Abstract
I argue that rationalists need not adopt Kant’s method for determining what one has reason to do, where by “Kant’s method” I mean the view that normative guidance comes only from directives imposed on the agent by the agent’s own will. I focus on Kant’s argument for “imperatives of skill,” one sort of hypothetical imperative. I argue, against Korsgaard, that Kant’s argument is neither better nor significantly different than the sort of argument non-Kantian rationalists offer. I close by arguing that Korsgaard is wrong to think that her question “why should I care about performing the means to my ends?” is a serious worry.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
K. Baier (1996) ‘Comments’ J.B. Schneewind (Eds) Reason, Ethics and Society Open Court La Salle
Cohen, G. (1996): ‘Reason, Humanity, and the Moral Law’, in Korsgaard (1996)
Cohon, R. (2000): ‘The Roots of Reason’, Philosophical Review 109
J. Hampton (1996) ‘On Instrumental Rationality’ J.B. Schneewind (Eds) Reason, Ethics, and Society Open Court La Salle
Hill, Jr., T.E. (1973): ‘The Hypothetical Imperative’, Philosophical Review 82
Kant, I. (1964): Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals,trans. H.J. Paton, New York: Harper
C. Korsgaard (1996) The Sources of Normativity Cambridge University Press Cambridge
C. Korsgaard (1997) ‘The Normativity of Instrumental Reason’ Garrett Cullity Berys Gaut (Eds) Ethics and Practical Reason Clarendon Press Oxford
T. Nagel (1986) The View from Nowhere Oxford University Press Oxford
D. Parfit (1984) Reasons and Persons Oxford University Press Oxford
Parfit, D. (1997): ‘Reasons and Motivation’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 71 (suppl)
J. Rawls (2000) Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA
H. Sidgwick (1981) The Methods of Ethics Hackett Indianapolis
A. Wood (1999) Kant’s Ethical Thought Cambridge University Press Cambridge
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shaver, R. Korsgaard on Hypothetical Imperatives. Philos Stud 129, 335–347 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-1646-x
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-1646-x