37/43) of patients. Hypopituitarism (defined as a deficit of at least one of the adenohypophysis hormonal axes) was the most common endocrine alteration, being present in 73% of patients. Hyperprolactinemia was found in 57% of cases. The gonadal axis was involved in nearly half of patients (51%), while the corticotroph and the thyrotroph axes were less frequently impaired (both 40%). DI was reported in approximately one third of the patients (35%). Panhypopituitarism (i.e. the presence of complete anterior pituitary deficit and DI) was present in 16% of cases only.

A paraneoplastic syndrome related to the ectopic secretion of pituitary peptides from NEN cells was detected in six cases (Cushing syndrome in four and acromegaly in two patients) [13, 16, 21, 28, 29, 46]. Interestingly, in five other cases, PM developed within a pituitary adenoma (two non-functioning adenomas, one prolactinoma, one GH-secreting and one ACTH-secreting adenoma) [12, 30, 32, 34, 43].

Data on neurological or ocular symptoms at PM diagnosis were available for 95% (41/43) patients. Visual alterations were the most frequent clinical manifestation, being present in all but six patients. Specifically, visual field impairment was present in 66% of patients, 44% reported diplopia or blurred vision, and 22% had paralysis of at least one oculomotor nerve. Headache was reported in 49% of patients.

Relevant radiological features detected by MRI and/or CT scan were reported in 84% (36/43) patients. Most of them (83%) had a suprasellar extension; a displacement and/or a compression of the optic chiasm was radiologically found in more than half cases (56%). Bone erosion was observed in one case, while only 19% showed an invasion of the cavernous sinus. Four radiological reports [11, 19, 21, 28] described a thickening or an involvement of the pituitary stalk. In a minority of patients, the authors reported the involvement of other encephalic structures, such as the compression of the third ventricle (n = 4) [22, 25, 36, 39], of the optic nerve (n = 2) [13, 25] or the extension into the prepontine and premesencephalic cisterns (n = 1) [22].

When available, the signal intensity of PM on the T1-weighted and T2-weighted sequences of the MRI scan was variable among the reports. In two cases, the loss of the expected T1-hyperintense signal of the posterior lobe was observed [11, 19]. After paramagnetic contrast injection, MRI scan demonstrated a homogeneous enhancement for some lesions, while an inhomogeneous enhancement was described by other studies. The pituitary mass was associated to other central nervous system (CNS) metastatic lesions in 17% of cases. Moreover, a rapid PM growth was reported in three patients who performed two MRI scans at a close time interval [6, 36, 41]. Two PM appeared calcified [6, 40] and one caused a fibrotic reaction around the sella turcica [23].

Nearly three quarters (74%) of patients underwent surgical resection of PM, mainly through a trans-sphenoidal approach; a craniotomic approach was performed only in three patients (in all cases during the 1980s) and one patient had a trans-ciliary approach. Among patients not surgically treated, but having a histological diagnosis based on the biopsy, all but one underwent radiotherapy (RT) or chemotherapy (CT) treatment regimens. Overall, RT and CT were employed in 51% and 44% of patients, respectively. Only in two patients peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) was used in combination with other treatments.

Regarding clinical, hormonal and/or local improvement after therapy of PM, data were lacking for the majority of patients. Among the cases with available data on neurological outcome (30%, 13/43), 77% showed clinical improvement of neurological symptoms; among them, almost all the patients were surgically treated with only one case that did not undergo surgery, but was treated with RT and CT. Regarding ocular symptoms (data available for 53% of patients, 23/43), some improvement after therapy was seen in 61% of patients. All but two of these patients had undergone surgical resection of PM and the majority was also treated with RT. Given the lack of data, it was not possible to carry out an analysis regarding hormonal improvement after PM therapy.

Survival data were available for 70% of patients (30/43). The median survival from PM diagnosis was 14 months (95% CI 9–21 months); five patients survived more than 18 months. Surgery was associated with prolonged survival (see Fig. 4): patients who underwent surgical resection of PM had a median survival of 18 months (95% CI 14.0–26.0), compared to 9 months (95% CI 4.0–11.0) for patients that were not surgically treated (p = 0.09). No difference in survival was noted in patients with SCLC compared with patients with NENs from other histology.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Kaplan–Meier survival analysis comparing outcomes between surgically-treated (dashed line) versus non surgically-treated (solid line) patients with PM. PM pituitary metastases

Discussion

We presented a rare case of PM from a pancreatic NET, which gives us the opportunity to speculate on the tools for distinguishing this lesion from a pituitary adenoma and to revise the literature on metastatic localizations of NENs in the pituitary gland.

PM are rare findings, even in patients with an advanced neoplastic disease. In general, approximately 5% of patients with a known history of malignancy are thought to have a latent PM [47], with the highest percentages in patients with breast cancer [1, 48, 49]. The abundant blood supply of the pituitary gland may facilitate hematogenic metastatic spreading and seeding [50]. As observed in five of the cases included in this review, PM can even develop inside a pituitary adenoma (so called “collision tumours”) that could be hormonally active [32].

Compared to the published reviews on PM from NENs [4,5,6], the present review on 43 cases (42 from the literature and one presented in this review) by covering a time span of 36 years, allows to better evaluate the clinical features of patients suffering from NEN-derived PM.

Among the cases of PM from NENs, the most common primary tumour was SCLC in line with recently published studies [5, 6]. This finding is somewhat expected, given the aggressive clinical behaviour of this type of tumour and its high metastatic potential, especially to the CNS [51]. In previous studies regarding PM from any primary tumour location, they represented the first manifestation of neoplastic disease in approximately 20–30% of cases [1, 38, 52, 53]. Conversely, in the population analysed in this review, PM was the first manifestation of malignancy in the majority of patients. Most of these cases were represented by SCLC, notoriously characterized by a rapid metastatic spreading.

Regarding symptoms, prevalence of DI and hyperprolactinemia in patients with PM from NEN appears to be in line with other reports regarding PM from other solid tumours [38, 52, 53]. Conversely, in patients with PM from NEN, hypopituitarism, in comparison with recent large reviews in PM from solid tumours [1, 38, 53], was a more common alteration; in this review, the most involved pituitary axis was the gonadal one, followed by secondary hypoadrenalism and hypothyroidism. These findings are consistent with previous observations, although only a small number of patients were tested for hypogonadism in those series [52].

The diagnosis and clinical management of PM, especially from NENs, can be challenging also due to the possible coexistence of paraneoplastic syndromes, as seen in this review. Moreover, when evaluating a sellar mass in a patient with a known NEN, the possibility of a diagnosis of MEN syndrome should be taken into consideration. The currently reported case had only moderately increased PRL levels associated with secondary hypothyroidism. A treatment with cabergoline and levothyroxine was started and mutations in the MEN1 gene were ruled out.

Also the prevalence of visual alterations and cranial nerve palsy were similar in our analysis compared with previous reports [37, 38, 52, 54]. Given their rarity in pituitary adenomas, some Authors proposed that in the presence of a pituitary mass, either DI or cranial nerve palsies should favour a diagnosis of PM rather than pituitary adenoma, especially if rapidly progressive and affecting patients older than 50 years [1].

MRI is the gold standard for the study of sellar lesions. Although several findings might point toward a diagnosis of PM, radiological techniques are usually unable to clearly distinguish between PM and pituitary adenomas [5]. Moreover, the published reports did not always include a detailed neuroimaging description, limiting the definition of a specific radiological pattern for NEN-derived PM as opposed to pituitary adenomas.

In previous reports, PM have been described as dumbbell-shaped intrasellar and suprasellar lesions, with a clear indentation at the level of the diaphragma sellae on sagittal images. However, this presentation might also be seen in case of benign tumours [37, 54].

According to other studies about PM, MRI generally revealed an isointense or hypointense sellar mass on T1-weighted and hyperintense on T2-weighted images, with homogeneous enhancement after gadolinium. However, neither of these findings has been demonstrated to be highly specific for PM [54]. In this series, the signal intensity of the pituitary lesion on the MRI did not help in the differential diagnosis of the pituitary mass. Some lesions were characterized by inhomogeneous enhancement, probably as a result of intralesional haemorrhage or necrosis. Moreover, the loss of the posterior lobe brightness has been described in two of the reported cases, maybe due to tumour infiltration, similarly to what has been anecdotally reported in literature [37].

The suprasellar extension of the pituitary mass was reported in the majority of the cases included in our review, in accordance with the available data for PM from other tumours [3]. Many of the selected cases also described an involvement of the optic chiasm, with subsequent relevant clinical implications, as observed in our patient.

Being a malignant lesion, tumour growth rate of PM is expected to be higher than for pituitary adenomas [3], also in well-differentiated NENs. Indeed, a rapid growth was reported also among the cases in the current review (including our patient), when serial MRIs were performed at short temporal distance. Interestingly, in our case, the Ki67 proliferation index was higher in the PM than in the primary pancreatic NET. This finding may reflect a tendency of the tumour to progress towards a higher grade, along time, and may have a prognostic meaning [55].

Overall, the differential diagnosis of a sellar mass should include the possibility of PM, especially in case of an enhancing, rapidly-growing suprasellar mass with signs of neurological or hormonal impairment (hypopituitarism, diabetes insipidus, cranial nerve palsy) in a patient aged more than 50 years [56, 57].

There are no specific recommendations for the treatment of sellar masses suspicious for PM. Given the frequent suprasellar extension and local invasiveness, a complete surgical excision is frequently not achievable [58]. Nonetheless, surgical treatment of PM (mainly through a trans-sphenoidal route) could have a role in symptoms palliation [59, 60]. No significant improvement in survival outcomes has been reported after surgery in some cohorts [58, 61], probably because surgical indications had been considered only for rapidly growing and symptomatic PM from more aggressive tumours.

In this review, we found that surgical resection of PM was associated with an improvement in survival. By analysing the limited data of the low number of cases retrieved, it appears that this survival advantage was not related to differences in patients and disease characteristics between the two groups. Nonetheless, it could be postulated that localized or oligometastatic disease and general good clinical condition may support a more aggressive choice of treatment, therefore favouring the surgical approach and a better survival. Although the small number of cases and the retrospective nature of the analysis are clear limits of this analysis, this finding could make surgery a reasonable approach not only for symptoms palliation but also for prolonging survival.

Regarding histopathology, high grade neuroendocrine carcinomas of small and large cells can easily be classified, but the correct distinction of a pituitary adenoma from a metastatic well-differentiated NEN is challenging, since the morphological features of these neoplasms are largely overlapping in the various locations. In such context, a carefully selected immunohistochemical panel is crucial for a good differential diagnosis. Specifically, an algorithmic approach is indicated including, as a first step, pituitary-specific transcription factors (Pit1, TPIT, SF1 and GATA3), as well as TTF1 (for lung NENs and MTC) and CDX2 (for intestinal NENs). Subsequently, the refinement of the diagnosis may benefit of immunostainings for site- and cell type-specific hormonal products and other markers [62]. In the current case, pituitary-related transcription factors and pituitary hormones were not expressed and this was in favour of a metastatic localization of the known pancreatic NET. The rare expression of inhibin, generally associated to NETs with clear cell changes [7] was observed also in the pituitary tumour, further supporting the metastatic nature of the lesion.

Among the therapeutic strategies for PM, RT is another valuable option, usually employed when surgery is not indicated or in the post-operative setting. A recent systematic review showed significant survival advantage in patients treated with RT, in particular with the stereotactic technique [61].

In our series, only two patients with PM from NENs have been treated with PRRT [5, 23], with a substantial radiological and clinical response in one of them [5]. PRRT is a novel treatment option shown to produce substantial responses in patients with metastatic well-differentiated NENs associated to a significant disease burden [63]. While no study specifically focused on the response of PM to PRRT was designed, some reports regarding the use of PRRT in the setting of aggressive pituitary tumours are available [64].

Despite the various treatment options available, PM from solid tumours remains a condition with a poor prognosis: previous studies showed a median survival for PM of 13.6 months [38]. Data from this review, with a median survival of 14 months, are in line with previous reports on PM from all solid tumours.

In conclusion, PM is an uncommon manifestation of NENs, and it should be suspected in the presence of hormonal disarrangement and/or ocular or neurological symptoms in patients with previous diagnosis of NEN. Their features are mainly similar to those of PM deriving from other solid tumours. However, PM from NENs seem to show a more frequent involvement of the anterior pituitary rather than the neurohypophysis. Therefore, a thorough hormonal evaluation, including all the pituitary axes, is essential; in particular, secondary adrenal insufficiency must be ruled out given its life-threatening risk. The differential diagnosis from pituitary adenoma is not easy, considering the overlapping morphology with, at least, well-differentiated NEN; thus, a proper use of specific histopathologic markers is needed. Clearly, the high growth rate and the presence of concomitant brain lesions should raise suspicion of PM. Although reported survival outcomes remain poor, surgical resection may be considered in selected patients.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  1. 1.

    He W, Chen F, Dalm B et al (2015) Metastatic involvement of the pituitary gland: a systematic review with pooled individual patient data analysis. Pituitary 18:159–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-014-0552-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Goulart CR, Upadhyay S, Ditzel Filho LFS et al (2017) Newly diagnosed sellar tumors in patients with cancer: a diagnostic challenge and management dilemma. World Neurosurg 106:254–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.06.139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Al-Aridi R, El Sibai K, Fu P et al (2014) Clinical and biochemical characteristic features of metastatic cancer to the sella turcica: an analytical review. Pituitary 17:575–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-013-0542-9

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    de Siqueira PF, Mathez ALG, Pedretti DB, Abucham J (2015) Pituitary metastasis of lung neuroendocrine carcinoma: case report and literature review. Arch Endocrinol Metab 59:548–553. https://doi.org/10.1590/2359-3997000000139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Goglia U, Ferone D, Sidoti M et al (2008) Treatment of a pituitary metastasis from a neuroendocrine tumour: case report and literature review. Pituitary 11:93–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-007-0038-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Moshkin O, Rotondo F, Scheithauer BW et al (2012) Bronchial carcinoid tumors metastatic to the sella turcica and review of the literature. Pituitary 15:160–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-012-0388-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Gucer H, Szentgyorgyi E, Ezzat S et al (2013) Inhibin-expressing clear cell neuroendocrine tumor of the ampulla: an unusual presentation of von Hippel-Lindau disease. Virchows Arch 463:593–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-013-1465-6

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Pennacchietti V, Garzaro M, Grottoli S et al (2016) Three-dimensional endoscopic endonasal approach and outcomes in sellar lesions: a single-center experience of 104 cases. World Neurosurg 89:121–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.01.049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Suganuma H, Yoshimi T, Kita T et al (1994) Rare case with metastatic involvement of hypothalamo-pituitary and pineal body presenting as hypopituitarism and diabetes insipidus. Intern Med 33:795–798. https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.33.795

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Aaberg TM, Kay M, Sternau L (1995) Metastatic tumors to the pituitary. Am J Ophthalmol 119:779–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(14)72785-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Koshimoto Y, Maeda M, Naiki H et al (1995) MR of pituitary metastasis in a patient with diabetes insipidus. Am J Neuroradiol 16:971–974

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Abe T, Matsumoto K, Iida M et al (1997) Malignant carcinoid tumor of the anterior mediastinum metastasis to a prolactin-secreting pituitary adenoma: a case report. Surg Neurol 48:389–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-3019(97)00002-5

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Genka S, Soeda H, Takahashi M et al (1995) Acromegaly, diabetes insipidus, and visual loss caused by metastatic growth hormone-releasing hormone-producing malignant pancreatic endocrine tumor in the pituitary gland: Case report. J Neurosurg 83:719–723. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1995.83.4.0719

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Hopster DJ, Robinson SF, Chadwick L, Geddes JF (1997) Widespread neuroendocrine malignancy within the central nervous system: a diagnostic conundrum. J Clin Pathol 50:440–442. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.50.5.440

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Huang MC, Lee LS, Ho DMT et al (2001) A metastatic pituitary carcinoid tumor successfully treated with gamma knife radiosurgery. Chinese Med J 64:414–418

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Isowa N, Nakamura T, Yamazaki F et al (2003) Thymic atypical carcinoid with cushing’s syndrome manifesting in the terminal stage. Japanese J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 51:427–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02719595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Shimon I, Hadani M, Nass D, Zwas ST (2004) Malignant bronchial carcinoid tumor metastatic to the pituitary in a thyroid carcinoma patient: Successful treatment with surgery, radiotherapy and somatostatin analog. Pituitary 7:51–57. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PITU.0000044627.63261.b4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Weilbaecher C, Patwardhan RV, Fowler M et al (2004) Metastatic lesions involving the sella: report of three cases and review of the literature. Neurol India 52:365–368

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Harzallah L, Migaw H, Harzallah F, Kraiem C (2005) Diabetes insipidus and panhypopituitarism revealing pituitary metastasis of small cell lung carcinoma: A case report. Ann Endocrinol (Paris) 66:117–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4266(05)81708-1

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Jonnakuty CG, Mezitis SGE (2007) Pulmonary atypical carcinoid tumor with metastatic involvement of the pituitary gland causing functional hypopituitarism. Endocr Pract 13:291–295. https://doi.org/10.4158/EP.13.3.291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Nasr C, Mason A, Mayberg M et al (2006) Acromegaly and somatotroph hyperplasia with adenomatous transformation due to pituitary metastasis of a growth hormone-releasing hormone-secreting pulmonary endocrine carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:4776–4780. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2006-0610

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Takei H, Buckleair L, Goodman JC, Powell SZ (2007) Intraoperative cytologic diagnosis of symptomatic carcinoma (Pulmonary small cell carcinoma) metastatic to the pituitary gland: a case report. Acta Cytol 51:637–641. https://doi.org/10.1159/000325816

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Gur C, Lalazar G, Salmon A et al (2008) Metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor presenting as a pituitary space occupying lesion: a case report. Pituitary 11:293–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-007-0053-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Bhatoe HS, Badwal S, Dutta V, Kannan N (2008) Pituitary metastasis from medullary carcinoma of thyroid: case report and review of literature. J Neurooncol 89:63–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-008-9586-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Santarpia L, Gagel RF, Sherman SI et al (2009) Diabetes insipidus and panhypopituitarism due to intrasellar metastasis from medullary thyroid cancer. Head Neck 31:419–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.20911

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Feletti A, Marton E, Rossi S et al (2010) Pituitary metastasis of merkel cell carcinoma. J Neurooncol 97:295–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-009-0025-z

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Luu ST, Billing K, Crompton JL et al (2010) Clinicopathological correlation in pituitary gland metastasis presenting as anterior visual pathway compression. J Clin Neurosci 17:790–793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2009.09.044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Fridley J, Adams G, Rao V et al (2011) Small cell lung cancer metastasis in the pituitary gland presenting with seizures and headache. J Clin Neurosci 18:420–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2010.05.006

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Chandra V, Mcdonald LW, Anderson RJ (1984) Metastatic small cell carcinoma of the lung presenting as pituitary apoplexy and Cushing ’ ssyndrome. J Neuro-oncol 2(1):59–66

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Nassiri F, Cusimano M, Rotondo F et al (2012) Neuroendocrine tumor of unknown origin metastasizing to a growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma. World Neurosurg 77:201.e9-201.e12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2011.02.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Conway A, Wiernik A, Rawal A et al (2012) Occult primary medullary thyroid carcinoma presenting with pituitary and parotid metastases: Case report and review of the literature. Endocr Pathol 23:115–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-012-9200-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Campbell D, Amponsah N, Mott R, Ellis T (2012) Carcinoid tumor of the lung metastatic to a previously identified pituitary adenoma. J Surg Case Reports 2012:12–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/jscr/2012.10.12

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Mathioudakis N, Quinones-Hinojosa A, Salvatori R, Basaria S (2012) A lifelong smoker with hypopituitarism: rethinking the hypothesis of a tumor in the hypophysis. Case Rep Med. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/853568

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Senetta R, Castellano I, Garbossa D et al (2013) Pituitary metastasis of an unknown neuroendocrine breast carcinoma mimicking a pituitary adenoma. Pathology 45:422–424. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAT.0b013e328360dfd1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Sogani J, Yang W, Lavi E et al (2014) Sellar collision tumor involving metastatic lung cancer and pituitary adenoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation and review of the literature. Clin Imaging 38:318–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2013.12.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Little EW, Kazmi KS, Queenan JV, Katsetos CD (2016) Synchronous bifocal metastatic involvement of pituitary and pineal glands unmasking small cell lung cancer. Clin Neuropathol 35:93–97. https://doi.org/10.5414/NP300918

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Castle-Kirszbaum M, Goldschlager T, Ho B et al (2018) Twelve cases of pituitary metastasis: a case series and review of the literature. Pituitary 21:463–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-018-0899-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Javanbakht A, D’Apuzzo M, Badie B, Salehian B (2018) Pituitary metastasis: A rare condition. Endocr Connect 7:1049–1057. https://doi.org/10.1530/EC-18-0338

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Kałużny M, Zieliński G, Maksymowicz M, Bolanowski M (2019) Hypopituitarism secondary to pituitary metastasis from small cell lung cancer. Polish Arch Intern Med 129:419–421. https://doi.org/10.20452/pamw.4483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Rossi ML, Bevan JS, Fleming KA, Cruz-Sanchez F (1988) Pituitary metastasis from malignant bronchial carcinoid. Tumori 74:101–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/030089168807400118

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Hu H, Sengupta A, Bowes D (2020) Pituitary metastasis of pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma: a case report. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7226

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Kimura A, Kuroiwa A, Teramoto A et al (1988) Metastatic pituitary tumor presenting as bitemporal visual field defects. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 28:1123–1127. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.28.1123

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Ramsay JA, Kovacs K, Scheithauer BW et al (1988) Metastatic carcinoma to pituitary adenomas: a report of two cases. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 92:69–76. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1210783

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Allen EM, Kannan SR, Powell A (1989) Infundibular metastasis and panhypopituitarism. J Natl Med Assoc 81(325–7):330

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Paulus P, Paridaens R, Mockel J et al (1990) Argyrophilic breast carcinoma, single metastasis to the pituitary gland. Bull Cancer 77:377–384

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Tabata M, Ohnoshi T, Ueoka H et al (1993) A case of small cell lung cancer associated with diabetes insipidus and Cushing’s syndrome. Nihon Kyobu Shikkan Gakkai Zasshi 31:235–239

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Moreno-Perez O, Peiró FM, López P et al (2007) An isolated pituitary metastasis as presentation of a differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma mimicking a nonfunctioning macroadenoma. J Endocrinol Invest 30:428–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03346322

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    de la Monte SM, Hutchins GM, Moore GW (1984) Endocrine organ metastases from breast carcinoma. Am J Pathol 114:131–136

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Fortunati N, Felicetti F, Donadio M et al (2015) Pituitary lesions in breast cancer patients: a report of three cases. Oncol Lett 9:2762–2766. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2015.3149

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Angelousi A, Alexandraki KI, Kyriakopoulos G et al (2020) Neoplastic metastases to the endocrine glands. Endocr Relat Cancer 27:R1–R20. https://doi.org/10.1530/ERC-19-0263

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    van Meerbeeck JP, Fennell DA, De Ruysscher DKM (2011) Small-cell lung cancer. Lancet (London, England) 378:1741–1755. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60165-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Schill F, Nilsson M, Olsson DS et al (2019) Pituitary metastases: a nationwide study on current characteristics with special reference to breast cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 104:3379–3388. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2019-00012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Heshmati HM, Scheithauer BW, Young WF (2002) Metastases to the pituitary gland. Endocrinologist 12:45–49. https://doi.org/10.1097/00019616-200201000-00010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Komninos J, Vlassopoulou V, Protopapa D et al (2004) Tumors metastatic to the pituitary gland: case report and literature review. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:574–580. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2003-030395

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Richards-Taylor S, Tilley C, Jaynes E et al (2017) Clinically significant differences in Ki-67 proliferation index between primary and metastases in resected pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Pancreas 46:1354–1358. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0000000000000933

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Freda PU, Post KD (1999) Differential diagnosis of sellar masses. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 28(81–117):vi. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-8529(05)70058-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Famini P, Maya MM, Melmed S (2011) Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging for sellar and parasellar masses: ten-year experience in 2598 patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96:1633–1641. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-0168

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Gilard V, Alexandru C, Proust F et al (2016) Pituitary metastasis: Is there still a place for neurosurgical treatment? J Neurooncol 126:219–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-015-1967-y

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Feiz-Erfan I, Rao G, White WL, McCutcheon IE (2008) Efficacy of trans-septal trans-sphenoidal surgey in correcting visual symptoms caused by Hematogenous metastases to the sella and pituitary gland. Skull Base 18:77–84. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-991105

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Patel KR, Zheng J, Tabar V et al (2020) Extended survival after surgical resection for pituitary metastases: clinical features, management, and outcomes of metastatic disease to the sella. Oncologist 25:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Ng S, Fomekong F, Delabar V et al (2020) Current status and treatment modalities in metastases to the pituitary: a systematic review. J Neurooncol 146:219–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-020-03396-w

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Uccella S, Asa SL, Mete O (2021) Metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms of unknown primary site. The Spectrum of Neuroendocrine Neoplasia. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 357–387

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Saravana-Bawan B, Bajwa A, Paterson J et al (2019) Efficacy of 177Lu peptide receptor radionuclide therapy for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. Clin Nucl Med 44:719–727. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000002646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Giuffrida G, Ferraù F, Laudicella R et al (2019) Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy for aggressive pituitary tumors: a monocentric experience. Endocr Connect 8:528–535. https://doi.org/10.1530/EC-19-0065

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Fabio Bioletto for the valuable help in the statistical analysis. This article is dedicated to the memory of Aragone Angelo.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Torino within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. This research did not receive any specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sector.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AR and AP had the idea. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by AR, AN, FR, DR and MC. The first draft of the manuscript was written by AR, AN, FR, DR and MC and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. MP, NP, GZ, FZ, SU, PC, MG, AP and EA supervised the manuscript drafting. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alberto Ragni.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.

Ethical approval

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The patient included in the manuscript as the case followed at our centre provided her written informed consent for publication.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ragni, A., Nervo, A., Papotti, M. et al. Pituitary metastases from neuroendocrine neoplasms: case report and narrative review. Pituitary 24, 828–837 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-021-01178-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-021-01178-9

Keywords

  • Neuroendocrine tumours
  • NET
  • Neuroendocrine neoplasm
  • Hypophysis
  • Sellar metastases
  • Hypopituitarism