Skip to main content
Log in

Walter Hopp, Perception and Knowledge: a Phenomenological Account

Cambridge University Press. 2011. ISBN: 978-1-107-00316-3

  • Published:
Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. Unless otherwise noted, all references are to this book

  2. See especially Schear’s McDowell/Dreyfus Debate (2013) for an overview of contemporary discussions on non-conceptual content within phenomenology or my review of it (Van Mazijk 2014)

  3. See (McDowell 1994, p. 26) for one of the most quoted fragments of Mind and World, on the basis of which many non-conceptualists have argued for a logical fallacy in McDowell’s argumentative structure (e.g. Heck 2000, Peacocke 2001, Hopp 2010, 2011)

  4. See also (p. 201–206) where Hopp distinguishes a number of different syntheses

  5. Cf. also Evans’s generality constraint (1982, pp. 100–105)

  6. Cf. McDowell (1994, pp. 46–65) and Kelly (2001)

  7. As is well known, McDowell nuanced his views about the extent to which concepts can figure in perception in his later works on pressure of Travis (2004). His claim about perception being open to conceptualization has remained unaltered

  8. Note that this is also a main theme in the first sections of Husserl’s Fifth Logical Investigations

References

  • Brandom, R. (2001). Articulating reasons: An introduction to Inferentialism. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, B. (1999). Perception and reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. (2002). ‘The Relational View of Experience’, In: Reference and Consciousness, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Evans, G. (1982). The varieties of reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck, R. J. (2000). ‘Non-Conceptual Content and the ‘Space of Reasons”. Philosophical Review, 109, 483–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopp, W. (2010). ‘How To Think About Nonconceptual Content’, The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy, 10, 1: 24, pp. 1–24.

  • Hopp, W. (2011). Perception and Knowledge: A Phenomenological Account. Cambridge University Press.

  • Husserl, E. (1997). Experience and judgment: Investigations in a genealogy of logic. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, S. (2001). Demonstrative concepts and experience. Philosophical Review, 110(3), 397–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J. H. (1994). Mind and world. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J. H. (2009). Having the world in view: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacocke, C. (2001). Does Perception Have a Non-Conceptual Content? The Journal of Philosophy, 98(5), 239–264.

  • Schear, J. K. (2013). Mind, Reason, and Being-in-the-World: the McDowell-Dreyfus Debate. In: by J. K. (Ed.) Schear, London, New York: Routledge.

  • Travis, C. (2004). The silence of the senses. Mind, 113(449), 57–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Mazijk, C. (2014). ‘Phenomenology and Non-Conceptual Content’, book review of J. K. Schear’s Mind, Reason, and Being-in-the-World: the McDowell/Dreyfus-Debate (2013), forthcoming in Metodo, Vol. 2, No. 2.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Corijn van Mazijk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

van Mazijk, C. Walter Hopp, Perception and Knowledge: a Phenomenological Account . Phenom Cogn Sci 14, 1185–1191 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-014-9382-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-014-9382-y

Navigation