Skip to main content

Origin’s Chapter IX and X: From Old Objections to Novel Explanations: Darwin on the Fossil Record

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Understanding Evolution in Darwin's "Origin"

Part of the book series: History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences ((HPTL,volume 34))

Abstract

The ninth and tenth chapters of the Origin mark a profound, if perhaps difficult to detect, shift in the book’s argumentative structure. In the previous few chapters and in the ninth, Darwin has been exploring a variety of objections to natural selection, some more obvious (where are all the fossils of transitional forms?) and some showing careful attention to challenging consequences of evolution (could selection really produce instincts?). Starting in the tenth, however, Darwin turns to showing us what kinds of new and unexpected results evolutionary theory might be able to offer us, again in domains both predictable (extinction) and unexpected (biogeography, embryology). It is notable that it is the fossil record that serves as this pivot point, being both a source of potentially powerful objections to evolutionary theory and home to some of its most compelling new explanations. In this chapter, I present both sets of arguments and consider what role Darwin gave to fossil evidence, in the process attempting to discover why it might have played this unique role in two different parts of Darwin’s “long argument” for evolution by natural selection. Geology’s special place, I argue, derives at least in part from its particular importance in Darwin’s social and intellectual context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    At the very least, landmarks for this view prior to Lyell’s work include Buffon’s Histoire naturelle (1749; for an especially illuminating analysis of the biological context, see Sloan 1987) and the anatomical works of Georges Cuvier (1817; see Rudwick (1997).

  2. 2.

    He would later revise the estimate down by around a factor of ten, making the problem that much worse for Darwin (Kelvin, 1895).

  3. 3.

    The idea that Darwin’s responses to objections cloud the force of his argument has often motivated philosophers of biology to read the first edition of the Origin, prior to the integration of many such responses. This opinion goes at least as far back as Darwin’s son Leonard, who wrote to R. A. Fisher that he wondered whether “it would be worth republishing the first edition of the Origin of Speciesbecause it was written before my father had been subject to any criticism whatever” (L. Darwin to Fisher, [late-September 1926?], Bennett, 1983, p. 81, original emphasis).

References

  • Barrett, P. H. (1974). The Sedgwick-Darwin geologic tour of North Wales. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 118(2), 146–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. H. (Ed.). (1983). Natural selection, heredity, and eugenics: Including selected correspondence of R.A. Fisher with Leonard Darwin and others. Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, P. J. (1989). Evolution: The history of an idea. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, W. F. (1976). Charles Lyell, radical Actualism, and theory. British Journal for the History of Science, 9(2), 104–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuvier, G. (1817). Le règne animal distribué d’après son organisation, pour servir de base à l’histoire naturelle des animaux et d’introduction à l’anatomie comparée, tome I. Deterville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daeschler, E. B., Shubin, N. H., & Jenkins, F. A. (2006). A Devonian tetrapod-like fish and the evolution of the tetrapod body plan. Nature, 440(7085), 757–763.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. R. (1835a). Extracts from letters addressed to Professor Henslow. Privately printed. Kees Rookmaker (Ed.) http://darwin-online.org.uk/

  • Darwin, C. R. (1835b). The position of the bones of Mastodon (?) at Port St Julian is of interest. CUL-DAR42.97–99. Kees Rookmaker (Ed.) http://darwin-online.org.uk/

  • Darwin, C. R. (1859). On the origin of species. 1st ed. John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. R. (1958). The autobiography of Charles Darwin, 1809–1882, with original omissions restored. Nora Barlow (Ed.). Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. R. (1860). Letter 2971 – Darwin, C. R. to Henslow, J. S., 8 May [1860]. Darwin Correspondence Project. https://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/entry-2791

  • Buffon, G.-L. L. (1749). L’Histoire Naturelle, générale et particulière, avec la description du Cabinet du Roi. Imprimerie Royale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, M. J. S. (1977). The structure and strategy of Darwin’s ‘long argument’. British Journal for the History of Science, 10(3), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087400015685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, M. J. S. (1983). Darwin and the Laws of the animate part of the terrestrial system (1835–1837): On the Lyellian origins of his Zoonomical explanatory program. Studies in History of Biology, 6, 1–106.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, M. J. S. (1989). Darwin’s theory and Darwin’s argument. In M. Ruse (Ed.), What the philosophy of biology is: Essays for David Hull (pp. 136–182). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, M. J. S. (1992). Darwin’s argument in the origin. Philosophy of Science, 59(3), 461–464. https://doi.org/10.1086/289682

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, M. J. S. (2009). The notebook programmes and projects of Darwin’s London years. In M. J. S. Hodge & G. Radick (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Darwin (2nd ed., pp. 44–72). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L. (2009). Darwin’s science and Victorian philosophy of science. In M. J. S. Hodge & G. Radick (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Darwin (2nd ed., pp. 173–196). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kelvin, W. T. (1895). The age of the earth. Nature, 51(1323), 438–440. https://doi.org/10.1038/051438c0

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Lennox, J. G. (2005). Darwin’s methodological evolution. Journal of the History of Biology, 38, 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-004-6511-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewens, T. (2009). The Origin and philosophy. In M. Ruse & R. J. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to the “Origin of Species” (pp. 314–332). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyell, C. (1832). Principles of geology (Vol. II). John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyell, C. (1863). The geological evidences of the antiquity of man, with remarks on theories of the origin of species by variation. John Murray.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Manier, E. (1978). The young Darwin and his cultural circle. D. Riedel Publishing Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pence, C. H. (2018). Sir John F. W. Herschel and Charles Darwin: Nineteenth-century science and its methodology. HOPOS, 8(1), 108–140. https://doi.org/10.1086/695719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pence, C. H. (2022). The rise of chance in evolutionary theory: A pompous parade of arithmetic. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Playfair, J. (1802). Illustrations of the Huttonian theory of the earth. Cadell and Davies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R. J., & Ruse, M. (2016). Debating Darwin. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rudwick, M. J. S. (1985). The great Devonian controversy: The shaping of scientific knowledge among gentlemanly specialists. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rudwick, M. J. S. (1997). Georges Cuvier, fossil bones, and geological catastrophes: New translations & interpretations of the primary texts. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rudwick, M. J. S. (1998). Lyell and the principles of geology. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 143(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.143.01.02

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. (1996). Monad to man: The concept of progress in evolutionary biology. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Secord, J. A. (1991). The discovery of a vocation: Darwin’s early geology. British Journal for the History of Science, 24(2), 133–157. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087400027059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedgwick, A. (1860). Objections to Mr. Darwin’s theory of the origin of species. The Spectator, 33(March), 285–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, P. R. (1987). From logical universals to historical individuals: Buffon’s idea of biological species. In Histoire du concept d’espèce dans les sciences de la vie (pp. 101–140). Editions de la Fondation Singer-Polignac.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, W. (1862). On the secular cooling of the earth. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 23(1), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0080456800018512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, C. K. (2009). The arguments in The Origin of Species. In M. J. S. Hodge & G. Radick (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Darwin (2nd ed., pp. 120–143). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles H. Pence .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pence, C.H. (2023). Origin’s Chapter IX and X: From Old Objections to Novel Explanations: Darwin on the Fossil Record. In: Elice Brzezinski Prestes, M. (eds) Understanding Evolution in Darwin's "Origin". History, Philosophy and Theory of the Life Sciences, vol 34. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40165-7_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40165-7_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-40164-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-40165-7

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics