Skip to main content
Log in

Backwards in Retrospect

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the title chapter of Did Darwin Write the Origin Backwards?, Sober argues for an asymmetry between facts about genealogy and facts about natural selection, which has the result that evidentially (but not causally) Darwin's book is the wrong way round. Here I make three points about Sober's argument in that chapter. First, it is not clear that Darwin employs what Sober calls 'tree thinking' as frequently as Sober himself suggests. Second, I argue that Darwin's reason for structuring the Origin as he did can be understood if we think of the Origin's argument as an inference to the best explanation. Third, I show circumstances where, even if selection is the only important evolutionary force, we would still be able to infer common ancestry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Behe, M. (1996). Darwin’s black box. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, P. (1983). The eclipse of Darwinism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1988). Charles Darwin’s Beagle diary (R. Keynes, Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Hodge, M. J. S. (1977). The structure and strategy of Darwin’s “Long Argument”. British Journal for the History of Science, 10, 237–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, M. J. S. (2012). Darwin’s book: On the origin of species. Science & Education,. doi:10.1007/s11191-012-9544-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewens, T. (2007). Darwin. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. (1998). Six sayings about adaptationism. In D. Hull & M. Ruse (Eds.), Philosophy of biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, K. (2003). The arguments in the Origin of species. In J. Hodge & G. Radick (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Darwin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

For valuable discussion of these ideas I am grateful to Elliott Sober, Samir Okasha, Jean Gayon, Jim Moore, Greg Radick and Jon Hodge. This work has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013)/ERC Grant agreement no 284123.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Lewens.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lewens, T. Backwards in Retrospect. Philos Stud 172, 813–821 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-014-0370-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-014-0370-4

Keywords

Navigation