Abstract
Bas van Fraassen’s empiricist reading of Perrin’s achievement invites the question: whose doubts about atoms did Perrin put to rest? This comment recontextualizes the argument and applies the notion of empirical grounding to some contemporary work in behavioral biology.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Caspi A., Moffitt T. (2006). Gene-environment interactions in psychiatry: Joining forces with neuroscience Nature Reviews/Neuroscience, 7, 583–590.
Caspi, A., McClay J., Moffitt, T. E., Mill, J., Martin, J., & Craig, I. W. (2002). Role of genotype in the cycle of violence in maltreated children. Science, 297, 851–854.
Moffitt T. E., Caspi A., Rutter M. (2005). Strategy for investigating interactions between measured genes and measured environments. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 473–481.
Perrin, J.-B. (1926).Discontinuous structure of matter 1926 Nobel prize in physics lecture. Accessed March 29, 2008, from http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physic0s/laureates/1926/perrin-lecture.html.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Longino, H. Perilous thoughts: comment on van Fraassen. Philos Stud 143, 25–32 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-008-9316-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-008-9316-z